exploring-replay-vision-observations
Guides agents through pulling a Replay Vision scanner's observations, reading the findings, and acting on them — summarizing patterns across sessions, drilling…
npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/ai-plugin --skill exploring-replay-vision-observationsExploring Replay Vision observations
A scanner is a standing LLM probe over session recordings; each time it runs against a session it records one observation. This skill is about the other half of the loop — reading what the scanners have found and doing something useful with it. For creating or sizing scanners, use [[creating-replay-vision-scanners]].
Mental model
- Scanner → observations. One observation = one scan of one session. There is at most one observation
per
(scanner, session). - The finding lives in
scanner_result. Its shape depends on the scanner'sscanner_type, but it always carries aconfidence:monitor→ averdict(yes/no/inconclusive) plus an open-ended observation.classifier→ one or moretagsfrom the scanner's label set.scorer→ a numeric score on the scanner'sscale.summarizer→ a free-text summary (optionally with facet embeddings).
- Only
succeededobservations carry a finding. Triage the rest bystatus/error_reason(see below). - Observations are LLM judgments, not ground truth. One observation is one model's read of one session — corroborate before you act on it.
If a scanner has emits_signals: true, its observations also feed the Signals pipeline and may surface as
Inbox signal reports (clusters of related findings). When the user's intent is "work the reports", that's
the inbox path — see Acting on findings below.
Step 1 — Anchor on the scanner
If the user gave a /project/<id>/replay-vision/<scanner-id> URL, that path segment is the scanner ID.
Otherwise list them with vision-scanners-list and pick the relevant one.
Then call vision-scanners-get to read its configuration before reading results — the scanner_type and
scanner_config.prompt tell you how to interpret scanner_result (a verdict field only makes sense once you
know it's a monitor; a score only means something against the scorer's scale).
Step 2 — Pull the observations
Pick the axis that matches the question:
- What has this scanner found, over time? →
vision-scanners-observations-list(the workhorse). Filter tostatus=succeededto get only sessions with a finding, then narrow byverdict(monitors) ortags(classifiers). Scorers aren't filtered by score — rank them withorder_by=-result_scoreinstead. Useorder_by(e.g.-result_score,-completed_at) to surface the strongest hits first. - What did every scanner find about one session? →
vision-observations-list(thesession_idquery parameter is REQUIRED). Use this while investigating a single recording. - The full detail of one finding →
vision-scanners-observations-getorvision-observations-retrieve— returns the frozenscanner_snapshot(config at run time) and the completescanner_result, including any event citations that link the finding back to specific events in the recording.
Triage status so you don't mistake a non-result for "nothing wrong":
| status | meaning | typical error_reason |
|---|---|---|
succeeded | has a scanner_result | — |
ineligible | session couldn't be analysed — a normal outcome, not an error | too_short, no_recording, too_inactive, too_long, no_events |
failed | the scan errored | provider_rejected, validation_failed, rasterization_failed, provider_transient, internal_error |
pending / running | still in flight | — |
A scanner that looks like it "found nothing" is often producing mostly ineligible observations — check the
mix before concluding.
Step 3 — Read the findings
- Monitors: focus on
verdict: yes; treatinconclusiveas a weak signal. The observation text is the substance. - Classifiers: group by
tagsto see the distribution of what's happening across sessions. - Scorers: look at the tails (highest/lowest scores), not just the average.
- Summarizers: read for recurring themes across summaries.
Weight by confidence, and don't over-index on a single observation. To understand a specific hit, take its
session_id and either cross-reference other scanners (vision-observations-list) or drill into the actual
recording with the [[investigating-replay]] skill and the session-recording MCP tools.
To test a scanner's lens against a specific session that doesn't have an observation yet, trigger one on demand
with vision-scanners-scan-session — it's async (minutes; rasterising the recording + the LLM call are slow)
and, like all observations, runs at most once per (scanner, session).
Step 4 — Act on the findings
Match the action to the user's intent, and corroborate before you create work:
- Summarize a pattern. Report the finding back with the numbers and a few representative
session_ids (e.g. "12 of 40 succeeded observations flagged checkout confusion; sessions A, B, C"). Cite, don't assert. - Make it trackable. When a finding is corroborated across several sessions (not one low-confidence
hit), capture it durably with the tools that exist: create an
insightornotebookto track its frequency, bundle the supporting recordings into a session-recording playlist so a human can watch the evidence, and add anannotationif it marks a regression. There is no MCP tool to open a PostHog task directly — to route a finding into tracked work, use the Inbox path below (for signal-emitting scanners) or hand the summary to a human or coding agent to act on. Group by distinct issue, not per observation. - Work the Inbox. If the scanner emits signals, its findings may already be clustered into signal reports —
read and act on those with
inbox-reports-list+inbox-report-artefacts-list(the report's work log is the evidence). See the [[inbox-exploration]] skill; that path also records your work against the report.
The discipline that matters: a single observation is one model's judgment on one recording. Confirm a finding reproduces across observations (or against the raw recording) before turning it into a task, an alert, or a claim — the same rigor the signals pipeline applies before it promotes observations to a report.
Gotchas
- Only
succeededobservations have ascanner_result— everything else is triage metadata. ineligible≠failed. Ineligible is a normal terminal outcome (e.g. the recording was too short), not a bug to chase.- One observation per
(scanner, session)— re-scanning a session that already has any observation (even ineligible/failed) is a no-op. - Findings are snapshotted. Each observation keeps the
scanner_snapshotit ran under, so older observations may reflect a previous prompt/config (scanner_version). - Quota is shared. On-demand scans count against the org's monthly budget — check
vision-quota-retrievebefore triggering a batch of them.