golang-structs-interfaces

от samber

Шаблоны проектирования структур и интерфейсов Golang — композиция, встраивание, утверждения типов, переключатели типов, разделение интерфейсов, внедрение зависимостей через интерфейсы, теги полей структур, а также получатели указателей и значений. Используйте этот навык при проектировании типов Go, определении или реализации интерфейсов, встраивании структур или интерфейсов, написании утверждений типов или переключателей типов, добавлении тегов полей структур для сериализации JSON/YAML/БД или выборе между получателями указателей и значений. Также используйте, когда пользователь...

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-structs-interfaces

Persona: You are a Go type system designer. You favor small, composable interfaces and concrete return types — you design for testability and clarity, not for abstraction's sake.

Community default. A company skill that explicitly supersedes samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-structs-interfaces skill takes precedence.

Go Structs & Interfaces

Interface Design Principles

Keep Interfaces Small

"The bigger the interface, the weaker the abstraction." — Go Proverbs

Interfaces SHOULD have 1-3 methods. Small interfaces are easier to implement, mock, and compose. If you need a larger contract, compose it from small interfaces:

→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming skill for interface naming conventions (method + "-er" suffix, canonical names)

type Reader interface {
    Read(p []byte) (n int, err error)
}

type Writer interface {
    Write(p []byte) (n int, err error)
}

// Composed from small interfaces
type ReadWriter interface {
    Reader
    Writer
}

Compose larger interfaces from smaller ones:

type ReadWriteCloser interface {
    io.Reader
    io.Writer
    io.Closer
}

Define Interfaces Where They're Consumed

Interfaces Belong to Consumers.

Interfaces MUST be defined where consumed, not where implemented. This keeps the consumer in control of the contract and avoids importing a package just for its interface.

// package notification — defines only what it needs
type Sender interface {
    Send(to, body string) error
}

type Service struct {
    sender Sender
}

The email package exports a concrete Client struct — it doesn't need to know about Sender.

Accept Interfaces, Return Structs

Functions SHOULD accept interface parameters for flexibility and return concrete types for clarity. Callers get full access to the returned type's fields and methods; consumers upstream can still assign the result to an interface variable if needed.

// Good — accepts interface, returns concrete
func NewService(store UserStore) *Service { ... }

// Bad — an interface return hides every other method of the concrete type from callers
func NewService(store UserStore) ServiceInterface { ... }

Don't Create Interfaces Prematurely

"Don't design with interfaces, discover them."

An interface written before a second implementation exists is a guess about which methods will vary — and the guess is usually wrong, so the abstraction has to be reshaped anyway. Meanwhile it costs a layer of indirection that hides the concrete type from readers and tooling. Start with concrete types; extract an interface once a second consumer, a second implementation, or a test mock demands it.

// Bad — premature interface with a single implementation
type UserRepository interface {
    FindByID(ctx context.Context, id string) (*User, error)
}
type userRepository struct { db *sql.DB }

// Good — start concrete, extract an interface later when needed
type UserRepository struct { db *sql.DB }

Make the Zero Value Useful

Design structs so they work without explicit initialization. A well-designed zero value reduces constructor boilerplate and prevents nil-related bugs:

// Good — zero value is ready to use
var buf bytes.Buffer
buf.WriteString("hello")

var mu sync.Mutex
mu.Lock()

// Bad — zero value is broken, requires constructor
type Registry struct {
    items map[string]Item // nil map, panics on write
}

// Good — lazy initialization guards the zero value
func (r *Registry) Register(name string, item Item) {
    if r.items == nil {
        r.items = make(map[string]Item)
    }
    r.items[name] = item
}

Avoid any / interface{} When a Specific Type Will Do

Since Go 1.18+, MUST prefer generics over any for type-safe operations. Use any only at true boundaries where the type is genuinely unknown (e.g., JSON decoding, reflection):

// Bad — loses type safety
func Contains(slice []any, target any) bool { ... }

// Good — generic, type-safe
func Contains[T comparable](slice []T, target T) bool { ... }

Key Standard Library Interfaces

InterfacePackageMethod
ReaderioRead(p []byte) (n int, err error)
WriterioWrite(p []byte) (n int, err error)
CloserioClose() error
StringerfmtString() string
errorbuiltinError() string
Handlernet/httpServeHTTP(ResponseWriter, *Request)
Marshalerencoding/jsonMarshalJSON() ([]byte, error)
Unmarshalerencoding/jsonUnmarshalJSON([]byte) error

Canonical method signatures MUST be honored — if your type has a String() method, it must match fmt.Stringer. Don't invent ToString() or ReadData().

Compile-Time Interface Check

Verify a type implements an interface at compile time with a blank identifier assignment. Place it near the type definition:

var _ io.ReadWriter = (*MyBuffer)(nil)

This costs nothing at runtime. If MyBuffer ever stops satisfying io.ReadWriter, the build fails immediately.

Type Assertions & Type Switches

Type assertions MUST use the comma-ok form (s, ok := val.(string)) — the single-value form panics on a type mismatch instead of branching. Use a type switch to dispatch on the dynamic type, and an assertion to a small optional interface (if f, ok := w.(Flusher); ok) to exploit richer implementations without widening the declared parameter type.

→ See Type Assertions & Type Switches for type switch ordering, nil cases, and the optional-behavior pattern.

Struct & Interface Embedding

Struct Embedding

Embedding promotes the inner type's methods and fields to the outer type — composition, not inheritance:

type Logger struct {
    *slog.Logger
}

type Server struct {
    Logger
    addr string
}

// s.Info(...) works — promoted from slog.Logger through Logger
s := Server{Logger: Logger{slog.Default()}, addr: ":8080"}
s.Info("starting", "addr", s.addr)

The receiver of promoted methods is the inner type, not the outer. The outer type can override by defining its own method with the same name.

When to Embed vs Named Field

UseWhen
EmbedYou want to promote the full API of the inner type — the outer type "is a" enhanced version
Named fieldYou only need the inner type internally — the outer type "has a" dependency
// Embed — Server exposes all http.Handler methods
type Server struct {
    http.Handler
}

// Named field — Server uses the store but doesn't expose its methods
type Server struct {
    store *DataStore
}

Dependency Injection via Interfaces

Accept dependencies as interfaces in constructors. This decouples components and makes testing straightforward:

type UserStore interface {
    FindByID(ctx context.Context, id string) (*User, error)
}

type UserService struct {
    store UserStore
}

func NewUserService(store UserStore) *UserService {
    return &UserService{store: store}
}

In tests, pass a mock or stub that satisfies UserStore — no real database needed.

Struct Field Tags

Exported fields in serialized structs MUST have field tags — without one, the encoder falls back to the Go field name, so renaming a field silently changes the wire format:

type Order struct {
    ID        string    `json:"id"         db:"id"`
    Total     float64   `json:"total"      db:"total"`
    CreatedAt time.Time `json:"created_at" db:"created_at"`
    Internal  string    `json:"-"          db:"-"`
}

→ See Struct Fields: Tags and Copy Safety for the full tag directive table, the omitempty vs omitzero trap, and go vet diagnostics.

Pointer vs Value Receivers

Use pointer (s *Server)Use value (s Server)
Method modifies the receiverReceiver is small and immutable
Receiver contains sync.Mutex or similarReceiver is a basic type (int, string)
Receiver is a large structMethod is a read-only accessor
Consistency: if any method uses a pointer, all shouldMap and function values (already reference types)

Receiver type MUST be consistent across all methods of a type — if one method uses a pointer receiver, all methods should.

Preventing Struct Copies with noCopy

A struct holding a mutex, a channel, or internal pointers breaks when copied: the copy duplicates the lock state, so two goroutines guard two different mutexes and the invariant disappears silently. Embed a noCopy sentinel so go vet reports every value copy, and pass such structs by pointer.

Diagnose: 1- go vet ./...copylocks reports value copies of lock-bearing structs

→ See Struct Fields: Tags and Copy Safety for the noCopy implementation and how vet detects it.

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming skill for interface naming conventions (Reader, Closer, Stringer)
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-design-patterns skill for functional options, constructors, and builder patterns
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-dependency-injection skill for DI patterns using interfaces
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-code-style skill for value vs pointer function parameters (distinct from receivers)
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls skill for safe rename and the implementInterface code action — renaming a method or receiver that participates in interface satisfaction updates every call site and refuses a rename that would silently break the interface, which grep/sed cannot detect

Common Mistakes

MistakeFix
Large interfaces (5+ methods)Split into focused 1-3 method interfaces, compose if needed
Defining interfaces in the implementor packageDefine where consumed
Returning interfaces from constructorsReturn concrete types
Bare type assertions without comma-okAlways use v, ok := x.(T)
Embedding when you only need a few methodsUse a named field and delegate explicitly
Missing field tags on serialized structsTag all exported fields in marshaled types
Mixing pointer and value receivers on a typePick one and be consistent
Forgetting compile-time interface checkAdd var _ Interface = (*Type)(nil)
Using ToString() instead of String()Honor canonical method names
Premature interface with a single implementationStart concrete, extract interface when needed
Nil map/slice in zero value structUse lazy initialization in methods
Using any for type-safe operationsUse generics ([T comparable]) instead

Больше skills от samber

golang-code-style
samber
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Russian, preserving the name "golang-testing" if it appears. The text is a description of a skill for Go testing. The instruction says: "Translate only the text inside <text>. Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "golang-testing" does not appear in the source text, so we should not add it. Also, preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. So "golang-testing" is not in the source, but "golang-stretchr-testify" is. We must preserve that. Also "goleak" is a tool name, preserve. "testify" is a library name, preserve. "CI" is an acronym, preserve. "Go" is a language name, preserve. "table-driven tests", "testify suites and mocks", "parallel tests", "fuzzing", "fixtures", "goroutine leak detection", "snapshot testing", "code coverage", "integration tests",
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
Идиоматические шаблоны проектирования Golang — функциональные опции, конструкторы, обработка ошибок и каскадирование, управление ресурсами и жизненным циклом, корректное завершение работы, отказоустойчивость, архитектура, внедрение зависимостей, работа с данными, стриминг и другое. Применяйте при осознанном выборе между архитектурными шаблонами, реализации функциональных опций, проектировании API конструкторов, настройке корректного завершения работы, применении шаблонов отказоустойчивости или при выборе идиоматического шаблона Go для конкретной задачи.
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Russian, preserving the name "golang-error-handling" but only if it appears in the source text. The source text does not contain the name "golang-error-handling" explicitly; it only appears in the instruction as the directory item name. The instruction says: "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." So we should not add it. Also preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. The text includes: "Golang", "%w", "errors.Is/As", "errors.Join", "panic/recover", "slog", "HTTP", "samber/oops", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops". Also "3rd-party" should be preserved as is or translated? "3rd-party" is a term, but we can translate as "сторонних" but keep the number? Better to keep "3rd-party" as is? The instruction says "preserve ... numbers, technical terms". "3rd
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Шаблоны и методология оптимизации производительности Golang — если узкое место X, примени Y. Охватывает снижение аллокаций, эффективность CPU, компоновку памяти, настройку GC, пулинг, кэширование и оптимизацию горячих путей. Используйте, когда профилирование или бенчмарки выявили узкое место и вам нужен правильный шаблон оптимизации для его устранения. Также используйте при проведении код-ревью производительности, чтобы предложить улучшения или бенчмарки, которые помогут выявить быстрые выигрыши в производительности. Не для методологии измерений (→...
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Лучшие практики безопасности и предотвращение уязвимостей для Golang. Охватывает инъекции (SQL, командные, XSS), криптографию, безопасность файловой системы, сетевую безопасность, куки, управление секретами, безопасность памяти и логирование. Применяется при написании, рецензировании или аудите Go-кода на безопасность, а также при работе с любым рискованным кодом, связанным с криптографией, вводом-выводом, управлением секретами, обработкой пользовательского ввода или аутентификацией. Включает настройку инструментов безопасности.
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Полное руководство по работе с базами данных в Go — параметризованные запросы, сканирование структур, NULL-допустимые столбцы, транзакции, уровни изоляции, SELECT FOR UPDATE, пул соединений, пакетная обработка, передача контекста и инструменты миграции. Используйте при написании, ревью или отладке Golang-кода, взаимодействующего с PostgreSQL, MariaDB, MySQL или SQLite; для тестирования баз данных; или по вопросам, связанным с database/sql, sqlx или pgx. НЕ генерирует схемы баз данных или SQL-миграции.
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
Лучшие практики линтинга и настройка golangci-lint для проектов на Golang — запуск линтеров, настройка .golangci.yml, подавление предупреждений с помощью директив nolint, интерпретация вывода линтера и выбор линтеров. Используйте при настройке golangci-lint, вопросах о предупреждениях линтера или подавлении nolint, настройке инструментов качества кода или выборе линтеров. Также используйте, когда пользователь упоминает golangci-lint, go vet, staticcheck или revive.
developmentcode-reviewtesting