implement-specs

Execute um conselho de subagentes com modelos diversos para investigar o mesmo problema sob múltiplas perspectivas, comparar descobertas e produzir uma recomendação final. Use esta habilidade sempre que o usuário solicitar um conselho, segundas opiniões, múltiplos agentes/modelos para avaliar uma questão, investigação paralela, comparação red-team/blue-team ou ajuda para decidir entre abordagens técnicas concorrentes.

Drive a spec-first workflow for substantial features by writing PRODUCT.md before implementation, writing TECH.md when warranted, and keeping both specs updated as implementation evolves. Use when starting a significant feature, planning agent-driven implementation, or when the user wants product and tech specs checked into source control.

Escreva uma especificação TECH.md para uma funcionalidade significativa do Warp após pesquisar a base de código atual e as restrições de implementação. Use quando o usuário solicitar uma especificação técnica, plano de implementação ou documento de arquitetura vinculado a uma especificação de produto.

Write a PRODUCT.md spec for a significant user-facing feature in Warp, focused on detailed behavior and validation. Use when the user asks for a product spec, desired behavior doc, or PRD, wants to define feature behavior before implementation, or when the feature is substantial or behaviorally ambiguous enough that a written spec would improve implementation or review.

Review a pull request diff and write structured feedback to review.json for the workflow to publish. Use when reviewing a checked-out PR from local artifacts like pr_diff.txt and pr_description.txt and producing machine-readable review output instead of posting directly to GitHub.

Create a pull request in the warp repository for the current branch. Use when the user mentions opening a PR, creating a pull request, submitting changes for review, or preparing code for merge.

Run a second round on a contested question by circulating each subagent's independent proposal to the other authors and asking for structured pros and cons, then synthesize. Use this skill whenever you have multiple independent proposals or opinions on a contested decision — architecture tradeoffs, code review disagreements, design choices, competing root-cause theories — and want sharper analysis than you'd produce by synthesizing alone. Pairs naturally with the council and research skills;...

Resolve Git merge conflicts by extracting only unresolved paths, conflict hunks, and compact diffs instead of loading whole files into context. Use when a merge, rebase, cherry-pick, or stash pop stops on conflicts, when `git status` shows unmerged paths, or when files contain conflict markers.