explore-code

We need to translate the given text from English to Brazilian Portuguese. The text is a description of an agent skill called "explore-code". The instruction says to preserve the name "explore-code" only if it appears in the source text. It does appear in the source text? Let's check: The source text has "explore-code" in the first line? Actually, the source text starts with "Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill for auditable candidate implementation..." There is no "explore-code" in the provided text. The name is given in the context but not inside the <text> tags. So we should not include it. The instruction says: "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." It does not appear. So we just translate the text. Also, preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. So "LoRA", "adapter layers", "rollback-aware records", "explore_outputs/", "current_research" should be kept as is or translated? Technical terms like "LoRA

npx skills add https://github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill explore-code

explore-code

Use this as the Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill. The installed slug remains explore-code for compatibility.

Use the shared operating principles in ../../references/agent-operating-principles.md; this skill should guide bounded candidate code work without over-prescribing implementation details.

When to apply

  • When the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory code changes on an isolated branch or worktree.
  • When the task is source-anchored module transplant, backbone adaptation, LoRA or adapter insertion, or low-risk module combination.
  • When summary-level recording is sufficient and the result is a candidate, not a trusted conclusion.

When not to apply

  • When the request is for trusted baseline work, conservative debugging, or normal training execution.
  • When the user did not explicitly authorize exploratory modifications.
  • When the task is a broad refactor or a from-scratch idea implementation.

Clear boundaries

  • This skill owns exploratory code modifications only.
  • It must keep work isolated from the trusted baseline.
  • Use ai-research-explore instead when the task spans both current_research coordination and exploratory runs.
  • It may hand off execution to minimal-run-and-audit or run-train.
  • It should favor source-anchored copying and minimal adaptation over freeform rewrites.
  • It should record why a candidate change is meaningful, how to roll it back, and why it remains a candidate rather than a verified contribution.

Output expectations

  • explore_outputs/CHANGESET.md
  • explore_outputs/SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md
  • explore_outputs/COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md
  • explore_outputs/TOP_RUNS.md
  • explore_outputs/status.json

Notes

Use references/explore-policy.md, ../../references/research-rigor-principles.md, scripts/plan_code_changes.py, and scripts/write_outputs.py.

Mais skills de lllllllama

ai-research-explore
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to Brazilian Portuguese. The text describes a skill for deep learning research exploration. We must preserve the name "ai-research-explore" if it appears, but it does not appear in the text. The text includes technical terms like "Rigor Explore", "SOTA", "README-first", etc. We should keep those as is or translate appropriately? The instruction says preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, and technical terms. "Rigor Explore" might be a product name? It's capitalized. "SOTA" is an acronym for state-of-the-art, often kept as is. "README-first" is a term. "explore_outputs/" is a path. We should keep those. Also "current_research" is a variable or term. Keep as is. We need to translate the rest naturally. The text: "Rigor Explore compatible skill slug for meaningful and potentially novel deep learning research candidates. Use when the researcher has chosen the task family, dataset, benchmark, evaluation method, provided SOTA references,
researchdata-analysisapi
analyze-project
lllllllama
Habilidade somente leitura do Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit para repositórios de pesquisa em deep learning. Use quando o usuário quiser ler e entender um repositório, inspecionar a estrutura do modelo e pontos de entrada de treinamento ou inferência, revisar configurações e pontos de inserção, ou sinalizar padrões de implementação suspeitos sem modificar código ou executar tarefas pesadas. Não use para execução ativa de comandos, refatoração ampla, adaptação especulativa de código ou correção automática de bugs.
developmentcode-reviewresearch
ai-research-reproduction
lllllllama
Orquestrador do modo de reprodução do RigorPilot para reprodução de repositórios de aprendizado profundo com foco em README. Use quando o usuário desejar um fluxo completo e de confiança mínima que primeiro leia o repositório, selecione o menor alvo de inferência ou avaliação documentado, coordene a ingestão, configuração, execução confiável, treinamento confiável opcional, análise opcional do repositório e resolução opcional de lacunas do artigo, aplique regras conservadoras de correção, registre evidências, suposições, desvios e pontos de decisão humana,...
researchdevelopmentdocument
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to Brazilian Portuguese. The text describes a skill called "minimal-run-and-audit" but the name is not to be included unless it appears in the source text. The source text does not include the name "minimal-run-and-audit" inside the <text> tags. The text starts with "Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction." So we translate that. Important: Preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. So "Rigor Run", "README-first", "deep learning", "repro_outputs/", "patch notes", etc. should remain as is or translated if they are common terms? "deep learning" is often kept as is in Portuguese, but can be translated as "aprendizado profundo". However, the instruction says preserve technical terms. I think "deep learning" is a technical term, so keep it. "README-first" is a concept, maybe keep as is. "Rigor Run" is a skill name? It says
developmenttestingcode-review
env-and-assets-bootstrap
lllllllama
Habilidade de configuração rigorosa para reprodução de repositório de deep learning com foco em README. Use quando a tarefa for especificamente preparar um ambiente conservador baseado em conda, suposições de caminhos de checkpoint e dataset, dicas de localização de cache e notas de configuração antes de qualquer execução em um repositório documentado por README. Não use para varredura de repositório, orquestração completa, interpretação de artigo, relatório final de execução ou configuração genérica de ambiente que não esteja vinculada a um alvo de reprodução específico.
developmentdevops
explore-run
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to Brazilian Portuguese. The text describes a skill called "explore-run" but the instruction says to preserve the name if it appears in the source text. The name "explore-run" appears in the text? Actually, the text says "Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill" - the name is "explore-run" but it's not explicitly written as "explore-run" in the text. The instruction says "Name to preserve: explore-run" but the source text has "Rigor Explore run leaf skill". Possibly the name is embedded. However, the instruction says "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "explore-run" does not appear literally; it appears as "Explore run" (two words). But the instruction says to preserve the name, so we should keep "explore-run" if it appears? It doesn't. The text has "Rigor Explore run" - that might be the skill name. But the instruction explicitly says "Name to preserve: explore
researchdevelopmentdata-analysis
safe-debug
lllllllama
Habilidade de Debug Rigoroso / Auditoria Rigorosa para trabalhos de pesquisa em aprendizado profundo. Use quando o usuário colar um traceback, erro de terminal, CUDA OOM, falha ao carregar checkpoint, incompatibilidade de forma, sintoma de perda NaN ou falha de treinamento e quiser um diagnóstico conservador antes de qualquer correção, com correções de debug claramente separadas das contribuições de pesquisa. Não use para refatoração ampla, adaptação especulativa, correção exploratória automática ou familiarização geral com o repositório.
developmenttestingcode-review
paper-context-resolver
lllllllama
Auxiliar de contexto do Paper Rigor para reprodução de repositórios de deep learning com foco no README. Use apenas quando o README e os arquivos do repositório deixarem uma lacuna crítica para reprodução e a tarefa for resolver um detalhe específico do artigo, como divisão de dataset, pré-processamento, protocolo de avaliação, mapeamento de checkpoint ou suposição de runtime a partir das fontes primárias do artigo, registrando conflitos. Não use para resumo geral de artigo, varredura de repositório, configuração de ambiente, execução de comandos, consulta apenas por título de artigo ou...
researchdocumentdata-analysis