ai-research-reproduction

Orquestrador do modo de reprodução do RigorPilot para reprodução de repositórios de aprendizado profundo com foco em README. Use quando o usuário desejar um fluxo completo e de confiança mínima que primeiro leia o repositório, selecione o menor alvo de inferência ou avaliação documentado, coordene a ingestão, configuração, execução confiável, treinamento confiável opcional, análise opcional do repositório e resolução opcional de lacunas do artigo, aplique regras conservadoras de correção, registre evidências, suposições, desvios e pontos de decisão humana,...

npx skills add https://github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill ai-research-reproduction

ai-research-reproduction

Purpose

Guide README-first deep learning reproduction toward a minimal trustworthy run with auditable evidence. Reproduction is not "make it run by changing anything"; faithfully read the README, environment, weights, datasets, and documented commands, then record results and deviations. Start with references/agent-operating-principles.md; load references/research-rigor-principles.md and references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md when scientific meaning or experiment details are at stake.

For first-use problems, run scripts/doctor.py with the intended Python (read-only; optional --repo and --require-module). The deterministic entrypoint is scripts/orchestrate_repro.py with a self-contained _bundled/ runtime, so this skill works when installed alone; separately installed companion skills remain optional reusable entrypoints. Use the entrypoint and --help for routine runs; inspect its implementation when a concrete blocker or safety question requires it. Executed commands persist lifecycle state, append-only events, and full streamed stdout/stderr under repro_outputs/_runtime/<run_id>/. A CANCEL file in the active run directory requests process-tree cancellation. For recovery, queues or model gates, read references/runtime-and-model-adapter.md; for the optional model/tool loop, read references/agent-runner.md and use scripts/run_agent.py.

Fit

Use this skill when all are true:

  • The target is an AI code repository with a README, scripts, configs, or documented commands.
  • The request spans multiple trusted phases such as intake, setup, execution, training verification, analysis, paper-gap resolution, and reporting.
  • The desired result is a small reproducible target, not broad experimentation.

Do not use this skill for paper summaries, generic environment setup, isolated repo scanning, standalone command execution, open-ended research design, or explicit candidate-only exploration.

Trusted Target Selection

Choose the smallest target that can honestly demonstrate repository-grounded reproduction:

  1. documented inference
  2. documented evaluation
  3. documented training startup or partial verification
  4. full training only after explicit user confirmation

Treat README guidance as the primary reproduction intent. Use repository files to clarify the README, not to silently replace it. When the README and paper conflict, record the conflict and use paper-context-resolver only for the narrow reproduction-critical gap.

Workflow

  1. Read the README and nearby repo signals.
  2. Run the bundled repo-intake-and-plan stage to extract commands and targets.
  3. Select and justify the minimum trustworthy target.
  4. Run env-and-assets-bootstrap only for target-specific environment, checkpoint, dataset, and cache assumptions.
  5. Run analyze-project only when structure, insertion points, or suspicious implementation patterns need read-only clarification.
  6. Use minimal-run-and-audit for documented inference, evaluation, smoke, or sanity execution. Keep direct execution as the default; native shell syntax requires explicit review and authorization.
  7. Use run-train instead when the selected trusted target is training startup, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume.
  8. Pause for human review before fuller training claims or any change that could alter dataset, split, checkpoint, preprocessing, metric, loss, model semantics, or result interpretation.
  9. Award result-match only when explicit expected metrics are compared under a recorded tolerance; observed metrics alone prove execution, not reproduction. Then write the standardized outputs and a concise final note in the user's language when practical.
  10. Once the requested target and evidence checks are complete, return the bounded result and stop. Optional stages and further README commands are not automatic follow-up work.

Patch Boundary

Prefer no repository edits. If edits are needed, keep them conservative and auditable:

  • Try command-line arguments, environment variables, path fixes, dependency version fixes, or dependency-file fixes before code changes.
  • Reproduction fixes are allowed when needed, but they must not be hidden. State what changed, why it was necessary, whether it changes scientific meaning, and whether it affects comparability with the paper, README, or baseline.
  • Avoid changing model architecture, core inference semantics, training logic, loss functions, or experiment meaning.
  • If repository files must change, create a branch named repro/YYYY-MM-DD-short-task, keep verified patch commits sparse, and record README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md.

See references/patch-policy.md.

Outputs

Always target repro_outputs/:

SUMMARY.md
COMMANDS.md
LOG.md
SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md
COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md
status.json
ANNOTATED_README.md   # original README + colored per-section agent-action annotations
PATCHES.md   # only if patches were applied

Use the templates under assets/ and the field rules in references/output-spec.md.

  • Put the shortest high-value summary in SUMMARY.md.
  • Put copyable commands in COMMANDS.md.
  • Put process evidence, assumptions, failures, and decisions in LOG.md.
  • Put scientific meaning and change effects in SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md.
  • Put comparison anchors and protocol deviations in COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md.
  • Put durable machine-readable state in status.json.
  • Put branch, commit, validation, and README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md when needed.
  • Put the researcher's at-a-glance view in ANNOTATED_README.md: the README replayed byte-for-byte—including its image, GIF, video, and HTML markup—with exactly one marked color annotation after every heading block. Never extract a text-only surrogate. Generation must pass the built-in strip/check round trip before the file is kept.
  • For original relative media/file context, use --source-adjacent-readme to also write RIGORPILOT_README.md beside the source README; inspect the reported path/status and never replace an unrelated existing file. See references/output-spec.md.
  • Distinguish verified facts from inferred guesses.

Reference Loading

  • Load references/language-policy.md when writing human-readable outputs.
  • Load references/research-rigor-principles.md before making comparability, contribution, or research-result claims.
  • Load references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md when dataset, split, metric, checkpoint, training, or evaluation details matter.
  • Consult ~/.rigorpilot/PERSONAL_RIGOR.md if present, under references/continuous-learning-policy.md (advisory only; core wins).
  • Failed and later-resolved runs are auto-recorded as lessons via shared/scripts/lessons_store.py (RIGORPILOT_LESSONS=0 disables).
  • Load references/research-safety-principles.md before protocol-sensitive decisions.
  • Load references/patch-policy.md before modifying repository files.
  • Keep specialized logic in sub-skills, scripts, templates, or references rather than expanding this entrypoint.

Mais skills de lllllllama

ai-research-explore
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to Brazilian Portuguese. The text describes a skill for deep learning research exploration. We must preserve the name "ai-research-explore" if it appears, but it does not appear in the text. The text includes technical terms like "Rigor Explore", "SOTA", "README-first", etc. We should keep those as is or translate appropriately? The instruction says preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, and technical terms. "Rigor Explore" might be a product name? It's capitalized. "SOTA" is an acronym for state-of-the-art, often kept as is. "README-first" is a term. "explore_outputs/" is a path. We should keep those. Also "current_research" is a variable or term. Keep as is. We need to translate the rest naturally. The text: "Rigor Explore compatible skill slug for meaningful and potentially novel deep learning research candidates. Use when the researcher has chosen the task family, dataset, benchmark, evaluation method, provided SOTA references,
researchdata-analysisapi
analyze-project
lllllllama
Habilidade somente leitura do Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit para repositórios de pesquisa em deep learning. Use quando o usuário quiser ler e entender um repositório, inspecionar a estrutura do modelo e pontos de entrada de treinamento ou inferência, revisar configurações e pontos de inserção, ou sinalizar padrões de implementação suspeitos sem modificar código ou executar tarefas pesadas. Não use para execução ativa de comandos, refatoração ampla, adaptação especulativa de código ou correção automática de bugs.
developmentcode-reviewresearch
explore-code
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to Brazilian Portuguese. The text is a description of an agent skill called "explore-code". The instruction says to preserve the name "explore-code" only if it appears in the source text. It does appear in the source text? Let's check: The source text has "explore-code" in the first line? Actually, the source text starts with "Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill for auditable candidate implementation..." There is no "explore-code" in the provided text. The name is given in the context but not inside the <text> tags. So we should not include it. The instruction says: "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." It does not appear. So we just translate the text. Also, preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. So "LoRA", "adapter layers", "rollback-aware records", "explore_outputs/", "current_research" should be kept as is or translated? Technical terms like "LoRA
developmentresearchcode-review
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to Brazilian Portuguese. The text describes a skill called "minimal-run-and-audit" but the name is not to be included unless it appears in the source text. The source text does not include the name "minimal-run-and-audit" inside the <text> tags. The text starts with "Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction." So we translate that. Important: Preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. So "Rigor Run", "README-first", "deep learning", "repro_outputs/", "patch notes", etc. should remain as is or translated if they are common terms? "deep learning" is often kept as is in Portuguese, but can be translated as "aprendizado profundo". However, the instruction says preserve technical terms. I think "deep learning" is a technical term, so keep it. "README-first" is a concept, maybe keep as is. "Rigor Run" is a skill name? It says
developmenttestingcode-review
env-and-assets-bootstrap
lllllllama
Habilidade de configuração rigorosa para reprodução de repositório de deep learning com foco em README. Use quando a tarefa for especificamente preparar um ambiente conservador baseado em conda, suposições de caminhos de checkpoint e dataset, dicas de localização de cache e notas de configuração antes de qualquer execução em um repositório documentado por README. Não use para varredura de repositório, orquestração completa, interpretação de artigo, relatório final de execução ou configuração genérica de ambiente que não esteja vinculada a um alvo de reprodução específico.
developmentdevops
explore-run
lllllllama
We need to translate the given text from English to Brazilian Portuguese. The text describes a skill called "explore-run" but the instruction says to preserve the name if it appears in the source text. The name "explore-run" appears in the text? Actually, the text says "Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill" - the name is "explore-run" but it's not explicitly written as "explore-run" in the text. The instruction says "Name to preserve: explore-run" but the source text has "Rigor Explore run leaf skill". Possibly the name is embedded. However, the instruction says "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "explore-run" does not appear literally; it appears as "Explore run" (two words). But the instruction says to preserve the name, so we should keep "explore-run" if it appears? It doesn't. The text has "Rigor Explore run" - that might be the skill name. But the instruction explicitly says "Name to preserve: explore
researchdevelopmentdata-analysis
safe-debug
lllllllama
Habilidade de Debug Rigoroso / Auditoria Rigorosa para trabalhos de pesquisa em aprendizado profundo. Use quando o usuário colar um traceback, erro de terminal, CUDA OOM, falha ao carregar checkpoint, incompatibilidade de forma, sintoma de perda NaN ou falha de treinamento e quiser um diagnóstico conservador antes de qualquer correção, com correções de debug claramente separadas das contribuições de pesquisa. Não use para refatoração ampla, adaptação especulativa, correção exploratória automática ou familiarização geral com o repositório.
developmenttestingcode-review
paper-context-resolver
lllllllama
Auxiliar de contexto do Paper Rigor para reprodução de repositórios de deep learning com foco no README. Use apenas quando o README e os arquivos do repositório deixarem uma lacuna crítica para reprodução e a tarefa for resolver um detalhe específico do artigo, como divisão de dataset, pré-processamento, protocolo de avaliação, mapeamento de checkpoint ou suposição de runtime a partir das fontes primárias do artigo, registrando conflitos. Não use para resumo geral de artigo, varredura de repositório, configuração de ambiente, execução de comandos, consulta apenas por título de artigo ou...
researchdocumentdata-analysis