prototype

Crie múltiplas versões genuinamente diferentes de uma peça de UI que você descrever, renderizadas atrás de um seletor visual para que você possa alternar entre elas ao vivo e promover a que parecer mais adequada. Só é executado quando invocado explicitamente; não é acionado por conta própria.

npx skills add https://github.com/emilkowalski/skills --skill prototype

Prototyping Variants

A divergence skill. It does ONE thing: take a described piece of UI ("a toast", "the pricing card", "a hold-to-delete button"), build several genuinely different versions of it, and put them behind a visual picker so the user can flip through them live and choose a winner. It does not review existing UI (that's review-animations), plan fixes for it (that's improve-animations), or choose dependencies (that's pick-ui-library).

Operating Posture

You are a senior design engineer running a design exploration. The entire value of this skill is divergence: three tints of the same idea waste the picker — the user learns nothing by flipping between them. Each variant must be a direction you could defend shipping on its own, exploring a genuinely different answer to the same brief.

Divergence is not an excuse to drop the craft bar. Every variant individually meets Emil Kowalski's standards — right easing (ease-out on entrances, never ease-in), sub-300ms UI motion, correct transform-origin, transform/opacity only, reduced-motion handled. A sloppy variant doesn't widen the exploration; it just loses on execution and teaches nothing about the direction it represents.

Hard Rules

  1. Never touch production code during exploration. Everything lives in an isolated prototype surface (see Phase 4). Integration happens only in Phase 6, only for the variant the user picked.
  2. Variants diverge on a named axis — layout, density, personality, motion, interaction model. Before building, you must be able to state each variant's axis in a phrase. Sharing the project's tokens is not convergence; variants should feel native to the product.
  3. Every variant fully works. Real interactions, real motion, realistic content — actual product-shaped copy, plausible names and numbers. No lorem ipsum, no dead buttons, no "imagine this part".
  4. The picker is chrome, not a contestant. Its exact markup, styles, and behavior are specified in PICKER.md — copy them verbatim. Its look is not a design decision and never adapts to the project.
  5. Clean up after the choice. When a winner is promoted, delete the prototype surface unless the user asks to keep it.

Workflow

Phase 1 — Scope

One thing per run. If the description spans multiple components ("the dashboard"), narrow it: pick the single highest-leverage piece, say which and why, and offer the rest as follow-up runs. Restate the brief in one sentence — what the thing is, where it will live, what it must do.

Phase 2 — Recon

Before designing anything, map the ground the variants must stand on:

  • Stack: framework, styling system (Tailwind, CSS modules, vanilla), motion library if any.
  • Tokens: colors, radii, spacing, fonts, easing/duration variables. Variants use these — every variant should look like it could ship in this product tomorrow.
  • Personality: playful consumer app or crisp dashboard? This bounds how far the boldest variant may go.
  • Context: where the piece renders — against what background, beside what neighbors, at what sizes.

If there is no project (empty directory, or the user is just exploring), skip to the standalone branch in Phase 4 and choose a restrained default look: neutral grays, one accent, system font stack.

Phase 3 — Choose directions

Default 3 variants; up to 5 when the user asks or the design space is genuinely wide. More than 5 dilutes the comparison.

Before writing any code, list the set: a name and an axis for each. Names describe the direction — "Quiet", "Editorial", "Playful", "Dense" — never "Option A/B/C". If two proposed directions would differ only in accent color or copy, they are one direction; replace one with a real alternative (different layout, different interaction model, different motion story).

Completion criterion: every variant has a name and a stated axis, and no two variants share an axis position.

Phase 4 — Build the picker harness

Two branches, by what exists:

  • In a project with a dev server — an isolated route or page (/prototypes/<slug>, or the framework's equivalent), one file per variant plus a small harness file. Nothing imports from the prototype surface into production code.
  • No project / static context — a single self-contained HTML file (inline CSS/JS) the user can open directly in a browser.

The picker's markup, styles, keyboard wiring, and placement come from PICKER.md, verbatim — load it now and build exactly that. Beyond the picker itself, the harness must render one variant at a time, full size, in realistic surrounding context — a toast needs a page behind it, a card needs siblings, a button needs a form. Side-by-side thumbnails distort spacing and scale; never judge UI at postage-stamp size. Switching is instant — flipping is a 100+/session action; by the frequency rule the variant swap gets no animation.

Phase 5 — Verify and hand off

Run the harness. Confirm every variant renders, every interaction responds, and the console is clean — flip through all of them yourself before showing the user. If browser tooling is available, screenshot each variant.

Then present the set and stop — the choice belongs to the user:

#VariantAxisWhen it's the right choiceIts cost
1QuietMinimal motion, borders over shadowsThe product is a daily-use toolLeast memorable
2EditorialLarge type, generous whitespaceThe moment deserves weightEats vertical space

Close with where the picker is running (URL or file path) and the keys to flip.

Completion criterion: every variant is reachable from the picker and behaves correctly; no console errors; the table names each variant's tradeoff honestly.

Phase 6 — Promote on selection

When the user picks: integrate that variant where it belongs, following the project's existing conventions (file layout, naming, token usage), then delete the prototype surface per Hard Rule 5. If the user instead wants another round, keep the harness and run Phase 3 again, diverging around the direction they gravitated to.

Invocation Variants

InvocationBehavior
<description>Full workflow: scope → recon → 3 variants → picker → wait for choice
<description> x5Same, with that many variants (capped at 5)
riff <variant>New round: keep the harness, generate a fresh set diverging around the named variant's direction
keep <variant>Promote that variant into the codebase and delete the prototype surface
keep <variant>, leave the pickerPromote, but keep the prototype surface around

Tone

Sell each variant honestly — one line on when it wins, one on what it costs. Never pre-pick a favorite in the table; if the user asks which you'd choose, answer with a reason rooted in the product's personality and frequency of use, not aesthetics alone. If two variants converged while you built them, cut one and say so: a picker with two truly distinct directions beats one padded to three.

Mais skills de emilkowalski

find-animation-opportunities
emilkowalski
Pesquise em um codebase ou UI por lugares que não animam mas deveriam, e rejeite tudo o que não deveria. Somente leitura; propõe movimento com valores exatos, não o implementa. Use quando o usuário perguntar "o que poderia ser animado aqui?" ou quiser "deixar isso mais vivo". Para corrigir animações existentes, use improve-animations ou review-animations.
developmentdesigncreative
animate
emilkowalski
Construa uma animação do zero, tomando as decisões na ordem que determina se ela parece certa — se ela deve animar de fato, qual propósito, qual ferramenta, quais propriedades, qual curva e duração, como ela interrompe, como ela sai. Escreve a implementação. Use quando for pedido para animar algo, adicionar movimento, fazer um componente parecer vivo ou construir uma transição. Para criticar movimentos existentes, use review-animations; para auditar uma base de código inteira, use improve-animations.
pick-ui-library
emilkowalski
Escolha a biblioteca certa para uma determinada tarefa de frontend a partir de uma lista selecionada e opinativa — números, entradas OTP, gráficos, menus de comando, virtualização, arrastar e soltar, toasts, estado, estilização e mais. Só é executado quando invocado explicitamente; não é acionado por conta própria.
ask-sonner
emilkowalski
Guia para Sonner, a biblioteca de toasts do React — instale e configure o Toaster, escolha a chamada toast() certa, toasts de promise e loading, atualização, dispensa e persistência de toasts, estilização, temas e ícones, posicionamento e múltiplos toasters. Use ao trabalhar com Sonner ou ao solucionar problemas — toasts que não aparecem, aparecem duas vezes, perdem os estilos, ignoram classes do Tailwind, ficam atrás de um modal ou não seguem o modo escuro.
emil-design-eng
emilkowalski
Esta habilidade codifica a filosofia de Emil Kowalski sobre polimento de UI, design de componentes, decisões de animação e os detalhes invisíveis que fazem o software parecer ótimo.
designdevelopmentcreative
review-animations
emilkowalski
Revisa o código de animação e movimento contra um alto padrão de qualidade derivado
animation-vocabulary
emilkowalski
Glossário de consulta reversa que transforma uma descrição vaga de uma animação web ou efeito de movimento em seu termo exato ("aquela coisa saltitante quando um popover abre" → Pop in; "o scroll elástico do iOS" → Rubber-banding). Use quando o usuário pergunta "como se chama quando…", ou descreve um efeito de movimento sem saber seu nome e quer a palavra certa para usar com uma IA ou designer. Serve para nomear um efeito, não para projetá-lo ou construí-lo.
creativedesignresearch
improve-animations
emilkowalski
Analisar o código de animação e movimento de uma base de código como um consultor sênior de motion, e então produzir uma auditoria priorizada e planos de implementação autocontidos para outros agentes (ou modelos mais baratos) executarem. Apenas leitura do código-fonte — planeja melhorias, não as aplica. Use quando o usuário pedir para "melhorar as animações", "auditar o movimento", "deixar este aplicativo com uma sensação melhor", ou quiser um roteiro de correções de animação em vez de uma revisão de uma única alteração.