evaluating-sdk-internal-updates

Avalia um PR "Update SDK to" do bitwarden/android em relação ao intervalo de commits do sdk-internal para mudanças de quebra em tempo de compilação e execução, mapeia símbolos afetados para…

npx skills add https://github.com/bitwarden/android --skill evaluating-sdk-internal-updates

Evaluating sdk-internal Updates

Identify both compile-time and runtime breaks before fixing anything — fixing the first break found is not finishing. Steps 3-7 always cover the entire commit range before step 8 starts, no matter how obvious or urgent an early compile-time break looks.

Identify

Binding surface facts specific to this SDK: #[uniffi::export] / derive(uniffi::...) annotations are scattered across many crates, not just crates/bitwarden-uniffi; crates/bitwarden-ffi is unrelated ("do not use"). No .udl files. UniFFI emits one Kotlin package per crate (com.bitwarden.core, com.bitwarden.vault, com.bitwarden.crypto, etc.) — only the top-level Client/AuthClient/GeneratorClients actually live under com.bitwarden.sdk. Both app and authenticator depend on the SDK; neither is optional to search.

A hunk that only touches a macro invocation (e.g. state_bridge! { ... }) doesn't show the binding surface — the expansion lives in the macro's definition, often in a different crate (e.g. bitwarden-state-bridge-macro). #[uniffi::export(with_foreign)] marks a callback interface: a trait Kotlin must implement, where adding a field/method is never additive-safe for the implementor.

  1. Locate the local bitwarden/sdk-internal clone (check sibling directories to this repo). If none exists, stop and tell the user it's a required prerequisite for this skill — do not clone it yourself.
  2. gh pr diff <PR> -R bitwarden/android | grep bitwardenSdk → old/new bitwardenSdk string. Everything after the second - is the git ref — a commit SHA or a branch name (.dev SDK builds use both); resolve a branch name as origin/<branch> in the clone.
  3. Attempt ./gradlew app:compileStandardDebugKotlin authenticator:compileDebugKotlin at the current checkout before crawling sdk-internal. A failure confirms a compile-time break directly, with a more precise location than any git search — note it and continue to steps 4-7 for the full commit range; do not fix it yet. A clean build only rules out compile-time breaks, not runtime ones.
  4. git -C <sdk-internal-path> log --oneline OLD..NEW -G'uniffi::export|derive\(uniffi|#\[uniffi' -- '*.rs' → candidate binding-surface commits.
  5. Classify per hunk, not per commit — a commit with one additive headline change can still have a second, unrelated breaking hunk. If a hunk only touches a macro invocation, read the macro's definition before classifying. git -C <sdk-internal-path> show <sha> -- '*.rs'.
  6. For every distinct symbol/type touched (every hunk, not just the commit's headline change), grep the whole repo for the bare symbol name to find Android call sites — a fixed module list or a com.bitwarden.sdk.<Symbol> import-prefix check both miss real consumers.
  7. Report: compile-time breaks, runtime breaks, safe/no-call-site — each with commit, symbol, and call sites. Cite sdk-internal commits and PRs as bitwarden/sdk-internal#<NNN> or a full commit URL/SHA — never a bare #<NNN> copied from a commit subject line. A bare reference auto-links within whatever repo the report is posted to (e.g. bitwarden/android), tagging an unrelated issue or PR there.

Resolve

Resolve the findings from Step 7 by deciding on a fix (step 8), implementing and committing it directly (step 9), then verifying (step 10).

  1. Decide the fix for anything found, compile-time or runtime, whenever the correct behavior is clear and within scope. For a new required method, grep for the underlying concept, not the new method/type name (it won't exist yet) — no existing consumer means stub it: a // no-op comment or a null/default return that satisfies the compiler, not a behavioral decision. Never TODO() — it throws at runtime, which is a crash, not a stub. A sibling's structure (naming, placement, style) is a template; its behavior (storage, defaulting, error handling, side effects) is not evidence for yours. If unsure, report it instead of guessing, along with anything needing a product decision.
  2. Implement every fix from step 8 directly: invoke Skill(implementing-android-code) first if the fix isn't purely mechanical, then commit with Skill(bitwarden-delivery-tools:committing-changes).
  3. Verify with the same compile task used in step 3.

Mais skills de bitwarden

figma-to-angular
bitwarden
Esta habilidade transforma uma especificação de design do Figma em um componente Angular totalmente implementado, com histórias do Storybook no monorepo do Bitwarden Clients. O resultado deve corresponder visualmente ao design, seguindo todas as convenções do código.
force-multiplier
bitwarden
Aplique uma intenção a muitos alvos de uma só vez — uma frota de repositórios no ecossistema Bitwarden, ou muitos projetos dentro de um monorepo — como N consistentes,…
analyzing-git-sessions
bitwarden
Analisa commits e alterações do git dentro de um período ou intervalo de commits, fornecendo resumos estruturados para revisão de código, retrospectivas, registros de trabalho ou sessões…
coordinating-cross-team-breakdown
bitwarden
Coordene a revisão e aprovação entre equipes para um Bitwarden Tech Breakdown. Use ao identificar equipes afetadas, montar a tabela de aprovação da Parte 3, buscar…
assessing-jira-issue-relevance
bitwarden
Use quando o usuário fornecer uma única chave de issue do Jira e perguntar se ela ainda é relevante, ainda é aplicável, ainda está pendente, ainda é um bug, foi corrigida ou pode…
assessing-test-coverage
bitwarden
Use ao determinar qual cobertura de teste JÁ EXISTE para uma alteração específica (um PR, chave Jira, documento Tech Breakdown, CSV do Testmo, caminhos alterados ou…
retrospecting
bitwarden
Realiza análise abrangente de sessões do Claude Code, examinando histórico do git, registros de conversas, alterações de código e coletando feedback do usuário para gerar…
reviewing-incremental-changes
bitwarden
Use esta habilidade ao revisar novamente um PR que já possui comentários ou ao responder a alterações do desenvolvedor após a revisão inicial. Aplique quando houver discussões no PR ou…