figma-to-angular

Esta habilidade transforma uma especificação de design do Figma em um componente Angular totalmente implementado, com histórias do Storybook no monorepo do Bitwarden Clients. O resultado deve corresponder visualmente ao design, seguindo todas as convenções do código.

npx skills add https://github.com/bitwarden/clients --skill figma-to-angular

Figma to Angular Component

This skill turns a Figma design spec into a fully implemented Angular component with Storybook stories in the Bitwarden Clients monorepo. The output should match the design visually while following all codebase conventions.

Workflow

Phase 1: Extract the design

Call get_design_context from the Figma MCP server. Extract the fileKey and nodeId from the URL:

  • figma.com/design/:fileKey/:fileName?node-id=:nodeId → convert - to : in nodeId
  • Pass clientFrameworks: "angular" and clientLanguages: "typescript,html,css"

The response contains reference code (React+Tailwind), a screenshot, and design metadata. Treat the code as a structural reference only — it must be fully converted to Angular.

Phase 2: Explore the codebase

Before writing any code, understand the conventions of the target location. Use an Explore agent to discover:

  1. Component file patterns — look at 2–3 sibling components in the same directory. Note the file naming, module structure, barrel exports, and whether they use standalone components.
  2. Existing components to reuse — search for components that match parts of the design (labels, buttons, inputs, icons). Reuse them instead of reimplementing.
  3. Tailwind configuration — read the relevant tailwind.config to understand the prefix (commonly tw-), available design tokens, and color system.
  4. Storybook patterns — check how sibling stories are structured: imports, moduleMetadata, I18nMockService usage, argTypes.
  5. i18n setup — find the I18nPipe import path and the locale messages file to add new keys.

This exploration is critical. Skipping it leads to components that don't match the codebase and require extensive rework.

Phase 3: Map design tokens

Create a mapping from Figma's design values to the codebase's Tailwind tokens. The Figma response includes raw CSS values (hex colors, px sizes). These must be translated to semantic tokens.

Common mappings for Bitwarden:

Figma conceptWhere to look
Colors (hex)tailwind.config → colors, bg, fg, border sections
Font sizestailwind.config → extend.fontSize
Spacing / paddingStandard Tailwind scale with prefix
Border radiusStandard Tailwind (rounded-*)
Component variantsExisting component source (e.g. base-button.directive.ts)

Never use raw hex values. Always map to a semantic token. If no exact match exists, use the closest available token and note the discrepancy.

Phase 4: Plan the component

Before writing code, create a plan covering:

  • Selector — follows the relevant prefix convention
  • Inputs and outputs — use Angular signal-based input() and output() functions
  • Content projection — identify slots for <ng-content> (labels, hints, actions)
  • Existing component reuse — which existing components to import and use
  • i18n keys — list all user-visible strings that need localization
  • Accessibility — keyboard navigation, ARIA attributes, focus management

Present this plan to the user and get approval before writing files.

Phase 5: Implement

Create these files following the patterns discovered in Phase 2:

Component TypeScript (component-name.component.ts)

@Component({
  selector: "bit-component-name",
  templateUrl: "./component-name.component.html",
  changeDetection: ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush,
  imports: [/* discovered dependencies */],
  host: {
    class: "tw-block",
  },
})

Key conventions:

  • ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush always
  • Signal-based inputs: input(), input.required<T>(), input(default, { transform: booleanAttribute })
  • Signal-based outputs: output<T>()
  • Internal state with signal() and viewChild()
  • Protected methods for template bindings, private for internal logic
  • No TypeScript enums — use Object.freeze({ ... } as const) with a same-name type alias (ADR-0025). Even for simple string unions, prefer the const object pattern for consistency.

Component template (component-name.component.html)

  • Use new Angular control flow: @if, @for, @switch
  • Avoid deprecated attributes like ngClass and ngStyle, prefer class and style.
  • All Tailwind classes use the library's prefix (check tailwind.config)
  • All user-visible strings go through {{ "key" | i18n }} or {{ "key" | i18n: param }}
  • Reuse existing components (bit-label, bitButton, bit-hint, etc.)

Barrel export (index.ts)

export { ComponentNameComponent } from "./component-name.component";

Storybook stories (component-name.stories.ts)

Every component gets stories. Follow the exact patterns from sibling components:

import { Meta, moduleMetadata, StoryObj } from "@storybook/angular";
import { I18nService } from "@bitwarden/common/platform/abstractions/i18n.service";
import { I18nMockService } from "../utils/i18n-mock.service";

export default {
  title: "Component Library/ComponentName",
  component: ComponentNameComponent,
  decorators: [
    moduleMetadata({
      imports: [/* component + dependencies */],
      providers: [
        {
          provide: I18nService,
          useFactory: () =>
            new I18nMockService({
              // All i18n keys used by the component
              // Use __$1__ for parameter placeholders
            }),
        },
      ],
    }),
  ],
  parameters: {
    design: {
      type: "figma",
      url: "/* original Figma URL */",
    },
  },
} as Meta<ComponentNameComponent>;

Include stories for:

  • Default state
  • Key variant states (if applicable)
  • Edge cases visible in the design (disabled, loading, empty, etc.)

Unit tests (component-name.component.spec.ts)

Write unit tests when the component has behavior that Storybook stories alone can't verify. Stories cover visual rendering and variant appearance — don't duplicate that. Tests should focus on:

  • Computed state and logic — e.g. a rating component rounding fractional values, a progress bar clamping percentages to 0–100, variant-to-class mappings
  • Event emission — outputs fire with the correct payload (files selected, rating changed, toast dismissed)
  • Input validation / edge cases — boundary values, empty inputs, invalid types rejected
  • Accessibility attributes — correct role, aria-label, aria-live values change with state
  • Keyboard interaction — Enter/Space triggers actions, arrow keys navigate

Skip tests for components that are purely presentational with no logic beyond displaying inputs (e.g. a simple badge or divider). Look at sibling *.spec.ts files to match the test setup patterns (TestBed configuration, imports, mock providers).

Update barrel exports

Add export * from "./component-name"; to the parent directory's index.ts, inserted alphabetically.

Phase 6: Verify in Storybook

Use Playwright MCP tools to verify the component renders correctly:

  1. Navigate to the story's iframe URL: http://localhost:6006/iframe.html?id=component-library-component-name--default&viewMode=story
  2. Take a snapshot to confirm the component rendered without errors
  3. Take a screenshot and compare it against the Figma design screenshot
  4. Test interactive behavior:
    • Click buttons and interactive elements
    • Verify correct responses (dialogs, state changes, etc.)
  5. Check the disabled story if applicable

If Storybook isn't running or Playwright isn't available, tell the user and suggest they verify manually.

Phase 7: Iterate

Present the screenshot to the user alongside the original Figma screenshot. Ask if adjustments are needed. Common refinements:

  • Token mismatches (wrong shade, spacing off)
  • Missing hover/focus states
  • Accessibility gaps
  • i18n strings that need rewording

Key principles

  • Never hardcode user-visible strings. Every string goes through I18nPipe. This includes aria-labels and other accessibility text — they need localization too. Add keys to the locale file and provide mocks in stories.
  • Reuse existing components aggressively. If the design has a button, use bitButton. If it has a label, use bit-label. Don't reimplement what exists.
  • Explore before you build. The codebase exploration step prevents most rework. Patterns vary between apps and libraries — always check the specific target directory.
  • Semantic tokens over raw values. Map every Figma color, spacing, and font size to the codebase's design token system. Raw hex values break theming.
  • Use native HTML patterns for file inputs. For file upload components, use a <label for> element pointing at a hidden <input type="file"> rather than programmatic .click(). The codebase has an AriaDisabledClickCaptureService that intercepts programmatic clicks on certain elements, causing silent failures.
  • No NgModules. All new components must be standalone (imports: [...] in the @Component decorator). Do not create *.module.ts files. The codebase is moving away from NgModules.
  • Plan before you code. The plan step catches API design issues early. It's cheaper to fix a plan than to rewrite files.

Mais skills de bitwarden

force-multiplier
bitwarden
Aplique uma intenção a muitos alvos de uma só vez — uma frota de repositórios no ecossistema Bitwarden, ou muitos projetos dentro de um monorepo — como N consistentes,…
analyzing-git-sessions
bitwarden
Analisa commits e alterações do git dentro de um período ou intervalo de commits, fornecendo resumos estruturados para revisão de código, retrospectivas, registros de trabalho ou sessões…
coordinating-cross-team-breakdown
bitwarden
Coordene a revisão e aprovação entre equipes para um Bitwarden Tech Breakdown. Use ao identificar equipes afetadas, montar a tabela de aprovação da Parte 3, buscar…
assessing-jira-issue-relevance
bitwarden
Use quando o usuário fornecer uma única chave de issue do Jira e perguntar se ela ainda é relevante, ainda é aplicável, ainda está pendente, ainda é um bug, foi corrigida ou pode…
assessing-test-coverage
bitwarden
Use ao determinar qual cobertura de teste JÁ EXISTE para uma alteração específica (um PR, chave Jira, documento Tech Breakdown, CSV do Testmo, caminhos alterados ou…
retrospecting
bitwarden
Realiza análise abrangente de sessões do Claude Code, examinando histórico do git, registros de conversas, alterações de código e coletando feedback do usuário para gerar…
reviewing-incremental-changes
bitwarden
Use esta habilidade ao revisar novamente um PR que já possui comentários ou ao responder a alterações do desenvolvedor após a revisão inicial. Aplique quando houver discussões no PR ou…
starting-breakdown
bitwarden
Sets up a new Bitwarden Tech Breakdown in the bitwarden/tech-breakdowns repo. Creates a per-breakdown folder (`<team>/<JIRA-KEY>-<short-slug>/`) containing…