wordpress-router
We need to translate the given text from English to Korean. The text describes a skill called "wordpress-router" but the instruction says not to include the name unless it appears in the source text. The name does appear in the source? Actually the source text starts with "Classify WordPress codebases..." and does not include "wordpress-router" in the provided text. The instruction says "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." So we should not add "wordpress-router" in the translation. The text is a description of the skill. We need to preserve product names like WordPress, WP-CLI, PHP, etc. Also preserve technical terms like "repo type", "plugin", "theme", "block theme", "Gutenberg blocks", "WP core", "bash/Node filesystem operations", "WP-CLI", "PHP 7.2.24+", "WordPress 6.9+". Also preserve numbers and URLs (none here). Translate the rest naturally into Korean. The text: "Classify WordPress codebases and
npx skills add https://github.com/wordpress/agent-skills --skill wordpress-routerWordPress Router
When to use
Use this skill at the start of most WordPress tasks to:
- identify what kind of WordPress codebase this is (plugin vs theme vs block theme vs WP core checkout vs full site),
- pick the right workflow and guardrails,
- delegate to the most relevant domain skill(s).
Inputs required
- Repo root (current working directory).
- The user’s intent (what they want changed) and any constraints (WP version targets, WP.com specifics, release requirements).
Procedure
- Run the project triage script:
node skills/wp-project-triage/scripts/detect_wp_project.mjs
- Read the triage output and classify:
- primary project kind(s),
- tooling available (PHP/Composer, Node, @wordpress/scripts),
- tests present (PHPUnit, Playwright, wp-env),
- any version hints.
- Route to domain workflows based on user intent + repo kind:
- For the decision tree, read:
skills/wordpress-router/references/decision-tree.md.
- For the decision tree, read:
- Apply guardrails before making changes:
- Confirm any version constraints if unclear.
- Prefer the repo’s existing tooling and conventions for builds/tests.
Verification
- Re-run the triage script if you create or restructure significant files.
- Run the repo’s lint/test/build commands that the triage output recommends (if available).
Failure modes / debugging
- If triage reports
kind: unknown, inspect:- root
composer.json,package.json,style.css,block.json,theme.json,wp-content/.
- root
- If the repo is huge, consider narrowing scanning scope or adding ignore rules to the triage script.
Escalation
- If routing is ambiguous, ask one question:
- “Is this intended to be a WordPress plugin, a theme (classic/block), or a full site repo?”