write-issue

작성자: tldraw

tldraw 저장소에서 GitHub 이슈를 작성하고 유지 관리하기 위한 참조 표준입니다. 다른 스킬이나 워크플로우가 이슈가 필요할 때 지원 지침으로 사용하세요.

npx skills add https://github.com/tldraw/tldraw --skill write-issue

Writing and maintaining GitHub issues

Standards for issues in tldraw/tldraw.

Title standards

  • Sentence case - Capitalize only the first word and proper nouns
  • No type prefixes - Use GitHub issue types, not Bug:, Feature:, [Bug], etc.
  • Imperative mood for enhancements - "Add padding option" not "Adding padding option"
  • Descriptive for bugs - Describe the symptom: "Arrow bindings break with rotated shapes"
  • Specific - Readable without opening the issue body

Good titles

  • Arrow bindings break with rotated shapes
  • Add padding option to zoomToFit method
  • Pinch zoom resets selection on Safari

Bad titles

  • Bug: arrow bug (prefix, vague)
  • [Feature] Add new feature (prefix, vague)
  • Not working (vague)

Title cleanup transformations

  1. Remove prefixes: Bug: XX
  2. Fix capitalization: Add Padding OptionAdd padding option
  3. Use imperative: Adding feature XAdd feature X
  4. Be specific: Problem[Describe the actual problem]
  5. Translate non-English titles to English

Issue types

Set via the GitHub GraphQL API after creating the issue (the --type flag is not reliably supported):

TypeUse for
BugSomething isn't working as expected
FeatureNew capability or improvement
ExampleRequest for a new SDK example
TaskInternal task or chore

Labels

Use sparingly (1-2 per issue) for metadata, not categorization.

Common labels

LabelUse for
good first issueWell-scoped issues for newcomers
More Info NeededRequires additional information
sdkAffects the tldraw SDK
dotcomRelated to tldraw.com
a11yAccessibility
performancePerformance improvement
apiAPI change

Automation labels (do not apply manually)

keep, stale, update-snapshots, publish-packages, major, minor, skip-release, deploy triggers

Issue body standards

Bug reports

  1. Clear description of what's wrong
  2. Steps to reproduce
  3. Expected vs actual behavior
  4. Environment details (browser, OS, version) when relevant
  5. Screenshots/recordings when applicable

Feature requests

  1. Problem statement - What problem does this solve?
  2. Proposed solution - How should it work?
  3. Alternatives considered
  4. Use cases

Example requests

  1. What API/pattern to demonstrate
  2. Why it's useful
  3. Suggested approach
  4. Which example category it belongs to

Agent-drafted issues (problem readback and open questions)

Issues created by the /issue skill capture the user's intent over a short interrogation, so they carry an unheaded readback paragraph beneath the verbatim description, followed by open questions and a confidence status line at the bottom:

  • Problem readback - A brief, unheaded paragraph that states the agent's interpretation of the problem, expected behavior, and scope. It should be easy for the user to correct. Keep it product-facing: no code blocks, no long implementation analysis, no file paths, no function names, no line numbers, and no fix recipes unless the user explicitly asks for them.
  • Open questions - A numbered list of the specific gaps in intent or context still worth asking the user about. Answers are written beneath each question as the user replies, and the readback is revised each round. A question prefixed with Critical: is genuinely blocking — the issue cannot be worked on until it is answered. Most issues have none. Non-critical questions the user chooses not to answer are marked _Deferred by user; not blocking implementation._.
  • Confidence line - A plain-text line at the bottom, not a section heading, such as Confidence: 84%, ready to get started. or Confidence: 42%, still need more information. It reflects whether the issue has enough of the user's intent and context to work on, not confidence in the eventual fix.

Leave the readback, open questions, and confidence line in the issue once interrogation is complete. The answered questions are a record of the discussion that produced the issue, so keep them rather than deleting them — mark questions resolved in place and keep the final readback as the issue's concise problem statement.

Triage workflow

New issues

  1. Verify sufficient information to act on
  2. Set appropriate issue type
  3. Clean up title if needed
  4. Add More Info Needed label and comment if details missing
  5. Add good first issue if appropriate

Stale issues

  1. Review if still relevant
  2. Close if no longer applicable
  3. Add keep label if should remain open
  4. Request updates if waiting on information

Important

  • Never include AI attribution unless the issue directly relates to AI tooling
  • Never use title case for descriptions - use sentence case

tldraw의 다른 스킬

write-example
tldraw
tldraw SDK 예제 앱을 위한 예제 작성. 새로운 예제를 만들거나, SDK 데모를 추가하거나, apps/examples에서 예제 코드를 작성할 때 사용합니다.
official
write-pr
tldraw
tldraw 저장소에서 풀 리퀘스트 제목과 설명을 작성하기 위한 참조 표준입니다. 다른 스킬이나 워크플로우가 필요할 때 지원 지침으로 사용됩니다...
official
write-release-notes
tldraw
tldraw SDK 릴리스를 위한 릴리스 노트 문서를 작성합니다. 새로운 릴리스 문서를 만들거나, 처음부터 릴리스 노트를 초안 작성하거나, 릴리스를 검토할 때 사용합니다.
official
write-tbp
tldraw
tldraw 기능과 구현 세부 사항에 관한 기술 블로그 포스트를 작성합니다. tldraw가 흥미로운 문제를 해결하는 방법에 대한 블로그 콘텐츠를 만들 때 사용하세요.
official
write-unit-tests
tldraw
tldraw SDK에 대한 단위 테스트 및 통합 테스트를 작성합니다. packages/editor 또는...에서 새 테스트를 만들거나, 테스트 커버리지를 추가하거나, 실패하는 테스트를 수정할 때 사용합니다.
official
clean-copy
tldraw
현재 브랜치를 깔끔하고 서사적인 품질의 git 커밋 기록을 가진 새 브랜치로 재구현합니다. 깔끔한 복사 브랜치를 만들거나 커밋을 정리하라는 요청이 있을 때 사용하세요.
official
commit-changes
tldraw
현재 변경 사항에 대한 git 커밋을 생성합니다. 커밋 요청, 커밋 생성, 커밋 메시지 생성, 또는 현재 작업 트리를 커밋하라는 요청을 받았을 때 사용합니다.
official
issue
tldraw
사용자 설명을 바탕으로 tldraw 저장소에 GitHub 이슈를 생성하고 조사합니다. 사용자가 이슈를 언급하거나, 이슈 생성을 요청하거나, 버그를 신고할 때 사용합니다.
official