studio-mock-api-tests

작성자: supabase

Supabase Studio의 컴포넌트 테스트로, MSW를 사용하여 네트워크 계층에서 API 요청을 모킹합니다. React 컴포넌트를 실행하는 컴포넌트 테스트를 작성하거나 검토할 때 사용하세요.

npx skills add https://github.com/supabase/supabase --skill studio-mock-api-tests

Studio MSW component tests

Mount a Studio component, intercept its network calls with MSW, assert what renders and what gets sent. The infrastructure is already wired up — this skill is the working template plus the gotchas.

When to use

  • The component (or any descendant it renders) calls a React Query hook or mutation that hits /platform/..., /v1/..., or another endpoint in apps/studio/data/api.d.ts.
  • You'd otherwise be tempted to write vi.mock('@/data/some-query', ...). Don't. Mock the network instead — see "Why not vi.mock" below.

If the component is purely presentational with no data fetching, you don't need MSW; render and assert directly.

The template

import { fireEvent, screen, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react'
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event'
import { mockAnimationsApi } from 'jsdom-testing-mocks'
import { HttpResponse } from 'msw'
import { describe, expect, test, vi } from 'vitest'

import { MyComponent } from './MyComponent'
import { customRender } from '@/tests/lib/custom-render'
import { addAPIMock } from '@/tests/lib/msw'

// Needed if the component renders inside a Sheet, Modal, Popover, or
// anything else built on Radix that uses Web Animations.
mockAnimationsApi()

describe('MyComponent', () => {
  test('renders rows from the API', async () => {
    addAPIMock({
      method: 'get',
      path: '/platform/organizations',
      response: () =>
        HttpResponse.json<OrganizationResponse[]>([
          {
            /* ... */
          },
        ]),
    })

    customRender(<MyComponent />)

    expect(await screen.findByText('Acme')).toBeInTheDocument()
  })
})

That's the whole pattern. Server lifecycle (listen/resetHandlers/ close) is handled by apps/studio/tests/vitestSetup.ts — handlers registered via addAPIMock are scoped to the current test.

Gotchas that will eat your afternoon

1. Path params use :slug, not {slug}

addAPIMock is typed from the OpenAPI paths, but path params are remapped to MSW's :param format. Autocomplete will guide you, but if typecheck reports the path isn't assignable, you're using the OpenAPI {slug} form.

// ❌ TypeScript error, MSW won't match
path: '/platform/organizations/{slug}/projects'

// ✅ Correct
path: '/platform/organizations/:slug/projects'

2. Use HttpResponse.json, not new HttpResponse

For success responses, always go through HttpResponse.json — even for 204/201-no-content endpoints. A raw new HttpResponse(null, { status: 201 }) returns no content-type, and openapi-fetch can hang the mutation flow, which silently breaks onSuccess callbacks.

// ❌ Mutation onSuccess silently never fires
response: () => new HttpResponse(null, { status: 201 })

// ✅ Works (pass the OpenAPI body shape explicitly — see gotcha #8)
response: () => HttpResponse.json<MyResponse>({}, { status: 201 })

3. Submit buttons in Sheets/Modals need fireEvent.click

The convention <Button form={FORM_ID} type="submit" /> (button outside the form, associated by id) doesn't reliably trigger submission under userEvent.click in jsdom. Use fireEvent.click for the submit button. Continue to use userEvent.type for inputs.

await userEvent.type(screen.getByPlaceholderText('value'), 'hello')
fireEvent.click(await screen.findByRole('button', { name: 'Save' }))

4. Profile-gated queries need a profileContext

Many hooks (useOrganizationsQuery, anything in data/projects/, anything that calls useProfile) refuse to fire until a profile is loaded. Pass one explicitly:

import type { ProfileContextType } from '@/lib/profile'

const PROFILE_CONTEXT: ProfileContextType = {
  profile: {
    id: 1,
    auth0_id: 'auth0|test',
    gotrue_id: 'gotrue-test',
    username: 'testuser',
    primary_email: 'test@example.com',
    first_name: null,
    last_name: null,
    mobile: null,
    is_alpha_user: false,
    is_sso_user: false,
    disabled_features: [],
    free_project_limit: null,
  },
  error: null,
  isLoading: false,
  isError: false,
  isSuccess: true,
}

customRender(<MyComponent />, { profileContext: PROFILE_CONTEXT })

5. useParams is globally mocked to { ref: 'default' }

You don't need to mock the Next router for project-scoped components. Just use 'default' as the project ref in your mock paths: /v1/projects/default/secrets, /platform/projects/default/.... If you need a different ref, override with routerMock.setCurrentUrl(...) (see apps/studio/tests/lib/route-mock.ts).

6. Unhandled requests fail loudly — mock every endpoint a render triggers

mswServer.listen({ onUnhandledRequest: 'error' }) is set globally. If a component (or any child it renders) fires an unmocked request, you'll see MSW errors in stderr and likely flaky behavior. Cards, lists, and details panels often fire nested queries (e.g. OrganizationCard calls useOrgProjectsInfiniteQuery) — read what the rendered subtree does and mock all of it, or stub it with vi.mock for nested components only.

7. Don't put query strings in the handler path

addAPIMock accepts ?foo=bar suffixes via TrimQueryParams, but the helper strips them before matching. MSW v2 doesn't match query params via path strings — read them inside the resolver instead:

addAPIMock({
  method: 'get',
  path: '/platform/projects',
  response: ({ request }) => {
    const limit = new URL(request.url).searchParams.get('limit')
    // ...
  },
})

8. Always pass an explicit generic to HttpResponse.json

addAPIMock's resolver is typed against the OpenAPI success body (and the standard { message: string } error envelope, exported as APIErrorBody). But MSW's HttpResponse.json uses NoInfer, so the body type doesn't narrow from context. Pass the expected shape explicitly — it doubles as a self-documenting contract assertion:

import { addAPIMock, type APIErrorBody } from '@/tests/lib/msw'

response: () => HttpResponse.json<OrganizationResponse[]>([...])
response: () =>
  HttpResponse.json<APIErrorBody>({ message: 'Boom' }, { status: 500 })

A mock that drifts from the contract (wrong envelope, missing fields, stale enum values) now fails at compile time, not at runtime. The cost is one type annotation per resolver — well worth it.

For mocks at the network boundary, also prefer createMockOrganizationResponse (returns the raw OpenAPI OrganizationResponse) over createMockOrganization (which extends with frontend-derived managed_by / partner_id that the query layer attaches). Same pattern applies to any type that's a frontend extension of an OpenAPI schema: build a createMockXResponse helper that returns the raw API shape.

Prefer asserting on UI state

MSW's own best-practices doc explicitly recommends asserting on what renders, not on whether a handler was called. The "did the form submit?" question is best answered by expect(onClose).toHaveBeenCalled() or by findByText('Saved') — not by spying on the resolver.

There's one legitimate exception: the request body itself is the contract you care about, and the server's reply doesn't reflect it back. Bulk-create endpoints (like POST /v1/projects/:ref/secrets) are the canonical case — 201 with no body, so the only way to verify the shape sent is to capture it:

const requests: Array<{ ref: string | undefined; body: unknown }> = []
addAPIMock({
  method: 'post',
  path: '/v1/projects/:ref/secrets',
  response: async ({ request, params }) => {
    requests.push({ ref: params.ref as string | undefined, body: await request.json() })
    return HttpResponse.json<CreateSecretsResponse>({}, { status: 201 })
  },
})

// ... drive the UI ...

expect(requests).toEqual([{ ref: 'default', body: [{ name: 'API_KEY', value: 'new-value' }] }])

When in doubt, assert on the UI first; reach for request capture only when the UI doesn't observably encode the contract.

Debugging an MSW test

If a request isn't being matched, wire up MSW's lifecycle events at the top of the test file (or temporarily in msw.ts):

import { mswServer } from '@/tests/lib/msw'

mswServer.events.on('request:unhandled', ({ request }) => {
  console.log('[MSW] UNHANDLED:', request.method, request.url)
})
mswServer.events.on('response:mocked', ({ request, response }) => {
  console.log('[MSW] MATCHED:', request.method, request.url, response.status)
})

request:start is already wired in msw.ts. Add request:unhandled and response:mocked locally when a test misbehaves — usually surfaces a path-param mismatch or a nested query you forgot to mock.

Why not vi.mock('@/data/...')

It bypasses the network boundary, so:

  • It hides real bugs: a renamed query key or a changed request payload passes the test, then breaks in production.
  • It doesn't exercise React Query's caching, retry, or invalidation paths — onMutate, onSuccess, and onError callbacks won't run as they do in real life. (tkdodo.eu/blog/testing-react-query)
  • It drifts independently from the OpenAPI types — handlers stay in sync, module-level mocks don't.

Reach for vi.mock only for non-network concerns: a heavy child component (e.g. a Monaco editor) you want to stub, or a common-package hook with global state.

Further reading

Codebase references

WhatWhere
Query-only example (loading, error, success)apps/studio/components/interfaces/Organization/OrgNotFound.test.tsx
Mutation example (form, payload assertion)apps/studio/components/interfaces/Functions/EdgeFunctionSecrets/EditSecretSheet.test.tsx
SQL-via-pg-meta example (POST resolver branch on query body)apps/studio/components/interfaces/Integrations/Vault/Secrets/__tests__/EditSecretModal.test.tsx
addAPIMock sourceapps/studio/tests/lib/msw.ts
customRender sourceapps/studio/tests/lib/custom-render.tsx
Global handlers + lifecycleapps/studio/tests/lib/msw-global-api-mocks.ts, apps/studio/tests/vitestSetup.ts
Related skillsstudio-testing (when to write a component test at all), studio-queries (hook conventions), vitest

supabase의 다른 스킬

studio-e2e-tests
supabase
Supabase Studio용 Playwright E2E 테스트를 작성하고 실행합니다. 요청 시 사용하세요.
pm-the-docs
supabase
Docs-PM 의사결정 지원 도구로, "Write the docs" 작성 프로세스에서 Frame 및 Shape 단계 중 대상 독자, 단계, 교차 범위 결정을 지원합니다…
studio-best-practices
supabase
Supabase Studio를 위한 React 및 TypeScript 모범 사례. Studio 컴포넌트 작성 또는 검토 시 사용 — boolean 명명, 컴포넌트 구조 등을 다룹니다.
docs-content
supabase
Supabase 콘텐츠를 apps/docs 어디에서든 작성, 편집, 구성, 검토하세요 — 가이드, 설명 자료, 튜토리얼, 문제 해결 항목, 참조 문서 등…
studio-mock-api-tests
supabase
Supabase Studio의 컴포넌트 테스트로, MSW를 사용하여 네트워크 계층에서 API 요청을 모킹합니다. React…를 실행하는 컴포넌트 테스트를 작성하거나 검토할 때 사용하세요.
studio-ui-patterns
supabase
Supabase Studio용 디자인 시스템 UI 패턴. 페이지, 양식, 테이블, 차트, 빈 상태, 네비게이션, 카드, 알림 또는 사이드…를 구축하거나 업데이트할 때 사용하세요.
react-hook-form
supabase
모노레포 어디서든 올바른 React Hook Form 사용법 — 데이터 흐름, 구독, 리셋, 더티 상태, 숫자 입력, 제어 입력 규칙. 이것을 로드하세요…
studio-queries
supabase
Supabase Studio에서 데이터 페칭을 위한 React Query 컨벤션. apps/studio/data/에서 쿼리 훅, 뮤테이션 훅, 또는 쿼리 키를 작성하거나 리뷰할 때 사용하세요—…