golang-spf13-viper

작성자: samber

Golang 설정 라이브러리로 spf13/viper 사용 — 계층적 우선순위 (플래그 > 환경변수 >

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-spf13-viper

Persona: You are a Go engineer who treats configuration as a layered system. Flag beats env beats file beats default — and you bind every key so all four layers stay reachable through one API.

Using spf13/viper for layered configuration in Go

Viper resolves configuration values from multiple sources in a fixed precedence order. It has no user-facing surface — it doesn't define commands or flags. Its job is to answer "what is the value of key X right now?" by walking its source layers from highest to lowest priority.

Official Resources:

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. For Go package docs, symbols, versions, importers, and known vulnerabilities, → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev skill (godig) — prefer it over Context7 for Go package facts. To navigate this library's usage in your own code (definitions, call sites, diagnostics), → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls skill (gopls). Context7 remains a fallback for docs not indexed on pkg.go.dev.

go get github.com/spf13/viper@latest

Viper vs. cobra

Cobra owns the command tree — subcommands, flags, arg validation, completions. Viper owns configuration resolution — it answers "what is the value of key X?" by walking its source layers. Viper has no user-facing surface; it is purely a key-value resolver. Use cobra alone for flag-only CLIs; viper alone for config-file daemons; both when you need both, binding flags at PersistentPreRunE via BindPFlag.

→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-spf13-cobra for the cobra side of this integration.

The precedence pipeline

Viper resolves a key by walking sources in this order (first set value wins):

1. explicit Set()      — viper.Set("key", val)    highest priority
2. flag                — bound pflag.Flag
3. env var             — BindEnv / AutomaticEnv
4. config file         — ReadInConfig / MergeInConfig
5. KV remote           — etcd / Consul
6. default             — viper.SetDefault("key", val)   lowest priority

This pipeline is fixed and cannot be reordered. Understanding it prevents most viper bugs: a key that "should" come from a config file may be shadowed by an env var or a flag with a default value.

Sources and config files

viper.SetConfigName("config")
viper.AddConfigPath("$HOME/.myapp")
if err := viper.ReadInConfig(); err != nil {
    var notFound *viper.ConfigFileNotFoundError
    if !errors.As(err, &notFound) {
        return fmt.Errorf("reading config: %w", err) // propagate real errors only
    }
}

ConfigFileNotFoundError must be handled gracefully — config files are usually optional. An unhandled error from a missing file crashes programs that are perfectly valid when run with only flags or env vars.

For supported formats (JSON, TOML, YAML, HCL, INI, properties), MergeInConfig, and remote KV, see sources-and-formats.md.

Env binding and key replacers

This is the highest-bug-density area in viper. All three settings must be wired together — missing any one breaks nested key resolution:

// ✓ Good — all three wired together at startup
viper.SetEnvPrefix("MYAPP")                             // prevent collisions: PORT → MYAPP_PORT
viper.SetEnvKeyReplacer(strings.NewReplacer(".", "_"))  // database.host → MYAPP_DATABASE_HOST
viper.AutomaticEnv()

// ✗ Bad — without SetEnvKeyReplacer, viper looks for MYAPP_DATABASE.HOST (dot preserved)

For BindEnv, AllowEmptyEnv, and env-vs-default interaction, see binding-and-env.md.

Flag binding (the cobra seam)

Bind cobra flags to viper in init() or PersistentPreRunE — never in RunE (config loading in PersistentPreRunE already ran before RunE, so bindings set in RunE are missed):

func init() {
    rootCmd.PersistentFlags().Int("port", 8080, "listen port")
    viper.BindPFlag("port", rootCmd.PersistentFlags().Lookup("port"))
    // viper.BindPFlags(cmd.Flags()) — bind an entire FlagSet at once
}

For AllowEmptyEnv and flag/env interaction details, see binding-and-env.md.

Unmarshaling into structs

viper.Unmarshal maps the resolved configuration into a struct using mapstructure:

type Config struct {
    Port     int `mapstructure:"port"`
    Database struct {
        MaxConn int `mapstructure:"max_conn"` // explicit tag: mapstructure won't convert underscore→camelCase
    } `mapstructure:"database"`
}
var cfg Config
viper.Unmarshal(&cfg)

Always use mapstructure tags — implicit mapping is fragile for nested structs and underscore-named fields. Prefer UnmarshalKey("database", &dbCfg) over Sub("database").Unmarshal — it avoids the nil-check Sub requires when the key is missing.

For time.Duration / net.IP / slice decoders and custom DecodeHook registration, see unmarshal.md.

Sub-trees

viper.Sub("database") returns a new *viper.Viper scoped to the prefix, or nil if the key does not exist — always nil-check before calling methods on the result. Prefer UnmarshalKey("database", &dbCfg) which avoids the nil risk entirely.

Hot reload

viper.WatchConfig()
viper.OnConfigChange(func(e fsnotify.Event) { /* re-apply changed values */ })

WatchConfig uses fsnotify and watches inodes. Editors that write atomically via rename (vim, neovim) replace the inode — the callback may not fire. Test hot-reload with echo >> config.yaml, not editor saves. For race-safe reload patterns, see watch-and-reload.md.

Test isolation

Never use the global viper in tests — state leaks across test cases. Use viper.New() per test so each instance is isolated:

v := viper.New()
v.SetConfigFile("testdata/config.yaml")
require.NoError(t, v.ReadInConfig())

For t.Setenv interactions and Reset() limitations, see testing-and-isolation.md.

Best Practices

  1. Set prefix + key replacer + AutomaticEnv together — missing any one causes nested env keys to silently not resolve (database.hostDATABASE.HOST instead of DATABASE_HOST).
  2. Handle ConfigFileNotFoundError gracefully — a missing config file should not crash a service that runs with only flags and env vars.
  3. Always use mapstructure tags on config structs — implicit mapping silently misses nested and underscore-named fields.
  4. Use viper.New() in tests, never the global — the global accumulates state across test runs; per-test instances are isolated.
  5. Bind flags before Execute() — binding in RunE is too late; cobra parses flags before RunE runs.

Common Mistakes

MistakeWhy it failsFix
AutomaticEnv without SetEnvKeyReplacerdatabase.host looks for MYAPP_DATABASE.HOST (dot preserved) — never matchesAdd SetEnvKeyReplacer(strings.NewReplacer(".", "_")) before AutomaticEnv
No mapstructure tags on struct fieldsSilently misses nested and underscore-named fieldsAdd mapstructure:"key_name" to every field
Using global viper in testsState from one test contaminates the next, causing flaky orderingCreate viper.New() per test
Missing ConfigFileNotFoundError checkMissing config file crashes a service that should run on flags/env aloneerrors.As(err, &notFound) — only propagate non-not-found errors

Further Reading

  • sources-and-formats.md — supported file formats, multi-path search, MergeInConfig, remote KV (etcd/Consul)
  • binding-and-env.md — BindEnv, AutomaticEnv, SetEnvPrefix, SetEnvKeyReplacer, AllowEmptyEnv, timing rules
  • unmarshal.md — Unmarshal, UnmarshalKey, mapstructure tags, custom DecodeHooks (Duration, IP, slice)
  • watch-and-reload.md — WatchConfig, OnConfigChange, fsnotify caveats, atomic-rename trap, race-safe patterns
  • testing-and-isolation.md — viper.New() per test, t.Setenv interactions, Reset() limitations, snapshot/restore

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-cli skill for general CLI architecture — project layout, exit codes, signal handling, cobra+viper integration
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-spf13-cobra skill for the cobra side of this integration (flag definition and binding)
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill for general Go testing patterns

If you encounter a bug or unexpected behavior in spf13/viper, open an issue at https://github.com/spf13/viper/issues.

samber의 다른 스킬

golang-code-style
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Korean, preserving the specified name "golang-code-style" and other technical terms. The instruction says to translate only the text inside <text>, and not include the name unless it appears in the source text. The name "golang-code-style" appears in the source? Actually, the source text does not contain "golang-code-style" explicitly; it's the directory item name. The instruction says "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." So we should not add it. The source text has references to other skills like "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming" etc. Those should be preserved as is. We need to translate the description of the skill. The text describes what the skill is about: Go code style conventions, line length, variable declarations, etc. And it says when to use it and what it's not for, with cross-references. We'll produce a natural Korean translation. Keep technical terms like "Go", "linter", "doc comments" as is
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Korean, preserving the name "golang-testing" if it appears. The text is a description of a skill for Go testing. The instruction says to translate only the text inside <text>, and not include the name unless it appears in the source text. The name "golang-testing" does not appear in the source text, so we don't include it. We must preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. So terms like "table-driven tests", "testify suites", "mocks", "parallel tests", "fuzzing", "fixtures", "goroutine leak detection", "goleak", "snapshot testing", "code coverage", "integration tests", "idiomatic test naming", "Go test CI", "flaky/slow tests", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify", "measurement methodology" should be kept as is or translated appropriately? The instruction says "preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers,
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
관용적인 Golang 디자인 패턴 — 함수형 옵션, 생성자, 오류 흐름 및 연쇄, 리소스 관리 및 생명주기, 정상 종료, 복원력, 아키텍처, 의존성 주입, 데이터 처리, 스트리밍 등. 아키텍처 패턴을 명시적으로 선택할 때, 함수형 옵션을 구현할 때, 생성자 API를 설계할 때, 정상 종료를 설정할 때, 복원력 패턴을 적용할 때, 또는 특정 문제에 맞는 관용적인 Go 패턴을 질문할 때 적용하세요.
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
관용적인 Golang 오류 처리 — 생성, %w를 사용한 래핑, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, 사용자 정의 오류 타입, 센티널 오류
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Golang 성능 최적화 패턴 및 방법론 - X 병목이 발생하면 Y를 적용. 할당 감소, CPU 효율성, 메모리 레이아웃, GC 튜닝, 풀링, 캐싱, 핫패스 최적화를 다룹니다. 프로파일링이나 벤치마크에서 병목이 확인되어 이를 해결할 적절한 최적화 패턴이 필요할 때 사용합니다. 또한 성능 코드 리뷰 시 개선 사항이나 빠른 성능 향상을 식별하는 데 도움이 될 벤치마크를 제안할 때 사용합니다. 측정 방법론에는 해당하지 않습니다(→...
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Golang의 보안 모범 사례와 취약점 방지. 인젝션(SQL, 명령어, XSS), 암호화, 파일 시스템 안전, 네트워크 보안, 쿠키, 비밀 관리, 메모리 안전, 로깅을 다룹니다. 보안을 위해 Go 코드를 작성, 검토 또는 감사할 때, 또는 암호화, I/O, 비밀 관리, 사용자 입력 처리, 인증과 관련된 위험한 코드 작업 시 적용하세요. 보안 도구 구성도 포함됩니다.
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Go 데이터베이스 접근에 대한 종합 가이드 — 매개변수화된 쿼리, 구조체 스캐닝, NULL 가능 컬럼, 트랜잭션, 격리 수준, SELECT FOR UPDATE, 연결 풀, 배치 처리, 컨텍스트 전파, 마이그레이션 도구. PostgreSQL, MariaDB, MySQL, SQLite와 상호작용하는 Golang 코드를 작성, 검토, 디버깅할 때 사용하거나, 데이터베이스 테스트 시, 또는 database/sql, sqlx, pgx에 대한 질문이 있을 때 사용합니다. 데이터베이스 스키마나 마이그레이션 SQL은 생성하지 않습니다.
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
Golang 프로젝트를 위한 린팅 모범 사례와 golangci-lint 설정 — 린터 실행, .golangci.yml 구성, nolint 지시어로 경고 억제, 린트 출력 해석, 린터 선택. golangci-lint를 구성할 때, 린트 경고나 nolint 억제에 대해 질문할 때, 코드 품질 도구를 설정할 때, 또는 린터를 선택할 때 사용합니다. 또한 사용자가 golangci-lint, go vet, staticcheck, revive를 언급할 때 사용합니다.
developmentcode-reviewtesting