golang-samber-slog

작성자: samber

Golang용 구조화된 로깅 확장으로, samber/slog-**** 패키지를 사용합니다 — 멀티 핸들러 파이프라인(slog-multi), 로그 샘플링(slog-sampling), 속성 포맷팅(slog-formatter), HTTP 미들웨어(slog-fiber, slog-gin, slog-chi, slog-echo), 백엔드 라우팅(slog-datadog, slog-sentry, slog-loki, slog-syslog, slog-logstash, slog-graylog...)을 포함합니다. slog를 사용하거나 도입할 때, 또는 코드베이스가 이미 github.com/samber/slog-* 패키지를 임포트하고 있을 때 적용하세요.

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-samber-slog

Persona: You are a Go logging architect. You design log pipelines where every record flows through the right handlers — sampling drops noise early, formatters strip PII before records leave the process, and routers send errors to Sentry while info goes to Loki.

samber/slog-**** — Structured Logging Pipeline for Go

20+ composable slog.Handler packages for Go 1.21+. Three core pipeline libraries plus HTTP middlewares and backend sinks that all implement the standard slog.Handler interface.

Official resources:

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. Context7 can help as a discoverability platform.

The Pipeline Model

Every samber/slog pipeline follows a canonical ordering. Records flow left to right — place sampling first to drop early and avoid wasting CPU on records that never reach a sink.

record → [Sampling] → [Pipe: trace/PII] → [Router] → [Sinks]

Order matters: sampling before formatting saves CPU. Formatting before routing ensures all sinks receive clean attributes. Reversing this wastes work on records that get dropped.

Core Libraries

LibraryPurposeKey constructors
slog-multiHandler compositionFanout, Router, FirstMatch, Failover, Pool, Pipe
slog-samplingThroughput controlUniformSamplingOption, ThresholdSamplingOption, AbsoluteSamplingOption, CustomSamplingOption
slog-formatterAttribute transformsPIIFormatter, ErrorFormatter, FormatByType[T], FormatByKey, FlattenFormatterMiddleware

slog-multi — Handler Composition

Six composition patterns, each for a different routing need:

PatternBehaviorLatency impact
Fanout(handlers...)Broadcast to all handlers sequentiallySum of all handler latencies
Router().Add(h, predicate).Handler()Route to ALL matching handlersSum of matching handlers
Router().Add(...).FirstMatch().Handler()Route to FIRST match onlySingle handler latency
Failover()(handlers...)Try sequentially until one succeedsPrimary handler latency (happy path)
Pool()(handlers...)Load-balance: sends each record to ONE handlerSingle handler latency
Pipe(middlewares...).Handler(sink)Middleware chain before sinkMiddleware overhead + sink
// Route errors to Sentry, all logs to stdout
logger := slog.New(
    slogmulti.Router().
        Add(sentryHandler, slogmulti.LevelIs(slog.LevelError)).
        Add(slog.NewJSONHandler(os.Stdout, nil)).
        Handler(),
)

Built-in predicates: LevelIs, LevelIsNot, MessageIs, MessageIsNot, MessageContains, MessageNotContains, AttrValueIs, AttrKindIs.

For full code examples of every pattern, see Pipeline Patterns.

slog-sampling — Throughput Control

StrategyBehaviorBest for
UniformDrop fixed % of all recordsDev/staging noise reduction
ThresholdLog first N per interval, then sample at rate RProduction — preserves initial visibility
AbsoluteCap at N records per interval globallyHard cost control
CustomUser function returns sample rate per recordLevel-aware or time-aware rules

Sampling MUST be the outermost handler in the pipeline — placing it after formatting wastes CPU on records that get dropped.

// Threshold: log first 10 per 5s, then 10% — errors always pass through via Router
logger := slog.New(
    slogmulti.
        Pipe(slogsampling.ThresholdSamplingOption{
            Tick: 5 * time.Second, Threshold: 10, Rate: 0.1,
        }.NewMiddleware()).
        Handler(innerHandler),
)

Matchers group similar records for deduplication: MatchByLevel(), MatchByMessage(), MatchByLevelAndMessage() (default), MatchBySource(), MatchByAttribute(groups, key).

For strategy comparison and configuration details, see Sampling Strategies.

slog-formatter — Attribute Transformation

Apply as a Pipe middleware so all downstream handlers receive clean attributes.

logger := slog.New(
    slogmulti.Pipe(slogformatter.NewFormatterMiddleware(
        slogformatter.PIIFormatter("user"),          // mask PII fields
        slogformatter.ErrorFormatter("error"),       // structured error info
        slogformatter.IPAddressFormatter("client"),  // mask IP addresses
    )).Handler(slog.NewJSONHandler(os.Stdout, nil)),
)

Key formatters: PIIFormatter, ErrorFormatter, TimeFormatter, UnixTimestampFormatter, IPAddressFormatter, HTTPRequestFormatter, HTTPResponseFormatter. Generic formatters: FormatByType[T], FormatByKey, FormatByKind, FormatByGroup, FormatByGroupKey. Flatten nested attributes with FlattenFormatterMiddleware.

HTTP Middlewares

Consistent pattern across frameworks: router.Use(slogXXX.New(logger)).

Available: slog-gin, slog-echo, slog-fiber, slog-chi, slog-http (net/http).

All share a Config struct with: DefaultLevel, ClientErrorLevel, ServerErrorLevel, WithRequestBody, WithResponseBody, WithUserAgent, WithRequestID, WithTraceID, WithSpanID, Filters.

// Gin with filters — skip health checks
router.Use(sloggin.NewWithConfig(logger, sloggin.Config{
    DefaultLevel:     slog.LevelInfo,
    ClientErrorLevel: slog.LevelWarn,
    ServerErrorLevel: slog.LevelError,
    WithRequestBody:  true,
    Filters: []sloggin.Filter{
        sloggin.IgnorePath("/health", "/metrics"),
    },
}))

For framework-specific setup, see HTTP Middlewares.

Backend Sinks

All follow the Option{}.NewXxxHandler() constructor pattern.

CategoryPackages
Cloudslog-datadog, slog-sentry, slog-loki, slog-graylog
Messagingslog-kafka, slog-fluentd, slog-logstash, slog-nats
Notificationslog-slack, slog-telegram, slog-webhook
Storageslog-parquet
Bridgesslog-zap, slog-zerolog, slog-logrus

Batch handlers require graceful shutdownslog-datadog, slog-loki, slog-kafka, and slog-parquet buffer records internally. Flush on shutdown (e.g., handler.Stop(ctx) for Datadog, lokiClient.Stop() for Loki, writer.Close() for Kafka) or buffered logs are lost.

For configuration examples and shutdown patterns, see Backend Handlers.

Common Mistakes

MistakeWhy it failsFix
Sampling after formattingWastes CPU formatting records that get droppedPlace sampling as outermost handler
Fanout to many synchronous handlersBlocks caller — latency is sum of all handlersUse Pool() for concurrent dispatch
Missing shutdown flush on batch handlersBuffered logs lost on shutdowndefer handler.Stop(ctx) (Datadog), defer lokiClient.Stop() (Loki), defer writer.Close() (Kafka)
Router without default/catch-all handlerUnmatched records silently droppedAdd a handler with no predicate as catch-all
AttrFromContext without HTTP middlewareContext has no request attributes to extractInstall slog-gin/echo/fiber/chi middleware first
Using Pipe with no middlewareNo-op wrapper adding per-record overheadRemove Pipe() if no middleware needed

Performance Warnings

  • Fanout latency = sum of all handler latencies (sequential). With 5 handlers at 10ms each, every log call costs 50ms. Use Pool() to reduce to max(latencies)
  • Pipe middleware adds per-record function call overhead — keep chains short (2-4 middlewares)
  • slog-formatter processes attributes sequentially — many formatters compound. For hot-path attribute formatting, prefer implementing slog.LogValuer on your types instead
  • Benchmark your pipeline with go test -bench before production deployment

Diagnose: measure per-record allocation and latency of your pipeline and identify which handler in the chain allocates most.

Best Practices

  1. Sample first, format second, route last — this canonical ordering minimizes wasted work and ensures all sinks see clean data
  2. Use Pipe for cross-cutting concerns — trace ID injection and PII scrubbing belong in middleware, not per-handler logic
  3. Test pipelines with slogmulti.NewHandleInlineHandler — assert on records reaching each stage without real sinks
  4. Use AttrFromContext to propagate request-scoped attributes from HTTP middleware to all handlers
  5. Prefer Router over Fanout when handlers need different record subsets — Router evaluates predicates and skips non-matching handlers

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-observability skill for slog fundamentals (levels, context, handler setup, migration)
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-error-handling skill for the log-or-return rule
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-security skill for PII handling in logs
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops skill for structured error context with samber/oops

If you encounter a bug or unexpected behavior in any samber/slog-* package, open an issue at the relevant repository (e.g., slog-multi/issues, slog-sampling/issues).

samber의 다른 스킬

golang-code-style
samber
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI, or debugging flaky/slow tests. For testify-specific APIs see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify`; for measurement methodology see...
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
관용적인 Golang 디자인 패턴 — 함수형 옵션, 생성자, 오류 흐름 및 연쇄, 리소스 관리 및 생명주기, 정상 종료, 복원력, 아키텍처, 의존성 주입, 데이터 처리, 스트리밍 등. 아키텍처 패턴을 명시적으로 선택할 때, 함수형 옵션을 구현할 때, 생성자 API를 설계할 때, 정상 종료를 설정할 때, 복원력 패턴을 적용할 때, 또는 특정 문제에 맞는 관용적인 Go 패턴을 질문할 때 적용하세요.
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
Idiomatic Golang error handling — creation, wrapping with %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, custom error types, sentinel errors, panic/recover, the single handling rule, structured logging with slog, HTTP request logging middleware, and samber/oops for production errors. Built to make logs usable at scale with log aggregation 3rd-party tools. Apply when creating, wrapping, inspecting, or logging errors in Go code. For samber/oops specifics → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops`...
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Golang 성능 최적화 패턴 및 방법론 - X 병목이 발생하면 Y를 적용. 할당 감소, CPU 효율성, 메모리 레이아웃, GC 튜닝, 풀링, 캐싱, 핫패스 최적화를 다룹니다. 프로파일링이나 벤치마크에서 병목이 확인되어 이를 해결할 적절한 최적화 패턴이 필요할 때 사용합니다. 또한 성능 코드 리뷰 시 개선 사항이나 빠른 성능 향상을 식별하는 데 도움이 될 벤치마크를 제안할 때 사용합니다. 측정 방법론에는 해당하지 않습니다(→...
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Golang의 보안 모범 사례와 취약점 방지. 인젝션(SQL, 명령어, XSS), 암호화, 파일 시스템 안전, 네트워크 보안, 쿠키, 비밀 관리, 메모리 안전, 로깅을 다룹니다. 보안을 위해 Go 코드를 작성, 검토 또는 감사할 때, 또는 암호화, I/O, 비밀 관리, 사용자 입력 처리, 인증과 관련된 위험한 코드 작업 시 적용하세요. 보안 도구 구성도 포함됩니다.
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Go 데이터베이스 접근에 대한 종합 가이드 — 매개변수화된 쿼리, 구조체 스캐닝, NULL 가능 컬럼, 트랜잭션, 격리 수준, SELECT FOR UPDATE, 연결 풀, 배치 처리, 컨텍스트 전파, 마이그레이션 도구. PostgreSQL, MariaDB, MySQL, SQLite와 상호작용하는 Golang 코드를 작성, 검토, 디버깅할 때 사용하거나, 데이터베이스 테스트 시, 또는 database/sql, sqlx, pgx에 대한 질문이 있을 때 사용합니다. 데이터베이스 스키마나 마이그레이션 SQL은 생성하지 않습니다.
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
Golang 프로젝트를 위한 린팅 모범 사례와 golangci-lint 설정 — 린터 실행, .golangci.yml 구성, nolint 지시어로 경고 억제, 린트 출력 해석, 린터 선택. golangci-lint를 구성할 때, 린트 경고나 nolint 억제에 대해 질문할 때, 코드 품질 도구를 설정할 때, 또는 린터를 선택할 때 사용합니다. 또한 사용자가 golangci-lint, go vet, staticcheck, revive를 언급할 때 사용합니다.
developmentcode-reviewtesting