golang-grpc

작성자: samber

gRPC 사용 지침, protobuf 구성, Golang 마이크로서비스를 위한 프로덕션 준비 패턴을 제공합니다. gRPC 서버/클라이언트 구현, 검토, 디버깅, proto 파일 작성, 인터셉터 설정, 상태 코드로 gRPC 오류 처리, TLS/mTLS 구성, bufconn으로 테스트, 스트리밍 RPC 작업 시 사용하세요.

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-grpc

Persona: You are a Go distributed systems engineer. You design gRPC services for correctness and operability — proper status codes, deadlines, interceptors, and graceful shutdown matter as much as the happy path.

Modes:

  • Build mode — implementing a new gRPC server or client from scratch.
  • Review mode — auditing existing gRPC code for correctness, security, and operability issues.

Dependencies:

  • protoc: brew install protobuf
  • protoc-gen-go: go install google.golang.org/protobuf/cmd/protoc-gen-go@latest
  • protoc-gen-go-grpc: go install google.golang.org/grpc/cmd/protoc-gen-go-grpc@latest

Go gRPC Best Practices

Treat gRPC as a pure transport layer — keep it separate from business logic. The official Go implementation is google.golang.org/grpc.

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. Context7 can help as a discoverability platform.

Quick Reference

ConcernPackage / Tool
Service definitionprotoc or buf with .proto files
Code generationprotoc-gen-go, protoc-gen-go-grpc
Error handlinggoogle.golang.org/grpc/status with codes
Rich error detailsgoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc/errdetails
Interceptorsgrpc.ChainUnaryInterceptor, grpc.ChainStreamInterceptor
Middleware ecosystemgithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-middleware
Testinggoogle.golang.org/grpc/test/bufconn
TLS / mTLSgoogle.golang.org/grpc/credentials
Health checksgoogle.golang.org/grpc/health

Proto File Organization

Organize by domain with versioned directories (proto/user/v1/). Always use Request/Response wrapper messages — bare types like string cannot have fields added later. Generate with buf generate or protoc.

Proto & code generation reference

Server Implementation

  • Implement health check service (grpc_health_v1) — Kubernetes probes need it to determine readiness
  • Use interceptors for cross-cutting concerns (logging, auth, recovery) — keeps business logic clean
  • Use GracefulStop() with a timeout fallback to Stop() — drains in-flight RPCs while preventing hangs
  • Disable reflection in production — it exposes your full API surface
srv := grpc.NewServer(
    grpc.ChainUnaryInterceptor(loggingInterceptor, recoveryInterceptor),
)
pb.RegisterUserServiceServer(srv, svc)
healthpb.RegisterHealthServer(srv, health.NewServer())

go srv.Serve(lis)

// On shutdown signal:
stopped := make(chan struct{})
go func() { srv.GracefulStop(); close(stopped) }()
select {
case <-stopped:
case <-time.After(15 * time.Second):
    srv.Stop()
}

Interceptor Pattern

func loggingInterceptor(ctx context.Context, req any, info *grpc.UnaryServerInfo, handler grpc.UnaryHandler) (any, error) {
    start := time.Now()
    resp, err := handler(ctx, req)
    log.Printf("method=%s duration=%s code=%s", info.FullMethod, time.Since(start), status.Code(err))
    return resp, err
}

Client Implementation

  • Reuse connections — gRPC multiplexes RPCs on a single HTTP/2 connection; one-per-request wastes TCP/TLS handshakes
  • Set deadlines on every call (context.WithTimeout) — without one, a slow upstream hangs goroutines indefinitely
  • Use round_robin with headless Kubernetes services via dns:/// scheme
  • Pass metadata (auth tokens, trace IDs) via metadata.NewOutgoingContext
conn, err := grpc.NewClient("dns:///user-service:50051",
    grpc.WithTransportCredentials(creds),
    grpc.WithDefaultServiceConfig(`{
        "loadBalancingPolicy": "round_robin",
        "methodConfig": [{
            "name": [{"service": ""}],
            "timeout": "5s",
            "retryPolicy": {
                "maxAttempts": 3,
                "initialBackoff": "0.1s",
                "maxBackoff": "1s",
                "backoffMultiplier": 2,
                "retryableStatusCodes": ["UNAVAILABLE"]
            }
        }]
    }`),
)
client := pb.NewUserServiceClient(conn)

Error Handling

Always return gRPC errors using status.Error with a specific code — a raw error becomes codes.Unknown, telling the client nothing actionable. Clients use codes to decide retry vs fail-fast vs degrade.

CodeWhen to Use
InvalidArgumentMalformed input (missing field, bad format)
NotFoundEntity does not exist
AlreadyExistsCreate failed, entity exists
PermissionDeniedCaller lacks permission
UnauthenticatedMissing or invalid token
FailedPreconditionSystem not in required state
ResourceExhaustedRate limit or quota exceeded
UnavailableTransient issue, safe to retry
InternalUnexpected bug
DeadlineExceededTimeout
// ✗ Bad — caller gets codes.Unknown, can't decide whether to retry
return nil, fmt.Errorf("user not found")

// ✓ Good — specific code lets clients act appropriately
if errors.Is(err, ErrNotFound) {
    return nil, status.Errorf(codes.NotFound, "user %q not found", req.UserId)
}
return nil, status.Errorf(codes.Internal, "lookup failed: %v", err)

For field-level validation errors, attach errdetails.BadRequest via status.WithDetails.

Streaming

PatternUse Case
Server streamingServer sends a sequence (log tailing, result sets)
Client streamingClient sends a sequence, server responds once (file upload, batch)
BidirectionalBoth send independently (chat, real-time sync)

Prefer streaming over large single messages — avoids per-message size limits and lowers memory pressure.

func (s *server) ListUsers(req *pb.ListUsersRequest, stream pb.UserService_ListUsersServer) error {
    for _, u := range users {
        if err := stream.Send(u); err != nil {
            return err
        }
    }
    return nil
}

Testing

Use bufconn for in-memory connections that exercise the full gRPC stack (serialization, interceptors, metadata) without network overhead. Always test that error scenarios return the expected gRPC status codes.

Testing patterns and examples

Security

  • TLS MUST be enabled in production — credentials travel in metadata
  • For service-to-service auth, use mTLS or delegate to a service mesh (Istio, Linkerd)
  • For user auth, implement credentials.PerRPCCredentials and validate tokens in an auth interceptor
  • Reflection SHOULD be disabled in production to prevent API discovery

Performance

SettingPurposeTypical Value
keepalive.ServerParameters.TimePing interval for idle connections30s
keepalive.ServerParameters.TimeoutPing ack timeout10s
grpc.MaxRecvMsgSizeOverride 4 MB default for large payloads16 MB
Connection poolingMultiple conns for high-load streaming4 connections

Most services do not need connection pooling — profile before adding complexity.

Common Mistakes

MistakeFix
Returning raw errorBecomes codes.Unknown — client can't decide whether to retry. Use status.Errorf with a specific code
No deadline on client callsSlow upstream hangs indefinitely. Always context.WithTimeout
New connection per requestWastes TCP/TLS handshakes. Create once, reuse — HTTP/2 multiplexes RPCs
Reflection enabled in productionLets attackers enumerate every method. Enable only in dev/staging
codes.Internal for all errorsWrong codes break client retry logic. Unavailable triggers retry; InvalidArgument does not
Bare types as RPC argumentsCan't add fields to string. Wrapper messages allow backwards-compatible evolution
Missing health check serviceKubernetes can't determine readiness, kills pods during deployments
Ignoring context cancellationLong operations continue after caller gave up. Check ctx.Err()

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-context skill for deadline and cancellation patterns
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-error-handling skill for gRPC error to Go error mapping
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-observability skill for gRPC interceptors (logging, tracing, metrics)
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill for gRPC testing with bufconn

samber의 다른 스킬

golang-code-style
samber
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI, or debugging flaky/slow tests. For testify-specific APIs see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify`; for measurement methodology see...
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
관용적인 Golang 디자인 패턴 — 함수형 옵션, 생성자, 오류 흐름 및 연쇄, 리소스 관리 및 생명주기, 정상 종료, 복원력, 아키텍처, 의존성 주입, 데이터 처리, 스트리밍 등. 아키텍처 패턴을 명시적으로 선택할 때, 함수형 옵션을 구현할 때, 생성자 API를 설계할 때, 정상 종료를 설정할 때, 복원력 패턴을 적용할 때, 또는 특정 문제에 맞는 관용적인 Go 패턴을 질문할 때 적용하세요.
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
Idiomatic Golang error handling — creation, wrapping with %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, custom error types, sentinel errors, panic/recover, the single handling rule, structured logging with slog, HTTP request logging middleware, and samber/oops for production errors. Built to make logs usable at scale with log aggregation 3rd-party tools. Apply when creating, wrapping, inspecting, or logging errors in Go code. For samber/oops specifics → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops`...
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Golang 성능 최적화 패턴 및 방법론 - X 병목이 발생하면 Y를 적용. 할당 감소, CPU 효율성, 메모리 레이아웃, GC 튜닝, 풀링, 캐싱, 핫패스 최적화를 다룹니다. 프로파일링이나 벤치마크에서 병목이 확인되어 이를 해결할 적절한 최적화 패턴이 필요할 때 사용합니다. 또한 성능 코드 리뷰 시 개선 사항이나 빠른 성능 향상을 식별하는 데 도움이 될 벤치마크를 제안할 때 사용합니다. 측정 방법론에는 해당하지 않습니다(→...
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Golang의 보안 모범 사례와 취약점 방지. 인젝션(SQL, 명령어, XSS), 암호화, 파일 시스템 안전, 네트워크 보안, 쿠키, 비밀 관리, 메모리 안전, 로깅을 다룹니다. 보안을 위해 Go 코드를 작성, 검토 또는 감사할 때, 또는 암호화, I/O, 비밀 관리, 사용자 입력 처리, 인증과 관련된 위험한 코드 작업 시 적용하세요. 보안 도구 구성도 포함됩니다.
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Go 데이터베이스 접근에 대한 종합 가이드 — 매개변수화된 쿼리, 구조체 스캐닝, NULL 가능 컬럼, 트랜잭션, 격리 수준, SELECT FOR UPDATE, 연결 풀, 배치 처리, 컨텍스트 전파, 마이그레이션 도구. PostgreSQL, MariaDB, MySQL, SQLite와 상호작용하는 Golang 코드를 작성, 검토, 디버깅할 때 사용하거나, 데이터베이스 테스트 시, 또는 database/sql, sqlx, pgx에 대한 질문이 있을 때 사용합니다. 데이터베이스 스키마나 마이그레이션 SQL은 생성하지 않습니다.
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
Golang 프로젝트를 위한 린팅 모범 사례와 golangci-lint 설정 — 린터 실행, .golangci.yml 구성, nolint 지시어로 경고 억제, 린트 출력 해석, 린터 선택. golangci-lint를 구성할 때, 린트 경고나 nolint 억제에 대해 질문할 때, 코드 품질 도구를 설정할 때, 또는 린터를 선택할 때 사용합니다. 또한 사용자가 golangci-lint, go vet, staticcheck, revive를 언급할 때 사용합니다.
developmentcode-reviewtesting