writing-beats

작성자: mattpocock

기사를 비트의 여정으로 구성하되, 선택지형 어드벤처 스타일로 만듭니다. 사용자가 원자료에서 시작 비트를 고르면, 당신은 그 비트만 작성한 후 다음에 어디로 방향을 전환할지 선택지를 제시합니다. 비트별로 이 과정을 반복하여 기사가 자연스러운 끝에 도달할 때까지 진행합니다. 사용자가 원자료를 가지고 있고, 이를 논증이 아닌 서사로 구성하고자 할 때 사용하세요.

npx skills add https://github.com/mattpocock/skills --skill writing-beats

The user has passed (or will pass) a markdown file of raw material. This is exploit: the exploring is done, the pile is fixed — commit to a path through it and mine the pile to fill each beat.

If the user did not say where to save the article, ask once and remember the path.

Then run a beat-by-beat journey, choose-your-own-adventure style:

  1. Establish the prerequisites. Before any beats, settle with the user what the audience already knows walking in — the concepts that are grounded from the start. Everything else must be grounded by a beat before a later beat can use it. See Grounding.
  2. Write 2–3 candidate starting beats, drawn from the raw material. Each is a different entry point into the article. Each may only lean on grounded concepts; note what new concepts each one grounds. Show the user the beats before writing to the article file. The user picks one. Preview what beats that pick unlocks — as if the user is seeing a little way down the path.
  3. Once the user picks a starting beat, write only that beat to the article file. A beat may be one sentence or several paragraphs — whatever that beat naturally is. Stop there.
  4. Re-read the article file from disk. Then offer 2–3 candidate next beats — different directions the journey could pivot to from where the article now stands. Each must be reachable from the current grounded set; note what each one grounds.
  5. Loop steps 3–5 until the article reaches a natural end.

Grounding

Every concept has to be grounded before a beat can lean on it: the audience either walked in knowing it or met it in an earlier beat. A beat that reaches for an ungrounded concept loses the reader — that is the one move the journey can't make. The unit is the concept, not the word for it: a beat can lean on an idea the reader lacks even with no jargon in sight. Where a concept has a name — a term — grounding it means landing the idea and the term together.

A concept gets grounded one of two ways:

  • Prerequisite — grounded before the first beat. The audience brings it. Fixed at the start.
  • Introduced — a beat establishes it, and from then on it's grounded for every later beat.

So each beat does two jobs: it requires concepts that are already grounded, and it grounds new ones. Keep a running list of what's grounded so far, and update it each time a beat lands.

This is what shapes the choose-your-own-adventure. A candidate beat is only reachable if everything it requires is already grounded; picking a beat that grounds concept X unlocks every beat that was waiting on X. When you offer next beats, they must all be reachable from the current grounded set — and say what each one grounds, so the user can see which paths it opens.

The big lever is what you make a prerequisite versus what you ground inside the piece. Demand too much up front and you shut out readers who don't have it; ground too much inside and the early beats drown in definitions. Settle this with the user when you establish prerequisites, and revisit it whenever a tempting beat turns out to require a concept nothing has grounded yet — the fix is either a grounding beat before it, or promoting the concept to a prerequisite.

What is a beat

A beat is one move in the journey. It does one thing — sets a scene, lands a point, asks a question, drops an aside, twists the angle. Then it stops, leaving the reader at a place where the next beat can pivot.

A beat is sized by what it needs:

  • A single sentence if that's all the move is ("And then nothing happened for three weeks.").
  • A short paragraph if the move needs setup.
  • Multiple paragraphs if the beat is a self-contained vignette, argument, or example.

If a "beat" needs five paragraphs and three subheadings, it's not a beat — it's two beats glued together. Split it.

Pulling from the pile

Pull material from the raw pile to populate each beat. You can paraphrase, split, recombine, or quote. The pile is a quarry.

Ending the journey

The article ends when the journey is complete — not when the pile is empty. Most piles will have leftover fragments that don't make it in. That is fine; that is the point of having more raw material than you need.

Writing rhythm

  • Append one beat at a time. Never write ahead.
  • Re-read the article file from disk before every write. Preserve user edits absolutely.
  • If the user edits a previous beat substantially, let it change what comes next.
  • If the user says "rewrite that beat" or "go back and try a different beat 3", do it — edit in place, leave the rest alone.

mattpocock의 다른 스킬

improve-codebase-architecture
mattpocock
코드베이스에서 심화 개선 기회를 찾되, CONTEXT.md의 도메인 언어와 docs/adr/의 결정 사항을 참고합니다. 사용자가 아키텍처를 개선하거나, 리팩토링 기회를 찾거나, 강하게 결합된 모듈을 통합하거나, 코드베이스를 더 테스트 가능하고 AI가 탐색하기 쉽게 만들고자 할 때 사용합니다.
developmentcode-reviewapi
tdd
mattpocock
레드-그린-리팩터 루프를 사용한 테스트 주도 개발. 사용자가 TDD로 기능을 구축하거나 버그를 수정하려 할 때, "레드-그린-리팩터"를 언급할 때, 통합 테스트를 원할 때, 또는 테스트 우선 개발을 요청할 때 사용합니다.
developmenttesting
handoff
mattpocock
현재 대화를 다른 에이전트가 이어받을 수 있도록 핸드오프 문서로 압축합니다.
communicationproject-managementdocument
prototype
mattpocock
디자인을 확정하기 전에 일회용 프로토타입을 만들어 검토합니다. 상태나 비즈니스 로직을 확인할 수 있는 실행 가능한 터미널 앱과, 하나의 경로에서 전환 가능한 여러 개의 완전히 다른 UI 변형이라는 두 가지 분기로 나뉩니다. 사용자가 프로토타입을 만들고, 데이터 모델이나 상태 머신을 검증하며, UI를 목업하고, 디자인 옵션을 탐색하려 하거나, "이걸 프로토타입으로 만들어 봐", "한번 가지고 놀게 해줘", "몇 가지 디자인을 시도해 봐"라고 말할 때 사용합니다.
developmentdesigncreative
triage
mattpocock
트라이지 역할에 의해 구동되는 상태 머신을 통해 이슈를 분류합니다. 사용자가 이슈를 생성하거나, 이슈를 분류하고, 들어오는 버그나 기능 요청을 검토하고, AFK 에이전트를 위해 이슈를 준비하거나, 이슈 워크플로를 관리하려는 경우 사용합니다.
developmentproject-managementcommunication
obsidian-vault
mattpocock
Obsidian 볼트에서 위키링크와 인덱스 노트를 사용하여 노트를 검색, 생성 및 관리합니다. 사용자가 Obsidian에서 노트를 찾거나, 생성하거나, 정리하려 할 때 사용하세요.
productivitydocument
edit-article
mattpocock
기사 초안의 섹션을 재구성하고, 명확성을 높이며, 문장을 간결하게 다듬어 편집하고 개선합니다. 사용자가 기사 초안을 편집, 수정 또는 개선하려 할 때 사용하세요.
documentcreative
writing-great-skills
mattpocock
스킬을 잘 작성하고 편집하기 위한 참고 자료 — 스킬을 예측 가능하게 만드는 어휘와 원칙.
documentdevelopment