to-tickets

작성자: mattpocock

계획, 명세서 또는 현재 대화를 일련의 트레이서-불릿 티켓으로 나누고, 각 티켓은 차단 에지를 선언하며 구성된 트래커에 게시됩니다. 에지는 로컬에서 티켓당 하나의 파일에 텍스트로 저장되거나 실제 트래커에서 기본 차단 링크로 저장됩니다.

npx skills add https://github.com/mattpocock/skills --skill to-tickets

To Tickets

Break a plan, spec, or conversation into a set of tickets — tracer-bullet vertical slices, each declaring the tickets that block it.

The issue tracker and triage label vocabulary should have been provided to you — run /setup-matt-pocock-skills if not.

Process

1. Gather context

Work from whatever is already in the conversation context. If the user passes a reference (a spec path, an issue number or URL) as an argument, fetch it and read its full body and comments.

2. Explore the codebase (optional)

If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current state of the code. Ticket titles and descriptions should use the project's domain glossary vocabulary, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.

Look for opportunities to prefactor the code to make the implementation easier. "Make the change easy, then make the easy change."

3. Draft vertical slices

Break the work into tracer bullet tickets.

  • Each slice cuts a narrow but COMPLETE path through every layer (schema, API, UI, tests) — vertical, NOT a horizontal slice of one layer
  • A completed slice is demoable or verifiable on its own
  • Each slice is sized to fit in a single fresh context window
  • Any prefactoring should be done first

Give each ticket its blocking edges — the other tickets that must complete before it can start. A ticket with no blockers can start immediately.

Wide refactors are the exception to vertical slicing. A wide refactor is one mechanical change — rename a column, retype a shared symbol — whose blast radius fans across the whole codebase, so a single edit breaks thousands of call sites at once and no vertical slice can land green. Don't force it into a tracer bullet; sequence it as expand–contract. First expand: add the new form beside the old so nothing breaks. Then migrate the call sites over in batches sized by blast radius (per package, per directory), each batch its own ticket blocked by the expand, keeping CI green batch to batch because the old form still exists. Finally contract: delete the old form once no caller remains, in a ticket blocked by every migrate batch. When even the batches can't stay green alone, keep the sequence but let them share an integration branch that all block a final integrate-and-verify ticket — green is promised only there.

4. Quiz the user

Present the proposed breakdown as a numbered list. For each ticket, show:

  • Title: short descriptive name
  • Blocked by: which other tickets (if any) must complete first
  • What it delivers: the end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work

Ask the user:

  • Does the granularity feel right? (too coarse / too fine)
  • Are the blocking edges correct — does each ticket only depend on tickets that genuinely gate it?
  • Should any tickets be merged or split further?

Iterate until the user approves the breakdown.

5. Publish the tickets to the configured tracker

Publish the approved tickets. How depends on the tracker /setup-matt-pocock-skills configured — the tickets are the same either way, only the shape of the blocking edges changes:

  • Local files → write one file per ticket under .scratch/<feature-slug>/issues/<NN>-<slug>.md, numbered from 01 in dependency order (blockers first). Each file's "Blocked by" lists the numbers/titles it depends on. Use the per-ticket file template below — one ticket per file, never a single combined file.
  • A real issue tracker (GitHub, Linear, …) → publish one issue per ticket in dependency order (blockers first) so each ticket's blocking edges can reference real identifiers. Use the platform's native blocking / sub-issue relationship where it has one; otherwise set each ticket's "Blocked by" to the blocking issues. Apply the ready-for-agent triage label unless instructed otherwise — the tickets are agent-grabbable by construction.

Work the frontier: any ticket whose blockers are all done. For a purely linear chain that means top to bottom.

Do NOT close or modify any parent issue.

What to build: the end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work, from the user's perspective — not a layer-by-layer implementation list.

Blocked by: the numbers/titles of the tickets that gate this one, or "None — can start immediately".

Status: ready-for-agent

  • Acceptance criterion 1
  • Acceptance criterion 2

Parent

A reference to the parent issue on the tracker (if the source was an existing issue, otherwise omit this section).

What to build

The end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work, from the user's perspective — not layer-by-layer implementation.

Acceptance criteria

  • Criterion 1
  • Criterion 2

Blocked by

  • A reference to each blocking ticket, or "None — can start immediately".

In either form, avoid specific file paths or code snippets — they go stale fast. Exception: if a prototype produced a snippet that encodes a decision more precisely than prose can (state machine, reducer, schema, type shape), inline it and note briefly that it came from a prototype. Trim to the decision-rich parts — not a working demo, just the important bits.

mattpocock의 다른 스킬

improve-codebase-architecture
mattpocock
코드베이스에서 심화 개선 기회를 찾되, CONTEXT.md의 도메인 언어와 docs/adr/의 결정 사항을 참고합니다. 사용자가 아키텍처를 개선하거나, 리팩토링 기회를 찾거나, 강하게 결합된 모듈을 통합하거나, 코드베이스를 더 테스트 가능하고 AI가 탐색하기 쉽게 만들고자 할 때 사용합니다.
developmentcode-reviewapi
tdd
mattpocock
레드-그린-리팩터 루프를 사용한 테스트 주도 개발. 사용자가 TDD로 기능을 구축하거나 버그를 수정하려 할 때, "레드-그린-리팩터"를 언급할 때, 통합 테스트를 원할 때, 또는 테스트 우선 개발을 요청할 때 사용합니다.
developmenttesting
handoff
mattpocock
현재 대화를 다른 에이전트가 이어받을 수 있도록 핸드오프 문서로 압축합니다.
communicationproject-managementdocument
prototype
mattpocock
디자인을 확정하기 전에 일회용 프로토타입을 만들어 검토합니다. 상태나 비즈니스 로직을 확인할 수 있는 실행 가능한 터미널 앱과, 하나의 경로에서 전환 가능한 여러 개의 완전히 다른 UI 변형이라는 두 가지 분기로 나뉩니다. 사용자가 프로토타입을 만들고, 데이터 모델이나 상태 머신을 검증하며, UI를 목업하고, 디자인 옵션을 탐색하려 하거나, "이걸 프로토타입으로 만들어 봐", "한번 가지고 놀게 해줘", "몇 가지 디자인을 시도해 봐"라고 말할 때 사용합니다.
developmentdesigncreative
triage
mattpocock
트라이지 역할에 의해 구동되는 상태 머신을 통해 이슈를 분류합니다. 사용자가 이슈를 생성하거나, 이슈를 분류하고, 들어오는 버그나 기능 요청을 검토하고, AFK 에이전트를 위해 이슈를 준비하거나, 이슈 워크플로를 관리하려는 경우 사용합니다.
developmentproject-managementcommunication
obsidian-vault
mattpocock
Obsidian 볼트에서 위키링크와 인덱스 노트를 사용하여 노트를 검색, 생성 및 관리합니다. 사용자가 Obsidian에서 노트를 찾거나, 생성하거나, 정리하려 할 때 사용하세요.
productivitydocument
edit-article
mattpocock
기사 초안의 섹션을 재구성하고, 명확성을 높이며, 문장을 간결하게 다듬어 편집하고 개선합니다. 사용자가 기사 초안을 편집, 수정 또는 개선하려 할 때 사용하세요.
documentcreative
writing-great-skills
mattpocock
스킬을 잘 작성하고 편집하기 위한 참고 자료 — 스킬을 예측 가능하게 만드는 어휘와 원칙.
documentdevelopment