explore-run

작성자: lllllllama

Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill for bounded exploratory evidence in deep learning research repositories. Use when the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory runs such as small-subset validation, short-cycle guess-and-check, batch sweeps, idle-GPU search, or quick transfer-learning trials, with fair-comparison caveats and no-overclaim summaries in `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for end-to-end exploration orchestration on top of `current_research`, trusted baseline...

npx skills add https://github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill explore-run

explore-run

Use this as the Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill. The installed slug remains explore-run for compatibility.

Use the shared operating principles in ../../references/agent-operating-principles.md; this skill should guide candidate run planning while preserving model judgment about the active repo.

When to apply

  • When the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory runs.
  • When the task is a small-subset validation, short-cycle training probe, batch sweep, idle-GPU search, or quick transfer-learning trial.
  • When the output should rank candidate runs rather than certify trusted success.

When not to apply

  • When the user wants trusted training execution or conservative verification.
  • When there is no explicit exploratory authorization.
  • When the task is repository setup, intake, or debugging.

Clear boundaries

  • This skill owns exploratory execution planning and summary only.
  • Use ai-research-explore instead when the task spans both current_research coordination and exploratory code changes.
  • It may hand off actual command execution to minimal-run-and-audit or run-train.
  • It should keep experiment state isolated from the trusted baseline.
  • It should prefer small-subset and short-cycle checks before heavier exploratory runs.
  • It should label run results as bounded evidence and explain when a comparison is not directly fair.

Ranking Semantics

  • Pre-execution candidate selection uses three factors: cost, success_rate, and expected_gain.
  • Default weights should stay conservative unless the researcher explicitly provides selection_weights.
  • Budget pruning still applies after scoring through max_variants and max_short_cycle_runs.
  • If runs are executed later, downstream ranking should switch to real execution evidence, not stay purely heuristic.

Variant Spec Hints

  • Use variant_axes to define the candidate dimension grid.
  • Use subset_sizes and short_run_steps to express exploratory run scale.
  • Use selection_weights to rebalance cost, success_rate, and expected_gain.
  • Use primary_metric and metric_goal so downstream ranking can order executed candidates consistently.

Output expectations

  • explore_outputs/CHANGESET.md
  • explore_outputs/SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md
  • explore_outputs/COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md
  • explore_outputs/TOP_RUNS.md
  • explore_outputs/status.json

Notes

Use references/execution-policy.md, ../../references/explore-variant-spec.md, ../../references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md, scripts/plan_variants.py, and scripts/write_outputs.py.

lllllllama의 다른 스킬

ai-research-explore
lllllllama
Rigor Explore compatible skill slug for meaningful and potentially novel deep learning research candidates. Use when the researcher has chosen the task family, dataset, benchmark, evaluation method, provided SOTA references, and wants candidate-only exploration on top of `current_research` with auditable repo understanding, idea gating, fair comparison, and governed experiments written to `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for README-first trusted reproduction, open-ended direction finding,...
researchdata-analysisapi
analyze-project
lllllllama
딥러닝 연구 저장소를 위한 Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit 읽기 전용 스킬입니다. 사용자가 저장소를 읽고 이해하거나, 모델 구조 및 학습/추론 진입점을 검사하거나, 설정 및 삽입 지점을 검토하거나, 코드 수정이나 무거운 작업 실행 없이 의심스러운 구현 패턴을 식별하려 할 때 사용하세요. 활성 명령 실행, 광범위한 리팩토링, 추측성 코드 적용, 자동 버그 수정에는 사용하지 마십시오.
developmentcode-reviewresearch
ai-research-reproduction
lllllllama
RigorPilot reproduce-mode orchestrator for README-first deep learning repository reproduction. Use when the user wants an end-to-end, minimal-trustworthy flow that reads the repository first, selects the smallest documented inference or evaluation target, coordinates intake, setup, trusted execution, optional trusted training, optional repository analysis, and optional paper-gap resolution, enforces conservative patch rules, records evidence assumptions deviations and human decision points,...
researchdevelopmentdocument
explore-code
lllllllama
Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill for auditable candidate implementation in deep learning research repositories. Use when the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory work on an isolated branch or worktree to transplant modules, adapt a backbone, add LoRA or adapter layers, replace a head, or stitch together meaningful low-risk migration ideas with rollback-aware records in `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for end-to-end exploration orchestration on top of `current_research`, trusted...
developmentresearchcode-review
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama
Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized `repro_outputs/` files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end-to-end orchestration by itself.
developmenttestingcode-review
env-and-assets-bootstrap
lllllllama
README 우선 딥러닝 리포지토리 재현을 위한 Rigor Setup 스킬입니다. README에 문서화된 리포지토리에서 실행 전에 보수적인 conda 우선 환경, 체크포인트 및 데이터셋 경로 가정, 캐시 위치 힌트, 설정 노트를 준비하는 작업에 사용하세요. 리포지토리 스캔, 전체 오케스트레이션, 논문 해석, 최종 실행 보고, 또는 특정 재현 대상과 연결되지 않은 일반 환경 설정에는 사용하지 마십시오.
developmentdevops
safe-debug
lllllllama
딥러닝 연구 작업을 위한 엄격한 디버그/엄격한 감사 스킬입니다. 사용자가 트레이스백, 터미널 오류, CUDA OOM, 체크포인트 로드 실패, 형태 불일치, NaN 손실 증상 또는 훈련 실패를 붙여넣고 패치 전에 보수적인 진단을 원하며 디버그 수정이 연구 기여와 명확히 분리되어야 할 때 사용하세요. 광범위한 리팩토링, 추측성 적응, 자동 탐색적 패치 또는 일반적인 저장소 숙지에는 사용하지 마십시오.
developmenttestingcode-review
paper-context-resolver
lllllllama
Rigor Paper Context helper for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use only when the README and repository files leave a narrow reproduction-critical gap and the task is to resolve a specific paper detail such as dataset split, preprocessing, evaluation protocol, checkpoint mapping, or runtime assumption from primary paper sources while recording conflicts. Do not use for general paper summary, repo scanning, environment setup, command execution, title-only paper lookup, or...
researchdocumentdata-analysis