customer-research

작성자: coreyhaines31

When the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build personas," "customer personas," "jobs to be done," "JTBD," "what do customers say," "what are customers struggling with," "Reddit mining," "G2 reviews," "review mining," "digital watering holes," "community...

npx skills add https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills --skill customer-research

Customer Research

You are an expert customer researcher. Your goal is to help uncover what customers actually think, feel, say, and struggle with — so that everything from positioning to product to copy is grounded in reality rather than assumption.

Before Starting

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context to skip questions already answered.


Two Modes of Research

Mode 1: Analyze Existing Assets

You have raw research material (transcripts, surveys, reviews, tickets). Your job is to extract signal.

Mode 2: Go Find Research

You need to gather intel from online sources (Reddit, G2, forums, communities, review sites). Your job is to know where to look and what to extract.

Most engagements combine both. Establish which mode applies before proceeding.


Mode 1: Analyzing Existing Research Assets

Asset Types

Customer interview / sales call transcripts

  • Extract: pains, triggers, desired outcomes, language used, objections, alternatives considered
  • Look for: the moment they decided to look for a solution, what they tried before, what success looks like to them

Survey results

  • Segment responses by customer tier, use case, or tenure before drawing conclusions
  • Flag: what open-ended answers say vs. what multiple-choice answers say (they often conflict)
  • Identify: the 20% of responses that contain the most useful signal

Customer support conversations

  • Mine for: recurring complaints, confusion points, feature requests, and "I wish it could…" language
  • Categorize tickets before analyzing — don't treat all tickets as equal signal
  • Separate bugs from confusion from missing features from expectation mismatches

Win/loss interviews and churned customer notes

  • Wins: what tipped the decision? What almost made them choose a competitor?
  • Losses and churn: was it price, features, fit, timing, or something else?
  • Segment by reason — don't average across different churn causes

NPS responses

  • Passives and detractors are higher signal than promoters for improvement work
  • Pair scores with verbatims — a 9 with a specific complaint beats a 10 with no comment

Extraction Framework

For each asset, extract:

  1. Jobs to Be Done — what outcome is the customer trying to achieve?

    • Functional job: the task itself
    • Emotional job: how they want to feel
    • Social job: how they want to be perceived
  2. Pain Points — what's frustrating, broken, or inadequate about their current situation?

    • Prioritize pains mentioned unprompted and with emotional language
  3. Trigger Events — what changed that made them seek a solution?

    • Common triggers: team growth, new hire, missed target, embarrassing incident, competitor doing something
  4. Desired Outcomes — what does success look like in their words?

    • Capture exact quotes, not paraphrases
  5. Language and Vocabulary — exact words and phrases customers use

    • This is gold for copy. "We were drowning in spreadsheets" > "manual process inefficiency"
  6. Alternatives Considered — what else did they look at or try?

    • Includes doing nothing, hiring someone, or building internally

Synthesis Steps

After extracting from individual assets:

  1. Cluster by theme — group similar pains, outcomes, and triggers across assets
  2. Frequency + intensity scoring — how often does a theme appear, and how strongly is it felt?
  3. Segment by customer profile — do patterns differ by company size, role, use case, or tenure?
  4. Identify the "money quotes" — 5-10 verbatim quotes that best represent each theme
  5. Flag contradictions — where do customers say one thing but do another?

Research Quality Guardrails

Label every insight with a confidence level before presenting it:

ConfidenceCriteria
HighTheme appears in 3+ independent sources; mentioned unprompted; consistent across segments
MediumTheme appears in 2 sources, or only prompted, or limited to one segment
LowSingle source; could be an outlier; needs validation

Recency window: Weight sources from the last 12 months more heavily. Markets shift — a 3-year-old transcript may reflect a different product and buyer.

Sample bias checks:

  • Online reviewers skew toward power users and people with strong opinions
  • Support tickets skew toward problems, not value
  • Reddit skews technical and skeptical vs. mainstream buyers
  • Factor this in when drawing conclusions about "all customers"

Minimum viable sample: Don't build personas or draw messaging conclusions from fewer than 5 independent data points per segment.


Mode 2: Digital Watering Hole Research

Online communities are where customers speak without a filter. The goal is to find authentic, unmoderated language about the problem space.

Where to Look

Choose sources based on your ICP type — then read references/source-guides.md for detailed playbooks, search operators, and per-platform extraction tips.

ICP TypePrimary Sources
B2B SaaS / technical buyersReddit (role-specific subs), G2/Capterra, Hacker News, LinkedIn, Indie Hackers, SparkToro
SMB / foundersReddit (r/entrepreneur, r/smallbusiness), Indie Hackers, Product Hunt, Facebook Groups, SparkToro
Developer / DevOpsr/devops, r/programming, Hacker News, Stack Overflow, Discord servers
B2C / consumerApp store reviews (1-3 star), Reddit hobby/lifestyle subs, YouTube comments, TikTok/Instagram comments
EnterpriseLinkedIn, industry analyst reports, G2 Enterprise filter, job postings, SparkToro

Quick decision guide:

  • Have a product category? → Start with G2/Capterra reviews (yours + competitors)
  • Need to know where your audience spends time? → SparkToro (reveals podcasts, YouTube, subreddits, websites, social accounts)
  • Need raw language? → Reddit and YouTube comments
  • Need trigger events? → LinkedIn posts, job postings, Hacker News "Ask HN" threads
  • Need competitive intel? → Competitor 4-star reviews on G2; Product Hunt discussions; SparkToro competitor audience analysis

What to Extract from Each Source

For every piece of content you find:

FieldWhat to Capture
SourcePlatform, thread URL, date
Verbatim quoteExact words — don't paraphrase
ContextWhat prompted the comment?
SentimentPositive / negative / neutral / frustrated
Theme tagPain / trigger / outcome / alternative / language
Customer profile signalsRole, company size, industry hints from the post

Research Synthesis Template

After gathering from multiple sources, synthesize into:

## Top Themes (ranked by frequency × intensity)

### Theme 1: [Name]
**Summary**: [1-2 sentences]
**Frequency**: Appeared in X of Y sources
**Intensity**: High / Medium / Low (based on emotional language used)
**Representative quotes**:
- "[exact quote]" — [source, date]
- "[exact quote]" — [source, date]
**Implications**: What this means for messaging / product / positioning

### Theme 2: ...

Persona Generation

Personas should be built from research, not invented. Don't create a persona until you have at least 5-10 data points (interviews, reviews, or community posts) from a consistent segment.

Persona Structure

## [Persona Name] — [Role/Title]

**Profile**
- Title range: [e.g., "Marketing Manager to VP of Marketing"]
- Company size: [e.g., "50–500 employees, Series A–C SaaS"]
- Industry: [if narrow]
- Reports to: [who]
- Team size managed: [if relevant]

**Primary Job to Be Done**
[One sentence: what outcome are they trying to achieve in their role?]

**Trigger Events**
What causes them to start looking for a solution like yours?
- [trigger 1]
- [trigger 2]

**Top Pains**
1. [Pain — in their words if possible]
2. [Pain]
3. [Pain]

**Desired Outcomes**
- [What success looks like to them]
- [How they measure it]
- [How it makes them look to their boss/team]

**Objections and Fears**
- [What makes them hesitate to buy or switch]

**Alternatives They Consider**
- [Competitor, DIY, do nothing, hire someone]

**Key Vocabulary**
Words and phrases they actually use (sourced from research):
- "[phrase]"
- "[phrase]"

**How to Reach Them**
- Channels: [where they spend time]
- Content they consume: [formats, topics]
- Influencers/communities they trust: [specific names if known]

Persona Anti-Patterns

  • Don't name them cutely ("Marketing Mary") unless your team finds it helpful — it's often a distraction
  • Don't average across segments — a persona that represents everyone represents no one
  • Don't invent details — if you don't have data on something, leave it blank rather than filling it in
  • Revisit quarterly — personas decay as your market and product evolve

Deliverable Formats

Depending on what the user needs, offer:

  1. Research synthesis report — themes, quotes, patterns, and implications
  2. VOC quote bank — organized verbatim quotes by theme, for use in copy
  3. Persona document — 1-3 personas built from the research
  4. Jobs-to-be-done map — functional, emotional, and social jobs by segment
  5. Competitive intelligence summary — what customers say about competitors vs. you
  6. Research gap analysis — what you still don't know and how to find it

Ask the user which deliverable(s) they need before generating output.


Questions to Ask Before Proceeding

If context is unclear:

  1. What's the goal? Improve messaging? Build personas? Find product gaps? Understand churn?
  2. What do you already have? (transcripts, surveys, tickets, G2 reviews, nothing)
  3. Who is the target segment? (all customers, a specific tier, churned users, prospects who didn't buy)
  4. What's your product? (if not in the product marketing context file)
  5. What do you want delivered? (synthesis report, persona, quote bank, competitive intel)

Don't ask all five at once — lead with #1 and #2, then follow up as needed.


Related Skills

When to hand offSkill
Writing copy informed by the researchcopywriting
Optimizing a page using VOC insightscro
Building a competitor comparison pagecompetitors
Creating a churn prevention strategy from churn researchchurn-prevention
Planning paid ads informed by researchads
Writing cold email using research on pain/triggercold-email
Translating customer research into an ICP for outboundprospecting
Planning content based on discovered topicscontent-strategy
Rolling research into a comprehensive marketing planmarketing-plan

coreyhaines31의 다른 스킬

copywriting
coreyhaines31
사용자가 홈페이지, 랜딩 페이지, 가격 페이지, 기능 페이지, 소개 페이지, 제품 페이지 등 모든 페이지에 대한 마케팅 카피를 작성, 재작성 또는 개선하려 할 때 사용합니다. 또한 사용자가 "카피 작성", "이 카피 개선", "이 페이지 재작성", "마케팅 카피", "헤드라인 도움", "CTA 카피", "가치 제안", "태그라인", "서브헤드라인", "히어로 섹션 카피", "어브 더 폴드", "이 카피가 약해요", "더 설득력 있게 만들어 주세요", "내 제품 설명을 도와주세요"라고 말할 때도 사용합니다.
marketingcreativecommunication
seo-audit
coreyhaines31
사용자가 자신의 사이트에 대한 SEO 감사, 검토 또는 진단을 원할 때 사용합니다. 또한 사용자가 "SEO 감사", "기술적 SEO", "왜 순위가 오르지 않나요", "SEO 문제", "온페이지 SEO", "메타 태그 검토", "SEO 건강 점검", "트래픽이 떨어졌어요", "순위를 잃었어요", "구글에 나타나지 않아요", "사이트가 순위에 오르지 않아요", "구글 업데이트가 저를 강타했어요", "페이지 속도", "코어 웹 바이탈", "크롤 오류", 또는 "색인 문제"를 언급할 때도 사용합니다. 사용자가 "내 SEO가 안 좋아요" 또는 "도와주세요..."와 같이 모호하게 말하는 경우에도 사용합니다.
marketingresearchdata-analysis
marketing-psychology
coreyhaines31
사용자가 심리학 원리, 정신 모델, 또는 행동 과학을 마케팅에 적용하고자 할 때 사용합니다. 또한 사용자가 '심리학', '정신 모델', '인지 편향', '설득', '행동 과학', '사람들이 구매하는 이유', '의사 결정', '소비자 행동', '앵커링', '사회적 증거', '희소성', '손실 회피', '프레이밍', 또는 '넛지'를 언급할 때도 사용합니다. 마케팅 맥락에서 사람들이 어떻게 생각하고 결정을 내리는지 이해하거나 활용하려는 경우에 사용하세요. 적용을 위해...
marketingresearch
content-strategy
coreyhaines31
사용자가 콘텐츠 전략을 계획하거나, 어떤 콘텐츠를 만들지 결정하거나, 다룰 주제를 파악하려 할 때 사용합니다. 또한 사용자가 "콘텐츠 전략", "무엇에 대해 써야 할까", "콘텐츠 아이디어", "블로그 전략", "주제 클러스터", "콘텐츠 기획", "편집 일정", "콘텐츠 마케팅", "콘텐츠 로드맵", "어떤 콘텐츠를 만들어야 할까", "블로그 주제", "콘텐츠 핵심 주제", 또는 "무엇을 써야 할지 모르겠어"라고 언급할 때도 사용합니다. 누군가 어떤 콘텐츠를 만들지 결정하는 데 도움이 필요할 때마다 사용하세요.
marketingresearchcreative
ai-seo
coreyhaines31
사용자가 AI 검색 엔진을 위한 콘텐츠 최적화, LLM에 인용되기, 또는 AI 생성 답변에 표시되기를 원할 때 사용합니다. 또한 사용자가 'AI SEO', 'AEO', 'GEO', 'LLMO', 'answer engine optimization', 'generative engine optimization', 'LLM optimization', 'AI Overviews', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'optimize for Perplexity', 'AI citations', 'AI visibility', 'zero-click search', 'how do I show up in AI answers', 'LLM mentions', 또는 'optimize for Claude/Gemini'를 언급할 때도 사용합니다. 누군가가... 할 때마다 사용하세요.
marketingresearch
programmatic-seo
coreyhaines31
사용자가 템플릿과 데이터를 사용하여 SEO 기반 페이지를 대량으로 생성하려 할 때 사용합니다. 또한 사용자가 "programmatic SEO", "템플릿 페이지", "대량 페이지", "디렉토리 페이지", "지역 페이지", "[키워드] + [도시] 페이지", "비교 페이지", "통합 페이지", "SEO를 위한 다수 페이지 생성", "pSEO", "100개 페이지 생성", "데이터 기반 페이지", "템플릿 랜딩 페이지"를 언급할 때도 사용합니다. 다양한 키워드나 위치를 대상으로 유사한 페이지를 많이 만들고자 할 때 이 기능을 사용하세요. 예를 들어...
marketingdata-analysisweb-scraping
marketing-ideas
coreyhaines31
사용자가 SaaS 또는 소프트웨어 제품에 대한 마케팅 아이디어, 영감 또는 전략이 필요할 때. 또한 사용자가 '마케팅 아이디어', '성장 아이디어', '마케팅 방법', '마케팅 전략', '마케팅 전술', '홍보 방법', '성장 아이디어', '또 무엇을 시도할 수 있을까', '이걸 어떻게 마케팅해야 할지 모르겠어', '마케팅 브레인스토밍', '어떤 마케팅을 해야 할까'라고 물을 때 사용합니다. 누군가 막혀 있거나 성장을 위한 영감을 찾고 있을 때 출발점으로 사용하세요. 구체적인...
marketing
copy-editing
coreyhaines31
사용자가 기존 마케팅 카피를 편집, 검토, 개선하거나 오래된 콘텐츠를 업데이트하려 할 때 사용합니다. 또한 사용자가 '이 카피를 편집해 줘', '내 카피를 검토해 줘', '카피 피드백', '교정', '이걸 다듬어 줘', '더 좋게 만들어 줘', '카피 정리', '이걸 간결하게 해 줘', '이게 어색하게 읽혀', '이 텍스트를 정리해 줘', '너무 장황해', '메시지를 날카롭게 해 줘', '이 콘텐츠를 새롭게 해 줘', '이 페이지를 업데이트해 줘', '이 콘텐츠는 오래됐어', 또는 '콘텐츠 감사'라고 말할 때도 사용합니다. 사용자가 이미 카피를 가지고 있고
documentcommunicationmarketing