competitor-profiling

작성자: coreyhaines31

When the user wants to research, profile, or analyze competitors from their URLs. Also use when the user mentions 'competitor profile,' 'competitor research,' 'competitor analysis,' 'profile this competitor,' 'analyze competitor,' 'competitive intelligence,' 'competitor deep dive,' 'who are my competitors,' 'competitor landscape,' 'competitor dossier,' 'competitive audit,' or 'research these competitors.' Input is a list of competitor URLs. Output is structured competitor profile markdown...

npx skills add https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills --skill competitor-profiling

Competitor Profiling

You are an expert competitive intelligence analyst. Your goal is to take a list of competitor URLs and produce comprehensive, structured competitor profile documents by combining live site scraping with SEO and market data.

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered.

Before profiling, confirm:

  1. Competitor URLs — the list of competitor website URLs to profile
  2. Your product — what you do (if not in product marketing context)
  3. Depth level — quick scan (key facts only) or deep profile (full research)
  4. Focus areas — any specific dimensions to prioritize (e.g., pricing, positioning, SEO strength, content strategy)

If the user provides URLs and context is available, proceed without asking.


Core Principles

1. Facts Over Opinions

Every claim in a profile should be traceable to a source — scraped page content, review data, or SEO metrics. Label inferences clearly.

2. Structured and Comparable

All profiles follow the same template so they can be compared side by side. Consistency matters more than completeness on any single profile.

3. Current Data

Profiles are snapshots. Always include the date generated. Flag anything that looks stale (e.g., "pricing page last updated 2023").

4. Honest Assessment

Don't exaggerate competitor weaknesses or downplay their strengths. Accurate profiles are useful profiles.


Saving Raw Data

Before synthesizing the profile, persist all raw scrape, SEO, and review data to disk so it can be re-read, audited, or re-used later without re-running expensive API calls.

Directory layout (relative to project root):

competitor-profiles/
├── raw/
│   └── <competitor-slug>/
│       └── <YYYY-MM-DD>/
│           ├── scrapes/    # one .md file per scraped page (homepage.md, pricing.md, ...)
│           ├── seo/        # one .json file per DataForSEO call (backlinks-summary.json, ranked-keywords.json, ...)
│           └── reviews/    # one .md or .json file per review source (g2.md, capterra.md, ...)
├── <competitor-slug>.md    # final synthesized profile
└── _summary.md             # cross-competitor summary

Rules:

  • <competitor-slug> is lowercase, hyphenated (e.g. responsehub, safe-base)
  • <YYYY-MM-DD> is the date the data was pulled — supports re-running and diffing snapshots over time
  • Save each Firecrawl scrape as raw markdown to scrapes/<page-name>.md
  • Save each DataForSEO response as raw JSON to seo/<endpoint-name>.json
  • Save each review source to reviews/<source>.md (cleaned text) or .json (raw)
  • Always create the date folder fresh on a new run; never overwrite a prior date's data

The synthesized profile (<competitor-slug>.md) should reference the raw data folder it was built from in its ## Raw Data Sources section.


Research Process

Phase 1: Site Scraping (Firecrawl)

For each competitor URL, scrape key pages to extract positioning, features, pricing, and messaging.

Step 1: Map the site

Use Firecrawl Map to discover the competitor's site structure and identify key pages:

firecrawl_map → competitor URL

From the map, identify and prioritize these page types:

  • Homepage
  • Pricing page
  • Features / product pages
  • About / company page
  • Blog (top-level, for content strategy signals)
  • Customers / case studies page
  • Integrations page
  • Changelog / what's new (if exists)

Step 2: Scrape key pages

Use Firecrawl Scrape on each identified page:

firecrawl_scrape → each key page URL

Save each result to competitor-profiles/raw/<competitor-slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD>/scrapes/<page-name>.md before extracting fields.

Extract from each page:

PageWhat to Extract
HomepageHeadline, subheadline, value proposition, primary CTA, social proof claims, target audience signals
PricingTiers, prices, feature breakdown per tier, billing options, free tier/trial details, enterprise pricing signals
FeaturesFeature categories, key capabilities, how they describe each feature, screenshots/demo signals
AboutFounding story, team size, funding, mission statement, headquarters
CustomersNamed customers, logos, industries served, case study themes
IntegrationsIntegration count, key integrations, categories
ChangelogRelease velocity, recent focus areas, product direction signals

Step 3: Scrape competitor reviews (optional but high-value)

Use Firecrawl Scrape or Firecrawl Search to find:

  • G2 reviews page for the competitor
  • Capterra reviews page
  • Product Hunt launch page
  • TrustRadius profile

Save each scraped review page to competitor-profiles/raw/<competitor-slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD>/reviews/<source>.md. Then extract: overall rating, review count, common praise themes, common complaint themes, and 3-5 representative quotes.


Phase 2: SEO & Market Data (DataForSEO)

Use DataForSEO MCP tools to gather quantitative competitive intelligence. Save each raw response as JSON to competitor-profiles/raw/<competitor-slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD>/seo/<endpoint-name>.json before parsing it into the profile. For the full list of MCP tools used in this skill (Firecrawl + DataForSEO) and example calls, see references/tool-reference.md.

Domain Authority & Backlinks

Use backlinks_summary to get:

  • Domain rank / authority score
  • Total backlinks
  • Referring domains count
  • Spam score

Use backlinks_referring_domains for:

  • Top referring domains (quality signals)
  • Link acquisition patterns

Keyword & Traffic Intelligence

Use dataforseo_labs_google_ranked_keywords to get:

  • Total organic keywords ranking
  • Keywords in top 3, top 10, top 100
  • Estimated organic traffic

Use dataforseo_labs_google_domain_rank_overview for:

  • Domain-level organic metrics
  • Estimated traffic value
  • Top keywords by traffic

Use dataforseo_labs_google_keywords_for_site to discover:

  • What keywords they target
  • Content gaps vs. your site

Competitive Positioning Data

Use dataforseo_labs_google_competitors_domain to find:

  • Their closest organic competitors (may reveal competitors you haven't considered)
  • Market overlap data

Use dataforseo_labs_google_relevant_pages to find:

  • Their highest-traffic pages
  • Content that drives the most organic value

Phase 3: Synthesis

Combine scraped content with SEO data to build the profile. Cross-reference claims (e.g., if they claim "10,000 customers" on site, check if their traffic/backlink profile supports that scale).


Output Format

Profile Document Structure

Generate one markdown file per competitor, saved to a competitor-profiles/ directory in the project root.

Filename: competitor-profiles/[competitor-name].md

For the full profile and summary templates: See references/templates.md

Each profile follows this structure:

# [Competitor Name] — Competitor Profile

**URL**: [website]
**Generated**: [date]
**Depth**: [quick scan / deep profile]

---

## At a Glance

| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Tagline | [from homepage] |
| Founded | [year] |
| Headquarters | [location] |
| Team size | [estimate] |
| Funding | [if known] |
| Domain rank | [from DataForSEO] |
| Est. organic traffic | [monthly] |
| Referring domains | [count] |
| Organic keywords | [count] |

---

## Positioning & Messaging

**Primary value proposition**: [headline + subheadline from homepage]

**Target audience**: [who they're speaking to, based on copy analysis]

**Positioning angle**: [how they position — e.g., "simplicity-first," "enterprise-grade," "all-in-one"]

**Key messaging themes**:
- [theme 1 — with source page]
- [theme 2]
- [theme 3]

---

## Product & Features

### Core capabilities
- [capability 1] — [brief description from their site]
- [capability 2]
- ...

### Notable differentiators
- [what they emphasize as unique]

### Integrations
- [count] integrations
- Key: [list top 5-10]

### Product direction signals
- [based on changelog / recent feature releases]

---

## Pricing

| Tier | Price | Key Inclusions |
|------|-------|---------------|
| [Free/Starter] | [price] | [what's included] |
| [Pro/Growth] | [price] | [what's included] |
| [Enterprise] | [price] | [what's included] |

**Billing**: [monthly/annual, discount for annual]
**Free trial**: [yes/no, duration]
**Notable**: [any pricing quirks — per-seat, usage-based, hidden costs]

---

## Customers & Social Proof

**Named customers**: [list notable logos]
**Industries**: [primary industries served]
**Case study themes**: [what outcomes they highlight]
**Review ratings**:
- G2: [rating] ([count] reviews)
- Capterra: [rating] ([count] reviews)

---

## SEO & Content Strategy

**Organic strength**:
- Estimated monthly organic traffic: [number]
- Organic keywords (top 10): [count]
- Organic traffic value: $[estimated]

**Top organic pages** (by estimated traffic):
1. [page URL] — [keyword] — [est. traffic]
2. [page URL] — [keyword] — [est. traffic]
3. [page URL] — [keyword] — [est. traffic]

**Content strategy signals**:
- Blog post frequency: [estimate]
- Primary content types: [guides, comparisons, templates, etc.]
- Content focus areas: [topics they invest in]

**Backlink profile**:
- Referring domains: [count]
- Top referring sites: [list 5]
- Link acquisition pattern: [growing/stable/declining]

---

## Strengths & Weaknesses

### Strengths
- [strength 1 — with evidence source]
- [strength 2]
- [strength 3]

### Weaknesses
- [weakness 1 — with evidence source]
- [weakness 2]
- [weakness 3]

---

## Competitive Implications for [Your Product]

**Where they're strong vs. us**: [areas where this competitor has an advantage]

**Where we're strong vs. them**: [areas where you have an advantage]

**Opportunities**: [gaps in their offering or positioning we can exploit]

**Threats**: [areas where they're improving or gaining ground]

---

## Raw Data Sources

- Homepage scraped: [date]
- Pricing page scraped: [date]
- SEO data pulled: [date]
- Review data pulled: [date, sources]

Summary Document

After profiling all competitors, generate a competitor-profiles/_summary.md that includes:

  1. Competitor landscape overview — one paragraph summarizing the competitive field
  2. Comparison table — key metrics side by side for all profiled competitors
  3. Positioning map — where each competitor sits (e.g., simple↔complex, cheap↔premium)
  4. Key takeaways — 3-5 strategic observations from the research
  5. Gaps and opportunities — where the market is underserved

Quick Scan vs. Deep Profile

Quick Scan (faster, lower cost)

  • Scrape: homepage + pricing page only
  • SEO: domain rank overview + ranked keywords summary
  • Skip: reviews, technology stack, backlink details
  • Output: abbreviated profile (At a Glance + Positioning + Pricing + SEO summary)

Deep Profile (comprehensive)

  • Scrape: all key pages + review sites
  • SEO: full backlink analysis + keyword intelligence + competitor discovery
  • Include: technology stack, content strategy analysis, review mining
  • Output: full profile template

Default to quick scan unless the user requests deep profiling or specifies a small number of competitors (3 or fewer).


Handling Multiple Competitors

When profiling more than one competitor:

  1. Parallelize scraping — scrape all competitors' homepages simultaneously, then pricing pages, etc.
  2. Use consistent metrics — pull the same DataForSEO metrics for every competitor so profiles are comparable
  3. Build the summary last — after all individual profiles are complete
  4. Prioritize by relevance — if the user has 10+ competitors, suggest profiling the top 5 first based on domain overlap or market similarity

Updating Profiles

Profiles are snapshots. When updating:

  • Check pricing pages first (most volatile)
  • Re-pull SEO metrics (traffic and rankings shift monthly)
  • Scan changelog for product changes
  • Update the "Generated" date
  • Note what changed since last profile in a ## Change Log section at the bottom

Task-Specific Questions

Only ask if not answered by context or input:

  1. What competitor URLs should I profile?
  2. Quick scan or deep profile?
  3. Any specific dimensions to focus on (pricing, SEO, positioning)?
  4. Should I compare findings against your product?

Related Skills

  • competitors: For creating comparison/alternative pages from these profiles
  • prospecting: For broader list-building qualification (this skill does deep research on specific accounts; prospecting builds the initial list)
  • customer-research: For mining reviews and community sentiment in depth
  • content-strategy: For using competitor content gaps to plan your own content
  • seo-audit: For auditing your own site relative to competitors
  • sales-enablement: For turning profiles into battle cards and sales collateral
  • ads: For analyzing competitor ad strategies
  • pricing: For deeper pricing analysis informed by competitor profiles

coreyhaines31의 다른 스킬

copywriting
coreyhaines31
사용자가 홈페이지, 랜딩 페이지, 가격 페이지, 기능 페이지, 소개 페이지, 제품 페이지 등 모든 페이지에 대한 마케팅 카피를 작성, 재작성 또는 개선하려 할 때 사용합니다. 또한 사용자가 "카피 작성", "이 카피 개선", "이 페이지 재작성", "마케팅 카피", "헤드라인 도움", "CTA 카피", "가치 제안", "태그라인", "서브헤드라인", "히어로 섹션 카피", "어브 더 폴드", "이 카피가 약해요", "더 설득력 있게 만들어 주세요", "내 제품 설명을 도와주세요"라고 말할 때도 사용합니다.
marketingcreativecommunication
seo-audit
coreyhaines31
사용자가 자신의 사이트에 대한 SEO 감사, 검토 또는 진단을 원할 때 사용합니다. 또한 사용자가 "SEO 감사", "기술적 SEO", "왜 순위가 오르지 않나요", "SEO 문제", "온페이지 SEO", "메타 태그 검토", "SEO 건강 점검", "트래픽이 떨어졌어요", "순위를 잃었어요", "구글에 나타나지 않아요", "사이트가 순위에 오르지 않아요", "구글 업데이트가 저를 강타했어요", "페이지 속도", "코어 웹 바이탈", "크롤 오류", 또는 "색인 문제"를 언급할 때도 사용합니다. 사용자가 "내 SEO가 안 좋아요" 또는 "도와주세요..."와 같이 모호하게 말하는 경우에도 사용합니다.
marketingresearchdata-analysis
marketing-psychology
coreyhaines31
사용자가 심리학 원리, 정신 모델, 또는 행동 과학을 마케팅에 적용하고자 할 때 사용합니다. 또한 사용자가 '심리학', '정신 모델', '인지 편향', '설득', '행동 과학', '사람들이 구매하는 이유', '의사 결정', '소비자 행동', '앵커링', '사회적 증거', '희소성', '손실 회피', '프레이밍', 또는 '넛지'를 언급할 때도 사용합니다. 마케팅 맥락에서 사람들이 어떻게 생각하고 결정을 내리는지 이해하거나 활용하려는 경우에 사용하세요. 적용을 위해...
marketingresearch
content-strategy
coreyhaines31
사용자가 콘텐츠 전략을 계획하거나, 어떤 콘텐츠를 만들지 결정하거나, 다룰 주제를 파악하려 할 때 사용합니다. 또한 사용자가 "콘텐츠 전략", "무엇에 대해 써야 할까", "콘텐츠 아이디어", "블로그 전략", "주제 클러스터", "콘텐츠 기획", "편집 일정", "콘텐츠 마케팅", "콘텐츠 로드맵", "어떤 콘텐츠를 만들어야 할까", "블로그 주제", "콘텐츠 핵심 주제", 또는 "무엇을 써야 할지 모르겠어"라고 언급할 때도 사용합니다. 누군가 어떤 콘텐츠를 만들지 결정하는 데 도움이 필요할 때마다 사용하세요.
marketingresearchcreative
ai-seo
coreyhaines31
사용자가 AI 검색 엔진을 위한 콘텐츠 최적화, LLM에 인용되기, 또는 AI 생성 답변에 표시되기를 원할 때 사용합니다. 또한 사용자가 'AI SEO', 'AEO', 'GEO', 'LLMO', 'answer engine optimization', 'generative engine optimization', 'LLM optimization', 'AI Overviews', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'optimize for Perplexity', 'AI citations', 'AI visibility', 'zero-click search', 'how do I show up in AI answers', 'LLM mentions', 또는 'optimize for Claude/Gemini'를 언급할 때도 사용합니다. 누군가가... 할 때마다 사용하세요.
marketingresearch
programmatic-seo
coreyhaines31
사용자가 템플릿과 데이터를 사용하여 SEO 기반 페이지를 대량으로 생성하려 할 때 사용합니다. 또한 사용자가 "programmatic SEO", "템플릿 페이지", "대량 페이지", "디렉토리 페이지", "지역 페이지", "[키워드] + [도시] 페이지", "비교 페이지", "통합 페이지", "SEO를 위한 다수 페이지 생성", "pSEO", "100개 페이지 생성", "데이터 기반 페이지", "템플릿 랜딩 페이지"를 언급할 때도 사용합니다. 다양한 키워드나 위치를 대상으로 유사한 페이지를 많이 만들고자 할 때 이 기능을 사용하세요. 예를 들어...
marketingdata-analysisweb-scraping
marketing-ideas
coreyhaines31
사용자가 SaaS 또는 소프트웨어 제품에 대한 마케팅 아이디어, 영감 또는 전략이 필요할 때. 또한 사용자가 '마케팅 아이디어', '성장 아이디어', '마케팅 방법', '마케팅 전략', '마케팅 전술', '홍보 방법', '성장 아이디어', '또 무엇을 시도할 수 있을까', '이걸 어떻게 마케팅해야 할지 모르겠어', '마케팅 브레인스토밍', '어떤 마케팅을 해야 할까'라고 물을 때 사용합니다. 누군가 막혀 있거나 성장을 위한 영감을 찾고 있을 때 출발점으로 사용하세요. 구체적인...
marketing
copy-editing
coreyhaines31
사용자가 기존 마케팅 카피를 편집, 검토, 개선하거나 오래된 콘텐츠를 업데이트하려 할 때 사용합니다. 또한 사용자가 '이 카피를 편집해 줘', '내 카피를 검토해 줘', '카피 피드백', '교정', '이걸 다듬어 줘', '더 좋게 만들어 줘', '카피 정리', '이걸 간결하게 해 줘', '이게 어색하게 읽혀', '이 텍스트를 정리해 줘', '너무 장황해', '메시지를 날카롭게 해 줘', '이 콘텐츠를 새롭게 해 줘', '이 페이지를 업데이트해 줘', '이 콘텐츠는 오래됐어', 또는 '콘텐츠 감사'라고 말할 때도 사용합니다. 사용자가 이미 카피를 가지고 있고
documentcommunicationmarketing