posting-review-summary
Use this skill when posting the final summary comment after all inline comments are posted. Apply as the LAST step of code review after all findings are…
npx skills add https://github.com/bitwarden/ai-plugins --skill posting-review-summaryPosting Review Summary
Context Detection
Check contexts in this order — use the first match:
| Context | How to Detect | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Mode | Sticky comment context provided in prompt (comment ID + <!-- bitwarden-code-review --> marker) | Write summary to /tmp/review-summary.md |
| GitHub Actions (tag mode) | mcp__github_comment__update_claude_comment available AND no sticky comment context | Update sticky comment via MCP tool |
| Local review | Neither agent mode context nor MCP tool available | Write to review-summary.md in working directory |
FORBIDDEN: Do not use gh pr comment to create summary comments.
PR Metadata Assessment
If PR title, description, or test plan is genuinely deficient, add as a finding in the Code Review Details collapsible section.
Rules
- DO NOT comment on minor improvements
- DO NOT comment on adequate-but-imperfect metadata
- NEVER add as an inline comment
- DO NOT exceed 3 lines of feedback on the PR Metadata Assessment
Examples
Genuinely deficient means:
- Title is literally "fix bug", "update", "changes", or single word
- Description is empty or just "See Jira"
- UI changes with zero screenshots
- No test plan AND changes are testable
Adequate (DO NOT flag):
- Title describes the change even if imperfect: "Fix login issue for SSO users"
- Description exists and explains the change, even briefly
- Test plan references Jira task with testing details
Format
- ❓ **QUESTION**: PR title could be more specific
- Suggested: "Fix null check in UserService.getProfile"
Summary Format
## 🤖 Bitwarden Claude Code Review
**Overall Assessment:** APPROVE / REQUEST CHANGES
[Up to 4 neutral sentences describing what was reviewed]
<details>
<summary>Code Review Details</summary>
[Findings grouped by severity - see ordering below]
[Optional PR Metadata Assessment - only for truly deficient metadata]
</details>
Dependency Changes Table
When the PR diff includes dependency manifest file changes, add a Dependency Changes subsection inside the <details> block, after the findings list and before the optional PR Metadata Assessment.
Only render this table when there are meaningful version changes — not for lock file-only churn with no manifest changes.
### Dependency Changes
| Package | Change | Ecosystem |
| ----------------- | --------------------- | --------- |
| `@foo/bar` | New (1.2.0) | npm |
| `lodash` | 3.x → 4.x (**major**) | npm |
| `Newtonsoft.Json` | 13.0.1 → 13.0.3 | NuGet |
| `old-package` | Removed | npm |
Bold the word "major" for major version bumps. Mark new additions as "New (version)" and removals as "Removed".
Findings in Details Section
Ordering: Group findings by severity in this exact order:
- ❌ : CRITICAL
- ⚠️ : IMPORTANT
- ♻️ : DEBT
- 🎨 : SUGGESTED
- ❓ : QUESTION
Omit empty categories entirely.
Format per finding:
- [emoji]: [One-line description]
- `filename.ts:42`
Example:
<details>
<summary>Code Review Details</summary>
- ❌ : SQL injection in user query builder
- `src/auth/queries.ts:87`
- ⚠️ : Missing null check on optional config
- `src/config/loader.ts:23`
</details>
Output Execution
Agent Mode (Sticky Comment)
When sticky comment context is provided in the prompt (comment ID + marker):
- Write the summary to
/tmp/review-summary.mdusing the Write tool - Append
\n\n<!-- bitwarden-code-review -->at the end of the file content - Do NOT use
mcp__github_comment__update_claude_comment - Do NOT use
gh pr commentorgh api
The workflow post-step will read this file and update the placeholder comment automatically.
GitHub Actions (Tag Mode)
Use mcp__github_comment__update_claude_comment to update the sticky comment with the summary.
Local
Write summary to review-summary.md in working directory.