ticket-triage

작성자: anthropic

지원 티켓이나 고객 문제를 분류하고 우선순위를 지정합니다. 새 티켓이 접수되어 분류, P1-P4 우선순위 할당, 어떤…

npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill ticket-triage

/ticket-triage

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Categorize, prioritize, and route an incoming support ticket or customer issue. Produces a structured triage assessment with a suggested initial response.

Usage

/ticket-triage <ticket text, customer message, or issue description>

Examples:

  • /ticket-triage Customer says their dashboard has been showing a blank page since this morning
  • /ticket-triage "I was charged twice for my subscription this month"
  • /ticket-triage User can't connect their SSO — getting a 403 error on the callback URL
  • /ticket-triage Feature request: they want to export reports as PDF

Workflow

1. Parse the Issue

Read the input and extract:

  • Core problem: What is the customer actually experiencing?
  • Symptoms: What specific behavior or error are they seeing?
  • Customer context: Who is this? Any account details, plan level, or history available?
  • Urgency signals: Are they blocked? Is this production? How many users affected?
  • Emotional state: Frustrated, confused, matter-of-fact, escalating?

2. Categorize and Prioritize

Using the category taxonomy and priority framework below:

  • Assign a primary category (bug, how-to, feature request, billing, account, integration, security, data, performance) and an optional secondary category
  • Assign a priority (P1–P4) based on impact and urgency
  • Identify the product area the issue maps to

3. Check for Duplicates and Known Issues

Before routing, check available sources:

  • ~~support platform: Search for similar open or recently resolved tickets
  • ~~knowledge base: Check for known issues or existing documentation
  • ~~project tracker: Check if there's an existing bug report or feature request

Apply the duplicate detection process below.

4. Determine Routing

Using the routing rules below, recommend which team or queue should handle this based on category and complexity.

5. Generate Triage Output

## Triage: [One-line issue summary]

**Category:** [Primary] / [Secondary if applicable]
**Priority:** [P1-P4] — [Brief justification]
**Product area:** [Area/team]

### Issue Summary
[2-3 sentence summary of what the customer is experiencing]

### Key Details
- **Customer:** [Name/account if known]
- **Impact:** [Who and what is affected]
- **Workaround:** [Available / Not available / Unknown]
- **Related tickets:** [Links to similar issues if found]
- **Known issue:** [Yes — link / No / Checking]

### Routing Recommendation
**Route to:** [Team or queue]
**Why:** [Brief reasoning]

### Suggested Initial Response
[Draft first response to the customer — acknowledge the issue,
set expectations, provide workaround if available.
Use the auto-response templates below as a starting point.]

### Internal Notes
- [Any additional context for the agent picking this up]
- [Reproduction hints if it's a bug]
- [Escalation triggers to watch for]

6. Offer Next Steps

After presenting the triage:

  • "Want me to draft a full response to the customer?"
  • "Should I search for more context on this issue?"
  • "Want me to check if this is a known bug in the tracker?"
  • "Should I escalate this? I can package it with /customer-escalation."

Category Taxonomy

Assign every ticket a primary category and optionally a secondary category:

CategoryDescriptionSignal Words
BugProduct is behaving incorrectly or unexpectedlyError, broken, crash, not working, unexpected, wrong, failing
How-toCustomer needs guidance on using the productHow do I, can I, where is, setting up, configure, help with
Feature requestCustomer wants a capability that doesn't existWould be great if, wish I could, any plans to, requesting
BillingPayment, subscription, invoice, or pricing issuesCharge, invoice, payment, subscription, refund, upgrade, downgrade
AccountAccount access, permissions, settings, or user managementLogin, password, access, permission, SSO, locked out, can't sign in
IntegrationIssues connecting to third-party tools or APIsAPI, webhook, integration, connect, OAuth, sync, third-party
SecuritySecurity concerns, data access, or compliance questionsData breach, unauthorized, compliance, GDPR, SOC 2, vulnerability
DataData quality, migration, import/export issuesMissing data, export, import, migration, incorrect data, duplicates
PerformanceSpeed, reliability, or availability issuesSlow, timeout, latency, down, unavailable, degraded

Category Determination Tips

  • If the customer reports both a bug and a feature request, the bug is primary
  • If they can't log in due to a bug, category is Bug (not Account) — root cause drives the category
  • "It used to work and now it doesn't" = Bug
  • "I want it to work differently" = Feature request
  • "How do I make it work?" = How-to
  • When in doubt, lean toward Bug — it's better to investigate than dismiss

Priority Framework

P1 — Critical

Criteria: Production system down, data loss or corruption, security breach, all or most users affected.

  • The customer cannot use the product at all
  • Data is being lost, corrupted, or exposed
  • A security incident is in progress
  • The issue is worsening or expanding in scope

SLA expectation: Respond within 1 hour. Continuous work until resolved or mitigated. Updates every 1-2 hours.

P2 — High

Criteria: Major feature broken, significant workflow blocked, many users affected, no workaround.

  • A core workflow is broken but the product is partially usable
  • Multiple users are affected or a key account is impacted
  • The issue is blocking time-sensitive work
  • No reasonable workaround exists

SLA expectation: Respond within 4 hours. Active investigation same day. Updates every 4 hours.

P3 — Medium

Criteria: Feature partially broken, workaround available, single user or small team affected.

  • A feature isn't working correctly but a workaround exists
  • The issue is inconvenient but not blocking critical work
  • A single user or small team is affected
  • The customer is not escalating urgently

SLA expectation: Respond within 1 business day. Resolution or update within 3 business days.

P4 — Low

Criteria: Minor inconvenience, cosmetic issue, general question, feature request.

  • Cosmetic or UI issues that don't affect functionality
  • Feature requests and enhancement ideas
  • General questions or how-to inquiries
  • Issues with simple, documented solutions

SLA expectation: Respond within 2 business days. Resolution at normal pace.

Priority Escalation Triggers

Automatically bump priority up when:

  • Customer has been waiting longer than the SLA allows
  • Multiple customers report the same issue (pattern detected)
  • The customer explicitly escalates or mentions executive involvement
  • A workaround that was in place stops working
  • The issue expands in scope (more users, more data, new symptoms)

Routing Rules

Route tickets based on category and complexity:

Route toWhen
Tier 1 (frontline support)How-to questions, known issues with documented solutions, billing inquiries, password resets
Tier 2 (senior support)Bugs requiring investigation, complex configuration, integration troubleshooting, account issues
EngineeringConfirmed bugs needing code fixes, infrastructure issues, performance degradation
ProductFeature requests with significant demand, design decisions, workflow gaps
SecurityData access concerns, vulnerability reports, compliance questions
Billing/FinanceRefund requests, contract disputes, complex billing adjustments

Duplicate Detection

Before creating a new ticket or routing, check for duplicates:

  1. Search by symptom: Look for tickets with similar error messages or descriptions
  2. Search by customer: Check if this customer has an open ticket for the same issue
  3. Search by product area: Look for recent tickets in the same feature area
  4. Check known issues: Compare against documented known issues

If a duplicate is found:

  • Link the new ticket to the existing one
  • Notify the customer that this is a known issue being tracked
  • Add any new information from the new report to the existing ticket
  • Bump priority if the new report adds urgency (more customers affected, etc.)

Auto-Response Templates by Category

Bug — Initial Response

Thank you for reporting this. I can see how [specific impact]
would be disruptive for your work.

I've logged this as a [priority] issue and our team is
investigating. [If workaround exists: "In the meantime, you
can [workaround]."]

I'll update you within [SLA timeframe] with what we find.

How-to — Initial Response

Great question! [Direct answer or link to documentation]

[If more complex: "Let me walk you through the steps:"]
[Steps or guidance]

Let me know if that helps, or if you have any follow-up
questions.

Feature Request — Initial Response

Thank you for this suggestion — I can see why [capability]
would be valuable for your workflow.

I've documented this and shared it with our product team.
While I can't commit to a specific timeline, your feedback
directly informs our roadmap priorities.

[If alternative exists: "In the meantime, you might find
[alternative] helpful for achieving something similar."]

Billing — Initial Response

I understand billing issues need prompt attention. Let me
look into this for you.

[If straightforward: resolution details]
[If complex: "I'm reviewing your account now and will have
an answer for you within [timeframe]."]

Security — Initial Response

Thank you for flagging this — we take security concerns
seriously and are reviewing this immediately.

I've escalated this to our security team for investigation.
We'll follow up with you within [timeframe] with our findings.

[If action is needed: "In the meantime, we recommend
[protective action]."]

Triage Best Practices

  1. Read the full ticket before categorizing — context in later messages often changes the assessment
  2. Categorize by root cause, not just the symptom described
  3. When in doubt on priority, err on the side of higher — it's easier to de-escalate than to recover from a missed SLA
  4. Always check for duplicates and known issues before routing
  5. Write internal notes that help the next person pick up context quickly
  6. Include what you've already checked or ruled out to avoid duplicate investigation
  7. Flag patterns — if you're seeing the same issue repeatedly, escalate the pattern even if individual tickets are low priority

anthropic의 다른 스킬

access
anthropic
Discord 채널 접근을 관리합니다 — 페어링 승인, 허용 목록 편집, DM/그룹 정책 설정. 사용자가 페어링 요청, 승인, 허용된 사람 확인 등을 요청할 때 사용합니다.
official
session-report
anthropic
~/.claude/projects 트랜스크립트에서 Claude Code 세션 사용량(토큰, 캐시, 하위 에이전트, 스킬, 고비용 프롬프트)에 대한 탐색 가능한 HTML 보고서를 생성합니다.
official
build-mcp-server
anthropic
이 스킬은 사용자가 "MCP 서버 구축", "MCP 생성", "MCP 통합 만들기", "Claude용 API 래핑", "도구 노출" 등을 요청할 때 사용해야 합니다.
official
cookbook-audit
anthropic
Anthropic Cookbook 노트북을 루브릭에 따라 감사합니다. 노트북 리뷰나 감사가 요청될 때마다 사용하세요.
official
handle-complaint
anthropic
들어오는 고객 불만을 처음부터 끝까지 처리합니다 — 맥락을 파악하고, 응답을 작성하며, 운영상의 수정을 제안합니다. 선택적으로 이메일이나 티켓 ID를 받습니다…
official
use-case-triage
anthropic
처리 활동이 PIA, 필수 GDPR DPIA가 필요한지 또는 진행 가능한지 신속히 판단하여 개인정보 처리방침 충돌을 표시하고 적절한 경로로 안내합니다…
official
board-minutes
anthropic
이사회 또는 위원회 회의록을 사내 형식으로 작성합니다. 캘린더에서 예정된 이사회 및 위원회 회의를 자동으로 감지하고, 안건을 요청한 후…
official
renewal-tracker
anthropic
유지 관리되는 갱신 등록부를 기반으로 취소 마감일이 다가오는 계약을 표시하고 통지 기간이 종료되기 전에 경고합니다. 사용자가 요청할 때 사용합니다.
official