iterate-pr

作成者: sentry

CIが通るまでPRを反復改善します。CIの失敗修正、レビュー対応、全チェックが通るまでの修正継続に使用します。…

npx skills add https://github.com/getsentry/skills --skill iterate-pr

Iterate on PR Until CI Passes

Goal: fix actionable CI failures and high/medium review feedback. Stop and report human approval, draft-readiness, and merge-readiness gates.

Requires:

  • authenticated gh
  • uv
  • target repository root as cwd
  • skill-root-relative script paths, for example scripts/fetch_pr_checks.py

Bundled Scripts

ScriptRunOutput
scripts/fetch_pr_checks.pyuv run scripts/fetch_pr_checks.py [--pr NUMBER]JSON: pr, summary, checks, failure snippets
scripts/fetch_pr_feedback.pyuv run scripts/fetch_pr_feedback.py [--pr NUMBER]JSON buckets: high, medium, low, bot, resolved
scripts/monitor_pr_checks.pyuv run scripts/monitor_pr_checks.py [--pr NUMBER]terminal marker plus tab-separated checks
scripts/reply_to_thread.pyuv run scripts/reply_to_thread.py THREAD_ID BODY [...]JSON reply results

Check summary fields include failed, pending, actionable_pending, and human_gate_pending.

Monitor markers:

  • ALL_CHECKS_PASSED
  • CHECKS_DONE_WITH_FAILURES
  • NO_CHECKS_REGISTERED
  • DRAFT_PR_WITH_NO_CHECKS
  • CHECKS_BLOCKED_BY_REVIEW_GATE

Workflow

1. Identify PR

Run:

gh pr view --json number,url,headRefName,isDraft,reviewDecision

Stop when:

  • no PR exists
  • draft PR has no checks after monitor grace period: report DRAFT_PR_WITH_NO_CHECKS

Draft rule: inspect existing checks/feedback only. Do not mark ready for review unless asked.

2. Handle Feedback

Run uv run scripts/fetch_pr_feedback.py [--pr NUMBER].

BucketAction
highfix
mediumfix
lowask user which to address
botskip informational comments
resolvedskip

Feedback fix checklist:

  • verify root cause
  • search related code
  • fix all instances
  • for review_bot: true: fix real issues, explain false positives

Low-priority prompt format:

Found 3 low-priority suggestions:
1. [l] "Consider renaming this variable" - @reviewer in api.py:42
2. [nit] "Could use a list comprehension" - @reviewer in utils.py:18
3. [style] "Add a docstring" - @reviewer in models.py:55

Which should I address? ("1,3", "all", or "none")

3. Check CI Status

Run uv run scripts/fetch_pr_checks.py [--pr NUMBER].

StateAction
failed > 0 and actionable_pending == 0fix failures
actionable_pending > 0wait; poll feedback while waiting
pending > 0 and actionable_pending == 0report CHECKS_BLOCKED_BY_REVIEW_GATE
no checks after grace periodreport NO_CHECKS_REGISTERED or DRAFT_PR_WITH_NO_CHECKS
all actionable checks passedrun post-CI feedback check

Wait for actionable review bots: sentry, warden, cursor, bugbot, seer, codeql. Do not wait for approval, isDraft, REVIEW_REQUIRED, Codecov, or informational bots.

4. Fix CI Failures

For each failure:

  1. read full log: gh run view <run-id> --log-failed
  2. trace from assertion/exception/lint rule to source
  3. state the cause before editing: "fails because X, affected by Y"
  4. search related call sites/patterns
  5. fix root cause, not symptom
  6. add focused test coverage when needed

5. Verify Locally, Then Commit and Push

Before commit:

  • test fix: rerun specific test
  • lint/type fix: rerun affected checker
  • code fix: rerun covering tests
  • local failure: fix before pushing
git add <files>
git commit -m "fix: <descriptive message>"
git push

6. Monitor CI and Address Feedback

Loop:

  1. run uv run scripts/fetch_pr_checks.py
  2. handle table in step 3
  3. while actionable_pending > 0, run uv run scripts/fetch_pr_feedback.py
  4. fix new high/medium feedback immediately
  5. if changed, verify, commit, push, restart loop
  6. otherwise sleep 30 seconds and repeat
  7. after checks pass, wait 10 seconds, fetch feedback once more
  8. if new high/medium feedback exists, return to step 4

Claude Code optional: run uv run scripts/monitor_pr_checks.py through MonitorTool with persistent: false; set timeout to normal repo CI duration. Restart the monitor after every push.

Exit Conditions

ExitConditions
Successactionable CI passed; post-CI feedback clean; low-priority choice handled
Ask usersame failure after 2 attempts; feedback unclear; infrastructure issue
Stopno PR; branch needs rebase; no checks; draft no-checks; only human gates remain

Fallback

If scripts fail, use gh CLI directly:

  • gh pr view --json number,url,headRefName,isDraft,reviewDecision
  • gh pr checks --json name,state,bucket,description,link
  • gh run view <run-id> --log-failed
  • gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{number}/comments

sentryのその他のスキル

generate-frontend-forms
sentry
Sentryの新しいフォームシステムを使用してフォームを作成するためのガイドです。フォーム、フォームフィールド、バリデーション、または自動保存機能を実装する際に使用してください。
official
sentry-snapshots-cocoa
sentry
Apple/Cocoaプロジェクト向けの完全なSentry Snapshots設定。 「SnapshotPreviewsを設定」「Appleスナップショットテストを設定」「Appleスナップショットをアップロード」と依頼された場合に使用します。
official
architecture-review
sentry
スタッフレベルのコードベースヘルスレビュー。モノリシックモジュール、サイレント障害、型安全性のギャップ、テストカバレッジの穴、LLMフレンドリー性の問題を発見します。
official
linear-type-labeler
sentry
Linearの課題を分類し、各課題のタイトルと説明の内容に基づいて、Sentryワークスペースのラベル分類からTypeラベルを適用します。
official
sentry-flutter-sdk
sentry
FlutterおよびDart向けの完全なSentry SDKセットアップ。「FlutterにSentryを追加」「sentry_flutterをインストール」「DartでSentryをセットアップ」、またはエラー設定を構成するよう求められた場合に使用します。
official
sentry-svelte-sdk
sentry
SvelteおよびSvelteKit向けの完全なSentry SDKセットアップ。「SvelteにSentryを追加」「SvelteKitにSentryを追加」「@sentry/sveltekitをインストール」、または設定を求められた場合に使用します。
official
vercel-react-best-practices
sentry
Vercel EngineeringによるReactおよびNext.jsのパフォーマンス最適化ガイドライン。このスキルは、React/Next.jsのコードを記述、レビュー、またはリファクタリングする際に使用すべきものです。
official
sentry-tanstack-start-sdk
sentry
TanStack Start React向けの完全なSentry SDKセットアップ。「TanStack StartにSentryを追加」、「@sentry/tanstackstart-reactをインストール」、またはエラー設定を求められた場合に使用します。
official