bootstrap-realtime-eval

作成者: openai

このクックブックリポジトリ内で、examples/evals/realtime_evals から適切なハーネスを選び、プロンプト/ツール/データ…をスキャフォールディングして、新しいリアルタイム評価フォルダをブートストラップします。

npx skills add https://github.com/openai/openai-cookbook --skill bootstrap-realtime-eval

Bootstrap Realtime Eval

Use this skill when the user wants a new realtime eval scaffold under examples/evals/realtime_evals/.

This skill is repo-specific. Do not copy harness code into the generated folder. The generated eval should point at the shared harnesses already in:

  • examples/evals/realtime_evals/crawl_harness
  • examples/evals/realtime_evals/walk_harness
  • examples/evals/realtime_evals/run_harness

Inputs To Collect

Always ask the user for the minimum set needed to choose and scaffold the eval before you create files, run the scaffold script, or author starter data. Do not skip this just because you can infer a default.

Ask for:

  • Eval name
  • Goal or scenario
  • Harness choice, or enough context to recommend one
  • System prompt path or inline text
  • Tools JSON path or tool descriptions
  • Data path or source materials
  • Desired graders

If the user does not know which harness they want, explain the options briefly and recommend one. See references/harness-selection.md.

When the user asks for synthetic audio but does not specify a harness, default to crawl text-to-TTS unless they need the generated audio to carry particular noise, telephony artifacts, speaker characteristics, or other replay-specific properties. Use walk for those cases.

Keep the questions concise and grouped into one short batch whenever possible.

If the user only provides user_text or a short task description, still ask the questions above first. If they answer only partially, then infer the remaining low-risk details, call out the assumptions, and make the scaffold easy to revise later.

Workflow

  1. Ask the user for the required inputs first.

    • Do this before making files or selecting a final harness.
    • If the user already supplied some of the inputs, ask only for the missing ones.
    • If you recommend a harness, wait for the user response before scaffolding.
  2. Pick the harness.

    • crawl: single-turn text-to-TTS.
    • walk: replay saved audio or generate audio from text rows.
    • run: multi-turn simulation with tool mocks and judge criteria.
    • If the user wants synthetic audio but does not care about replay-specific audio characteristics, prefer crawl over walk.
  3. Normalize the inputs.

    • If the user gives inline prompt or tool content, write it into the generated folder.
    • If the user gives CSV data, inspect it with pandas before wiring it in.
    • If the data is not yet harness-ready, scaffold the files and then have you author the starter dataset directly in those files.
    • If the user only gives user_text, infer example_id values and leave optional grading fields blank unless you have enough signal to fill them.
    • Ground the starter data in the use case, prompts, tools, and any other material the user provided.
    • Make the starter data realistic. Put yourself in the shoes of the end user in that use case and craft datapoints that a real user would plausibly say or do.
  4. Be proactive when data is missing.

    • crawl: you should author 3 starter rows covering one happy path and a couple of nearby variants or edge cases.
    • walk: you should author 3 source CSV rows and prepare the audio-generation step so the user can create audio immediately.
    • run: you should author 2 starter simulations, not 1.
    • Do not rely on deterministic script-generated samples for use-case-specific starter data.
    • Show the generated starter samples to the user, ask for a quick greenlight or correction, then expand only after feedback when the task calls for more coverage.
  5. Run the scaffold script:

python examples/evals/realtime_evals/skills/bootstrap-realtime-eval/scripts/bootstrap_realtime_eval.py --name "<eval_name>" --harness "<crawl|walk|run>"

Add flags for prompt, tools, data, graders, and run-specific fields as needed. Read the script help if you need the exact flag names.

  1. Review the generated folder.

    • Confirm the README is accurate for the selected harness.
    • Confirm the system prompt, tools, and data files point at the generated folder.
    • If the user provided real data, make sure it is wired in instead of leaving starter placeholders.
    • If you authored inferred starter data, show the user the generated rows or simulations before scaling up.
  2. Enrich the scaffold.

    • For crawl and walk, make the CSV realistic and ensure the expected tool columns are present.
    • For walk, if the dataset lacks audio_path, use the shared walk_harness/generate_audio.py flow described in the README.
    • For run, make sure simulations.csv and the starter sim_*.json file reflect the user’s scenario, tool mocks, and graders.
  3. Validate before returning.

    • Run a smoke eval for the generated folder.
    • If the smoke eval succeeds, automatically run the full eval for the generated folder in the same turn.
    • If the smoke eval fails, stop and fix or report the blocker before attempting the full eval.
    • Run pytest examples/evals/realtime_evals/tests -q.
    • Inspect the generated README and at least one generated data file.

Hard Rules

  • Keep the generated folder inside examples/evals/realtime_evals/.
  • Ask the user for the missing setup information before scaffolding. Do not jump straight to building a default eval when the request is to create a new eval.
  • Do not duplicate the main harness scripts into the generated folder.
  • Do not write generic placeholder starter data when the use case provides enough context to do better.
  • Use the prompt, tools, and scenario details to make the initial datapoints feel like a real user interaction.
  • The README must include:
    • why this harness was chosen
    • which files to edit first
    • smoke and full run commands
    • data contract notes
    • troubleshooting notes
  • Prefer assistant-specific flags for run harness commands:
    • --assistant-system-prompt-file
    • --assistant-tools-file

Completion Criteria

Treat the task as complete only when:

  • the folder exists under examples/evals/realtime_evals/<name>_realtime_eval/
  • README.md, system_prompt.txt, and tools.json exist
  • harness-specific starter data exists, authored by you when the user did not provide it
  • the smoke command has been run or is blocked for a clear reason
  • if the smoke command succeeded, the full eval command has also been run or is blocked for a clear reason
  • pytest examples/evals/realtime_evals/tests -q has been run

Learnings

When this skill uncovers a reusable workflow or harness constraint that should guide future bootstrap work, add a short note here.

Keep learnings concise and action-oriented:

  • Problem -> Fix -> Why

Only add items that are likely to help future realtime-eval scaffolding in this repo. Remove stale items when they no longer apply.

  • gpt-realtime temperature is unsupported -> Do not add a temperature field or CLI flag when scaffolding gpt-realtime evals -> Avoids invalid config and keeps runs aligned with the realtime harness constraints.
  • Starter samples should come from the model, not the scaffold script -> Use the script to create the folder structure and template files, then have you author the initial rows or simulations from the user’s use case -> Produces more relevant starter data and makes iteration easier with the user.
  • Synthetic audio can be overfit to the wrong harness -> Default unspecified synthetic-audio requests to crawl text-to-TTS and reserve walk for replay-specific audio characteristics like noise or telephony artifacts -> Keeps the bootstrap path simpler unless audio realism is the actual target.
  • Smoke-only validation can leave scaffolds half-proven -> After a successful smoke run, automatically run the full eval before declaring the bootstrap complete -> Catches dataset-wide or late-row failures that a one-example smoke test misses.

openaiのその他のスキル

user-context
openai
Data Analyticsプラグインの永続的なソースルーティング設定、オンボーディングロジック、セットアップ進捗、およびセマンティックレイヤーレジストリを読み込むか管理します。
official
notion-research-documentation
openai
Notionのコンテンツを調査し、構造化されたブリーフ、レポート、または引用付きの比較にまとめます。対象クエリを使用してNotionページを検索・取得し、テーマごとに調査結果を整理し、インラインのソース引用と参考文献セクションを追加します。範囲とユーザーの目的に応じて、4つの出力形式(クイックブリーフ、調査サマリー、比較、包括的レポート)から選択します。組み込みテンプレートを使用してNotionページを作成・更新し、新しい情報が到着するたびにソースを直接リンクし、変更を追跡します...
official
rcsb-pdb-skill
openai
コアメタデータ、Search APIクエリ、FASTAダウンロードのためのコンパクトなRCSB PDBリクエストを送信します。ユーザーが簡潔なRCSBサマリーを希望する場合に使用し、生のJSONや…を保存します。
official
pdf
openai
PDFの読み取り、作成、検証(視覚的レンダリングおよびプログラムによる生成を含む)。Poppler(pdftoppm)を使用して、納品前にレイアウト、スペーシング、タイポグラフィを視覚的に検査するためにPDFページをPNGにレンダリング。reportlabを使用してプログラム的にPDFを生成し、信頼性の高いフォーマットを実現。pdfplumberまたはpypdfを使用してテキストとメタデータを抽出。品質基準を遵守:テキストのクリッピングなし、要素の重なりなし、テーブルの破損なし、レンダリングアーティファクトなし。ASCIIハイフンのみ、人間が読める引用を使用。
official
test-coverage-improver
openai
Improve test coverage in the OpenAI Agents JS monorepo: run `pnpm test:coverage`, inspect coverage artifacts, identify low-coverage files and branches, propose…
official
playwright
openai
ターミナル駆動のブラウザ自動化で、要素スナップショットとインタラクティブなUIワークフローを備えています。playwright-cliラッパースクリプト(npxが必要)を介して動作し、ヘッドレスモードとヘッドモードの両方をサポートし、ビジュアルデバッグが可能です。コアワークフローは、ページを開き、安定した要素参照のためにスナップショットを取得し、参照を使用して操作し、ナビゲーションやDOM変更後に再スナップショットを取得します。フォーム入力、クリック、タイピング、マルチタブ管理、スクリーンショット/PDFキャプチャ、フローデバッグ用のトレース記録を含みます。要素参照(例:e3、e15)...
official
ukb-topmed-phewas-skill
openai
単一バリアントのコンパクトなUKB-TOPMed PheWASサマリーを取得します。rsID、GRCh37、またはGRCh38の入力を受け付け、必要なGRCh38クエリに解決します。以下の場合に使用します…
official
code-review-context
openai
モデル可視コンテキスト
official