reproduce-bug

作成者: n8n-io

Linearのチケットから、失敗するテストを伴うバグを再現します。入力として、チケットの完全なコンテキスト(タイトル、説明、コメント)が提供されることを前提としています。

npx skills add https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n --skill reproduce-bug

Bug Reproduction Framework

Given a Linear ticket context ($ARGUMENTS), systematically reproduce the bug with a failing regression test.

Step 1: Parse Signals

Extract the following from the provided ticket context:

  • Error message / stack trace (if provided)
  • Reproduction steps (if provided)
  • Workflow JSON (if attached)
  • Affected area (node, execution engine, editor, API, config, etc.)
  • Version where it broke / last working version

Step 2: Route to Test Strategy

Based on the affected area, pick the test layer and pattern:

AreaTest LayerPatternKey Location
Node operationVitest unitNodeTestHarness + nockpackages/nodes-base/nodes/*/test/
Node credentialVitest unitvitest-mock-extendedpackages/nodes-base/nodes/*/test/
Trigger webhookVitest unitmock IHookFunctions + vi.mock GenericFunctionspackages/nodes-base/nodes/*/test/
Binary dataVitest unitNodeTestHarness assertBinaryDatapackages/core/nodes-testing/
Execution engineVitest integrationWorkflowRunner + DI containerpackages/cli/src/__tests__/
CLI / APIVitest integrationsetupTestServer + supertestpackages/cli/test/integration/
ConfigVitest unitGlobalConfig + Containerpackages/@n8n/config/src/configs/__tests__/
Editor UIVitestVue Test Utils + Piniapackages/frontend/editor-ui/src/**/__tests__/
E2E / CanvasPlaywrightTest containers + composablespackages/testing/playwright/

Step 3: Locate Source Files

Find the source code for the affected area:

  1. Search for the node/service/component mentioned in the ticket
  2. Find the GenericFunctions file (common bug location for nodes)
  3. Check for existing test files in the same area
  4. Look at recent git history on affected files (git log --oneline -10 -- <path>)

Step 4: Trace the Code Path

Read the source code and trace the execution path that triggers the bug:

  • Follow the call chain from entry point to the failure
  • Identify the specific line(s) where the bug manifests
  • Note any error handling (or lack thereof) around the bug

Step 5: Form Hypothesis

State a clear, testable hypothesis:

  • "When [input/condition], the code does [wrong thing] because [root cause]"
  • Identify the exact line(s) that need to change
  • Predict what the test output will show

Step 6: Find Test Patterns

Look for existing tests in the same area:

  1. Check test/ directories near the affected code
  2. Identify which mock/setup patterns they use
  3. Use the same patterns for consistency
  4. If no tests exist, find the closest similar node/service tests as a template

Step 7: Write Failing Test

Write a regression test that:

  • Uses the patterns found in Step 6
  • Targets the specific hypothesis from Step 5
  • Includes a comment referencing the ticket ID
  • Asserts the CORRECT behavior (test will fail on current code)
  • Also includes a "happy path" test to prove the setup works

Step 8: Run and Score

Run the test from the package directory (e.g., cd packages/nodes-base && pnpm test <file>).

Classify the result:

ConfidenceCriteriaOutput
CONFIRMEDTest fails consistently, failure matches hypothesisReproduction Report
LIKELYTest fails but failure mode differs slightlyReport + caveat
UNCONFIRMEDCannot trigger the failureReport: what was tried
SKIPPEDHit a hard bailout triggerReport: why skipped
ALREADY_FIXEDBug no longer reproduces on current codeReport: when fixed

Step 9: Iterate or Bail

If UNCONFIRMED after first attempt:

  • Revisit hypothesis — re-read the code path
  • Try a different test approach or layer
  • Maximum 3 attempts before declaring UNCONFIRMED

Hard bailout triggers (stop immediately):

  • Requires real third-party API credentials
  • Race condition / timing-dependent
  • Requires specific cloud/enterprise infrastructure
  • Requires manual UI interaction that can't be scripted

Output: Reproduction Report

Present findings in this format:


Ticket: [ID] — [title] Confidence: [CONFIRMED | LIKELY | UNCONFIRMED | SKIPPED | ALREADY_FIXED]

Root Cause

[1-2 sentences explaining the bug mechanism]

Location

FileLinesIssue
path/to/file.tsXX-YYDescription of the problem

Failing Test

path/to/test/file.test.ts — X/Y tests fail:

  1. test name — [failure description]

Fix Hint

[Pseudocode or description of the fix approach]


Important

  • DO NOT fix the bug — only reproduce it with a failing test
  • Leave test files in place as evidence (don't commit unless asked)
  • Run tests from the package directory (e.g., pushd packages/nodes-base && pnpm test <file> && popd)
  • Always redirect build output: pnpm build > build.log 2>&1
  • DO NOT look at existing fix PRs — the goal is to reproduce from signals alone

n8n-ioのその他のスキル

n8n-cli
n8n-io
n8n CLIを使用して、n8nインスタンス上のワークフロー、認証情報、実行などを管理します。ユーザーがn8nとの連携やワークフローの自動化を依頼した場合に使用します。
official
create-issue
n8n-io
n8nの規約に従ってLinearチケットまたはGitHub Issueを作成します。ユーザーがチケット作成、バグ報告、Issue作成を依頼した場合、または/create-issueと入力した場合に使用します。
official
node-add-oauth
n8n-io
既存のn8nノードにOAuth2認証情報のサポートを追加します — 認証情報ファイルを作成し、ノードを更新し、テストを追加し、CLI定数を同期させます。次の場合に使用します…
official
spec-driven-development
n8n-io
実装と仕様の同期を維持します。.claude/specs/に仕様がある機能を扱う場合、ユーザーが/specと言った場合、または開始時に使用します。
official
content-design
n8n-io
Product content designer for UI copy. Use when writing, reviewing, or auditing user-facing text: button labels, error messages, tooltips, empty states, modal…
official
create-issue
n8n-io
n8nの規約に従ってLinearチケットまたはGitHub issueを作成します。ユーザーがチケット作成、バグ報告、issueのオープンを依頼した場合、または/create-issueと入力した場合に使用します。
official
agent-builder
n8n-io
Use when creating, configuring, or editing a target n8n agent's build configuration — chat integrations/triggers, MCP servers, node-tool resource locators,…
official
create-pr
n8n-io
Creates GitHub pull requests with properly formatted titles that pass the check-pr-title CI validation. Use when creating PRs, submitting changes for review,…
official