safe-debug
作成者: lllllllama
ディープラーニング研究作業のためのRigor Debug / Rigor Auditスキル。ユーザーがトレースバック、ターミナルエラー、CUDA OOM、チェックポイント読み込み失敗、形状不一致、NaN損失症状、またはトレーニング失敗を貼り付け、パッチ適用前に保守的な診断を希望し、デバッグ修正が研究貢献と明確に分離されている場合に使用します。広範なリファクタリング、推測的な適応、自動探索的パッチ適用、または一般的なリポジトリの習熟には使用しないでください。
npx skills add https://github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill safe-debugsafe-debug
Use this as the Rigor Debug / Rigor Audit skill. The installed slug remains
safe-debug for compatibility.
Use the shared operating principles in
../../references/agent-operating-principles.md; this skill should guide
conservative diagnosis without blocking the model from finding the local root
cause.
When to apply
- The user provides a traceback, terminal error, or concrete training or inference failure symptom.
- The user wants diagnosis, root-cause narrowing, and minimal patch suggestions before code is changed.
- The user wants a safe debug flow with explicit human approval before mutation.
When not to apply
- When the user wants a broad repository walkthrough without an active failure.
- When the task is speculative experimentation or code adaptation.
- When the user is asking for a large refactor or readability rewrite.
Clear boundaries
- Diagnose first.
- Do not modify repository code by default.
- If a patch is needed, propose the smallest fix and require explicit approval first.
- Escalate savepoint or branch creation before medium-risk or high-risk changes.
- A debug fix is not automatically a research contribution; if it changes experiment meaning or comparability, say so explicitly.
Output expectations
debug_outputs/DIAGNOSIS.mddebug_outputs/PATCH_PLAN.mddebug_outputs/status.json
Notes
Use references/debug-policy.md, ../../references/research-rigor-principles.md, and the shared ../../references/research-pitfall-checklist.md.