preparing-design-handoff

作成者: bitwarden

Bitwardenのデザインハンドオフを準備する — Ready-for-Dev状態のFigmaファイルと、それに伴うJiraの状態遷移。In-Designゲートの終了 /…

npx skills add https://github.com/bitwarden/ai-plugins --skill preparing-design-handoff

Preparing a Design Handoff

This skill is the end-of-In-Design gate. Engineering relies on a consistent set of signals to know a design is ready to pick up. A handoff missing any of those signals creates downstream questions and slows the epic into development.

The handoff is two things, not one

A handoff is finished when both are in place:

  1. The Figma file in Ready-for-Dev state. Final designs grouped on a single page, with sections named to match the engineering stories that will consume them. Sections marked "Ready for Dev" in Figma. User-visible strings (toasts, error messages, form verifications, email body copy) annotated on the frames. Annotated prototype available.
  2. The Jira state aligned. Figma file linked in the Epic's "Design" field, sections marked Ready for Dev in Figma, and the EM transitions the Epic to Ready for Dev. The full choreography is in navigating-design-jira-process.

If either is missing, the handoff isn't done.

Prep checklist (before declaring handoff)

  • The product initiative or PRD page exists and is current.
  • The engineering Epic exists in Jira and the designer is or has been assigned to it.
  • Designs have been through critique at 30%, 60%, and 90% and the 90% review has been addressed.
  • Real-user testing has happened where applicable (this is what 90% is for).
  • The Figma file's final-designs page is curated — no scratch pages, no unused frames in the Ready-for-Dev surface.
  • All user-visible strings are annotated in Figma alongside the frames they apply to.

If any item is missing, surface that before declaring the handoff ready — handoff is not the moment to discover the 90% review never happened.

Figma readiness check

Before marking sections Ready for Dev, confirm:

  • Sections aligned to stories. Each named section maps to a single engineering story. Avoid sections that span stories or stories that span multiple sections.
  • Tokens are library-bound. No raw hex values where a design-system variable exists. Compose using-figma with get_variable_defs to verify.
  • Strings annotated. Every user-visible string — button labels, error messages, toasts, empty states, helper text — is present in the Figma frames or annotations.
  • Edge cases covered. Empty, error, partial-success, offline, and premium-gated states exist on the relevant frames (or are explicitly out of scope and noted).

Composing with other skills

  • using-figma. Use get_metadata to confirm the Ready-for-Dev sections exist with the expected names; use get_variable_defs to confirm tokens are library-bound rather than raw values; use search_design_system if a component in the design is suspiciously close to one that already exists.
  • navigating-design-jira-process. The Jira moves that go with handoff — link Figma to Epic "Design" field, mark Ready for Dev in Figma, EM transitions Epic — live there.
  • content-style-guide. Walk every annotated string through the style guide before declaring handoff. Toasts, errors, and form-verification text are the highest-leverage place to catch content-style issues before engineering localizes them.

Common omissions to catch

  • Figma file with no Ready-for-Dev marks. Engineering can't find what's final. This is the most-skipped step.
  • Sections not aligned to stories. Each story should map to a Figma section whose content is only that story. Mismatch creates ambiguity at review time.
  • Missing string annotations. Engineering will ask for strings the moment they pick the Epic up. Annotate them in Figma alongside the frames before declaring handoff — don't defer to engineering to invent copy.
  • Edge states absent. Empty, error, partial-success, offline, premium-gated. If they're out of scope, say so explicitly on the frames or in the dev-support comments.

Output format

When asked to help prep a handoff:

  1. Prep checklist — what's in place, what's missing.
  2. Figma readiness check — section-to-story alignment, token binding, string annotations, edge states.
  3. Jira moves — the specific status transitions and Figma links to apply (link to Epic "Design" field, mark sections Ready for Dev, EM transitions Epic). Defer to navigating-design-jira-process for the canonical choreography.

Always end with the explicit go/no-go: is this handoff actually ready?

bitwardenのその他のスキル

figma-to-angular
bitwarden
このスキルは、Figmaのデザイン仕様を、Bitwarden Clientsモノレポ内でStorybookストーリーを持つ完全に実装されたAngularコンポーネントに変換します。出力は、すべてのコードベースの規約に従いながら、視覚的にデザインと一致する必要があります。
force-multiplier
bitwarden
1つの意図を多数のターゲットに同時に適用する——Bitwardenエコシステム全体のリポジトリ群や、モノレポ内の多くのプロジェクト——をN個の一貫した……として。
analyzing-git-sessions
bitwarden
指定された時間枠またはコミット範囲内のgitコミットと変更を分析し、コードレビュー、振り返り、作業ログ、セッション…のための構造化されたサマリーを提供します。
coordinating-cross-team-breakdown
bitwarden
クロスチームのレビューと承認を調整し、Bitwarden Tech Breakdownを実施します。影響を受けるチームの特定、パート3の承認テーブルの作成、フォローアップの際に使用します。
assessing-jira-issue-relevance
bitwarden
ユーザーが単一のJira課題キーを提示し、それがまだ関連性があるか、まだ適用可能か、まだ保留中か、まだバグか、修正済みか、またはその可能性があるかを尋ねる場合に使用します。
assessing-test-coverage
bitwarden
特定の変更(PR、Jiraキー、Tech Breakdownドキュメント、Testmo CSV、変更されたパス、または指定された…)に対して、どのテストカバレッジが既に存在するかを判断する際に使用します。
retrospecting
bitwarden
Claude Codeセッションの包括的な分析を実行し、git履歴、会話ログ、コード変更を調査し、ユーザーフィードバックを収集して生成する…
reviewing-incremental-changes
bitwarden
このスキルは、既にコメントがあるPRを再レビューする際や、初回レビュー後の開発者の変更に対応する際に使用します。PRスレッドが存在する場合や…に適用します。