finding-replay-for-issue

द्वारा posthog

जब कोई उपयोगकर्ता कहता है "मुझे इस त्रुटि के लिए एक रीप्ले दिखाएं" या "समस्या X के लिए एक रिकॉर्डिंग ढूंढें", तो लक्ष्य केवल कोई लिंक किया गया सत्र नहीं है — बल्कि वह सत्र है जो सबसे अच्छा दिखाता है कि त्रुटि किस कारण हुई। लोकप्रिय समस्याओं से सैकड़ों लिंक किए गए सत्र जुड़े हो सकते हैं, और अधिकांश केवल क्रैश-ओनली टुकड़े या डुप्लिकेट घटनाएं होती हैं। यह कौशल सबसे उपय

npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/ai-plugin --skill finding-replay-for-issue

Finding the best replay for an error tracking issue

When a user says "show me a replay for this error" or "find a recording for issue X", the goal isn't just any linked session — it's the one that best shows what led to the error. Popular issues can have hundreds of linked sessions, and most are crash-only fragments or duplicate occurrences. This skill picks the most useful one.

Available tools

ToolPurpose
posthog:query-error-tracking-issueGet issue details (fingerprint, status, volume)
posthog:execute-sqlQuery exception events to find linked sessions
posthog:query-session-recordings-listFetch recording metadata for candidate sessions
posthog:session-recording-getGet full details for the selected recording
posthog:vision-observations-listCheck for an existing Replay Vision AI summary
posthog:vision-scanners-listFind summarizer scanners (scanner_type=summarizer)
posthog:vision-scanners-scan-sessionRun a summarizer scanner on the recording (optional, slow)

Workflow

Step 1 — Get the issue details

Fetch the error tracking issue to understand what you're looking for:

posthog:query-error-tracking-issue
{
  "issueId": "<issue_id>"
}

Note the issue's fingerprint, name, and description — you'll need the fingerprint to find linked sessions.

Step 2 — Find sessions with this error

Query exception events to get session IDs where this error occurred. Order by recency and include basic context:

posthog:execute-sql
SELECT
    $session_id AS session_id,
    count() AS occurrences,
    min(timestamp) AS first_seen,
    max(timestamp) AS last_seen,
    any(properties.$current_url) AS url
FROM events
WHERE event = '$exception'
    AND properties.$exception_fingerprint = '<fingerprint>'
    AND $session_id IS NOT NULL
    AND timestamp > now() - INTERVAL 30 DAY
GROUP BY session_id
ORDER BY last_seen DESC
LIMIT 20

This gives you up to 20 candidate sessions. More candidates means better selection.

Step 3 — Rank the candidates

Fetch recording metadata for the candidate sessions to rank them:

posthog:query-session-recordings-list
{
  "session_ids": ["<id1>", "<id2>", "<id3>", ...],
  "date_from": "-30d"
}

Pick the best recording by filtering out bad candidates, then ranking what's left:

Filter out:

  • Sessions under 10 seconds (crash-only fragments, no pre-error context)
  • Sessions over 1 hour (too much data to load, error is a needle in a haystack)

Rank by:

  1. Sweet-spot duration — 2-15 minutes is ideal. Long enough to show the user's journey before the error, short enough to be practical to watch or summarize.
  2. Active time ratio — compare active_seconds to recording_duration. A 20-minute recording with 10 seconds of activity is mostly idle tabs — the user walked away. Prefer sessions where active_seconds / recording_duration is above 0.3 (30%).
  3. Activity score — higher activity_score means the user was actively interacting, not idle. More interesting to watch.
  4. Recency — more recent sessions reflect current app behavior.

Step 4 — Present the finding

Fetch full details for the selected recording:

posthog:session-recording-get
{
  "id": "<best_recording_id>"
}

Present to the user:

  • The recording with a link to watch it
  • Why this one — briefly explain the selection ("longest session with the error, user was browsing 3 pages before hitting it")
  • Pre-error context — what pages the user visited and key actions before the exception, derived from the events query in step 2 (the url and first_seen columns)
  • Error frequency — how many times the error occurred in this session

Optional: AI summary via Replay Vision

If the user wants a narrative summary without watching, use Replay Vision — "check-then-scan", since a scanner can only observe a given session once.

  1. Check for an existing summary on the selected recording:

    posthog:vision-observations-list
    {
      "session_id": "<best_recording_id>"
    }
    

    If an observation has scanner_snapshot.scanner_type summarizer and status succeeded, read scanner_result.model_output (title, summary, intent, outcome, friction_points, keywords) — done.

  2. Find a summarizer scanner if none exists:

    posthog:vision-scanners-list
    {
      "scanner_type": "summarizer"
    }
    

    One → use it. More than one → ask the user which (show name + prompt). None → offer to create one via the creating-replay-vision-scanners skill.

  3. Scan the recording with the chosen scanner (async, several minutes):

    posthog:vision-scanners-scan-session
    {
      "id": "<scanner_id>",
      "session_id": "<best_recording_id>"
    }
    
  4. Retrieve by polling vision-observations-list until succeeded.

Tips

  • If all candidate sessions are very short (<10 seconds), the error likely crashes the page immediately. Note this — it's useful context even without a long replay.
  • When the issue has very few linked sessions (<3), skip the ranking and just present what's available with a note about the small sample.
  • If $session_id is null on many exception events, session replay may not be enabled for the affected users. Mention this as a possible gap.
  • Replay Vision has no per-call focus parameter — a summarizer scanner's focus comes from its own prompt. For error-focused summaries, prefer (or create) a summarizer scanner whose prompt targets error/exception context rather than the whole session.

posthog की और Skills

error-tracking-go
posthog
PostHog द्वारा Go के लिए त्रुटि ट्रैकिंग
official
integration-laravel
posthog
PostHog का Laravel अनुप्रयोगों के लिए एकीकरण
official
integration-nextjs-app-router
posthog
PostHog का Next.js App Router अनुप्रयोगों के लिए एकीकरण
official
logs-other
posthog
PostHog लॉग्स अन्य भाषाओं के लिए
official
logs-python
posthog
PostHog लॉग्स फॉर पायथन
official
analyzing-experiment-session-replays
posthog
प्रयोग वेरिएंट में सत्र रीप्ले पैटर्न का विश्लेषण करें ताकि उपयोगकर्ता व्यवहार में अंतर को समझा जा सके। इसका उपयोग तब करें जब उपयोगकर्ता यह देखना चाहे कि उपयोगकर्ता कैसे इंटरैक्ट करते हैं...
official
auditing-experiments-flags
posthog
PostHog प्रयोगों और फीचर फ्लैग्स का ऑडिट करें, कॉन्फ़िगरेशन समस्याओं, पुरानेपन और सर्वोत्तम-अभ्यास उल्लंघनों के लिए। तब पढ़ें जब उपयोगकर्ता ऑडिट, स्वास्थ्य-जांच, ... के लिए पूछे।
official
auditing-warehouse-data-health
posthog
यह कौशल डेटा वेयरहाउस पाइपलाइन का एक प्रोजेक्ट-व्यापी ऑडिट तैयार करता है। इसका उपयोग तब करें जब उपयोगकर्ता सब कुछ खराब होने का सारांश चाहता है, न कि किसी एक सिंक की गहन जांच। व्यक्तिगत विफलताओं की गहन जांच diagnosing-failed-warehouse-syncs है; यह कौशल वह स्कैन है जो उन्हें बताता है कि पहले कहाँ देखना है।
official