exploring-apm-traces

द्वारा posthog

PostHog OpenTelemetry से वितरित ट्रेस कैप्चर करता है। प्रत्येक ट्रेस स्पैन का एक पेड़ होता है जो सेवाओं के माध्यम से एक अनुरोध के पथ का प्रतिनिधित्व करता है।

npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/ai-plugin --skill exploring-apm-traces

Exploring APM traces (OpenTelemetry spans)

PostHog captures distributed traces from OpenTelemetry. Each trace is a tree of spans representing a request's path through services.

Disambiguation: This skill is for APM / OpenTelemetry traces. Do not confuse with AI observability traces (agent/model $ai_* events) or logs (posthog:query-logs, posthog:logs-*).

Available tools

ToolPurpose
posthog:query-apm-spansSearch and filter spans (compact list view)
posthog:apm-trace-getGet the full span list for one hex trace_id
posthog:apm-spans-aggregatePer-operation aggregates (count, p50/p95, errors)
posthog:apm-spans-treeCall-tree aggregates per (parent, child) edge
posthog:apm-spans-countScalar span count — cheap filter pre-flight
posthog:apm-spans-sparklineSpan counts over time (zero-filled time series)
posthog:apm-spans-duration-histogramTrace counts per log-scale duration bucket
posthog:apm-attribute-breakdownSpan counts grouped by one attribute's value
posthog:apm-services-listList distinct service names
posthog:apm-attributes-listList span or resource attribute keys
posthog:apm-attribute-values-listList values for a specific attribute key

See references/spans-and-fields.md for the response schema and the kind/status_code enums.

Workflow: debug a trace from a URL

Step 1 — Fetch the trace

posthog:apm-trace-get
{
  "trace_id": "<hex_trace_id>"
}

The response is { results: [span, span, …] } — a flat list of every span in the trace. The list can be very large for fan-out request flows; when it exceeds the inline limit, Claude Code auto-persists it to a file.

From the result you get:

  • Every span with name, service_name, kind, status_code, parent_span_id, duration_nano, is_root_span
  • The _posthogUrlalways include this in your response so the user can click through to the UI

Step 2 — Parse large results with scripts

When the result is persisted to a file (traces with hundreds of spans across services), use the parsing scripts to explore it.

Start with the summary to get the full picture, then drill into specifics:

# 1. Overview: services, span count, slowest spans, errors
python3 scripts/print_summary.py /path/to/persisted-file.json

# 2. Indented chronological tree (DFS by parent_span_id)
python3 scripts/print_timeline.py /path/to/persisted-file.json

# 3. Drill into a specific span by name
SPAN="HTTP GET /api/users" python3 scripts/extract_span.py /path/to/persisted-file.json

# 4. Search for a keyword across span names, services, IDs
SEARCH="keyword" python3 scripts/search_spans.py /path/to/persisted-file.json

# 5. When the JSON shape looks unfamiliar
python3 scripts/show_structure.py /path/to/persisted-file.json

All scripts support MAX_LEN=N env var to control truncation (0 = unlimited).

Tree reconstruction (parent_span_id → span_id)

The flat span list is a tree. Each span carries:

  • trace_id — same on every span in the trace
  • span_id — this span's unique hex ID
  • parent_span_id — points to the parent's span_id (zero-padded hex 000…000 for the root)
  • is_root_span — convenience flag for the trace entry

To rebuild the tree:

  1. Spans where is_root_span is true (or parent_span_id == "00000000…") are root spans.
  2. Every other span is a child of the span whose span_id matches its parent_span_id.
  3. Group by parent_span_id, walk from each root downward.

scripts/print_timeline.py does this for you and prints a DFS-indented tree.

Investigation patterns

"Where is time going?"

  1. Every span from apm-trace-get carries self_time_nano — duration not covered by children. Sort by it: the top span is where wall-clock actually went. A parent with large self_time_nano is an uninstrumented gap (the work happened inside it, not in any recorded child).
  2. Run print_summary.py — it surfaces the top-5 slowest spans by duration_nano.
  3. For a noisy trace, run print_timeline.py and scan the indented durations — you can see whether time is dominated by one child span or fan-out across many.
  4. To dig into one slow span, SPAN="<name>" python3 scripts/extract_span.py FILE.
  5. For aggregate "which child dominates" questions use apm-spans-tree and read calls_per_parent_invocation — it separates a child that's slow per call from one that merely runs 20× per parent.

"Where did the error happen?"

  1. print_summary.py lists every span with status_code == 2 (Error). Each entry shows service, span name, and parent context.
  2. Walk up the tree from an error span via parent_span_id to see what request path led there.
  3. Error detail lives in each span's attributes map (e.g. exception.message, exception.type), which is returned in the trace payload — read it directly off the error span. apm-attribute-values-list is for discovering values across spans, not a prerequisite for reading one span's attributes.

"Did the request hit service X?"

  1. Run print_summary.py — it prints the set of services involved in the trace.
  2. If service X is missing, the request never reached it (or instrumentation is missing — check apm-services-list to confirm X has emitted spans recently at all).

"What's different about the bad spans?" (over-represented values)

  1. Scope to the bad population: filterGroup with status_code = Error, or a duration threshold.
  2. Discover candidate keys with apm-attributes-list — typical suspects: server.address, http.response.status_code, db.system, resource keys like k8s.pod.name / service.version.
  3. Run apm-attribute-breakdown per candidate key on the bad set. A value owning most of the count is the signature.
  4. Confirm over-representation: re-run without the bad-set filter (or compare error_count / count per row). A value at 95% of errors but 10% of traffic is the culprit; one at 95% of both is just volume.

"When did it spike?" (trends over time)

  1. apm-spans-sparkline with your filters → total counts per time bucket (zero-filled, ~50 adaptive buckets per window).
  2. The same call with statusCodes: [2] → error counts per bucket.
  3. Error rate per bucket = errors / total; the bucket where the ratio jumps is when the spike started.
  4. Zoom in: re-run with a narrower dateRange around that bucket, then pull raw spans via query-apm-spans.

"What does the latency distribution look like?"

  1. apm-spans-duration-histogram → trace counts per log-scale (1-2-5 series) duration bucket of the ROOT span.
  2. A second hump or a fat tail = a distinct slow population; note its bucket_ns range.
  3. Fetch the actual slow traces with query-apm-spans using a duration filter (nanoseconds) and orderBy: "duration".

"Did the fan-out look right?"

  1. print_timeline.py shows the indentation — wide trees mean parallel calls, deep trees mean sequential dependencies.
  2. Look for spans of kind Client (3) followed by matching Server (2) spans on the called service — that's a synchronous downstream call.

Searching by attribute (e.g. http.method=POST)

Each span carries an attributes map (span-level OTel attributes like http.method, db.statement) in the payload — so for a span you already have, just read it. Resource attributes (k8s labels, service.version) are not in the payload. To filter the whole dataset by an attribute:

  1. Use apm-attributes-list / apm-attribute-values-list to discover keys and values (resource attributes especially).
  2. Re-issue query-apm-spans with a filterGroup entry of type span_attribute or span_resource_attribute.

Constructing UI links

apm-trace-get and query-apm-spans return _posthogUrlalways surface this to the user so they can verify in the PostHog UI.

When presenting findings, include the relevant PostHog URL.

Finding traces

Use posthog:query-apm-spans to search and filter spans. Note this returns spans, not a tree — pass query.traceId or grab a trace_id from the results and feed it to apm-trace-get for the tree.

Discover before filtering

Before constructing filters, discover what's actually in the project:

  1. Confirm services exist — call apm-services-list to see which services have emitted spans.
  2. Find filterable attributes — call apm-attributes-list with attribute_type: "span" or "resource".
  3. Get actual values — call apm-attribute-values-list with a key to see the real values in use.

Only then construct query-apm-spans filters. Custom attributes vary per project and cannot be guessed.

By filters

posthog:query-apm-spans
{
  "query": {
    "serviceNames": ["api-gateway"],
    "dateRange": {"date_from": "-1h"},
    "filterGroup": [
      {"key": "http.status_code", "operator": "gt", "type": "span_attribute", "value": "499"}
    ]
  }
}

By trace ID (when known)

posthog:apm-trace-get
{
  "trace_id": "0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef"
}

Common gotchas

  • Durations are nanoseconds. 1 second = 1_000_000_000. Filter values in query-apm-spans for duration are also nanoseconds.
  • status_code == 2 is Error. 0 is Unset, 1 is OK. Use OK to match {0, 1} in the UI filter.
  • kind is an integer 0–5: 0 Unspecified, 1 Internal, 2 Server, 3 Client, 4 Producer, 5 Consumer.
  • parent_span_id of a root span is "0000000000000000" (16 zero hex chars, matching the 8-byte span ID width — not the 16-byte trace ID width), not null.

Parsing large trace results

Trace tool results are JSON. When too large to read inline, Claude Code persists them to a file.

Persisted file format

[{ "type": "text", "text": "{\"results\": [...], \"_posthogUrl\": \"...\"}" }]

Every script in scripts/ unwraps this envelope before parsing.

Trace JSON structure

results (array of span dicts)
  └── each span:
        ├── uuid, trace_id, span_id, parent_span_id (hex strings)
        ├── name, kind (int 0–5), service_name
        ├── status_code (int 0–2), is_root_span (bool)
        ├── timestamp, end_time (ISO 8601)
        ├── duration_nano (int, nanoseconds)
        ├── attributes (map of span-level OTel attributes, e.g. db.statement, http.url)
        └── matched_filter (0/1 — 1 if this span matched the query-apm-spans filter, 0 if it
            only shares a trace with a match; always present, only meaningful from query-apm-spans)

Available scripts

ScriptPurposeUsage
print_summary.pyTrace metadata, services, slowest spans, errorspython3 scripts/print_summary.py FILE
print_timeline.pyDFS-indented tree from parent_span_id walkpython3 scripts/print_timeline.py FILE
extract_span.pyFull row + parent/children for spans matching a nameSPAN="name" python3 scripts/extract_span.py FILE
search_spans.pyFind a keyword across name, service_name, IDsSEARCH="kw" python3 scripts/search_spans.py FILE
show_structure.pyShow JSON keys and types without valuespython3 scripts/show_structure.py FILE

Tips

  • Always set dateRange on query-apm-spans — queries without a time range are slow. Default is -1h; widen only when needed.
  • Always include the _posthogUrl in your response so the user can click through.
  • Span-level attributes are in the apm-trace-get / query-apm-spans payload (each span's attributes map). Resource attributes are not — use apm-attributes-list (type resource) and apm-attribute-values-list for those.
  • is_root_span is the cheap way to find the trace entry — don't string-match 00000000….
  • For aggregates (p95 by operation, slowest children of a span), use apm-spans-aggregate for a flat view or apm-spans-tree for parent→child edges — don't reach for SQL.

posthog की और Skills

error-tracking-go
posthog
PostHog द्वारा Go के लिए त्रुटि ट्रैकिंग
official
integration-laravel
posthog
PostHog का Laravel अनुप्रयोगों के लिए एकीकरण
official
integration-nextjs-app-router
posthog
PostHog का Next.js App Router अनुप्रयोगों के लिए एकीकरण
official
logs-other
posthog
PostHog लॉग्स अन्य भाषाओं के लिए
official
logs-python
posthog
PostHog लॉग्स फॉर पायथन
official
analyzing-experiment-session-replays
posthog
प्रयोग वेरिएंट में सत्र रीप्ले पैटर्न का विश्लेषण करें ताकि उपयोगकर्ता व्यवहार में अंतर को समझा जा सके। इसका उपयोग तब करें जब उपयोगकर्ता यह देखना चाहे कि उपयोगकर्ता कैसे इंटरैक्ट करते हैं...
official
auditing-experiments-flags
posthog
PostHog प्रयोगों और फीचर फ्लैग्स का ऑडिट करें, कॉन्फ़िगरेशन समस्याओं, पुरानेपन और सर्वोत्तम-अभ्यास उल्लंघनों के लिए। तब पढ़ें जब उपयोगकर्ता ऑडिट, स्वास्थ्य-जांच, ... के लिए पूछे।
official
auditing-warehouse-data-health
posthog
यह कौशल डेटा वेयरहाउस पाइपलाइन का एक प्रोजेक्ट-व्यापी ऑडिट तैयार करता है। इसका उपयोग तब करें जब उपयोगकर्ता सब कुछ खराब होने का सारांश चाहता है, न कि किसी एक सिंक की गहन जांच। व्यक्तिगत विफलताओं की गहन जांच diagnosing-failed-warehouse-syncs है; यह कौशल वह स्कैन है जो उन्हें बताता है कि पहले कहाँ देखना है।
official