node-compat
Node.js संगतता परीक्षण चलाएँ, विफलताओं का निदान करें, और या तो कार्यान्वयन ठीक करें, छोड़ दें, या परीक्षण को अनदेखा करें। जब node compat परीक्षणों पर काम करने के लिए कहा जाए तो उपयोग करें।
npx skills add https://github.com/denoland/deno --skill node-compatNode Compat Test
Work on Node.js compatibility test $ARGUMENTS.
Step 1: Build and run the test
./x build
./x test-compat $ARGUMENTS
If the test passes, report success and ensure test is specified in
tests/node_compat/config.jsonc.
Step 2: Diagnose the failure
Read the test file to understand what it tests:
# Tests live under tests/node_compat/test/
Use Grep and Read to find the test source, then analyze:
- What Node.js API or behavior is being tested?
- What is the actual error or assertion failure?
- Where is the relevant Deno implementation? Check
ext/node/(polyfills, ops, internal bindings),runtime/, orcli/.
Read the corresponding Node.js docs and/or source code to understand the expected behavior.
Step 3: Classify the failure
Determine which category this failure falls into:
A. Fixable bug
The Deno implementation is wrong or incomplete, but can be corrected. This includes:
- Missing method/property on a polyfill
- Wrong return value or error type
- Missing event emission
- Incorrect argument handling
- Hard-to-fix but still fundamentally implementable behaviors
Action: Fix the implementation (Step 4).
B. Inherent incompatibility
The test relies on Node.js internals or architecture that Deno fundamentally cannot or will not support:
internalBinding()calls to Node's C++ layer- Node.js-specific CLI flags (
--inspect,--prof, etc.) - V8 internals exposed through Node-specific APIs
- Node.js-specific build/addon tooling (node-gyp internals)
- Tests for Node.js's own test infrastructure
Action: Ignore the test with a reason (Step 5).
C. Not worth fixing
The test exercises an edge case or behavior that is technically possible but provides negligible value:
- Extremely obscure error message wording differences
- Node.js-specific deprecation warnings
- Behavior that no real-world code depends on
Action: Ignore or skip the test with a reason (Step 5).
Step 4: Fix the implementation
If the failure is fixable:
- Locate the relevant code in
ext/node/(or elsewhere). - Implement the fix. Match Node.js behavior - check Node.js docs and/or source code, not just what "seems right."
- Use lazy-loaded imports where possible.
- Use primordials for internal JS code to avoid prototype pollution.
- Rebuild the source code with
./x build- this is paramount, changes won't take effect until you do. - Re-run the test to verify the fix:
./x test-compat $ARGUMENTS
- Once the test passes, make sure the test is listed in
tests/node_compat/config.jsoncwith an empty config:
"category/test-name.js": {}
The entries in config.jsonc are sorted alphabetically within their category.
Place the new entry in the correct position.
Step 5: Skip or ignore the test
If the test cannot or should not be fixed, update
tests/node_compat/config.jsonc.
Ignore (test should never run — inherent incompatibility)
"category/test-name.js": {
"ignore": true,
"reason": "Brief, specific explanation of why this can't work in Deno"
}
"reason" must be specified otherwise the lint step will fail!
Platform-specific skip
If the test only fails on certain platforms:
"category/test-name.js": {
"windows": false
}
Expected failure (test runs but fails with known output)
If you want the test to run but expect a specific failure:
"category/test-name.js": {
"exitCode": 1,
"output": "[WILDCARD]specific error message[WILDCARD]",
"reason": "Brief explanation of why this fails"
}
This is a good middle ground for tests that are generally compatible but have a specific known issue. If a fix is ever done this assertion will notify the implementer to update the config.
Writing good reasons
Reasons should be specific and actionable. Good examples:
- "Tests Node.js internal C++ binding (internalBinding('zlib').Zlib) which is not implemented in Deno"
- "requires
deno --interactiveflag (not yet implemented)" - "URL.createObjectURL does not throw ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE for non-Blob arguments"
Bad examples:
- "Not supported" (too vague)
- "Doesn't work" (says nothing)
- "Node-specific" (which part?)
Step 6: Verify
Re-run the test one final time to confirm the outcome matches expectations:
./x test-compat $ARGUMENTS
Config reference
The full schema for config.jsonc entries is in
tests/node_compat/schema.json.
PR title conventions
When opening a PR for node-compat work, use the appropriate prefix:
test:— when the PR only updatestests/node_compat/config.jsoncto skip, ignore, or otherwise reclassify tests without changing implementation code.fix(ext/node):— when the PR actually fixes the implementation so a previously failing test now passes (typically changes underext/node/plus enabling the test inconfig.jsonc).