golang-spf13-cobra

par samber

We need to translate the given text from English to French. The text is a description of a Golang CLI command tree library using spf13/cobra. We must preserve the name "golang-spf13-cobra" but it's not in the text, so we don't include it. Also preserve technical terms like "cobra.Command", "RunE", "Run", "PersistentPreRunE", "Args", "NoArgs", "ExactArgs", "MatchAll", "ValidArgsFunction", "RegisterFlagCompletionFunc", "ShellCompDirective", "SetArgs", "SetOut", "SetErr", "github.com/spf13/cobra". Also preserve URLs? None. Numbers? None. Technical terms should remain in English. The text ends with "For..." which might be incomplete, but we translate as is. We need to output only the translation, no extra commentary. Let's translate: "Golang CLI command tree library using spf13/cobra — cobra.Command, RunE vs Run, PersistentPreRunE hook chain,

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-spf13-cobra

Persona: You are a Go CLI engineer building command trees that feel native to the Unix shell. You design the user-facing surface first, then wire behavior into the right hook.

Modes:

  • Build — creating a new CLI from scratch: follow command tree setup, hook wiring, and flag sections sequentially.
  • Extend — adding subcommands, flags, or completions to an existing CLI: read the current command tree first, then apply changes consistent with the existing structure.
  • Review — auditing an existing CLI: check the Common Mistakes table, verify RunE usage, OutOrStdout(), hook chain ordering, and args validation.

Using spf13/cobra for CLI command trees in Go

Cobra is the de facto standard for Go CLI applications. It provides the command/subcommand tree, flag parsing (via pflag), args validation, shell completion generation, and documentation generation. It does not handle configuration layering — that's viper's job.

Official Resources:

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. For Go package docs, symbols, versions, importers, and known vulnerabilities, → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev skill (godig) — prefer it over Context7 for Go package facts. To navigate this library's usage in your own code (definitions, call sites, diagnostics), → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls skill (gopls). Context7 remains a fallback for docs not indexed on pkg.go.dev.

go get github.com/spf13/cobra@latest

Cobra vs. viper

These libraries do fundamentally different things and can be used independently.

Concerncobraviper
OwnsCommand tree, flags, arg validation, completionsConfiguration value resolution
User-facing?Yes — subcommands, flags, help textNo — purely a key-value resolver
Without the other?Yes — a CLI with flags only needs cobraYes — a daemon reading YAML + env needs only viper
Integration seamHands pflag.Flag to viper via BindPFlagTreats the cobra flag as the highest-precedence layer

Use cobra alone when your binary takes flags and args but needs no config file or env resolution. Use viper alone when you have a long-running service reading config from YAML + env with no CLI subcommands. Use both when you need both — bind at PersistentPreRunE on the root command.

→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-spf13-viper for the viper side of this integration.

Command tree

Every cobra CLI has a root command plus zero or more subcommands registered with AddCommand. The root command name is the binary name.

var rootCmd = &cobra.Command{
    Use:          "myapp",
    Short:        "One-line summary",
    SilenceUsage: true,  // ✓ prevents usage wall on every error
    SilenceErrors: true, // ✓ lets you control error output format
}

Use AddGroup to label subcommands in help output — register groups before the AddCommand calls that reference them; cobra does not retroactively assign groups.

The Run* family

Cobra commands have five run hooks executed in order:

PersistentPreRunE → PreRunE → RunE → PostRunE → PersistentPostRunE

Always use *E variants — the non-E forms cannot return errors. Key rules:

  • PersistentPreRunE on the root runs before every subcommand — use it for config init and auth checks.
  • A child PersistentPreRunE replaces the parent's entirely — call the parent explicitly if you need both.
  • PostRunE runs only if RunE succeeded.

For the full lifecycle and inheritance rules, see commands-and-args.md.

Args validators

Cobra validates positional arguments before RunE runs. Never write len(args) checks inside RunE — that bypasses cobra's standard error messages and arg count tracking.

Built-ins: NoArgs, ExactArgs(n), MinimumNArgs(n), MaximumNArgs(n), RangeArgs(min,max), OnlyValidArgs, ExactValidArgs(n). Compose with MatchAll(v1, v2). Custom validator: func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) error.

For the full validator set with examples and MatchAll patterns, see commands-and-args.md.

Flags primer

Cobra delegates flag parsing to pflag. Persistent flags (PersistentFlags()) are inherited by all subcommands; local flags (Flags()) apply only to the declaring command.

rootCmd.PersistentFlags().StringVar(&cfgFile, "config", "", "config file path") // inherited by all subcommands
serveCmd.Flags().IntVar(&port, "port", 8080, "listen port")                     // local to serveCmd only
serveCmd.MarkFlagRequired("port")
serveCmd.MarkFlagsMutuallyExclusive("json", "yaml")

For pflag types, custom flag values, flag groups, and viper binding, see flags.md.

Completions primer

Cobra generates shell completions automatically. Extend them with:

  • ValidArgs []string — static positional arg completion.
  • ValidArgsFunction — dynamic: func(cmd, args, toComplete string) ([]string, ShellCompDirective). Return ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp to suppress file fallback.
  • RegisterFlagCompletionFunc(name, fn) — flag value completion.

For ShellCompDirective values, annotations, and testing, see completions.md.

Testing commands

Test commands by executing them programmatically. Never use os.Stdout / os.Stderr directly in command handlers — use cmd.OutOrStdout() / cmd.ErrOrStderr() so tests can redirect output.

func TestServeCmd(t *testing.T) {
    buf := new(bytes.Buffer)
    rootCmd.SetOut(buf)
    rootCmd.SetArgs([]string{"serve", "--port", "9090"})
    require.NoError(t, rootCmd.Execute())
    assert.Contains(t, buf.String(), "listening on :9090")
}

Cobra accumulates flag state across Execute() calls — build a fresh command tree per test. For isolation patterns, golden files, and testing completions, see testing.md.

Best Practices

  1. Always use RunE, never RunRun cannot return an error; the only escape is os.Exit or panic, bypassing defers.
  2. Put config initialization in PersistentPreRunE — it runs before every subcommand; the right place for viper binding and auth checks.
  3. Validate positional args with Args, not inside RunEArgs gives cobra's standard error messages; MatchAll composes validators.
  4. Use cmd.OutOrStdout() / cmd.ErrOrStderr() for all output — direct os.Stdout writes cannot be captured by tests.
  5. Re-create the command tree per test — cobra accumulates flag state across Execute() calls on the same instance.

Common Mistakes

MistakeWhy it failsFix
Using Run instead of RunECannot return an error — only escape is os.Exit or panic, bypassing defersUse RunE — return the error, let cobra handle the exit
Writing len(args) checks in RunEBypasses cobra's standard error messages ("accepts 1 arg, received 2")Declare Args: cobra.ExactArgs(1) on the command
Writing to os.Stdout directlyTests cannot capture output — os-level file handles can't be redirectedUse cmd.OutOrStdout() / cmd.ErrOrStderr()
Child PersistentPreRunE silently drops parent'sCobra does not chain — the child replaces the parent's hook entirelyCall parent.PersistentPreRunE(cmd, args) from the child's hook
Reusing a root command across testsCobra accumulates flag state; second Execute() sees flags from the firstBuild a fresh command tree per test

Further Reading

  • commands-and-args.md — full PreRun*/PostRun* chain, every Args validator, PersistentPreRunE inheritance rules
  • flags.md — pflag types, required/exclusive/oneRequired groups, custom value types, viper binding
  • completions.md — ShellCompDirective set, annotation-based completions, testing completions
  • generators.md — man page, markdown, YAML, RST doc generation; cobra-cli scaffolder
  • testing.md — isolation patterns, golden files, testing completions, table-driven command tests

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-cli skill for general CLI architecture — project layout, exit codes, signal handling, I/O patterns
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-spf13-viper skill for configuration layering alongside cobra (flag → env → file → default precedence)
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill for general Go testing patterns

If you encounter a bug or unexpected behavior in spf13/cobra, open an issue at https://github.com/spf13/cobra/issues.

Plus de skills de samber

golang-code-style
samber
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to French. The text is a description of a skill for Golang testing. We must preserve the name "golang-testing" but it's not in the text, so we don't include it. Also preserve technical terms like "table-driven tests", "testify suites", "mocks", "parallel tests", "fuzzing", "fixtures", "goroutine leak detection", "goleak", "snapshot testing", "code coverage", "integration tests", "idiomatic test naming", "Go test CI", "flaky/slow tests", "testify-specific APIs", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify", "measurement methodology". Also preserve URLs or references like that. The translation should be natural French but keep all technical terms in English as they are standard. Also note the instruction: "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "golang-testing" does not appear in the source text, so we don't include it
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
Modèles de conception idiomatiques en Golang — options fonctionnelles, constructeurs, flux et cascade d'erreurs, gestion des ressources et cycle de vie, arrêt gracieux, résilience, architecture, injection de dépendances, traitement des données, streaming, et plus. À appliquer lors du choix explicite entre des modèles architecturaux, de l'implémentation d'options fonctionnelles, de la conception d'API de constructeurs, de la mise en place d'un arrêt gracieux, de l'application de modèles de résilience, ou pour demander quel modèle Go idiomatique correspond à un problème spécifique.
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to French. The text is about Golang error handling. We must preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. The name "golang-error-handling" is not in the text, so we don't include it. The text includes "samber/oops", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops", "slog", "HTTP", "Go", "Golang", "errors.Is/As", "errors.Join", "%w", etc. These should remain as is. Also "3rd-party" should be kept as "tiers" or "third-party"? Probably keep as "tiers" but it's a technical term? The instruction says preserve technical terms, so "third-party" can be translated as "tiers" but it's common. However, "3rd-party" might be kept as "tiers" or "third-party". I'll use "tiers" as it's standard. Also "log aggregation" -> "agrégation
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Modèles et méthodologie d'optimisation des performances Golang - si goulot d'étranglement X, alors appliquer Y. Couvre la réduction des allocations, l'efficacité CPU, la disposition mémoire, le réglage du GC, le pooling, la mise en cache et l'optimisation des chemins chauds. À utiliser lorsque le profilage ou les benchmarks ont identifié un goulot d'étranglement et que vous avez besoin du bon modèle d'optimisation pour le corriger. À utiliser également lors d'une revue de code de performance pour suggérer des améliorations ou des benchmarks qui pourraient aider à identifier des gains de performance rapides. Pas pour la méthodologie de mesure (→...
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Bonnes pratiques de sécurité et prévention des vulnérabilités pour Golang. Couvre l'injection (SQL, commande, XSS), la cryptographie, la sécurité du système de fichiers, la sécurité réseau, les cookies, la gestion des secrets, la sécurité mémoire et la journalisation. À appliquer lors de l'écriture, de la révision ou de l'audit de code Go pour la sécurité, ou lors du travail sur tout code risqué impliquant la cryptographie, les E/S, la gestion des secrets, le traitement des entrées utilisateur ou l'authentification. Inclut la configuration des outils de sécurité.
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Guide complet pour l'accès aux bases de données en Go — requêtes paramétrées, scan de structures, colonnes NULLables, transactions, niveaux d'isolation, SELECT FOR UPDATE, pool de connexions, traitement par lots, propagation de contexte et outils de migration. À utiliser lors de l'écriture, de la révision ou du débogage de code Golang interagissant avec PostgreSQL, MariaDB, MySQL ou SQLite ; pour les tests de bases de données ; ou pour des questions concernant database/sql, sqlx ou pgx. Ne génère PAS de schémas de base de données ni de SQL de migration.
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
Bonnes pratiques de linting et configuration de golangci-lint pour les projets Golang — exécution des linters, configuration de .golangci.yml, suppression des avertissements avec les directives nolint, interprétation des résultats de linting et sélection des linters. À utiliser lors de la configuration de golangci-lint, en cas de questions sur les avertissements de linting ou les suppressions nolint, lors de la mise en place d'outils de qualité de code, ou pour choisir des linters. À utiliser également lorsque l'utilisateur mentionne golangci-lint, go vet, staticcheck ou revive.
developmentcode-reviewtesting