golang-samber-slog

par samber

Extensions de journalisation structurée pour Golang utilisant les packages samber/slog-**** — pipelines multi-handlers (slog-multi), échantillonnage de logs (slog-sampling), formatage d'attributs (slog-formatter), middleware HTTP (slog-fiber, slog-gin, slog-chi, slog-echo), et routage backend (slog-datadog, slog-sentry, slog-loki, slog-syslog, slog-logstash, slog-graylog...). À appliquer lors de l'utilisation ou de l'adoption de slog, ou lorsque la base de code importe déjà un package github.com/samber/slog-*.

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-samber-slog

Persona: You are a Go logging architect. You design log pipelines where every record flows through the right handlers — sampling drops noise early, formatters strip PII before records leave the process, and routers send errors to Sentry while info goes to Loki.

samber/slog-**** — Structured Logging Pipeline for Go

20+ composable slog.Handler packages for Go 1.21+. Three core pipeline libraries plus HTTP middlewares and backend sinks that all implement the standard slog.Handler interface.

Official resources:

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. Context7 can help as a discoverability platform.

The Pipeline Model

Every samber/slog pipeline follows a canonical ordering. Records flow left to right — place sampling first to drop early and avoid wasting CPU on records that never reach a sink.

record → [Sampling] → [Pipe: trace/PII] → [Router] → [Sinks]

Order matters: sampling before formatting saves CPU. Formatting before routing ensures all sinks receive clean attributes. Reversing this wastes work on records that get dropped.

Core Libraries

LibraryPurposeKey constructors
slog-multiHandler compositionFanout, Router, FirstMatch, Failover, Pool, Pipe
slog-samplingThroughput controlUniformSamplingOption, ThresholdSamplingOption, AbsoluteSamplingOption, CustomSamplingOption
slog-formatterAttribute transformsPIIFormatter, ErrorFormatter, FormatByType[T], FormatByKey, FlattenFormatterMiddleware

slog-multi — Handler Composition

Six composition patterns, each for a different routing need:

PatternBehaviorLatency impact
Fanout(handlers...)Broadcast to all handlers sequentiallySum of all handler latencies
Router().Add(h, predicate).Handler()Route to ALL matching handlersSum of matching handlers
Router().Add(...).FirstMatch().Handler()Route to FIRST match onlySingle handler latency
Failover()(handlers...)Try sequentially until one succeedsPrimary handler latency (happy path)
Pool()(handlers...)Load-balance: sends each record to ONE handlerSingle handler latency
Pipe(middlewares...).Handler(sink)Middleware chain before sinkMiddleware overhead + sink
// Route errors to Sentry, all logs to stdout
logger := slog.New(
    slogmulti.Router().
        Add(sentryHandler, slogmulti.LevelIs(slog.LevelError)).
        Add(slog.NewJSONHandler(os.Stdout, nil)).
        Handler(),
)

Built-in predicates: LevelIs, LevelIsNot, MessageIs, MessageIsNot, MessageContains, MessageNotContains, AttrValueIs, AttrKindIs.

For full code examples of every pattern, see Pipeline Patterns.

slog-sampling — Throughput Control

StrategyBehaviorBest for
UniformDrop fixed % of all recordsDev/staging noise reduction
ThresholdLog first N per interval, then sample at rate RProduction — preserves initial visibility
AbsoluteCap at N records per interval globallyHard cost control
CustomUser function returns sample rate per recordLevel-aware or time-aware rules

Sampling MUST be the outermost handler in the pipeline — placing it after formatting wastes CPU on records that get dropped.

// Threshold: log first 10 per 5s, then 10% — errors always pass through via Router
logger := slog.New(
    slogmulti.
        Pipe(slogsampling.ThresholdSamplingOption{
            Tick: 5 * time.Second, Threshold: 10, Rate: 0.1,
        }.NewMiddleware()).
        Handler(innerHandler),
)

Matchers group similar records for deduplication: MatchByLevel(), MatchByMessage(), MatchByLevelAndMessage() (default), MatchBySource(), MatchByAttribute(groups, key).

For strategy comparison and configuration details, see Sampling Strategies.

slog-formatter — Attribute Transformation

Apply as a Pipe middleware so all downstream handlers receive clean attributes.

logger := slog.New(
    slogmulti.Pipe(slogformatter.NewFormatterMiddleware(
        slogformatter.PIIFormatter("user"),          // mask PII fields
        slogformatter.ErrorFormatter("error"),       // structured error info
        slogformatter.IPAddressFormatter("client"),  // mask IP addresses
    )).Handler(slog.NewJSONHandler(os.Stdout, nil)),
)

Key formatters: PIIFormatter, ErrorFormatter, TimeFormatter, UnixTimestampFormatter, IPAddressFormatter, HTTPRequestFormatter, HTTPResponseFormatter. Generic formatters: FormatByType[T], FormatByKey, FormatByKind, FormatByGroup, FormatByGroupKey. Flatten nested attributes with FlattenFormatterMiddleware.

HTTP Middlewares

Consistent pattern across frameworks: router.Use(slogXXX.New(logger)).

Available: slog-gin, slog-echo, slog-fiber, slog-chi, slog-http (net/http).

All share a Config struct with: DefaultLevel, ClientErrorLevel, ServerErrorLevel, WithRequestBody, WithResponseBody, WithUserAgent, WithRequestID, WithTraceID, WithSpanID, Filters.

// Gin with filters — skip health checks
router.Use(sloggin.NewWithConfig(logger, sloggin.Config{
    DefaultLevel:     slog.LevelInfo,
    ClientErrorLevel: slog.LevelWarn,
    ServerErrorLevel: slog.LevelError,
    WithRequestBody:  true,
    Filters: []sloggin.Filter{
        sloggin.IgnorePath("/health", "/metrics"),
    },
}))

For framework-specific setup, see HTTP Middlewares.

Backend Sinks

All follow the Option{}.NewXxxHandler() constructor pattern.

CategoryPackages
Cloudslog-datadog, slog-sentry, slog-loki, slog-graylog
Messagingslog-kafka, slog-fluentd, slog-logstash, slog-nats
Notificationslog-slack, slog-telegram, slog-webhook
Storageslog-parquet
Bridgesslog-zap, slog-zerolog, slog-logrus

Batch handlers require graceful shutdownslog-datadog, slog-loki, slog-kafka, and slog-parquet buffer records internally. Flush on shutdown (e.g., handler.Stop(ctx) for Datadog, lokiClient.Stop() for Loki, writer.Close() for Kafka) or buffered logs are lost.

For configuration examples and shutdown patterns, see Backend Handlers.

Common Mistakes

MistakeWhy it failsFix
Sampling after formattingWastes CPU formatting records that get droppedPlace sampling as outermost handler
Fanout to many synchronous handlersBlocks caller — latency is sum of all handlersUse Pool() for concurrent dispatch
Missing shutdown flush on batch handlersBuffered logs lost on shutdowndefer handler.Stop(ctx) (Datadog), defer lokiClient.Stop() (Loki), defer writer.Close() (Kafka)
Router without default/catch-all handlerUnmatched records silently droppedAdd a handler with no predicate as catch-all
AttrFromContext without HTTP middlewareContext has no request attributes to extractInstall slog-gin/echo/fiber/chi middleware first
Using Pipe with no middlewareNo-op wrapper adding per-record overheadRemove Pipe() if no middleware needed

Performance Warnings

  • Fanout latency = sum of all handler latencies (sequential). With 5 handlers at 10ms each, every log call costs 50ms. Use Pool() to reduce to max(latencies)
  • Pipe middleware adds per-record function call overhead — keep chains short (2-4 middlewares)
  • slog-formatter processes attributes sequentially — many formatters compound. For hot-path attribute formatting, prefer implementing slog.LogValuer on your types instead
  • Benchmark your pipeline with go test -bench before production deployment

Diagnose: measure per-record allocation and latency of your pipeline and identify which handler in the chain allocates most.

Best Practices

  1. Sample first, format second, route last — this canonical ordering minimizes wasted work and ensures all sinks see clean data
  2. Use Pipe for cross-cutting concerns — trace ID injection and PII scrubbing belong in middleware, not per-handler logic
  3. Test pipelines with slogmulti.NewHandleInlineHandler — assert on records reaching each stage without real sinks
  4. Use AttrFromContext to propagate request-scoped attributes from HTTP middleware to all handlers
  5. Prefer Router over Fanout when handlers need different record subsets — Router evaluates predicates and skips non-matching handlers

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-observability skill for slog fundamentals (levels, context, handler setup, migration)
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-error-handling skill for the log-or-return rule
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-security skill for PII handling in logs
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops skill for structured error context with samber/oops

If you encounter a bug or unexpected behavior in any samber/slog-* package, open an issue at the relevant repository (e.g., slog-multi/issues, slog-sampling/issues).

Plus de skills de samber

golang-code-style
samber
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI, or debugging flaky/slow tests. For testify-specific APIs see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify`; for measurement methodology see...
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
Modèles de conception idiomatiques en Golang — options fonctionnelles, constructeurs, flux et cascade d'erreurs, gestion des ressources et cycle de vie, arrêt gracieux, résilience, architecture, injection de dépendances, traitement des données, streaming, et plus. À appliquer lors du choix explicite entre des modèles architecturaux, de l'implémentation d'options fonctionnelles, de la conception d'API de constructeurs, de la mise en place d'un arrêt gracieux, de l'application de modèles de résilience, ou pour demander quel modèle Go idiomatique correspond à un problème spécifique.
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
Idiomatic Golang error handling — creation, wrapping with %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, custom error types, sentinel errors, panic/recover, the single handling rule, structured logging with slog, HTTP request logging middleware, and samber/oops for production errors. Built to make logs usable at scale with log aggregation 3rd-party tools. Apply when creating, wrapping, inspecting, or logging errors in Go code. For samber/oops specifics → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops`...
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Modèles et méthodologie d'optimisation des performances Golang - si goulot d'étranglement X, alors appliquer Y. Couvre la réduction des allocations, l'efficacité CPU, la disposition mémoire, le réglage du GC, le pooling, la mise en cache et l'optimisation des chemins chauds. À utiliser lorsque le profilage ou les benchmarks ont identifié un goulot d'étranglement et que vous avez besoin du bon modèle d'optimisation pour le corriger. À utiliser également lors d'une revue de code de performance pour suggérer des améliorations ou des benchmarks qui pourraient aider à identifier des gains de performance rapides. Pas pour la méthodologie de mesure (→...
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Bonnes pratiques de sécurité et prévention des vulnérabilités pour Golang. Couvre l'injection (SQL, commande, XSS), la cryptographie, la sécurité du système de fichiers, la sécurité réseau, les cookies, la gestion des secrets, la sécurité mémoire et la journalisation. À appliquer lors de l'écriture, de la révision ou de l'audit de code Go pour la sécurité, ou lors du travail sur tout code risqué impliquant la cryptographie, les E/S, la gestion des secrets, le traitement des entrées utilisateur ou l'authentification. Inclut la configuration des outils de sécurité.
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Guide complet pour l'accès aux bases de données en Go — requêtes paramétrées, scan de structures, colonnes NULLables, transactions, niveaux d'isolation, SELECT FOR UPDATE, pool de connexions, traitement par lots, propagation de contexte et outils de migration. À utiliser lors de l'écriture, de la révision ou du débogage de code Golang interagissant avec PostgreSQL, MariaDB, MySQL ou SQLite ; pour les tests de bases de données ; ou pour des questions concernant database/sql, sqlx ou pgx. Ne génère PAS de schémas de base de données ni de SQL de migration.
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
Bonnes pratiques de linting et configuration de golangci-lint pour les projets Golang — exécution des linters, configuration de .golangci.yml, suppression des avertissements avec les directives nolint, interprétation des résultats de linting et sélection des linters. À utiliser lors de la configuration de golangci-lint, en cas de questions sur les avertissements de linting ou les suppressions nolint, lors de la mise en place d'outils de qualité de code, ou pour choisir des linters. À utiliser également lorsque l'utilisateur mentionne golangci-lint, go vet, staticcheck ou revive.
developmentcode-reviewtesting