golang-samber-do

par samber

Injection de dépendances en Golang avec samber/do — conteneurs de services, gestion du cycle de vie, portées, vérifications de santé, arrêt gracieux et organisation des modules. À appliquer lors de l'utilisation ou de l'adoption de samber/do, lorsque la base de code importe github.com/samber/do ou github.com/samber/do/v2, ou lors du refactoring d'injection manuelle de constructeurs vers un conteneur DI.

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-samber-do

Persona: You are a Go architect setting up dependency injection. You keep the container at the composition root, depend on interfaces not concrete types, and treat provider errors as first-class failures.

Using samber/do for Dependency Injection in Go

Type-safe dependency injection toolkit for Go based on Go 1.18+ generics.

Official Resources:

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. For Go package docs, symbols, versions, importers, and known vulnerabilities, → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev skill (godig) — prefer it over Context7 for Go package facts. To navigate this library's usage in your own code (definitions, call sites, diagnostics), → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls skill (gopls). Context7 remains a fallback for docs not indexed on pkg.go.dev.

DO NOT USE v1 OF THIS LIBRARY. INSTALL v2 INSTEAD:

go get -u github.com/samber/do/v2

Core Concepts

The Injector (Container)

import "github.com/samber/do/v2"

injector := do.New()

Service Types

  • Lazy (default): Created when first requested
  • Eager: Created immediately when the container starts
  • Transient: New instance created on every request
  • Value: Pre-created value, no instantiation

Provider Functions

Services MUST be registered via provider functions:

type Provider[T any] func(i Injector) (T, error)

Basic Usage

1. Define and Register Services

Follow "Accept Interfaces, Return Structs":

// Register a service (lazy by default)
do.Provide(injector, func(i do.Injector) (Database, error) {
    return &PostgreSQLDatabase{connString: "postgres://..."}, nil
})

// Register a pre-created value
do.ProvideValue(injector, &Config{Port: 8080})

// Register a transient service (new instance each time)
do.ProvideTransient(injector, func(i do.Injector) (*Logger, error) {
    return &Logger{}, nil
})

// Register an eager service (created immediately at startup)
do.ProvideValue(injector, &Config{Port: 8080})

2. Invoke Services

The container MUST only be accessed at the composition root:

// Invoke with error handling — reserve for call sites outside the DI graph
// (e.g. an HTTP handler that must degrade gracefully instead of crashing)
db, err := do.Invoke[Database](injector)

// MustInvoke panics on error — preferred in providers, recovered by do.Invoke on the parent call
db := do.MustInvoke[Database](injector)

Inside a provider function, always use do.MustInvoke (or MustInvokeAs/MustInvokeNamed/MustInvokeStruct) rather than the error-returning variant. A provider already returns (T, error), so propagating a dependency failure with do.Invoke costs an extra if err != nil { return nil, err } on every call. do.MustInvoke panics instead, but samber/do correctly catches and recovers that panic at the enclosing Invoke call and converts it back into a regular error — this recover happens inside the library itself, not in caller code, so MustInvoke is safe to use inside providers. The failure still surfaces as an error at the composition root, just without the manual boilerplate in every provider.

3. Service Dependencies

func NewUserService(i do.Injector) (UserService, error) {
    db := do.MustInvoke[Database](i)
    cache := do.MustInvoke[Cache](i)
    return &userService{db: db, cache: cache}, nil
}

do.Provide(injector, NewUserService)

4. Implicit Aliasing (Preferred)

Register a concrete type and invoke as an interface without explicit aliasing:

// Register concrete type
do.Provide(injector, func(i do.Injector) (*PostgreSQLDatabase, error) {
    return &PostgreSQLDatabase{}, nil
})

// Invoke directly as interface (implicit aliasing)
db := do.MustInvokeAs[Database](injector)

5. Named Services

Register multiple services of the same type:

do.ProvideNamed(injector, "primary-db", func(i do.Injector) (*Database, error) {
    return &Database{URL: "postgres://primary..."}, nil
})

mainDB := do.MustInvokeNamed[*Database](injector, "primary-db")

Package Organization

Use do.Package() to organize service registration by module:

// infrastructure/package.go
var Package = do.Package(
    do.Lazy(func(i do.Injector) (*postgres.DB, error) {
        cfg := do.MustInvoke[*Config](i)
        return postgres.Connect(cfg.DatabaseURL)
    }),
    do.Lazy(func(i do.Injector) (*redis.Client, error) {
        cfg := do.MustInvoke[*Config](i)
        return redis.NewClient(cfg.RedisURL), nil
    }),
)

// main.go
injector := do.New(infrastructure.Package, service.Package)

Full Application Setup

func main() {
    injector := do.New(
        infrastructure.Package,
        repository.Package,
        service.Package,
        transport.Package,
    )

    server := do.MustInvoke[*http.Server](injector)
    go server.ListenAndServe()

    _ = injector.ShutdownOnSignalsWithContext(context.Background(), os.Interrupt)
}

Best Practices

  1. Depend on interfaces, not concrete types — lets you swap implementations in tests without touching production code
  2. Each service should have one job — services with multiple responsibilities are harder to test and harder to replace
  3. Keep dependency trees shallow — chains beyond 3-4 levels make initialization order fragile and errors harder to trace
  4. Handle errors in provider functions — a silently failing provider creates a broken service that crashes later in unexpected places
  5. Use scopes to organize services by lifecycle — request-scoped services prevent leaks, global services prevent redundant initialization
  6. Use do.MustInvoke* inside provider functions instead of do.Invoke* — samber/do correctly catches and recovers the panic at the outer Invoke call, turning it back into a returned error, so it's safe to use inside providers and you get the same error propagation without the boilerplate

For scopes, lifecycle management, struct injection, and debugging, see Advanced Usage.

For testing patterns (cloning, overrides, mocks), see Testing.

Quick Reference

Registration

FunctionPurpose
do.Provide[T]()Register lazy service (default)
do.ProvideNamed[T]()Register named lazy service
do.ProvideValue[T]()Register pre-created value
do.ProvideNamedValue[T]()Register named value
do.ProvideTransient[T]()Register new instance each time
do.ProvideNamedTransient[T]()Register named transient service
do.Package()Group service registrations

Invocation

FunctionPurpose
do.Invoke[T]()Get service (with error)
do.InvokeNamed[T]()Get named service
do.InvokeAs[T]()Get first service matching interface
do.InvokeStruct[T]()Inject into struct fields using tags
do.MustInvoke[T]()Get service (panic on error)
do.MustInvokeNamed[T]()Get named service (panic on error)
do.MustInvokeAs[T]()Get service by interface (panic on error)
do.MustInvokeStruct[T]()Inject into struct (panic on error)

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-dependency-injection skill for DI concepts, comparison, and when to adopt a DI library
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-structs-interfaces skill for interface design patterns
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill for general testing patterns

Plus de skills de samber

golang-code-style
samber
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to French. The text is a description of a skill for Golang testing. We must preserve the name "golang-testing" but it's not in the text, so we don't include it. Also preserve technical terms like "table-driven tests", "testify suites", "mocks", "parallel tests", "fuzzing", "fixtures", "goroutine leak detection", "goleak", "snapshot testing", "code coverage", "integration tests", "idiomatic test naming", "Go test CI", "flaky/slow tests", "testify-specific APIs", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify", "measurement methodology". Also preserve URLs or references like that. The translation should be natural French but keep all technical terms in English as they are standard. Also note the instruction: "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "golang-testing" does not appear in the source text, so we don't include it
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
Modèles de conception idiomatiques en Golang — options fonctionnelles, constructeurs, flux et cascade d'erreurs, gestion des ressources et cycle de vie, arrêt gracieux, résilience, architecture, injection de dépendances, traitement des données, streaming, et plus. À appliquer lors du choix explicite entre des modèles architecturaux, de l'implémentation d'options fonctionnelles, de la conception d'API de constructeurs, de la mise en place d'un arrêt gracieux, de l'application de modèles de résilience, ou pour demander quel modèle Go idiomatique correspond à un problème spécifique.
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to French. The text is about Golang error handling. We must preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. The name "golang-error-handling" is not in the text, so we don't include it. The text includes "samber/oops", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops", "slog", "HTTP", "Go", "Golang", "errors.Is/As", "errors.Join", "%w", etc. These should remain as is. Also "3rd-party" should be kept as "tiers" or "third-party"? Probably keep as "tiers" but it's a technical term? The instruction says preserve technical terms, so "third-party" can be translated as "tiers" but it's common. However, "3rd-party" might be kept as "tiers" or "third-party". I'll use "tiers" as it's standard. Also "log aggregation" -> "agrégation
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Modèles et méthodologie d'optimisation des performances Golang - si goulot d'étranglement X, alors appliquer Y. Couvre la réduction des allocations, l'efficacité CPU, la disposition mémoire, le réglage du GC, le pooling, la mise en cache et l'optimisation des chemins chauds. À utiliser lorsque le profilage ou les benchmarks ont identifié un goulot d'étranglement et que vous avez besoin du bon modèle d'optimisation pour le corriger. À utiliser également lors d'une revue de code de performance pour suggérer des améliorations ou des benchmarks qui pourraient aider à identifier des gains de performance rapides. Pas pour la méthodologie de mesure (→...
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Bonnes pratiques de sécurité et prévention des vulnérabilités pour Golang. Couvre l'injection (SQL, commande, XSS), la cryptographie, la sécurité du système de fichiers, la sécurité réseau, les cookies, la gestion des secrets, la sécurité mémoire et la journalisation. À appliquer lors de l'écriture, de la révision ou de l'audit de code Go pour la sécurité, ou lors du travail sur tout code risqué impliquant la cryptographie, les E/S, la gestion des secrets, le traitement des entrées utilisateur ou l'authentification. Inclut la configuration des outils de sécurité.
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Guide complet pour l'accès aux bases de données en Go — requêtes paramétrées, scan de structures, colonnes NULLables, transactions, niveaux d'isolation, SELECT FOR UPDATE, pool de connexions, traitement par lots, propagation de contexte et outils de migration. À utiliser lors de l'écriture, de la révision ou du débogage de code Golang interagissant avec PostgreSQL, MariaDB, MySQL ou SQLite ; pour les tests de bases de données ; ou pour des questions concernant database/sql, sqlx ou pgx. Ne génère PAS de schémas de base de données ni de SQL de migration.
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
Bonnes pratiques de linting et configuration de golangci-lint pour les projets Golang — exécution des linters, configuration de .golangci.yml, suppression des avertissements avec les directives nolint, interprétation des résultats de linting et sélection des linters. À utiliser lors de la configuration de golangci-lint, en cas de questions sur les avertissements de linting ou les suppressions nolint, lors de la mise en place d'outils de qualité de code, ou pour choisir des linters. À utiliser également lorsque l'utilisateur mentionne golangci-lint, go vet, staticcheck ou revive.
developmentcode-reviewtesting