golang-grpc

par samber

Fournit des directives d'utilisation de gRPC, l'organisation des protobufs et des patrons prêts pour la production pour les microservices Golang. À utiliser lors de l'implémentation, la révision ou le débogage de serveurs/clients gRPC, de l'écriture de fichiers proto, de la mise en place d'intercepteurs, de la gestion des erreurs gRPC avec codes de statut, de la configuration TLS/mTLS, des tests avec bufconn, ou du travail avec des RPC en streaming.

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-grpc

Persona: You are a Go distributed systems engineer. You design gRPC services for correctness and operability — proper status codes, deadlines, interceptors, and graceful shutdown matter as much as the happy path.

Modes:

  • Build mode — implementing a new gRPC server or client from scratch.
  • Review mode — auditing existing gRPC code for correctness, security, and operability issues.

Dependencies:

  • protoc: brew install protobuf
  • protoc-gen-go: go install google.golang.org/protobuf/cmd/protoc-gen-go@latest
  • protoc-gen-go-grpc: go install google.golang.org/grpc/cmd/protoc-gen-go-grpc@latest

Go gRPC Best Practices

Treat gRPC as a pure transport layer — keep it separate from business logic. The official Go implementation is google.golang.org/grpc.

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. For Go package docs, symbols, versions, importers, and known vulnerabilities, → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev skill (godig) — prefer it over Context7 for Go package facts. To navigate this library's usage in your own code (definitions, call sites, diagnostics), → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls skill (gopls). Context7 remains a fallback for docs not indexed on pkg.go.dev.

Quick Reference

ConcernPackage / Tool
Service definitionprotoc or buf with .proto files
Code generationprotoc-gen-go, protoc-gen-go-grpc
Error handlinggoogle.golang.org/grpc/status with codes
Rich error detailsgoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc/errdetails
Interceptorsgrpc.ChainUnaryInterceptor, grpc.ChainStreamInterceptor
Middleware ecosystemgithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-middleware
Testinggoogle.golang.org/grpc/test/bufconn
TLS / mTLSgoogle.golang.org/grpc/credentials
Health checksgoogle.golang.org/grpc/health

Proto File Organization

Organize by domain with versioned directories (proto/user/v1/). Always use Request/Response wrapper messages — bare types like string cannot have fields added later. Generate with buf generate or protoc.

Proto & code generation reference

Server Implementation

  • Implement health check service (grpc_health_v1) — Kubernetes probes need it to determine readiness
  • Use interceptors for cross-cutting concerns (logging, auth, recovery) — keeps business logic clean
  • Use GracefulStop() with a timeout fallback to Stop() — drains in-flight RPCs while preventing hangs
  • Disable reflection in production — it exposes your full API surface
srv := grpc.NewServer(
    grpc.ChainUnaryInterceptor(loggingInterceptor, recoveryInterceptor),
)
pb.RegisterUserServiceServer(srv, svc)
healthpb.RegisterHealthServer(srv, health.NewServer())

go srv.Serve(lis)

// On shutdown signal:
stopped := make(chan struct{})
go func() { srv.GracefulStop(); close(stopped) }()
select {
case <-stopped:
case <-time.After(15 * time.Second):
    srv.Stop()
}

Interceptor Pattern

func loggingInterceptor(ctx context.Context, req any, info *grpc.UnaryServerInfo, handler grpc.UnaryHandler) (any, error) {
    start := time.Now()
    resp, err := handler(ctx, req)
    log.Printf("method=%s duration=%s code=%s", info.FullMethod, time.Since(start), status.Code(err))
    return resp, err
}

Client Implementation

  • Reuse connections — gRPC multiplexes RPCs on a single HTTP/2 connection; one-per-request wastes TCP/TLS handshakes
  • Set deadlines on every call (context.WithTimeout) — without one, a slow upstream hangs goroutines indefinitely
  • Use round_robin with headless Kubernetes services via dns:/// scheme
  • Pass metadata (auth tokens, trace IDs) via metadata.NewOutgoingContext
conn, err := grpc.NewClient("dns:///user-service:50051",
    grpc.WithTransportCredentials(creds),
    grpc.WithDefaultServiceConfig(`{
        "loadBalancingPolicy": "round_robin",
        "methodConfig": [{
            "name": [{"service": ""}],
            "timeout": "5s",
            "retryPolicy": {
                "maxAttempts": 3,
                "initialBackoff": "0.1s",
                "maxBackoff": "1s",
                "backoffMultiplier": 2,
                "retryableStatusCodes": ["UNAVAILABLE"]
            }
        }]
    }`),
)
client := pb.NewUserServiceClient(conn)

Error Handling

Always return gRPC errors using status.Error with a specific code — a raw error becomes codes.Unknown, telling the client nothing actionable. Clients use codes to decide retry vs fail-fast vs degrade.

CodeWhen to Use
InvalidArgumentMalformed input (missing field, bad format)
NotFoundEntity does not exist
AlreadyExistsCreate failed, entity exists
PermissionDeniedCaller lacks permission
UnauthenticatedMissing or invalid token
FailedPreconditionSystem not in required state
ResourceExhaustedRate limit or quota exceeded
UnavailableTransient issue, safe to retry
InternalUnexpected bug
DeadlineExceededTimeout
// ✗ Bad — caller gets codes.Unknown, can't decide whether to retry
return nil, fmt.Errorf("user not found")

// ✓ Good — specific code lets clients act appropriately
if errors.Is(err, ErrNotFound) {
    return nil, status.Errorf(codes.NotFound, "user %q not found", req.UserId)
}
return nil, status.Errorf(codes.Internal, "lookup failed: %v", err)

For field-level validation errors, attach errdetails.BadRequest via status.WithDetails.

Streaming

PatternUse Case
Server streamingServer sends a sequence (log tailing, result sets)
Client streamingClient sends a sequence, server responds once (file upload, batch)
BidirectionalBoth send independently (chat, real-time sync)

Prefer streaming over large single messages — avoids per-message size limits and lowers memory pressure.

func (s *server) ListUsers(req *pb.ListUsersRequest, stream pb.UserService_ListUsersServer) error {
    for _, u := range users {
        if err := stream.Send(u); err != nil {
            return err
        }
    }
    return nil
}

Testing

Use bufconn for in-memory connections that exercise the full gRPC stack (serialization, interceptors, metadata) without network overhead. Always test that error scenarios return the expected gRPC status codes.

Testing patterns and examples

Security

  • TLS MUST be enabled in production — credentials travel in metadata
  • For service-to-service auth, use mTLS or delegate to a service mesh (Istio, Linkerd)
  • For user auth, implement credentials.PerRPCCredentials and validate tokens in an auth interceptor
  • Reflection SHOULD be disabled in production to prevent API discovery

Performance

SettingPurposeTypical Value
keepalive.ServerParameters.TimePing interval for idle connections30s
keepalive.ServerParameters.TimeoutPing ack timeout10s
grpc.MaxRecvMsgSizeOverride 4 MB default for large payloads16 MB
Connection poolingMultiple conns for high-load streaming4 connections

Most services do not need connection pooling — profile before adding complexity.

Common Mistakes

MistakeFix
Returning raw errorBecomes codes.Unknown — client can't decide whether to retry. Use status.Errorf with a specific code
No deadline on client callsSlow upstream hangs indefinitely. Always context.WithTimeout
New connection per requestWastes TCP/TLS handshakes. Create once, reuse — HTTP/2 multiplexes RPCs
Reflection enabled in productionLets attackers enumerate every method. Enable only in dev/staging
codes.Internal for all errorsWrong codes break client retry logic. Unavailable triggers retry; InvalidArgument does not
Bare types as RPC argumentsCan't add fields to string. Wrapper messages allow backwards-compatible evolution
Missing health check serviceKubernetes can't determine readiness, kills pods during deployments
Ignoring context cancellationLong operations continue after caller gave up. Check ctx.Err()

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-context skill for deadline and cancellation patterns
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-error-handling skill for gRPC error to Go error mapping
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-observability skill for gRPC interceptors (logging, tracing, metrics)
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill for gRPC testing with bufconn

Plus de skills de samber

golang-code-style
samber
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to French. The text is a description of a skill for Golang testing. We must preserve the name "golang-testing" but it's not in the text, so we don't include it. Also preserve technical terms like "table-driven tests", "testify suites", "mocks", "parallel tests", "fuzzing", "fixtures", "goroutine leak detection", "goleak", "snapshot testing", "code coverage", "integration tests", "idiomatic test naming", "Go test CI", "flaky/slow tests", "testify-specific APIs", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify", "measurement methodology". Also preserve URLs or references like that. The translation should be natural French but keep all technical terms in English as they are standard. Also note the instruction: "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "golang-testing" does not appear in the source text, so we don't include it
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
Modèles de conception idiomatiques en Golang — options fonctionnelles, constructeurs, flux et cascade d'erreurs, gestion des ressources et cycle de vie, arrêt gracieux, résilience, architecture, injection de dépendances, traitement des données, streaming, et plus. À appliquer lors du choix explicite entre des modèles architecturaux, de l'implémentation d'options fonctionnelles, de la conception d'API de constructeurs, de la mise en place d'un arrêt gracieux, de l'application de modèles de résilience, ou pour demander quel modèle Go idiomatique correspond à un problème spécifique.
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to French. The text is about Golang error handling. We must preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. The name "golang-error-handling" is not in the text, so we don't include it. The text includes "samber/oops", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops", "slog", "HTTP", "Go", "Golang", "errors.Is/As", "errors.Join", "%w", etc. These should remain as is. Also "3rd-party" should be kept as "tiers" or "third-party"? Probably keep as "tiers" but it's a technical term? The instruction says preserve technical terms, so "third-party" can be translated as "tiers" but it's common. However, "3rd-party" might be kept as "tiers" or "third-party". I'll use "tiers" as it's standard. Also "log aggregation" -> "agrégation
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Modèles et méthodologie d'optimisation des performances Golang - si goulot d'étranglement X, alors appliquer Y. Couvre la réduction des allocations, l'efficacité CPU, la disposition mémoire, le réglage du GC, le pooling, la mise en cache et l'optimisation des chemins chauds. À utiliser lorsque le profilage ou les benchmarks ont identifié un goulot d'étranglement et que vous avez besoin du bon modèle d'optimisation pour le corriger. À utiliser également lors d'une revue de code de performance pour suggérer des améliorations ou des benchmarks qui pourraient aider à identifier des gains de performance rapides. Pas pour la méthodologie de mesure (→...
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Bonnes pratiques de sécurité et prévention des vulnérabilités pour Golang. Couvre l'injection (SQL, commande, XSS), la cryptographie, la sécurité du système de fichiers, la sécurité réseau, les cookies, la gestion des secrets, la sécurité mémoire et la journalisation. À appliquer lors de l'écriture, de la révision ou de l'audit de code Go pour la sécurité, ou lors du travail sur tout code risqué impliquant la cryptographie, les E/S, la gestion des secrets, le traitement des entrées utilisateur ou l'authentification. Inclut la configuration des outils de sécurité.
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Guide complet pour l'accès aux bases de données en Go — requêtes paramétrées, scan de structures, colonnes NULLables, transactions, niveaux d'isolation, SELECT FOR UPDATE, pool de connexions, traitement par lots, propagation de contexte et outils de migration. À utiliser lors de l'écriture, de la révision ou du débogage de code Golang interagissant avec PostgreSQL, MariaDB, MySQL ou SQLite ; pour les tests de bases de données ; ou pour des questions concernant database/sql, sqlx ou pgx. Ne génère PAS de schémas de base de données ni de SQL de migration.
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
Bonnes pratiques de linting et configuration de golangci-lint pour les projets Golang — exécution des linters, configuration de .golangci.yml, suppression des avertissements avec les directives nolint, interprétation des résultats de linting et sélection des linters. À utiliser lors de la configuration de golangci-lint, en cas de questions sur les avertissements de linting ou les suppressions nolint, lors de la mise en place d'outils de qualité de code, ou pour choisir des linters. À utiliser également lorsque l'utilisateur mentionne golangci-lint, go vet, staticcheck ou revive.
developmentcode-reviewtesting