investigate-ci-failure
Enquêter sur les échecs de tâches CI/Prow sur une pull request GitHub. Utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur colle une URL de PR et demande des informations sur les échecs CI, les vérifications rouges, les échecs de test, ou souhaite…
npx skills add https://github.com/openshift/lightspeed-service --skill investigate-ci-failureInvestigate CI Failure
Given a PR URL (e.g. https://github.com/openshift/lightspeed-service/pull/2825), diagnose why CI jobs failed.
Workflow
1. Extract PR info
Parse org, repo, and PR number from the URL. Fetch metadata with gh:
# PR metadata
gh api repos/{org}/{repo}/pulls/{pr} --jq '{title, state, user: .user.login, head_sha: .head.sha}'
# Changed files
gh api repos/{org}/{repo}/pulls/{pr}/files --jq '.[].filename'
2. Get check statuses
# All checks at a glance
gh pr checks {pr} --repo {org}/{repo}
# Detailed statuses with Prow URLs (use head SHA from step 1)
gh api repos/{org}/{repo}/statuses/{head_sha} \
--jq '.[] | select(.state == "failure" or .state == "error") | {context, state, target_url}'
This gives you the list of failed jobs and their Prow dashboard URLs.
3. Construct GCS artifact URLs
From a Prow target_url like:
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/{org}_{repo}/{pr}/{job_name}/{build_id}
Derive:
- Directory browser (for navigating artifact tree):
https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/{org}_{repo}/{pr}/{job_name}/{build_id}/ - Raw file content (for fetching logs and JSON):
https://storage.googleapis.com/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/{org}_{repo}/{pr}/{job_name}/{build_id}/{path}
4. Triage the failure
For each failed job, fetch artifacts in this order:
4a. Quick status
GET storage.googleapis.com/.../finished.json
Check "passed": false and "result": "FAILURE".
4b. Build log (most useful)
GET storage.googleapis.com/.../build-log.txt
This is the main ci-operator build log. It can be large (200KB+). Search from the end for:
failed/FAILED/error/ERRORstep .* failed- Python tracebacks (
Traceback,AssertionError,FAILED tests/) - Container crash indicators (
CrashLoopBackOff,OOMKilled,Error from server)
4c. Artifact tree exploration
The build log alone often doesn't tell the full story. Browse the GCS artifact directory to find step-specific logs, cluster state, and pod logs:
GET gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/.../artifacts/
Full artifact tree for an e2e job:
{build_id}/
├── build-log.txt ← main ci-operator log (start here)
├── finished.json ← pass/fail + metadata
├── artifacts/
│ ├── ci-operator.log ← detailed ci-operator log
│ ├── junit_operator.xml ← top-level JUnit results
│ ├── ci-operator-step-graph.json ← step dependency graph
│ ├── ci-operator-metrics.json
│ ├── metadata.json
│ ├── build-logs/ ← container image build logs
│ │ ├── lightspeed-service-api-amd64.log
│ │ ├── root-amd64.log
│ │ └── src-amd64.log
│ ├── build-resources/ ← CI namespace state
│ │ ├── pods.json ← all pods in CI namespace
│ │ ├── events.json ← k8s events (useful for crashes)
│ │ ├── builds.json
│ │ ├── imagestreams.json
│ │ └── clusterClaim.json
│ ├── release/ ← cluster provisioning step
│ │ ├── build-log.txt
│ │ └── finished.json
│ └── e2e-ols-cluster/ ← test workflow steps
│ ├── ipi-install-rbac/ ← cluster RBAC setup
│ │ └── build-log.txt
│ ├── e2e/ ← THE ACTUAL TEST STEP
│ │ ├── build-log.txt ← test runner output (pytest)
│ │ ├── finished.json
│ │ └── artifacts/ ← per-provider test results
│ │ ├── junit_e2e_azure_openai.xml
│ │ ├── junit_e2e_openai.xml
│ │ ├── junit_e2e_watsonx.xml
│ │ ├── junit_e2e_rhelai_vllm.xml
│ │ ├── junit_e2e_rhoai_vllm.xml
│ │ ├── junit_e2e_*_tool_calling.xml
│ │ ├── junit_e2e_quota_limits.xml
│ │ └── {provider}/cluster/ ← cluster state per provider
│ │ ├── podlogs/
│ │ │ ├── lightspeed-app-server-*.log ← OLS service logs
│ │ │ ├── lightspeed-postgres-server-*.log
│ │ │ └── lightspeed-console-plugin-*.log
│ │ ├── olsconfig.yaml ← OLS config used
│ │ ├── pods.yaml
│ │ ├── deployments.yaml
│ │ ├── configmap.yaml
│ │ ├── services.yaml
│ │ └── routes.yaml
│ ├── gather-must-gather/ ← cluster diagnostics
│ │ └── artifacts/
│ │ ├── must-gather.tar ← full must-gather (large, ~25MB)
│ │ ├── camgi.html ← must-gather analysis report
│ │ └── event-filter.html
│ └── openshift-configure-cincinnati/
Where to look by failure type:
| Symptom | Check these artifacts |
|---|---|
| Test assertion failure | e2e/build-log.txt + junit_e2e_*.xml |
| OLS service error/crash | {provider}/cluster/podlogs/lightspeed-app-server-*.log |
| Postgres issues | {provider}/cluster/podlogs/lightspeed-postgres-server-*.log |
| Deployment failure | {provider}/cluster/pods.yaml + deployments.yaml |
| Image build failure | build-logs/*.log |
| Cluster infra issue | gather-must-gather/artifacts/camgi.html + event-filter.html |
| CI namespace issues | build-resources/events.json + pods.json |
4d. Downloading artifacts locally
When you need to search across many files or the artifacts are too large
for WebFetch, download them to a temp directory using gsutil or gcloud storage:
TMPDIR=$(mktemp -d)
# Download a specific subdirectory
gcloud storage cp -r \
gs://test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/{org}_{repo}/{pr}/{job_name}/{build_id}/artifacts/e2e-ols-cluster/e2e/artifacts/ \
"$TMPDIR/"
The GCS bucket path mirrors the Prow URL: strip https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/
and prepend gs://.
When multiple jobs have failed, investigate each in a separate subagent (Task tool) to keep build-log context isolated and run fetches in parallel.
5. Cross-reference with PR changes
Compare the failure with the files changed in the PR. Common patterns:
| Failure type | Likely cause |
|---|---|
| Unit/integration test failure | Direct code bug in changed files |
| e2e cluster test failure | Infrastructure issue OR deployment-breaking change |
| Verify/lint failure | Formatting, type errors, or import issues |
| Image build failure | Dependency or Dockerfile issue |
| Flaky (passes on retest) | Known flake, not PR-related |
Check if the same job fails on main branch (flaky test) by looking at job history:
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/job-history/gs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/directory/{job_name}
6. Report findings
Summarize:
- Which jobs failed and which passed
- Root cause for each failure (with relevant log excerpts)
- Whether it's PR-related or infrastructure/flaky
- Suggested fix if the failure is caused by the PR changes
Known CI jobs for this repo
| Context | What it tests |
|---|---|
ci/prow/unit | make test-unit — pytest unit tests |
ci/prow/integration | make test-integration — integration tests |
ci/prow/verify | make verify — black, ruff, pylint, mypy, woke |
ci/prow/security | make security-check — bandit |
ci/prow/images | Container image build |
ci/prow/fips-image-scan-service | FIPS compliance scan |
ci/prow/e2e-ols-cluster | Full cluster e2e — deploys OLS + operator on OpenShift, runs make test-e2e |
tide | Merge readiness (labels, approvals) — not a test |
| Konflux | Supply chain security pipeline (separate from Prow) |
Tool usage notes
- Use
ghCLI for all GitHub API calls (PR metadata, statuses, checks, comments, files). - Use
WebFetchto browse GCS directories (gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/...). - Use
WebFetchto fetch raw log/JSON content (storage.googleapis.com/test-platform-results/...). - The Prow dashboard URL itself is JS-rendered and not useful via WebFetch — always use GCS URLs instead.
- Build logs can be very large. When fetched via WebFetch, they're saved to a temp file — read from the end to find failures quickly.