investigate-ci-failure

Enquêter sur les échecs de tâches CI/Prow sur une pull request GitHub. Utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur colle une URL de PR et demande des informations sur les échecs CI, les vérifications rouges, les échecs de test, ou souhaite…

npx skills add https://github.com/openshift/lightspeed-service --skill investigate-ci-failure

Investigate CI Failure

Given a PR URL (e.g. https://github.com/openshift/lightspeed-service/pull/2825), diagnose why CI jobs failed.

Workflow

1. Extract PR info

Parse org, repo, and PR number from the URL. Fetch metadata with gh:

# PR metadata
gh api repos/{org}/{repo}/pulls/{pr} --jq '{title, state, user: .user.login, head_sha: .head.sha}'

# Changed files
gh api repos/{org}/{repo}/pulls/{pr}/files --jq '.[].filename'

2. Get check statuses

# All checks at a glance
gh pr checks {pr} --repo {org}/{repo}

# Detailed statuses with Prow URLs (use head SHA from step 1)
gh api repos/{org}/{repo}/statuses/{head_sha} \
  --jq '.[] | select(.state == "failure" or .state == "error") | {context, state, target_url}'

This gives you the list of failed jobs and their Prow dashboard URLs.

3. Construct GCS artifact URLs

From a Prow target_url like:

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/{org}_{repo}/{pr}/{job_name}/{build_id}

Derive:

  • Directory browser (for navigating artifact tree): https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/{org}_{repo}/{pr}/{job_name}/{build_id}/
  • Raw file content (for fetching logs and JSON): https://storage.googleapis.com/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/{org}_{repo}/{pr}/{job_name}/{build_id}/{path}

4. Triage the failure

For each failed job, fetch artifacts in this order:

4a. Quick status

GET storage.googleapis.com/.../finished.json

Check "passed": false and "result": "FAILURE".

4b. Build log (most useful)

GET storage.googleapis.com/.../build-log.txt

This is the main ci-operator build log. It can be large (200KB+). Search from the end for:

  • failed / FAILED / error / ERROR
  • step .* failed
  • Python tracebacks (Traceback, AssertionError, FAILED tests/)
  • Container crash indicators (CrashLoopBackOff, OOMKilled, Error from server)

4c. Artifact tree exploration

The build log alone often doesn't tell the full story. Browse the GCS artifact directory to find step-specific logs, cluster state, and pod logs:

GET gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/.../artifacts/

Full artifact tree for an e2e job:

{build_id}/
├── build-log.txt                    ← main ci-operator log (start here)
├── finished.json                    ← pass/fail + metadata
├── artifacts/
│   ├── ci-operator.log              ← detailed ci-operator log
│   ├── junit_operator.xml           ← top-level JUnit results
│   ├── ci-operator-step-graph.json  ← step dependency graph
│   ├── ci-operator-metrics.json
│   ├── metadata.json
│   ├── build-logs/                  ← container image build logs
│   │   ├── lightspeed-service-api-amd64.log
│   │   ├── root-amd64.log
│   │   └── src-amd64.log
│   ├── build-resources/             ← CI namespace state
│   │   ├── pods.json                ← all pods in CI namespace
│   │   ├── events.json              ← k8s events (useful for crashes)
│   │   ├── builds.json
│   │   ├── imagestreams.json
│   │   └── clusterClaim.json
│   ├── release/                     ← cluster provisioning step
│   │   ├── build-log.txt
│   │   └── finished.json
│   └── e2e-ols-cluster/             ← test workflow steps
│       ├── ipi-install-rbac/        ← cluster RBAC setup
│       │   └── build-log.txt
│       ├── e2e/                     ← THE ACTUAL TEST STEP
│       │   ├── build-log.txt        ← test runner output (pytest)
│       │   ├── finished.json
│       │   └── artifacts/           ← per-provider test results
│       │       ├── junit_e2e_azure_openai.xml
│       │       ├── junit_e2e_openai.xml
│       │       ├── junit_e2e_watsonx.xml
│       │       ├── junit_e2e_rhelai_vllm.xml
│       │       ├── junit_e2e_rhoai_vllm.xml
│       │       ├── junit_e2e_*_tool_calling.xml
│       │       ├── junit_e2e_quota_limits.xml
│       │       └── {provider}/cluster/   ← cluster state per provider
│       │           ├── podlogs/
│       │           │   ├── lightspeed-app-server-*.log  ← OLS service logs
│       │           │   ├── lightspeed-postgres-server-*.log
│       │           │   └── lightspeed-console-plugin-*.log
│       │           ├── olsconfig.yaml    ← OLS config used
│       │           ├── pods.yaml
│       │           ├── deployments.yaml
│       │           ├── configmap.yaml
│       │           ├── services.yaml
│       │           └── routes.yaml
│       ├── gather-must-gather/      ← cluster diagnostics
│       │   └── artifacts/
│       │       ├── must-gather.tar  ← full must-gather (large, ~25MB)
│       │       ├── camgi.html       ← must-gather analysis report
│       │       └── event-filter.html
│       └── openshift-configure-cincinnati/

Where to look by failure type:

SymptomCheck these artifacts
Test assertion failuree2e/build-log.txt + junit_e2e_*.xml
OLS service error/crash{provider}/cluster/podlogs/lightspeed-app-server-*.log
Postgres issues{provider}/cluster/podlogs/lightspeed-postgres-server-*.log
Deployment failure{provider}/cluster/pods.yaml + deployments.yaml
Image build failurebuild-logs/*.log
Cluster infra issuegather-must-gather/artifacts/camgi.html + event-filter.html
CI namespace issuesbuild-resources/events.json + pods.json

4d. Downloading artifacts locally

When you need to search across many files or the artifacts are too large for WebFetch, download them to a temp directory using gsutil or gcloud storage:

TMPDIR=$(mktemp -d)
# Download a specific subdirectory
gcloud storage cp -r \
  gs://test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/{org}_{repo}/{pr}/{job_name}/{build_id}/artifacts/e2e-ols-cluster/e2e/artifacts/ \
  "$TMPDIR/"

The GCS bucket path mirrors the Prow URL: strip https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/ and prepend gs://.

When multiple jobs have failed, investigate each in a separate subagent (Task tool) to keep build-log context isolated and run fetches in parallel.

5. Cross-reference with PR changes

Compare the failure with the files changed in the PR. Common patterns:

Failure typeLikely cause
Unit/integration test failureDirect code bug in changed files
e2e cluster test failureInfrastructure issue OR deployment-breaking change
Verify/lint failureFormatting, type errors, or import issues
Image build failureDependency or Dockerfile issue
Flaky (passes on retest)Known flake, not PR-related

Check if the same job fails on main branch (flaky test) by looking at job history:

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/job-history/gs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/directory/{job_name}

6. Report findings

Summarize:

  1. Which jobs failed and which passed
  2. Root cause for each failure (with relevant log excerpts)
  3. Whether it's PR-related or infrastructure/flaky
  4. Suggested fix if the failure is caused by the PR changes

Known CI jobs for this repo

ContextWhat it tests
ci/prow/unitmake test-unit — pytest unit tests
ci/prow/integrationmake test-integration — integration tests
ci/prow/verifymake verify — black, ruff, pylint, mypy, woke
ci/prow/securitymake security-check — bandit
ci/prow/imagesContainer image build
ci/prow/fips-image-scan-serviceFIPS compliance scan
ci/prow/e2e-ols-clusterFull cluster e2e — deploys OLS + operator on OpenShift, runs make test-e2e
tideMerge readiness (labels, approvals) — not a test
KonfluxSupply chain security pipeline (separate from Prow)

Tool usage notes

  • Use gh CLI for all GitHub API calls (PR metadata, statuses, checks, comments, files).
  • Use WebFetch to browse GCS directories (gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/...).
  • Use WebFetch to fetch raw log/JSON content (storage.googleapis.com/test-platform-results/...).
  • The Prow dashboard URL itself is JS-rendered and not useful via WebFetch — always use GCS URLs instead.
  • Build logs can be very large. When fetched via WebFetch, they're saved to a temp file — read from the end to find failures quickly.

Plus de skills de openshift

openshift-expert
openshift
Expert de la plateforme OpenShift et de Kubernetes avec une connaissance approfondie de l'architecture des clusters, des opérateurs, du réseau, du stockage, du dépannage et des pipelines CI/CD. Utilisez…
official
find-token
openshift
Trouvez le jeton de vérification caché. Exécutez le script find-token pour récupérer un jeton unique.
official
code-review
openshift
Examiner une demande de tirage pour la qualité du code, l'exactitude et les conventions du projet. Utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur demande de réviser une PR, une revue de code, ou d'examiner des modifications sur une…
official
css-review
openshift
Examiner le CSS pour le style de codage, l'utilisation des tokens PatternFly et les bonnes pratiques. Utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur demande de réviser du CSS, vérifier des styles ou auditer des fichiers CSS.
official
review-readmes
openshift
Examiner tous les fichiers README.md du dépôt pour détecter les fautes de frappe, erreurs et informations obsolètes. Utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur demande de vérifier les README, de contrôler l'exactitude de la documentation, ou…
official
review-skills
openshift
Examiner les compétences IA du projet pour détecter les doublons, les références obsolètes, les erreurs et les problèmes structurels. Utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur demande de réviser les compétences, d'auditer les compétences, de vérifier…
official
test
openshift
Exécute des tests de bout en bout filtrés par balise. À utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur demande d'exécuter des tests, de lancer Playwright, ou de tester une balise de fonctionnalité spécifique comme @core ou @attach.
official
unused-exports
openshift
Trouve les symboles exportés qui ne sont jamais importés par un autre fichier. À utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur dit "vérifier les exports", "exports inutilisés" ou demande de nettoyer les exports.
official