swiftui-performance-audit

par openai

Auditer et améliorer les performances d'exécution SwiftUI à partir de la revue de code et de l'architecture. Utiliser pour les demandes de diagnostic de rendu lent, de défilement saccadé, de CPU/mémoire élevée…

npx skills add https://github.com/openai/plugins --skill swiftui-performance-audit

SwiftUI Performance Audit

Quick start

Use this skill to diagnose SwiftUI performance issues from code first, then request profiling evidence when code review alone cannot explain the symptoms.

Workflow

  1. Classify the symptom: slow rendering, janky scrolling, high CPU, memory growth, hangs, or excessive view updates.
  2. If code is available, start with a code-first review using references/code-smells.md.
  3. If code is not available, ask for the smallest useful slice: target view, data flow, reproduction steps, and deployment target.
  4. If code review is inconclusive or runtime evidence is required, guide the user through profiling with references/profiling-intake.md.
  5. Summarize likely causes, evidence, remediation, and validation steps using references/report-template.md.

1. Intake

Collect:

  • Target view or feature code.
  • Symptoms and exact reproduction steps.
  • Data flow: @State, @Binding, environment dependencies, and observable models.
  • Whether the issue shows up on device or simulator, and whether it was observed in Debug or Release.

Ask the user to classify the issue if possible:

  • CPU spike or battery drain
  • Janky scrolling or dropped frames
  • High memory or image pressure
  • Hangs or unresponsive interactions
  • Excessive or unexpectedly broad view updates

For the full profiling intake checklist, read references/profiling-intake.md.

2. Code-First Review

Focus on:

  • Invalidation storms from broad observation or environment reads.
  • Unstable identity in lists and ForEach.
  • Heavy derived work in body or view builders.
  • Layout thrash from complex hierarchies, GeometryReader, or preference chains.
  • Large image decode or resize work on the main thread.
  • Animation or transition work applied too broadly.

Use references/code-smells.md for the detailed smell catalog and fix guidance.

Provide:

  • Likely root causes with code references.
  • Suggested fixes and refactors.
  • If needed, a minimal repro or instrumentation suggestion.

3. Guide the User to Profile

If code review does not explain the issue, ask for runtime evidence:

  • A trace export or screenshots of the SwiftUI timeline and Time Profiler call tree.
  • Device/OS/build configuration.
  • The exact interaction being profiled.
  • Before/after metrics if the user is comparing a change.

Use references/profiling-intake.md for the exact checklist and collection steps.

4. Analyze and Diagnose

  • Map the evidence to the most likely category: invalidation, identity churn, layout thrash, main-thread work, image cost, or animation cost.
  • Prioritize problems by impact, not by how easy they are to explain.
  • Distinguish code-level suspicion from trace-backed evidence.
  • Call out when profiling is still insufficient and what additional evidence would reduce uncertainty.

5. Remediate

Apply targeted fixes:

  • Narrow state scope and reduce broad observation fan-out.
  • Stabilize identities for ForEach and lists.
  • Move heavy work out of body into derived state updated from inputs, model-layer precomputation, memoized helpers, or background preprocessing. Use @State only for view-owned state, not as an ad hoc cache for arbitrary computation.
  • Use equatable() only when equality is cheaper than recomputing the subtree and the inputs are truly value-semantic.
  • Downsample images before rendering.
  • Reduce layout complexity or use fixed sizing where possible.

Use references/code-smells.md for examples, Observation-specific fan-out guidance, and remediation patterns.

6. Verify

Ask the user to re-run the same capture and compare with baseline metrics. Summarize the delta (CPU, frame drops, memory peak) if provided.

Outputs

Provide:

  • A short metrics table (before/after if available).
  • Top issues (ordered by impact).
  • Proposed fixes with estimated effort.

Use references/report-template.md when formatting the final audit.

References

  • Profiling intake and collection checklist: references/profiling-intake.md
  • Common code smells and remediation patterns: references/code-smells.md
  • Audit output template: references/report-template.md
  • Add Apple documentation and WWDC resources under references/ as they are supplied by the user.
  • Optimizing SwiftUI performance with Instruments: references/optimizing-swiftui-performance-instruments.md
  • Understanding and improving SwiftUI performance: references/understanding-improving-swiftui-performance.md
  • Understanding hangs in your app: references/understanding-hangs-in-your-app.md
  • Demystify SwiftUI performance (WWDC23): references/demystify-swiftui-performance-wwdc23.md
  • In addition to the references above, use web search to consult current Apple Developer documentation when Instruments workflows or SwiftUI performance guidance may have changed.

Plus de skills de openai

release
openai
Créez une version Symphony en incrémentant la version validée, en la fusionnant, en taguant le commit fusionné et en vérifiant le workflow de publication Burrito. Utilisez lorsque l'on vous demande de…
signing-entitlements
openai
Inspectez les problèmes de signature, d’entitlements, de runtime renforcé et de Gatekeeper pour les applications macOS. Utilisez lorsque l’on vous demande de diagnostiquer des échecs de signature de code, des entitlements manquants,…
building-ai-agent-on-cloudflare
openai
Construit des agents IA sur Cloudflare en utilisant le SDK Agents avec gestion d'état, WebSockets en temps réel, tâches planifiées, intégration d'outils, et chat…
epigraphdb-skill
openai
Soumettre des requêtes compactes à l'API EpiGraphDB pour l'ontologie, la littérature, la MR, les gènes-médicaments et les preuves de voies de soutien. Utiliser lorsqu'un utilisateur souhaite des résumés concis d'EpiGraphDB.
runtime-behavior-probe
openai
Planifier et exécuter des investigations sur le comportement d'exécution avec des scripts de sonde temporaires, des matrices de validation, des contrôles d'état et des rapports axés sur les résultats. Utiliser uniquement lorsque…
deep-security-scan
openai
À utiliser lorsque l’utilisateur demande une analyse de sécurité Codex approfondie, exhaustive, multi-passes ou réduisant la variance, à l’échelle du dépôt ou sur un chemin ciblé. Exécutez des passes indépendantes répétées…
define-security-policy
openai
Définir, réviser ou mettre à jour les directives SECURITY.md pour un dépôt ou un composant. À utiliser lorsque l’utilisateur souhaite clarifier ce que Codex Security doit examiner, ce qui est hors…
validation
openai
À utiliser lorsque Codex est déjà dans la phase de validation d'un scan de sécurité ou que l'utilisateur demande explicitement de déterminer si une ou plusieurs conclusions de sécurité candidates…