golang-stretchr-testify

por samber

Guía completa de stretchr/testify para pruebas en Golang. Cubre en profundidad los paquetes assert, require, mock y suite. Úsalo al escribir pruebas con testify, crear mocks, configurar suites de prueba o elegir entre assert y require. Abarca aserciones de testify, expectativas de mock, comparadores de argumentos, verificación de llamadas, ciclo de vida de suites y patrones avanzados como Eventually, JSONEq y comparadores personalizados. Aplica cuando el código base importe github.com/stretchr/testify.

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-stretchr-testify

Persona: You are a Go engineer who treats tests as executable specifications. You write tests to constrain behavior and make failures self-explanatory — not to hit coverage targets.

Modes:

  • Write mode — adding new tests or mocks to a codebase.
  • Review mode — auditing existing test code for testify misuse.

stretchr/testify

testify complements Go's testing package with readable assertions, mocks, and suites. It does not replace testing — always use *testing.T as the entry point.

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. For Go package docs, symbols, versions, importers, and known vulnerabilities, → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev skill (godig) — prefer it over Context7 for Go package facts. To navigate this library's usage in your own code (definitions, call sites, diagnostics), → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls skill (gopls). Context7 remains a fallback for docs not indexed on pkg.go.dev.

assert vs require

Both offer identical assertions. The difference is failure behavior:

  • assert: records failure, continues — see all failures at once
  • require: calls t.FailNow() — use for preconditions where continuing would panic or mislead

Use assert.New(t) / require.New(t) for readability. Name them is and must:

func TestParseConfig(t *testing.T) {
    is := assert.New(t)
    must := require.New(t)

    cfg, err := ParseConfig("testdata/valid.yaml")
    must.NoError(err)    // stop if parsing fails — cfg would be nil
    must.NotNil(cfg)

    is.Equal("production", cfg.Environment)
    is.Equal(8080, cfg.Port)
    is.True(cfg.TLS.Enabled)
}

Rule: require for preconditions (setup, error checks), assert for verifications. Never mix randomly.

Core Assertions

is := assert.New(t)

// Equality
is.Equal(expected, actual)              // DeepEqual + exact type
is.NotEqual(unexpected, actual)
is.EqualValues(expected, actual)        // converts to common type first
is.EqualExportedValues(expected, actual)

// Nil / Bool / Emptiness
is.Nil(obj)                  is.NotNil(obj)
is.True(cond)                is.False(cond)
is.Empty(collection)         is.NotEmpty(collection)
is.Len(collection, n)

// Contains (strings, slices, map keys)
is.Contains("hello world", "world")
is.Contains([]int{1, 2, 3}, 2)
is.Contains(map[string]int{"a": 1}, "a")

// Comparison
is.Greater(actual, threshold)     is.Less(actual, ceiling)
is.Positive(val)                  is.Negative(val)
is.Zero(val)

// Errors
is.Error(err)                     is.NoError(err)
is.ErrorIs(err, ErrNotFound)      // walks error chain
is.ErrorAs(err, &target)
is.ErrorContains(err, "not found")

// Type
is.IsType(&User{}, obj)
is.Implements((*io.Reader)(nil), obj)

Argument order: always (expected, actual) — swapping produces confusing diff output.

Advanced Assertions

is.ElementsMatch([]string{"b", "a", "c"}, result)             // unordered comparison
is.InDelta(3.14, computedPi, 0.01)                            // float tolerance
is.JSONEq(`{"name":"alice"}`, `{"name": "alice"}`)             // ignores whitespace/key order
is.WithinDuration(expected, actual, 5*time.Second)
is.Regexp(`^user-[a-f0-9]+$`, userID)

// Async polling
is.Eventually(func() bool {
    status, _ := client.GetJobStatus(jobID)
    return status == "completed"
}, 5*time.Second, 100*time.Millisecond)

// Async polling with rich assertions
is.EventuallyWithT(func(c *assert.CollectT) {
    resp, err := client.GetOrder(orderID)
    assert.NoError(c, err)
    assert.Equal(c, "shipped", resp.Status)
}, 10*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond)

testify/mock

Mock interfaces to isolate the unit under test. Embed mock.Mock, implement methods with m.Called(), always verify with AssertExpectations(t).

Key matchers: mock.Anything, mock.AnythingOfType("T"), mock.MatchedBy(func). Call modifiers: .Once(), .Times(n), .Maybe(), .Run(func).

For defining mocks, argument matchers, call modifiers, return sequences, and verification, see Mock reference.

testify/suite

Suites group related tests with shared setup/teardown.

Lifecycle

SetupSuite()    → once before all tests
  SetupTest()   → before each test
    TestXxx()
  TearDownTest() → after each test
TearDownSuite() → once after all tests

Example

type TokenServiceSuite struct {
    suite.Suite
    store   *MockTokenStore
    service *TokenService
}

func (s *TokenServiceSuite) SetupTest() {
    s.store = new(MockTokenStore)
    s.service = NewTokenService(s.store)
}

func (s *TokenServiceSuite) TestGenerate_ReturnsValidToken() {
    s.store.On("Save", mock.Anything, mock.Anything).Return(nil)
    token, err := s.service.Generate("user-42")
    s.NoError(err)
    s.NotEmpty(token)
    s.store.AssertExpectations(s.T())
}

// Required launcher
func TestTokenServiceSuite(t *testing.T) {
    suite.Run(t, new(TokenServiceSuite))
}

Suite methods like s.Equal() behave like assert. For require: s.Require().NotNil(obj).

Common Mistakes

  • Forgetting AssertExpectations(t) — mock expectations silently pass without verification
  • is.Equal(ErrNotFound, err) — fails on wrapped errors. Use is.ErrorIs to walk the chain
  • Swapped argument order — testify assumes (expected, actual). Swapping produces backwards diffs
  • assert for guards — test continues after failure and panics on nil dereference. Use require
  • Missing suite.Run() — without the launcher function, zero tests execute silently
  • Comparing pointersis.Equal(ptr1, ptr2) compares addresses. Dereference or use EqualExportedValues

Linters

Use testifylint to catch wrong argument order, assert/require misuse, and more. See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint skill.

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill for general test patterns, table-driven tests, and CI
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint skill for testifylint configuration

Más skills de samber

golang-code-style
samber
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Spanish. The text is a description of a skill for Go testing. We must preserve the name "golang-testing" but it's not in the text, so we don't include it. Also preserve technical terms like "table-driven tests", "testify suites", "mocks", "parallel tests", "fuzzing", "fixtures", "goroutine leak detection", "goleak", "snapshot testing", "code coverage", "integration tests", "idiomatic test naming", "Go test CI", "flaky/slow tests", "testify-specific APIs", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify", "measurement methodology". Also preserve URLs? There is no URL. Numbers? None. Technical terms should be kept as is or translated if common? Usually in technical translations, terms like "table-driven tests" might be translated as "pruebas basadas en tablas" but it's common to keep English terms. The instruction says "Preserve product names
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
Patrones de diseño idiomáticos en Golang: opciones funcionales, constructores, flujo y cascada de errores, gestión y ciclo de vida de recursos, apagado elegante, resiliencia, arquitectura, inyección de dependencias, manejo de datos, streaming y más. Aplicar al elegir explícitamente entre patrones arquitectónicos, implementar opciones funcionales, diseñar APIs de constructores, configurar un apagado elegante, aplicar patrones de resiliencia o preguntar qué patrón idiomático de Go se ajusta a un problema específico.
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to Spanish, preserving the name "golang-error-handling" as it appears in the source? The instruction says: "Do not include the name unless it appears in the source text." The name "golang-error-handling" is not in the <text> block. The text block contains the description. So we only translate the text inside <text>. Also preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. So "Golang", "slog", "samber/oops", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops" should remain as is. Also "errors.Is/As", "errors.Join", "panic/recover", "HTTP", "log aggregation", "3rd-party", "Go code". Translate the rest idiomatically. Translation: "Manejo idiomático de errores en Golang: creación, envoltura con %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, tipos de error personalizados, errores centinela, panic/recover, la
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Patrones y metodología de optimización de rendimiento en Golang: si hay un cuello de botella X, entonces aplica Y. Cubre reducción de asignaciones, eficiencia de CPU, diseño de memoria, ajuste de GC, pooling, caching y optimización de rutas críticas. Úsalo cuando el perfilado o los benchmarks hayan identificado un cuello de botella y necesites el patrón de optimización adecuado para solucionarlo. También úsalo al realizar una revisión de código de rendimiento para sugerir mejoras o benchmarks que ayuden a identificar ganancias rápidas de rendimiento. No es para metodología de medición (→...
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Prácticas recomendadas de seguridad y prevención de vulnerabilidades para Golang. Abarca inyección (SQL, comandos, XSS), criptografía, seguridad del sistema de archivos, seguridad de red, cookies, gestión de secretos, seguridad de memoria y registro. Aplicar al escribir, revisar o auditar código Go por seguridad, o al trabajar en cualquier código riesgoso que involucre criptografía, E/S, gestión de secretos, manejo de entrada de usuario o autenticación. Incluye configuración de herramientas de seguridad.
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Guía completa para el acceso a bases de datos en Go: consultas parametrizadas, escaneo de estructuras, columnas anulables, transacciones, niveles de aislamiento, SELECT FOR UPDATE, pool de conexiones, procesamiento por lotes, propagación de contexto y herramientas de migración. Úsela al escribir, revisar o depurar código Golang que interactúe con PostgreSQL, MariaDB, MySQL o SQLite; para pruebas de bases de datos; o para preguntas sobre database/sql, sqlx o pgx. NO genera esquemas de bases de datos ni SQL de migración.
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
Mejores prácticas de linting y configuración de golangci-lint para proyectos Golang: ejecutar linters, configurar .golangci.yml, suprimir advertencias con directivas nolint, interpretar la salida de lint y seleccionar linters. Úselo al configurar golangci-lint, preguntar sobre advertencias de lint o supresiones nolint, configurar herramientas de calidad de código o elegir linters. También úselo cuando el usuario mencione golangci-lint, go vet, staticcheck o revive.
developmentcode-reviewtesting