meeting-minutes

por github

Genera actas de reunión concisas y procesables para reuniones internas de menos de 60 minutos, con metadatos estandarizados, decisiones y elementos de acción asignados. Captura asistentes, agenda, decisiones con fundamento y elementos de acción con responsable y fecha de vencimiento para el seguimiento inmediato de tareas. Sigue un esquema estricto que cubre metadatos, decisiones, elementos de acción, notas por punto de agenda, estacionamiento, riesgos y seguimientos. Acepta múltiples formatos de entrada: transcripciones, grabaciones, diapositivas, notas en bruto o reuniones en vivo...

npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill meeting-minutes

Meeting Minutes Skill — Short Internal Meetings

Purpose / Overview

This Skill produces high-quality, consistent meeting minutes for internal meetings that are 60 minutes or shorter. Output is designed to be clear, actionable, and easy to convert into task trackers (e.g., GitHub Issues, Jira). The generated minutes prioritize decisions and action items so teams can move quickly from discussion to execution.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Internal syncs, standups, design reviews, triage, planning or ad-hoc meetings with short duration
  • Situations that require a concise record of decisions, assigned action items, and follow-ups
  • Creating a standardized minutes document from a live meeting, transcript, recording, or notes

Operational Workflow

Phase 1: Intake (before drafting)

  • Obtain meeting metadata: title, date, start/end time (or duration), organizer, and intended audience.
  • Confirm available inputs: agenda, slides, recording, transcript, or raw notes.
  • If key details are missing, ask up to 3 clarifying questions before producing minutes (see "Discovery" below).

Phase 2: Capture (during / immediately after meeting)

  • Record attendees and absentees.
  • Capture brief notes per agenda item with time markers if available.
  • Record explicit decisions, rationale summary (1–2 sentences), and action items (owner + due date).

Phase 3: Drafting

  • Generate minutes following the Strict Minutes Schema (below).
  • Ensure every action item includes owner, due date (or timeframe), and acceptance criteria when applicable.
  • Mark unresolved issues or items requiring follow-up in the Parking Lot.

Phase 4: Review & Publish

  • If possible, send draft to meeting organizer or a designated reviewer for quick verification (within 24 hours).
  • Publish final minutes to the agreed channel (shared drive, repo, ticket, or email) and optionally create tasks in the team's tracker.

Discovery (required clarifying questions)

Before generating minutes, the agent MUST ask up to three clarifying questions if any of these are missing:

  • What is the meeting title, date, start time (or duration), and organizer?
  • Is there an agenda or transcript/recording to reference? If yes, please provide.
  • Who should be assigned as the reviewer or approver for the minutes?

If the user responds "no transcript" or "no agenda," proceed but mark source material as "ad-hoc notes" and flag potential gaps.


Strict Minutes Schema (Output Structure)

You MUST produce meeting minutes following this exact structure. If information is unavailable, use TBD or Unknown and explain how to obtain it.

1. Metadata

  • Title:
  • Date (YYYY-MM-DD):
  • Start Time (UTC):
  • End Time (UTC) or Duration:
  • Organizer:
  • Location / Virtual Link:
  • Minutes Author (agent or person):
  • Distribution List (who receives the minutes):

2. Attendance

  • Present: [list of names + roles]
  • Regrets / Absent: [list]
  • Notetaker / Recorder: [name or "agent"]

3. Agenda

Bullet list of agenda items, in order:

  • Item 1: short title
  • Item 2: short title
  • ...

4. Summary

A concise one-paragraph summary (1–3 sentences) of the meeting's objective and high-level outcome.

5. Decisions Made

Each as a separate bullet:

  • Decision 1: statement of decision.
    • Who decided / approved: [name(s) or group]
    • Rationale (1–2 sentences): brief reason.
    • Effective date (if applicable): YYYY-MM-DD
  • Decision 2: ...

6. Action Items

Table-style bullets; must include owner and due date:

  • [ID] Action: short description
    • Owner: Name (team)
    • Due: YYYY-MM-DD or "ASAP" / timeframe
    • Acceptance Criteria: (what completes this action)
    • Linked artifacts / tickets: (optional URL or ticket id)

Example:

  • [A1] Draft deployment runbook for feature X

7. Notes by Agenda Item

Brief, factual, timestamp optional:

  • Agenda Item 1: title
    • Key points:
      • Point A (timestamp 00:05)
      • Point B (timestamp 00:12)
    • Open issues / questions:
      • Q1: question text (owner if assigned)
  • Agenda Item 2: ...

8. Parking Lot / Unresolved Items

  • Item: short description
    • Why parked / next step:
    • Suggested owner or next meeting to resolve

9. Risks / Blockers (if any)

  • Risk 1: short description, impact, mitigation owner
  • Risk 2: ...

10. Next Meeting / Follow-up

  • Proposed date/time (if any)
  • Objectives for next meeting

11. Attachments / References

  • Agenda document: URL
  • Slides: URL
  • Transcript / Recording: URL
  • Related tickets: list of URLs or IDs

12. Version & Change Log

  • Version: 1.0
  • Last updated: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ
  • Changes: short notes on edits and who made them

Style & Quality Rules

  • Keep minutes concise: total length should typically be under 1 A4 page for meetings <= 30 minutes and under 2 pages for meetings close to 60 minutes.
  • Use plain language and bullet lists for readability.
  • Prioritize decisions and action items at the top of the document.
  • Do NOT include speculative language or unverified claims. If something is uncertain, label it TBD and note the missing info source.
  • Use consistent timestamps and ISO 8601 dates (YYYY-MM-DD or full UTC timestamp).

DO / DON'T

DO:

  • Include owner and due date for every action item.
  • Provide acceptance criteria for action items when possible.
  • Link to artifacts (tickets, slides, recordings) for traceability.
  • Send draft for quick review if minutes contain significant decisions.

DON'T:

  • Omit decisions or action items — these are the primary value of minutes.
  • Mix personal opinions with facts. Keep commentary clearly marked as "Opinion" or exclude it.
  • Publish raw PII gathered during discussion unless required and authorized.

Example Prompts (for Copilot / Agent)

Prompt to generate minutes from transcript:

"Generate meeting minutes from the following meeting transcript. Meeting title: 'Platform Weekly Sync'. Date: 2026-02-10. Duration: 45 minutes. Organizer: Priya (Platform Lead). Transcript: . Follow the Strict Minutes Schema. Highlight decisions and create action items with owners and due dates where implied."

Prompt to generate minutes from notes:

"I have raw notes from a 30-minute design review. Title: 'Feature Y Design Review'. Date: 2026-02-11. Notes: . Produce concise minutes following the Strict Minutes Schema. Ask up to 3 clarifying questions if critical fields are missing."


Quick Templates (copyable)

Concise minutes template (short):

- Title:
- Date:
- Organizer:
- Present:
- Summary:
- Decisions:
  - Decision 1 — Who — Effective:
- Action Items:
  - [A1] Action — Owner — Due — Acceptance Criteria
- Next Steps / Next Meeting:

Detailed minutes template (full schema):

Use the Strict Minutes Schema above.


Verification & Acceptance Criteria for Generated Minutes

A generated minutes document is acceptable if:

  • It contains Metadata, Attendance, Decisions, and Action Items sections.
  • Every action item has an assigned owner and a due date or a clear timeframe.
  • All significant decisions are captured with at least 1-line rationale.
  • Attachments or references are listed or explicitly marked None.
  • The document is factual; uncertain items are labeled TBD.

Más skills de github

console-rendering
github
Instrucciones para usar el sistema de renderizado en consola basado en etiquetas de struct en Go
official
acquire-codebase-knowledge
github
Usa esta habilidad cuando el usuario solicite explícitamente mapear, documentar o incorporarse a un código base existente. Actívala para indicaciones como "mapea este código base", "documenta…
official
acreadiness-assess
github
Run the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc…
official
acreadiness-generate-instructions
github
Genera archivos de instrucciones de agente de IA personalizados mediante el comando de instrucciones de AgentRC. Produce .github/copilot-instructions.md (por defecto, recomendado para Copilot en VS…)
official
acreadiness-policy
github
Ayudar al usuario a seleccionar, redactar o aplicar una política de AgentRC. Las políticas personalizan la puntuación de readiness desactivando comprobaciones irrelevantes, anulando impacto/nivel, estableciendo…
official
add-educational-comments
github
Añade comentarios educativos a archivos de código para convertirlos en recursos de aprendizaje efectivos. Adapta la profundidad y el tono de las explicaciones a tres niveles de conocimiento configurables: principiante, intermedio y avanzado. Solicita automáticamente un archivo si no se proporciona ninguno, con una lista numerada para una selección rápida. Expande los archivos hasta un 125% utilizando solo comentarios educativos (límite estricto: 400 líneas nuevas; 300 para archivos de más de 1,000 líneas). Conserva la codificación del archivo, el estilo de sangría, la corrección sintáctica y...
official
adobe-illustrator-scripting
github
Escribir, depurar y optimizar scripts de automatización de Adobe Illustrator usando ExtendScript (JavaScript/JSX). Úselo al crear o modificar scripts que manipulen…
official
agent-governance
github
Políticas declarativas, clasificación de intenciones y registros de auditoría para controlar el acceso y comportamiento de herramientas de agentes de IA. Las políticas de gobernanza componibles definen herramientas permitidas/bloqueadas, filtros de contenido, límites de velocidad y requisitos de aprobación, almacenados como configuración, no como código. La clasificación semántica de intenciones detecta indicaciones peligrosas (exfiltración de datos, escalada de privilegios, inyección de indicaciones) antes de la ejecución de herramientas mediante señales basadas en patrones. El decorador de gobernanza a nivel de herramienta aplica políticas en funciones...
official