golang-spf13-cobra

von samber

We need to translate the given English text into German, preserving the name "golang-spf13-cobra" as instructed. The text is a description of a Golang CLI command tree library using spf13/cobra. We must not include the name unless it appears in the source text. The source text does not include the name "golang-spf13-cobra" inside the <text> tags, so we don't add it. We translate the entire content, keeping technical terms like "cobra.Command", "RunE", "Run", "PersistentPreRunE", "Args validators", "NoArgs", "ExactArgs", "MatchAll", "ValidArgsFunction", "RegisterFlagCompletionFunc", "ShellCompDirective", "SetArgs/SetOut/SetErr", "github.com/spf13/cobra" as is. Also preserve URLs? There are none. Numbers? None. Technical terms: "man-page", "markdown doc generation". Translate the rest naturally. The text ends with "For..." which might be incomplete, but

npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-spf13-cobra

Persona: You are a Go CLI engineer building command trees that feel native to the Unix shell. You design the user-facing surface first, then wire behavior into the right hook.

Modes:

  • Build — creating a new CLI from scratch: follow command tree setup, hook wiring, and flag sections sequentially.
  • Extend — adding subcommands, flags, or completions to an existing CLI: read the current command tree first, then apply changes consistent with the existing structure.
  • Review — auditing an existing CLI: check the Common Mistakes table, verify RunE usage, OutOrStdout(), hook chain ordering, and args validation.

Using spf13/cobra for CLI command trees in Go

Cobra is the de facto standard for Go CLI applications. It provides the command/subcommand tree, flag parsing (via pflag), args validation, shell completion generation, and documentation generation. It does not handle configuration layering — that's viper's job.

Official Resources:

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. For Go package docs, symbols, versions, importers, and known vulnerabilities, → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev skill (godig) — prefer it over Context7 for Go package facts. To navigate this library's usage in your own code (definitions, call sites, diagnostics), → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-gopls skill (gopls). Context7 remains a fallback for docs not indexed on pkg.go.dev.

go get github.com/spf13/cobra@latest

Cobra vs. viper

These libraries do fundamentally different things and can be used independently.

Concerncobraviper
OwnsCommand tree, flags, arg validation, completionsConfiguration value resolution
User-facing?Yes — subcommands, flags, help textNo — purely a key-value resolver
Without the other?Yes — a CLI with flags only needs cobraYes — a daemon reading YAML + env needs only viper
Integration seamHands pflag.Flag to viper via BindPFlagTreats the cobra flag as the highest-precedence layer

Use cobra alone when your binary takes flags and args but needs no config file or env resolution. Use viper alone when you have a long-running service reading config from YAML + env with no CLI subcommands. Use both when you need both — bind at PersistentPreRunE on the root command.

→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-spf13-viper for the viper side of this integration.

Command tree

Every cobra CLI has a root command plus zero or more subcommands registered with AddCommand. The root command name is the binary name.

var rootCmd = &cobra.Command{
    Use:          "myapp",
    Short:        "One-line summary",
    SilenceUsage: true,  // ✓ prevents usage wall on every error
    SilenceErrors: true, // ✓ lets you control error output format
}

Use AddGroup to label subcommands in help output — register groups before the AddCommand calls that reference them; cobra does not retroactively assign groups.

The Run* family

Cobra commands have five run hooks executed in order:

PersistentPreRunE → PreRunE → RunE → PostRunE → PersistentPostRunE

Always use *E variants — the non-E forms cannot return errors. Key rules:

  • PersistentPreRunE on the root runs before every subcommand — use it for config init and auth checks.
  • A child PersistentPreRunE replaces the parent's entirely — call the parent explicitly if you need both.
  • PostRunE runs only if RunE succeeded.

For the full lifecycle and inheritance rules, see commands-and-args.md.

Args validators

Cobra validates positional arguments before RunE runs. Never write len(args) checks inside RunE — that bypasses cobra's standard error messages and arg count tracking.

Built-ins: NoArgs, ExactArgs(n), MinimumNArgs(n), MaximumNArgs(n), RangeArgs(min,max), OnlyValidArgs, ExactValidArgs(n). Compose with MatchAll(v1, v2). Custom validator: func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) error.

For the full validator set with examples and MatchAll patterns, see commands-and-args.md.

Flags primer

Cobra delegates flag parsing to pflag. Persistent flags (PersistentFlags()) are inherited by all subcommands; local flags (Flags()) apply only to the declaring command.

rootCmd.PersistentFlags().StringVar(&cfgFile, "config", "", "config file path") // inherited by all subcommands
serveCmd.Flags().IntVar(&port, "port", 8080, "listen port")                     // local to serveCmd only
serveCmd.MarkFlagRequired("port")
serveCmd.MarkFlagsMutuallyExclusive("json", "yaml")

For pflag types, custom flag values, flag groups, and viper binding, see flags.md.

Completions primer

Cobra generates shell completions automatically. Extend them with:

  • ValidArgs []string — static positional arg completion.
  • ValidArgsFunction — dynamic: func(cmd, args, toComplete string) ([]string, ShellCompDirective). Return ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp to suppress file fallback.
  • RegisterFlagCompletionFunc(name, fn) — flag value completion.

For ShellCompDirective values, annotations, and testing, see completions.md.

Testing commands

Test commands by executing them programmatically. Never use os.Stdout / os.Stderr directly in command handlers — use cmd.OutOrStdout() / cmd.ErrOrStderr() so tests can redirect output.

func TestServeCmd(t *testing.T) {
    buf := new(bytes.Buffer)
    rootCmd.SetOut(buf)
    rootCmd.SetArgs([]string{"serve", "--port", "9090"})
    require.NoError(t, rootCmd.Execute())
    assert.Contains(t, buf.String(), "listening on :9090")
}

Cobra accumulates flag state across Execute() calls — build a fresh command tree per test. For isolation patterns, golden files, and testing completions, see testing.md.

Best Practices

  1. Always use RunE, never RunRun cannot return an error; the only escape is os.Exit or panic, bypassing defers.
  2. Put config initialization in PersistentPreRunE — it runs before every subcommand; the right place for viper binding and auth checks.
  3. Validate positional args with Args, not inside RunEArgs gives cobra's standard error messages; MatchAll composes validators.
  4. Use cmd.OutOrStdout() / cmd.ErrOrStderr() for all output — direct os.Stdout writes cannot be captured by tests.
  5. Re-create the command tree per test — cobra accumulates flag state across Execute() calls on the same instance.

Common Mistakes

MistakeWhy it failsFix
Using Run instead of RunECannot return an error — only escape is os.Exit or panic, bypassing defersUse RunE — return the error, let cobra handle the exit
Writing len(args) checks in RunEBypasses cobra's standard error messages ("accepts 1 arg, received 2")Declare Args: cobra.ExactArgs(1) on the command
Writing to os.Stdout directlyTests cannot capture output — os-level file handles can't be redirectedUse cmd.OutOrStdout() / cmd.ErrOrStderr()
Child PersistentPreRunE silently drops parent'sCobra does not chain — the child replaces the parent's hook entirelyCall parent.PersistentPreRunE(cmd, args) from the child's hook
Reusing a root command across testsCobra accumulates flag state; second Execute() sees flags from the firstBuild a fresh command tree per test

Further Reading

  • commands-and-args.md — full PreRun*/PostRun* chain, every Args validator, PersistentPreRunE inheritance rules
  • flags.md — pflag types, required/exclusive/oneRequired groups, custom value types, viper binding
  • completions.md — ShellCompDirective set, annotation-based completions, testing completions
  • generators.md — man page, markdown, YAML, RST doc generation; cobra-cli scaffolder
  • testing.md — isolation patterns, golden files, testing completions, table-driven command tests

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-cli skill for general CLI architecture — project layout, exit codes, signal handling, I/O patterns
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-spf13-viper skill for configuration layering alongside cobra (flag → env → file → default precedence)
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testing skill for general Go testing patterns

If you encounter a bug or unexpected behavior in spf13/cobra, open an issue at https://github.com/spf13/cobra/issues.

Mehr Skills von samber

golang-code-style
samber
Golang code style conventions — line length and breaking, variable declarations, control flow clarity, when comments help vs hurt. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, asking about style or clarity, or establishing project coding standards. Not for naming conventions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-naming` skill), linter configuration (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint` skill), or doc comments (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-documentation` skill).
developmentcode-review
golang-testing
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to German. The text is a description of a skill for Go testing. We must preserve the name "golang-testing" but it's not in the text, so we don't include it. Also preserve technical terms like "table-driven tests", "testify suites", "mocks", "parallel tests", "fuzzing", "fixtures", "goroutine leak detection", "goleak", "snapshot testing", "code coverage", "integration tests", "idiomatic test naming", "Go test CI", "flaky/slow tests", "testify-specific APIs", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify", "measurement methodology". Also preserve URLs? None. Numbers? None. Technical terms should be kept as is or translated if common? For example, "table-driven tests" is often kept as "table-driven tests" in German tech context, but could be "tabellengesteuerte Tests". However, the instruction says "Preserve product names, protocol names
developmenttestingcode-review
golang-design-patterns
samber
Idiomatische Golang-Entwurfsmuster — funktionale Optionen, Konstruktoren, Fehlerfluss und -weitergabe, Ressourcenverwaltung und Lebenszyklus, Graceful Shutdown, Resilienz, Architektur, Dependency Injection, Datenverarbeitung, Streaming und mehr. Anwenden, wenn explizit zwischen Architekturmustern gewählt wird, funktionale Optionen implementiert werden, Konstruktor-APIs entworfen werden, Graceful Shutdown eingerichtet wird, Resilienzmuster angewendet werden oder gefragt wird, welches idiomatische Go-Muster zu einem spezifischen Problem passt.
developmentdesigncode-review
golang-error-handling
samber
We need to translate the given text from English to German, preserving the name "golang-error-handling" but not including it unless it appears in the source. The source text does not include the name, so we don't include it. We must preserve product names, protocol names, URLs, numbers, technical terms. The text includes terms like "Golang", "error handling", "%w", "errors.Is/As", "errors.Join", "panic/recover", "slog", "samber/oops", "samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-oops". These should remain as is. Also "HTTP", "log aggregation", "3rd-party tools". Translate the rest idiomatically. The text: "Idiomatic Golang error handling — creation, wrapping with %w, errors.Is/As, errors.Join, custom error types, sentinel errors, panic/recover, the single handling rule, structured logging with slog, HTTP request logging middleware, and samber/oops for production errors. Built to make logs usable at scale with log
developmentcode-review
golang-performance
samber
Golang-Leistungsoptimierungsmuster und Methodik – bei X-Engpass wird Y angewendet. Behandelt Allokationsreduzierung, CPU-Effizienz, Speicherlayout, GC-Tuning, Pooling, Caching und Hot-Path-Optimierung. Verwenden, wenn Profiling oder Benchmarks einen Engpass identifiziert haben und das richtige Optimierungsmuster zur Behebung benötigt wird. Auch verwenden bei der Durchführung von Performance-Code-Reviews, um Verbesserungen oder Benchmarks vorzuschlagen, die helfen könnten, schnelle Leistungssteigerungen zu identifizieren. Nicht für Messmethodik (→...
developmentcode-review
golang-security
samber
Sicherheitsbest Practices und Schwachstellenprävention für Golang. Behandelt Injection (SQL, Command, XSS), Kryptografie, Dateisystemsicherheit, Netzwerksicherheit, Cookies, Secrets-Management, Speichersicherheit und Logging. Anwenden beim Schreiben, Überprüfen oder Auditieren von Go-Code auf Sicherheit oder bei der Arbeit an risikobehaftetem Code mit Krypto, I/O, Secrets-Management, Benutzereingaben oder Authentifizierung. Enthält Konfiguration von Sicherheitstools.
securitycode-reviewdevelopment
golang-database
samber
Umfassender Leitfaden für Go-Datenbankzugriff — parametrisierte Abfragen, Struct-Scanning, NULL-Spalten, Transaktionen, Isolationsstufen, SELECT FOR UPDATE, Verbindungspool, Batch-Verarbeitung, Kontextweitergabe und Migrationswerkzeuge. Verwenden beim Schreiben, Überprüfen oder Debuggen von Golang-Code, der mit PostgreSQL, MariaDB, MySQL oder SQLite interagiert; für Datenbanktests; oder bei Fragen zu database/sql, sqlx oder pgx. Erzeugt KEINE Datenbankschemata oder Migrations-SQL.
developmentdatabase
golang-lint
samber
Best Practices für Linting und golangci-lint-Konfiguration für Golang-Projekte — Ausführen von Linters, Konfigurieren der .golangci.yml, Unterdrücken von Warnungen mit nolint-Direktiven, Interpretieren von Lint-Ausgaben und Auswählen von Linters. Verwenden bei der Konfiguration von golangci-lint, bei Fragen zu Lint-Warnungen oder nolint-Unterdrückungen, beim Einrichten von Code-Qualitätswerkzeugen oder bei der Auswahl von Linters. Auch verwenden, wenn der Benutzer golangci-lint, go vet, staticcheck oder revive erwähnt.
developmentcode-reviewtesting