backlog-templates

Gemeinsame Vorlagen und Konventionen für Arbeitselemente zur Übergabe von Backlogs in ADO und GitHub zwischen den Planern für RAI, Security, SSSC, Accessibility und Privacy

npx skills add https://github.com/microsoft/hve-core --skill backlog-templates

Backlog Templates

Shared reference for ADO and GitHub work-item template generation, content sanitization, autonomy-tier vocabulary, disclaimer-block placement, and work-item ID conventions used by every planner that emits a backlog handoff.

Overview

Planners that emit Phase-final backlog work items all need the same dual-format template skeletons, the same content sanitization rules, and the same convention for where to assign work-item IDs. This skill consolidates those shared pieces so each planner instruction file can reference one source instead of restating them.

Callers:

  • RAI Planner (rai-planner skill references/backlog-handoff.md)
  • Security Planner (Security Planner agent; security-specific handoff details in the security-planning skill's references/backlog-formats.md)
  • SSSC Planner (SSSC Planner agent, governed by sssc-planner.instructions.md)
  • Accessibility Planner (accessibility/accessibility skill references/phases/backlog-handoff.md)
  • Privacy Planner (Privacy Planner agent, governed by privacy-identity.instructions.md)

What stays per-planner (NOT in this skill):

  • Domain-specific HTML and markdown body content (NIST characteristic vs. STRIDE category vs. WCAG criterion vs. Scorecard check).
  • Severity-to-priority and severity-to-tier mapping tables — different input vocabularies per planner.
  • Work-item hierarchy mapping (Epic / Feature / Story / Task / Bug).
  • The accessibility disclaimer text (pinned to accessibility-identity.instructions.md by the L7 disclaimer lever).

ADO Work Item Template

ADO description fields use HTML and embed a planner-specific field block plus a verbatim disclaimer blockquote. Parameterize the skeleton with the planner ID prefix and per-planner field set.

Skeleton:

<div>
  <h3>{Domain} Control: {control_name}</h3>
  <!-- planner-specific field block goes here -->
  <h4>Implementation</h4>
  <p>{implementation_details}</p>
  <h4>Acceptance Criteria</h4>
  <ul>
    <li>{criterion_1}</li>
    <li>{criterion_2}</li>
  </ul>
  <blockquote>
  <p><strong>Note</strong> — The author created this content with assistance from AI. All outputs should be reviewed and validated by a qualified {role} reviewer before use.</p>
  <ul><li><input type="checkbox" disabled /> Reviewed and validated by a qualified {role} reviewer</li></ul>
  </blockquote>
</div>

Worked example (Security Planner):

<div>
  <h3>Security Control: {mitigation_name}</h3>
  <p><strong>Threat:</strong> {threat_id} - {threat_description}</p>
  <p><strong>Bucket:</strong> {bucket_name}</p>
  <p><strong>Standards:</strong> {owasp_ref}, {nist_ref}</p>
  <h4>Implementation</h4>
  <p>{implementation_details}</p>
  <h4>Acceptance Criteria</h4>
  <ul>
    <li>{criterion_1}</li>
    <li>{criterion_2}</li>
  </ul>
</div>

Each planner substitutes its own field block (NIST characteristic + threat + control surface for RAI; framework + criterion + surface + personas + evidence + tradeoff for Accessibility; supply-chain control + Scorecard check + adoption type for SSSC; data category + processing purpose + DPIA reference + lawful basis + risk tier for Privacy).

Planner-specific ADO description field block (the keys substituted into the <!-- planner-specific field block goes here --> slot):

  • RAI — characteristic, subcategory, principle, maturity_level, tradeoff_ref (when applicable).
  • Security — threat_id, stride_category, bucket, risk_level.
  • SSSC — Scorecard Check, Risk Level, Effort, Adoption Type, Prerequisite, Adoption Steps, Source References (Workflow, Script, Documentation).
  • Accessibility — framework, criterion, surface, wcag_level, severity, category, risk_tier, tradeoff_ref (when applicable). Add an assistive-technology validation note when severity is critical or major.
  • Privacy — data_category, processing_purpose, dpia_ref, lawful_basis, risk_tier.

GitHub Issue Template

GitHub issues use a YAML metadata header followed by a markdown body. Temporary IDs of the form {{<PREFIX>-TEMP-N}} are replaced with real issue numbers on creation.

Canonical YAML metadata header:

---
id: "{{<PREFIX>-TEMP-N}}"
planner: {rai|security|sssc|accessibility|privacy}
priority: {Critical|High|Medium|Low}
standards: ["{standard_id_1}", "{standard_id_2}"]
evidence_refs: ["{evidence_id_1}"]
cross_planner_refs: ["{wi_id_1}"]
---

Planner-specific augmentation fields (added to the same YAML block, not replacing it):

  • RAI — characteristic, subcategory, principle, maturity_level, tradeoff_ref, horizon, standards.
  • Security — threat_id, stride_category, risk_level, bucket, standards.
  • SSSC — scorecard_check, risk_level, adoption_type, effort, standards.
  • Accessibility — framework, criterion, surface, wcag_level, severity, category, risk_tier, tradeoff_ref, standards.
  • Privacy — data_category, processing_purpose, dpia_ref, lawful_basis, risk_tier, standards.

Markdown body skeleton:

## {Domain} Control: {control_name}

{planner_specific_summary_lines}

### Implementation

{implementation_details}

### Acceptance Criteria

* [ ] {criterion_1}
* [ ] {criterion_2}

The disclaimer blockquote from the ADO template is reused verbatim at the end of the markdown body for parity across formats.

Per-Platform Field Mappings

ADO

FieldPurposeRequiredPer-planner override
TitleBracket-tag prefix + concise descriptionYesTitle prefix differs ([Security], [RAI], [A11Y][{framework}]).
DescriptionHTML body per the ADO template skeletonYesField block contents differ.
AcceptanceCriteriaVerifiable checksYesAccessibility adds assistive-technology validation when required.
TagsDomain tags + applicable property tagsYesTag vocabulary differs (CIA triad, RAI principles, WCAG level, etc.).
PriorityDerived from risk or severityYesMapping table per planner.
IterationIteration path supplied by userOptionalEmpty defaults to backlog refinement.
AreaPathProject area supplied by userYesRequired for ADO emission across all planners.
ParentEpic or Feature parent referenceOptionalSet when seed maps into the planner-specific hierarchy.

GitHub

FieldPurposeRequiredPer-planner override
titleBracket-tag prefix + concise descriptionYesTitle prefix differs (matches ADO Title convention).
bodyMarkdown body per the GitHub templateYesYAML header augmentation and body summary lines differ.
labelsLowercased domain + property labelsYesLabel vocabulary differs; strip prefix: form when colons are disallowed.
milestonePlanning milestone if one existsOptionalEach planner may target a domain milestone; otherwise leave unset.
assigneesOwner role suggestionOptionalDefault to TBD — assign during backlog refinement.

Content Sanitization Protocol

Apply these five rules to every work item before emission to ADO or GitHub. Sanitization runs after rendering and before MCP-driven creation.

  1. Replace any occurrence of .copilot-tracking/ with a descriptive phrase such as {domain} plan artifacts (for example, security plan artifacts, accessibility plan artifacts).
  2. Replace absolute file system paths with workspace-relative references.
  3. Remove embedded state JSON or pointers to state JSON files; standards references inside state remain after extraction.
  4. Preserve standards identifiers verbatim — OWASP A{NN}, NIST AI RMF subcategory IDs, CIS control numbers, WCAG criterion IDs (1.1.1, 1.3.5), Scorecard check names, SLSA level strings, Section 508 chapter IDs, EN 301 549 clause numbers.
  5. Append a state.noticeLog entry per sanitized artifact with noticeType: "sanitization", source: "<planner-handoff-instruction-path>", the artifact path, and the sanitization rules that fired.

Debug-mode output retained under .copilot-tracking/<planner-domain>/{slug}/debug/ keeps full paths and never reaches external-facing work items.

Autonomy-Tier Enumeration

Three tiers control how rendered work items reach the target backlog system. The canonical vocabulary is manual / supervised / autonomous. A fourth value, coached, names a capability that emits no work items at all.

  • manual — The planner emits a backlog handoff file under .copilot-tracking/. The user creates each work item in the target system independently. No MCP tool invocations.
  • supervised — The planner drafts rendered work items in .copilot-tracking/, presents each batch of 5 to 10 items for user review, and only invokes MCP creation tools on user approval. This is the default tier.
  • autonomous — The planner invokes MCP creation tools directly on the sanitized batch after the user pre-approves the run. All items are created in a single operation.
  • coached — The capability produces a conversation and its own output rather than backlog work items. It renders nothing, invokes no creation tool, and reaches no backlog system, so no tier applies to it. No backlog planner selects this value and no planner state schema accepts it; it exists so a coaching-shaped capability has a name in this vocabulary instead of an undocumented absence. Coaching capabilities record no autonomy field in their own state.

Cross-reference mapping for planners that use divergent vocabularies. Each planner persists the selected value in its session state under userPreferences.autonomyTier using its own vocabulary; this table is the single source of truth for cross-planner equivalence.

Canonical (this skill)Accessibility (seed schema)SecurityRAISSSCPrivacy
autonomousautonomousFullFullFullFull
supervised (default)supervisedPartialPartialPartial (default)Partial (default)
manualmanualManualManualGuidedManual
coachednot applicablenot applicablenot applicablenot applicablenot applicable

Notes:

  • Accessibility's vocabulary already matches the canonical names; the seed schema autonomyTier field is the persisted form.
  • SSSC uses Guided as the lowest-autonomy tier label. Treat Guided and Manual as equivalent across planners for cross-reference and reporting.
  • coached is not a tier and has no planner equivalent. It is not selectable, not persisted in any planner state schema, and carries no severity-to-tier routing. A planner that encounters it should treat it as out of range.
  • Severity-to-tier mapping (which severity routes to which tier) stays in each planner's handoff instruction file.

Disclaimer-Block Placement Convention

Every backlog handoff artifact (handoff summary, ADO output file, GitHub output file) emits a disclaimer block verbatim at the end of the file. The block is the source of authority that the planner emission was AI-assisted and requires qualified human review before execution.

Source-of-truth split for the disclaimer text:

  • RAI, Security, SSSC — Read the disclaimer text from the automatically applied disclaimer-language.instructions.md under the corresponding planner section.
  • Privacy — Read the disclaimer text from the automatically applied disclaimer-language.instructions.md under the Privacy Planning section.
  • Accessibility — Read the disclaimer text from the automatically applied accessibility-identity.instructions.md under the Disclaimer Handling heading. The L7 disclaimer lever pins the accessibility disclaimer to that file. Do not move it to disclaimer-language.instructions.md.

Placement rules:

  • Emit the block at the end of every emitted artifact, not at the start.
  • Set state.disclaimerShownAt to the ISO 8601 timestamp at first emission within a session.
  • Append a state.noticeLog entry per emission with noticeType: "handoff-disclaimer", source: "<authoritative-instruction-path>", and the artifact path.
  • For ADO emission, the per-work-item HTML blockquote inside the description field is a separate review affordance and does not replace the file-level disclaimer block.

This skill intentionally does not reproduce the disclaimer text. Read it from the authoritative source above at emission time so updates to the canonical text propagate without skill edits.

Work Item ID Naming Convention

Work items use the format WI-{PREFIX}-{NNN} where the prefix identifies the originating planner and {NNN} is a zero-padded monotonic sequence scoped to the plan slug.

PlannerADO prefixGitHub temp ID
RAIWI-RAI-{{RAI-TEMP-N}}
SecurityWI-SEC-{{SEC-TEMP-N}}
SSSCWI-SSSC-{{SSSC-TEMP-N}}
AccessibilityWI-A11Y-{{A11Y-TEMP-N}}
PrivacyWI-PRIV-{{PRIV-TEMP-N}}

Rules:

  • Distinct prefixes prevent ID collision when multiple planners produce a backlog against the same project.
  • Sequence is monotonic per plan slug. Do not reuse identifiers across plans or sessions.
  • GitHub temporary IDs are replaced with real issue numbers at creation time; preserve the temporary ID in state.noticeLog for traceability.
  • Cross-planner references use the target planner's full ID, prefixed with the relationship type: Accessibility-Ref: WI-A11Y-{NNN}, Security-Ref: WI-SEC-{NNN}, RAI-Ref: WI-RAI-{NNN}, SSSC-Ref: WI-SSSC-{NNN}, Privacy-Ref: WI-PRIV-{NNN}.

Internal reference IDs (T-{BUCKET}-{NNN} for threats, EV-A11Y-{NNN} for evidence, SEED-A11Y-{NNN} for seeds, TO-A11Y-{NNN} for tradeoffs) remain scoped to their owning planner and are out of scope for this skill.

Mehr Skills von microsoft

oss-growth
microsoft
OSS-Wachstums-Hacker-Persona
agent-framework-azure-ai-py
microsoft
Erstellen Sie Azure AI Foundry-Agents mit dem Microsoft Agent Framework Python SDK (agent-framework-azure-ai). Verwenden Sie dies beim Erstellen persistenter Agents mit AzureAIAgentsProvider, bei der Nutzung gehosteter Tools (Code-Interpreter, Dateisuche, Websuche), bei der Integration von MCP-Servern, bei der Verwaltung von Konversationsthreads oder bei der Implementierung von Streaming-Antworten. Umfasst Funktionstools, strukturierte Ausgaben und Multi-Tool-Agents.
development
airunway-aks-setup
microsoft
Richte AI Runway auf AKS ein – vom leeren Cluster bis zum laufenden Modell. Umfasst Cluster-Überprüfung, Controller-Installation, GPU-Bewertung, Provider-Einrichtung und erste Bereitstellung. WANN: „AI Runway einrichten“, „AKS-Cluster onboarden“, „AI Runway installieren“, „airunway setup“, „Modell auf AKS bereitstellen“, „GPU-Inferenz auf AKS“, „KAITO-Setup auf AKS“, „LLM auf AKS ausführen“, „vLLM auf AKS“, „Modell-Serving auf AKS einrichten“, „AI Runway-Controller“.
devops
appinsights-instrumentation
microsoft
Leitfaden zur Instrumentierung von Webanwendungen mit Azure Application Insights. Bietet Telemetriemuster, SDK-Einrichtung und Konfigurationsreferenzen. WANN: wie man eine App instrumentiert, App Insights SDK, Telemetriemuster, was ist App Insights, Application Insights-Anleitung, Instrumentierungsbeispiele, APM-Best Practices.
devops
applicationinsights-web-ts
microsoft
Instrumentieren Sie Browser-/Web-Apps mit dem Application Insights JavaScript SDK (@microsoft/applicationinsights-web). Verwenden Sie es für Real User Monitoring (RUM) – Seitenaufrufe, Klicks, AJAX/Fetch-Abhängigkeiten, Ausnahmen, benutzerdefinierte Ereignisse und browser-seitige GenAI-Agent-Traces, die mit Backend-OpenTelemetry-Traces korreliert werden. Umfasst SDK-Loader-Skript und npm-Setup, Framework-Erweiterungen (React, React Native, Angular), Click Analytics, Telemetrie-Initialisierer und OTel-GenAI-Semantik-Konventionen für Agent-/Tool-/Modell-Spans, die vom Browser ausgegeben werden.
devops
azure-ai-anomalydetector-java
microsoft
Erstellen Sie Anomalieerkennungsanwendungen mit dem Azure AI Anomaly Detector SDK für Java. Verwenden Sie dies bei der Implementierung von univariater/multivariater Anomalieerkennung, Zeitreihenanalyse oder KI-gestützter Überwachung.
development
azure-ai-language-conversations-py
microsoft
Implementieren Sie Conversational Language Understanding (CLU) mit dem azure-ai-language-conversations Python SDK. Verwenden Sie dies, wenn Sie mit ConversationAnalysisClient arbeiten, um Gesprächsabsichten und Entitäten zu analysieren, NLP-Funktionen zu erstellen oder Sprachverständnis in Anwendungen zu integrieren.
development
azure-ai-ml-py
microsoft
Azure Machine Learning SDK v2 für Python. Verwenden für ML-Workspaces, Jobs, Modelle, Datensätze, Compute und Pipelines. Auslöser: „azure-ai-ml“, „MLClient“, „Workspace“, „Modell-Registry“, „Trainings-Jobs“, „Datensätze“.
development