go-testing-code-review

Go Testing Code Review

Quick Reference

Review Checklist

File Organization

• Test file naming: All test files follow *_test.go convention (e.g., reconciler_test.go for reconciler.go)
• Co-location: Unit tests are in the same package as the code they test

Standard Go Testing

• Tests are table-driven with clear case names
• Subtests use t.Run for parallel execution
• Test names describe behavior, not implementation
• Errors include got/want with descriptive message
• Cleanup registered with t.Cleanup
• Parallel tests don't share mutable state
• Mocks use interfaces defined in test file
• Coverage includes edge cases and error paths

Ginkgo/Gomega (BDD Framework)

• Use Describe for test suites, Context for scenarios, It for test cases
• Setup/teardown in BeforeEach/AfterEach for proper isolation
• Assertions use Expect() with matchers (To(), NotTo())
• Complex nested contexts organized logically (not too flat, not too deep)
• Use By() for multi-step test documentation

Kubernetes/Controller Testing

• Controller tests use envtest for realistic API server testing
• Test fixtures cleaned up properly (remove finalizers before deletion)
• Owner references validated on created resources
• Reconciliation loops tested with eventual consistency (Eventually())
• Both success and error paths tested for each reconcile function

Critical Patterns

Table-Driven Tests

// BAD - repetitive
func TestAdd(t *testing.T) {
    if Add(1, 2) != 3 {
        t.Error("wrong")
    }
    if Add(0, 0) != 0 {
        t.Error("wrong")
    }
}

// GOOD
func TestAdd(t *testing.T) {
    tests := []struct {
        name     string
        a, b     int
        want     int
    }{
        {"positive numbers", 1, 2, 3},
        {"zeros", 0, 0, 0},
        {"negative", -1, 1, 0},
    }

    for _, tt := range tests {
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            got := Add(tt.a, tt.b)
            if got != tt.want {
                t.Errorf("Add(%d, %d) = %d, want %d", tt.a, tt.b, got, tt.want)
            }
        })
    }
}

Error Messages

// BAD
if got != want {
    t.Error("wrong result")
}

// GOOD
if got != want {
    t.Errorf("GetUser(%d) = %v, want %v", id, got, want)
}

// For complex types
if diff := cmp.Diff(want, got); diff != "" {
    t.Errorf("GetUser() mismatch (-want +got):\n%s", diff)
}

Parallel Tests

func TestFoo(t *testing.T) {
    tests := []struct{...}

    for _, tt := range tests {
        tt := tt  // capture (not needed Go 1.22+)
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            t.Parallel()
            // test code
        })
    }
}

Cleanup

// BAD - manual cleanup, skipped on failure
func TestWithTempFile(t *testing.T) {
    f, _ := os.CreateTemp("", "test")
    defer os.Remove(f.Name())  // skipped if test panics
}

// GOOD
func TestWithTempFile(t *testing.T) {
    f, _ := os.CreateTemp("", "test")
    t.Cleanup(func() {
        os.Remove(f.Name())
    })
}

Anti-Patterns

1. Testing Internal Implementation

// BAD - tests private state
func TestUser(t *testing.T) {
    u := NewUser("alice")
    if u.id != 1 {  // testing internal field
        t.Error("wrong id")
    }
}

// GOOD - tests behavior
func TestUser(t *testing.T) {
    u := NewUser("alice")
    if u.ID() != 1 {
        t.Error("wrong ID")
    }
}

2. Shared Mutable State

// BAD - tests interfere with each other
var testDB = setupDB()

func TestA(t *testing.T) {
    t.Parallel()
    testDB.Insert(...)  // race!
}

// GOOD - isolated per test
func TestA(t *testing.T) {
    db := setupTestDB(t)
    t.Cleanup(func() { db.Close() })
    db.Insert(...)
}

3. Assertions Without Context

// BAD
assert.Equal(t, want, got)  // "expected X got Y" - which test?

// GOOD
assert.Equal(t, want, got, "user name after update")

When to Load References

• Reviewing test file structure → structure.md
• Reviewing mock implementations → mocking.md

Review Questions

1. Are tests table-driven with named cases?
2. Do error messages include input, got, and want?
3. Are parallel tests isolated (no shared state)?
4. Is cleanup done via t.Cleanup?
5. Do tests verify behavior, not implementation?