repo-intake-and-plan

Rigor Intake helper for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to scan a repository, read the README and common project files, extract documented commands, classify inference, evaluation, and training candidates, and return the smallest trustworthy reproduction plan to the main orchestrator. Do not use for environment setup, asset download, command execution, final reporting, paper lookup, or end-to-end orchestration.

npx skills add https://github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill repo-intake-and-plan

repo-intake-and-plan

Use this as the Rigor Intake helper. The installed slug remains repo-intake-and-plan for compatibility.

When to apply

  • At the beginning of README-first reproduction work.
  • When the main skill needs a fast map of repo structure and documented commands.
  • When inference, evaluation, and training candidates must be classified conservatively.
  • When the user explicitly wants to inspect the repo first and not run anything yet.

When not to apply

  • When execution has already started and the task is now about running commands or writing outputs.
  • When the target is not a repository-backed reproduction task.
  • When the user only wants paper interpretation without repo inspection.
  • When the user already has a selected documented command and only needs setup or execution.

Clear boundaries

  • This skill scans and plans.
  • This skill is helper-tier and should usually be orchestrator-invoked.
  • It does not install environments.
  • It does not prepare large assets.
  • It does not execute substantive reproduction commands.
  • It does not decide high-risk patching.

Input expectations

  • Target repository path.
  • Access to README and common project files if present.
  • Optional user hints about desired priority, such as inference-first.

Output expectations

  • concise repo structure summary
  • documented command inventory
  • inferred candidate categories: inference, evaluation, training, other
  • minimum trustworthy reproduction recommendation
  • notable ambiguity or risk list

Notes

Use references/repo-scan-rules.md and helper scripts under scripts/.

More skills from lllllllama

ai-research-explore
lllllllama
Rigor Explore compatible skill slug for meaningful and potentially novel deep learning research candidates. Use when the researcher has chosen the task family, dataset, benchmark, evaluation method, provided SOTA references, and wants candidate-only exploration on top of `current_research` with auditable repo understanding, idea gating, fair comparison, and governed experiments written to `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for README-first trusted reproduction, open-ended direction finding,...
researchdata-analysisapi
analyze-project
lllllllama
Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit read-only skill for deep learning research repositories. Use when the user wants to read and understand a repository, inspect model structure and training or inference entrypoints, review configs and insertion points, or flag suspicious implementation patterns without modifying code or running heavy jobs. Do not use for active command execution, broad refactoring, speculative code adaptation, or automatic bug fixing.
developmentcode-reviewresearch
ai-research-reproduction
lllllllama
RigorPilot reproduce-mode orchestrator for README-first deep learning repository reproduction. Use when the user wants an end-to-end, minimal-trustworthy flow that reads the repository first, selects the smallest documented inference or evaluation target, coordinates intake, setup, trusted execution, optional trusted training, optional repository analysis, and optional paper-gap resolution, enforces conservative patch rules, records evidence assumptions deviations and human decision points,...
researchdevelopmentdocument
explore-code
lllllllama
Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill for auditable candidate implementation in deep learning research repositories. Use when the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory work on an isolated branch or worktree to transplant modules, adapt a backbone, add LoRA or adapter layers, replace a head, or stitch together meaningful low-risk migration ideas with rollback-aware records in `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for end-to-end exploration orchestration on top of `current_research`, trusted...
developmentresearchcode-review
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama
Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized `repro_outputs/` files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end-to-end orchestration by itself.
developmenttestingcode-review
env-and-assets-bootstrap
lllllllama
Rigor Setup skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to prepare a conservative conda-first environment, checkpoint and dataset path assumptions, cache location hints, and setup notes before any run on a README-documented repository. Do not use for repo scanning, full orchestration, paper interpretation, final run reporting, or generic environment setup that is not tied to a specific reproduction target.
developmentdevops
explore-run
lllllllama
Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill for bounded exploratory evidence in deep learning research repositories. Use when the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory runs such as small-subset validation, short-cycle guess-and-check, batch sweeps, idle-GPU search, or quick transfer-learning trials, with fair-comparison caveats and no-overclaim summaries in `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for end-to-end exploration orchestration on top of `current_research`, trusted baseline...
researchdevelopmentdata-analysis
safe-debug
lllllllama
Rigor Debug / Rigor Audit skill for deep learning research work. Use when the user pastes a traceback, terminal error, CUDA OOM, checkpoint load failure, shape mismatch, NaN loss symptom, or training failure and wants conservative diagnosis before any patching, with debug fixes clearly separated from research contributions. Do not use for broad refactoring, speculative adaptation, automatic exploratory patching, or general repository familiarization.
developmenttestingcode-review