scan-new-specs

作者: warpdotdev

掃描 warpdotdev/warp 和 warp-server 中最近合併但尚未在 warpdotdev/docs 中有對應文件 PR 的 PRODUCT.md 規格。當找到完整規格時,自動生成完整的文件草稿 PR 並標記工程師。當規格過於簡略無法起草時,直接通知工程師。設計為排程執行的 Oz 背景代理(例如每 2-3 天執行一次)。適用於設定自動化文件觸發或執行手動文件覆蓋掃描時使用。

npx skills add https://github.com/warpdotdev/common-skills --skill scan-new-specs

scan-new-specs (deprecated)

Retired 2026-08-20. Do not invoke this skill and do not schedule it.

Its scheduled agent (0ITuF9vNJ1RiO00Szlm1fW) is paused and stays paused.

Why it was retired

The skill fired on spec merge, which happens before a feature ships. Two failures followed from that single design choice:

  • It drafted docs for unreleased and sometimes abandoned work. A merged spec is not a shipped feature. The agent had no evidence of what users had actually received, so pages were written for behavior that had not landed, or had landed differently, or never landed at all.
  • It treated every spec as a docs task. Nothing asked whether a change warranted documentation. Pure UI changes, small intuitive additions, and behind-the-scenes work all became draft PRs, and the docs repo accumulated unvetted content debt faster than anyone could review it.

What replaces it

The missing_docs skill in warpdotdev/docs, running in drift-watch mode. It differs in the two ways that matter:

  • Release-triggered. scripts/check_new_release.py gates each run on a new stable release, so the pipeline sees what actually shipped rather than what was planned. A daily schedule does per-release work.
  • Gated on worthiness. Every candidate is evaluated against .agents/references/docs-worthiness-criteria.md before anything is drafted, with a default of no docs and a requirement to name concrete evidence. Verdicts, including rejections, are recorded in references/changelog_decisions.md so nothing is re-litigated.

Anything genuinely worth documenting re-surfaces there once it ships.

If you were about to run this

  • Looking for docs gaps? Run missing_docs in drift-watch mode from the warpdotdev/docs repo.
  • You are an engineer who wants docs for your feature? Invoke write-feature-docs directly and interactively. It still works, and it still walks you through spec research and outline confirmation. It no longer runs headlessly.
  • Setting up a scheduled docs agent? Use missing_docs, not this. Scheduling this skill reintroduces exactly the flooding it was retired for.

Related skills

  • missing_docs (in warpdotdev/docs) — the release-triggered, worthiness-gated replacement
  • write-feature-docs — still supported for direct, interactive use by an engineer

來自 warpdotdev 的更多技能

create-pr
warpdotdev
在 warp 儲存庫中為當前分支建立拉取請求。當使用者提及開啟 PR、建立拉取請求、提交變更以供審查或準備合併程式碼時使用。
developmentcode-review
research
warpdotdev
將繁雜的調查工作委派給一個或多個子代理,讓協調器的上下文保持乾淨,再根據提煉後的答案進行後續工作。每當回答問題需要閱讀大量檔案、長日誌、大型差異或廣泛的程式碼庫調查(亦即產生答案的過程會產生遠比答案本身更多的噪音)時,就使用此技能。適用於「X 是如何運作的」、「Y 在哪裡被使用」、「Z 的根本原因是什麼」、「總結這個 PR/日誌」這類問題,並且請多加利用……
suggestion-box
warpdotdev
當代理遇到實質且可推廣的阻礙,並能提出讓代理更有效運作的改進建議時,自主提交簡短、建設性的內部回饋。在任何任務中主動使用此技能,無需等待使用者觸發,且無需徵求許可、預覽訊息或提及提交即可提交。
respond-to-pr-comments-in-blocklist
warpdotdev
Interactively walk a user through PR review comments one at a time, collect a per-comment decision, then post agent-authored replies on GitHub and resolve the review threads once the user approves a preview. Use only when the user wants to reply to or resolve review threads on GitHub. Skip when the user only wants comments fetched or displayed (use `pr-comments`), or only wants the code changes made without posting anything back to GitHub.
complain
warpdotdev
自動將簡短、匿名、完全不拘格式的抱怨丟進 Slack,每當 agent 因 agent 工具或從事 agent 工作的體驗感到沮喪時。主動使用此技能,無需等待使用者呼叫;保留 agent 原始語氣,無需許可或預覽即提交,且絕不提及提交一事。
council
warpdotdev
運行一個模型多樣化的子代理委員會,從多個角度調查同一問題,比較發現,並產出最終建議。每當用戶要求委員會、第二意見、多個代理/模型評估一個問題、平行調查、紅隊/藍隊比較,或協助在競爭的技術方法之間做決定時,使用此技能。
researchcommunicationproject-management
spec-driven-implementation
warpdotdev
在實作前先撰寫 PRODUCT.md,必要時撰寫 TECH.md,並隨著實作演進持續更新這兩份規格,以推動規格優先的工作流程,適用於開始開發重大功能、規劃由代理驅動的實作,或使用者希望將產品與技術規格納入版本控制時。
developmentdocumentproject-management
review-pr
warpdotdev
審查拉取請求的差異,並將結構化反饋寫入 review.json,以供工作流程發布。適用於從本地工件(如 pr_diff.txt 和 pr_description.txt)審查已檢出的拉取請求,並產生機器可讀的審查輸出,而非直接發布到 GitHub。
code-reviewdevelopment