studio-testing

作者: supabase

Supabase Studio 的測試策略。用於編寫測試、決定測試內容時使用。

npx skills add https://github.com/supabase/supabase --skill studio-testing

Studio Testing Strategy

How to write and structure tests for apps/studio/. The core principle: push logic out of React components into pure utility functions, then test those functions exhaustively. Only use component tests for complex UI interactions. Use E2E tests for features shared between self-hosted and platform.

When to Apply

Reference these guidelines when:

  • Writing new tests for Studio code
  • Deciding which type of test to write (unit, component, E2E)
  • Extracting logic from a component to make it testable
  • Reviewing whether test coverage is sufficient
  • Adding a new feature that needs tests

Rule Categories by Priority

PriorityCategoryImpactPrefix
1Logic ExtractionCRITICALtesting-
2Test CoverageCRITICALtesting-
3Component TestsHIGHtesting-
4E2E TestsHIGHtesting-

Quick Reference

1. Logic Extraction (CRITICAL)

  • testing-extract-logic - Remove logic from components into .utils.ts files as pure functions: args in, return out

2. Test Coverage (CRITICAL)

  • testing-exhaustive-permutations - Test every permutation of utility functions: happy path, malformed input, empty values, edge cases

3. Component Tests (HIGH)

  • testing-component-tests-ui-only - Only write component tests for complex UI interaction logic, not business logic

4. E2E Tests (HIGH)

  • testing-e2e-shared-features - Write E2E tests for features used in both self-hosted and platform; cover clicks AND keyboard shortcuts

Decision Tree: Which Test Type?

Is the logic a pure transformation (parse, format, validate, compute)?
  YES -> Extract to .utils.ts, write unit test with vitest
  NO  -> Does the feature involve complex UI interactions?
           YES -> Is it used in both self-hosted and platform?
                    YES -> Write E2E test in e2e/studio/features/
                    NO  -> Write component test with customRender
           NO  -> Can you extract the logic to make it pure?
                    YES -> Do that, then unit test it
                    NO  -> Write a component test

1. Extract Logic Into Utility Files (CRITICAL)

Remove as much logic from components as possible. Put it in co-located .utils.ts files as pure functions: arguments in, return value out.

File naming:

  • Utility: ComponentName.utils.ts next to the component
  • Test: tests/components/.../ComponentName.utils.test.ts mirroring the source path
// ❌ Logic buried in component — hard to test without rendering
function TaxIdForm({ taxIdValue, taxIdName }: Props) {
  const handleSubmit = () => {
    const taxId = TAX_IDS.find((t) => t.name === taxIdName)
    let sanitized = taxIdValue
    if (taxId?.vatPrefix && !taxIdValue.startsWith(taxId.vatPrefix)) {
      sanitized = taxId.vatPrefix + taxIdValue
    }
    submitToApi(sanitized)
  }
  return <form onSubmit={handleSubmit}>...</form>
}

// ✅ Logic extracted to .utils.ts — trivially testable
// TaxID.utils.ts
export function sanitizeTaxIdValue({ value, name }: { value: string; name: string }): string {
  const taxId = TAX_IDS.find((t) => t.name === name)
  if (taxId?.vatPrefix && !value.startsWith(taxId.vatPrefix)) {
    return taxId.vatPrefix + value
  }
  return value
}

// TaxIdForm.tsx — thin shell
const handleSubmit = () => {
  const sanitized = sanitizeTaxIdValue({ value: taxIdValue, name: taxIdName })
  submitToApi(sanitized)
}

2. Test Every Permutation (CRITICAL)

Once logic is extracted, test exhaustively. Every code path needs a test:

  • Valid inputs (happy path for each branch)
  • Invalid / malformed inputs
  • Empty values, null values, missing fields
  • Edge cases (timestamps with colons, special characters, boundary values)
// ❌ Only happy path
test('parses a filter', () => {
  expect(formatFilterURLParams('id:gte:20')).toStrictEqual({ column: 'id', operator: 'gte', value: '20' })
})

// ✅ Every permutation
test('parses valid filter', () => { ... })
test('handles timestamp with colons in value', () => { ... })
test('rejects malformed filter with missing parts', () => { ... })
test('rejects unrecognized operator', () => { ... })
test('allows empty filter value', () => { ... })

3. Component Tests for Complex UI Only (HIGH)

Only write component tests when there is complex UI interaction logic that cannot be captured by testing utility functions alone.

Valid reasons: conditional rendering from user interaction sequences, popover open/close with keyboard/mouse, multi-step form transitions.

Not valid: testing a calculation or transformation that happens to live in a component — extract to .utils.ts and unit test instead.

// Studio component test conventions
import { fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react'
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event'
import { customRender } from 'tests/lib/custom-render' // always use customRender, not raw render
import { addAPIMock } from 'tests/lib/msw' // API mocking in beforeEach

4. E2E Tests for Shared Features (HIGH)

If a feature exists in both self-hosted and platform, create an E2E test. Cover mouse clicks AND keyboard shortcuts (Tab, Enter, Escape, Arrow keys).

Extract reusable interactions into e2e/studio/utils/*-helpers.ts. Use try/finally for resource cleanup. For E2E execution details, see the studio-e2e-tests skill.

Codebase References

WhatWhere
Util test examplesapps/studio/tests/components/Grid/Grid.utils.test.ts, apps/studio/tests/components/Billing/TaxID.utils.test.ts, apps/studio/tests/components/Editor/SpreadsheetImport.utils.test.ts
Component test examplesapps/studio/tests/features/logs/LogsFilterPopover.test.tsx, apps/studio/tests/components/CopyButton.test.tsx
E2E test examplee2e/studio/features/filter-bar.spec.ts
E2E helpers patterne2e/studio/utils/filter-bar-helpers.ts
Custom renderapps/studio/tests/lib/custom-render.tsx
MSW mock setupapps/studio/tests/lib/msw.ts (addAPIMock)
Test READMEapps/studio/tests/README.md
Vitest configapps/studio/vitest.config.ts
Related skillsstudio-e2e-tests (running E2E), vitest (API reference), vercel-composition-patterns (component architecture)

來自 supabase 的更多技能

studio-e2e-tests
supabase
撰寫並執行 Supabase Studio 的 Playwright E2E 測試。在收到要求時使用。
official
vitest
supabase
由 Vite 驅動、相容 Jest API 的 Vitest 快速單元測試框架。適用於撰寫測試、模擬、配置覆蓋率或處理測試相關工作時使用。
official
skill-creator
supabase
建立模組化技能的全面指南,可擴展 Claude 的功能,包含專業知識與工作流程。技能由必要的 SKILL.md 檔案(含 YAML 前置資料與 Markdown 指令)以及可選的捆綁資源(腳本、參考資料、素材)組成,這些資源按用途組織並逐步載入以節省上下文空間。圍繞具體使用範例設計技能;識別用於確定性任務的可重複使用腳本、用於領域知識的參考檔案,以及用於...的素材。
official
supabase
supabase
在執行任何涉及 Supabase 的任務時使用。觸發條件:Supabase 產品(資料庫、驗證、邊緣函數、即時功能、儲存、向量、排程、佇列);客戶端…
official
supabase-server
supabase
在撰寫 Supabase 伺服端程式碼時使用 — 包括 Edge Functions、Hono 應用程式、Webhook 處理器,或任何需要建立 Supabase 驗證與客戶端的後端環境。…
official
clickhouse-logs-queries
supabase
Write, review, and migrate Supabase logs queries against the ClickHouse-backed `logs` table (the `logs.all.otel` analytics endpoint). Use this whenever a task…
official
dev-toolbar-review
supabase
在審查涉及 packages/dev-tools/、packages/common/posthog-client.ts 的 PR 時使用
official
e2e-studio-tests
supabase
在 Studio 應用程式中執行端對端測試。當被要求執行端對端測試、執行 Studio 測試、Playwright 測試或測試功能時使用。
official