studio-mock-api-tests

作者: supabase

Component tests for Supabase Studio that mock API requests at the network layer with MSW. Use when writing or reviewing a component test that exercises a React…

npx skills add https://github.com/supabase/supabase --skill studio-mock-api-tests

Studio MSW component tests

Mount a Studio component, intercept its network calls with MSW, assert what renders and what gets sent. The infrastructure is already wired up — this skill is the working template plus the gotchas.

When to use

  • The component (or any descendant it renders) calls a React Query hook or mutation that hits /platform/..., /v1/..., or another endpoint in apps/studio/data/api.d.ts.
  • You'd otherwise be tempted to write vi.mock('@/data/some-query', ...). Don't. Mock the network instead — see "Why not vi.mock" below.

If the component is purely presentational with no data fetching, you don't need MSW; render and assert directly.

The template

import { fireEvent, screen, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react'
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event'
import { mockAnimationsApi } from 'jsdom-testing-mocks'
import { HttpResponse } from 'msw'
import { describe, expect, test, vi } from 'vitest'

import { MyComponent } from './MyComponent'
import { customRender } from '@/tests/lib/custom-render'
import { addAPIMock } from '@/tests/lib/msw'

// Needed if the component renders inside a Sheet, Modal, Popover, or
// anything else built on Radix that uses Web Animations.
mockAnimationsApi()

describe('MyComponent', () => {
  test('renders rows from the API', async () => {
    addAPIMock({
      method: 'get',
      path: '/platform/organizations',
      response: () =>
        HttpResponse.json<OrganizationResponse[]>([
          {
            /* ... */
          },
        ]),
    })

    customRender(<MyComponent />)

    expect(await screen.findByText('Acme')).toBeInTheDocument()
  })
})

That's the whole pattern. Server lifecycle (listen/resetHandlers/ close) is handled by apps/studio/tests/vitestSetup.ts — handlers registered via addAPIMock are scoped to the current test.

Gotchas that will eat your afternoon

1. Path params use :slug, not {slug}

addAPIMock is typed from the OpenAPI paths, but path params are remapped to MSW's :param format. Autocomplete will guide you, but if typecheck reports the path isn't assignable, you're using the OpenAPI {slug} form.

// ❌ TypeScript error, MSW won't match
path: '/platform/organizations/{slug}/projects'

// ✅ Correct
path: '/platform/organizations/:slug/projects'

2. Use HttpResponse.json, not new HttpResponse

For success responses, always go through HttpResponse.json — even for 204/201-no-content endpoints. A raw new HttpResponse(null, { status: 201 }) returns no content-type, and openapi-fetch can hang the mutation flow, which silently breaks onSuccess callbacks.

// ❌ Mutation onSuccess silently never fires
response: () => new HttpResponse(null, { status: 201 })

// ✅ Works (pass the OpenAPI body shape explicitly — see gotcha #8)
response: () => HttpResponse.json<MyResponse>({}, { status: 201 })

3. Submit buttons in Sheets/Modals need fireEvent.click

The convention <Button form={FORM_ID} type="submit" /> (button outside the form, associated by id) doesn't reliably trigger submission under userEvent.click in jsdom. Use fireEvent.click for the submit button. Continue to use userEvent.type for inputs.

await userEvent.type(screen.getByPlaceholderText('value'), 'hello')
fireEvent.click(await screen.findByRole('button', { name: 'Save' }))

4. Profile-gated queries need a profileContext

Many hooks (useOrganizationsQuery, anything in data/projects/, anything that calls useProfile) refuse to fire until a profile is loaded. Pass one explicitly:

import type { ProfileContextType } from '@/lib/profile'

const PROFILE_CONTEXT: ProfileContextType = {
  profile: {
    id: 1,
    auth0_id: 'auth0|test',
    gotrue_id: 'gotrue-test',
    username: 'testuser',
    primary_email: 'test@example.com',
    first_name: null,
    last_name: null,
    mobile: null,
    is_alpha_user: false,
    is_sso_user: false,
    disabled_features: [],
    free_project_limit: null,
  },
  error: null,
  isLoading: false,
  isError: false,
  isSuccess: true,
}

customRender(<MyComponent />, { profileContext: PROFILE_CONTEXT })

5. useParams is globally mocked to { ref: 'default' }

You don't need to mock the Next router for project-scoped components. Just use 'default' as the project ref in your mock paths: /v1/projects/default/secrets, /platform/projects/default/.... If you need a different ref, override with routerMock.setCurrentUrl(...) (see apps/studio/tests/lib/route-mock.ts).

6. Unhandled requests fail loudly — mock every endpoint a render triggers

mswServer.listen({ onUnhandledRequest: 'error' }) is set globally. If a component (or any child it renders) fires an unmocked request, you'll see MSW errors in stderr and likely flaky behavior. Cards, lists, and details panels often fire nested queries (e.g. OrganizationCard calls useOrgProjectsInfiniteQuery) — read what the rendered subtree does and mock all of it, or stub it with vi.mock for nested components only.

7. Don't put query strings in the handler path

addAPIMock accepts ?foo=bar suffixes via TrimQueryParams, but the helper strips them before matching. MSW v2 doesn't match query params via path strings — read them inside the resolver instead:

addAPIMock({
  method: 'get',
  path: '/platform/projects',
  response: ({ request }) => {
    const limit = new URL(request.url).searchParams.get('limit')
    // ...
  },
})

8. Always pass an explicit generic to HttpResponse.json

addAPIMock's resolver is typed against the OpenAPI success body (and the standard { message: string } error envelope, exported as APIErrorBody). But MSW's HttpResponse.json uses NoInfer, so the body type doesn't narrow from context. Pass the expected shape explicitly — it doubles as a self-documenting contract assertion:

import { addAPIMock, type APIErrorBody } from '@/tests/lib/msw'

response: () => HttpResponse.json<OrganizationResponse[]>([...])
response: () =>
  HttpResponse.json<APIErrorBody>({ message: 'Boom' }, { status: 500 })

A mock that drifts from the contract (wrong envelope, missing fields, stale enum values) now fails at compile time, not at runtime. The cost is one type annotation per resolver — well worth it.

For mocks at the network boundary, also prefer createMockOrganizationResponse (returns the raw OpenAPI OrganizationResponse) over createMockOrganization (which extends with frontend-derived managed_by / partner_id that the query layer attaches). Same pattern applies to any type that's a frontend extension of an OpenAPI schema: build a createMockXResponse helper that returns the raw API shape.

Prefer asserting on UI state

MSW's own best-practices doc explicitly recommends asserting on what renders, not on whether a handler was called. The "did the form submit?" question is best answered by expect(onClose).toHaveBeenCalled() or by findByText('Saved') — not by spying on the resolver.

There's one legitimate exception: the request body itself is the contract you care about, and the server's reply doesn't reflect it back. Bulk-create endpoints (like POST /v1/projects/:ref/secrets) are the canonical case — 201 with no body, so the only way to verify the shape sent is to capture it:

const requests: Array<{ ref: string | undefined; body: unknown }> = []
addAPIMock({
  method: 'post',
  path: '/v1/projects/:ref/secrets',
  response: async ({ request, params }) => {
    requests.push({ ref: params.ref as string | undefined, body: await request.json() })
    return HttpResponse.json<CreateSecretsResponse>({}, { status: 201 })
  },
})

// ... drive the UI ...

expect(requests).toEqual([{ ref: 'default', body: [{ name: 'API_KEY', value: 'new-value' }] }])

When in doubt, assert on the UI first; reach for request capture only when the UI doesn't observably encode the contract.

Debugging an MSW test

If a request isn't being matched, wire up MSW's lifecycle events at the top of the test file (or temporarily in msw.ts):

import { mswServer } from '@/tests/lib/msw'

mswServer.events.on('request:unhandled', ({ request }) => {
  console.log('[MSW] UNHANDLED:', request.method, request.url)
})
mswServer.events.on('response:mocked', ({ request, response }) => {
  console.log('[MSW] MATCHED:', request.method, request.url, response.status)
})

request:start is already wired in msw.ts. Add request:unhandled and response:mocked locally when a test misbehaves — usually surfaces a path-param mismatch or a nested query you forgot to mock.

Why not vi.mock('@/data/...')

It bypasses the network boundary, so:

  • It hides real bugs: a renamed query key or a changed request payload passes the test, then breaks in production.
  • It doesn't exercise React Query's caching, retry, or invalidation paths — onMutate, onSuccess, and onError callbacks won't run as they do in real life. (tkdodo.eu/blog/testing-react-query)
  • It drifts independently from the OpenAPI types — handlers stay in sync, module-level mocks don't.

Reach for vi.mock only for non-network concerns: a heavy child component (e.g. a Monaco editor) you want to stub, or a common-package hook with global state.

Further reading

Codebase references

WhatWhere
Query-only example (loading, error, success)apps/studio/components/interfaces/Organization/OrgNotFound.test.tsx
Mutation example (form, payload assertion)apps/studio/components/interfaces/Functions/EdgeFunctionSecrets/EditSecretSheet.test.tsx
SQL-via-pg-meta example (POST resolver branch on query body)apps/studio/components/interfaces/Integrations/Vault/Secrets/__tests__/EditSecretModal.test.tsx
addAPIMock sourceapps/studio/tests/lib/msw.ts
customRender sourceapps/studio/tests/lib/custom-render.tsx
Global handlers + lifecycleapps/studio/tests/lib/msw-global-api-mocks.ts, apps/studio/tests/vitestSetup.ts
Related skillsstudio-testing (when to write a component test at all), studio-queries (hook conventions), vitest

來自 supabase 的更多技能

studio-e2e-tests
supabase
撰寫並執行 Supabase Studio 的 Playwright E2E 測試。在收到要求時使用。
official
vitest
supabase
由 Vite 驅動、相容 Jest API 的 Vitest 快速單元測試框架。適用於撰寫測試、模擬、配置覆蓋率或處理測試相關工作時使用。
official
skill-creator
supabase
建立模組化技能的全面指南,可擴展 Claude 的功能,包含專業知識與工作流程。技能由必要的 SKILL.md 檔案(含 YAML 前置資料與 Markdown 指令)以及可選的捆綁資源(腳本、參考資料、素材)組成,這些資源按用途組織並逐步載入以節省上下文空間。圍繞具體使用範例設計技能;識別用於確定性任務的可重複使用腳本、用於領域知識的參考檔案,以及用於...的素材。
official
supabase
supabase
在執行任何涉及 Supabase 的任務時使用。觸發條件:Supabase 產品(資料庫、驗證、邊緣函數、即時功能、儲存、向量、排程、佇列);客戶端…
official
supabase-server
supabase
在撰寫 Supabase 伺服端程式碼時使用 — 包括 Edge Functions、Hono 應用程式、Webhook 處理器,或任何需要建立 Supabase 驗證與客戶端的後端環境。…
official
clickhouse-logs-queries
supabase
Write, review, and migrate Supabase logs queries against the ClickHouse-backed `logs` table (the `logs.all.otel` analytics endpoint). Use this whenever a task…
official
dev-toolbar-review
supabase
在審查涉及 packages/dev-tools/、packages/common/posthog-client.ts 的 PR 時使用
official
e2e-studio-tests
supabase
在 Studio 應用程式中執行端對端測試。當被要求執行端對端測試、執行 Studio 測試、Playwright 測試或測試功能時使用。
official