iterate-pr

作者: sentry

反覆修改 PR 直到 CI 通過。當需要修復 CI 失敗、處理審查意見,或持續推送修正直到所有檢查都通過時使用。…

npx skills add https://github.com/getsentry/skills --skill iterate-pr

Iterate on PR Until CI Passes

Goal: fix actionable CI failures and high/medium review feedback. Stop and report human approval, draft-readiness, and merge-readiness gates.

Requires:

  • authenticated gh
  • uv
  • target repository root as cwd
  • skill-root-relative script paths, for example scripts/fetch_pr_checks.py

Bundled Scripts

ScriptRunOutput
scripts/fetch_pr_checks.pyuv run scripts/fetch_pr_checks.py [--pr NUMBER]JSON: pr, summary, checks, failure snippets
scripts/fetch_pr_feedback.pyuv run scripts/fetch_pr_feedback.py [--pr NUMBER]JSON buckets: high, medium, low, bot, resolved
scripts/monitor_pr_checks.pyuv run scripts/monitor_pr_checks.py [--pr NUMBER]terminal marker plus tab-separated checks
scripts/reply_to_thread.pyuv run scripts/reply_to_thread.py THREAD_ID BODY [...]JSON reply results

Check summary fields include failed, pending, actionable_pending, and human_gate_pending.

Monitor markers:

  • ALL_CHECKS_PASSED
  • CHECKS_DONE_WITH_FAILURES
  • NO_CHECKS_REGISTERED
  • DRAFT_PR_WITH_NO_CHECKS
  • CHECKS_BLOCKED_BY_REVIEW_GATE

Workflow

1. Identify PR

Run:

gh pr view --json number,url,headRefName,isDraft,reviewDecision

Stop when:

  • no PR exists
  • draft PR has no checks after monitor grace period: report DRAFT_PR_WITH_NO_CHECKS

Draft rule: inspect existing checks/feedback only. Do not mark ready for review unless asked.

2. Handle Feedback

Run uv run scripts/fetch_pr_feedback.py [--pr NUMBER].

BucketAction
highfix
mediumfix
lowask user which to address
botskip informational comments
resolvedskip

Feedback fix checklist:

  • verify root cause
  • search related code
  • fix all instances
  • for review_bot: true: fix real issues, explain false positives

Low-priority prompt format:

Found 3 low-priority suggestions:
1. [l] "Consider renaming this variable" - @reviewer in api.py:42
2. [nit] "Could use a list comprehension" - @reviewer in utils.py:18
3. [style] "Add a docstring" - @reviewer in models.py:55

Which should I address? ("1,3", "all", or "none")

3. Check CI Status

Run uv run scripts/fetch_pr_checks.py [--pr NUMBER].

StateAction
failed > 0 and actionable_pending == 0fix failures
actionable_pending > 0wait; poll feedback while waiting
pending > 0 and actionable_pending == 0report CHECKS_BLOCKED_BY_REVIEW_GATE
no checks after grace periodreport NO_CHECKS_REGISTERED or DRAFT_PR_WITH_NO_CHECKS
all actionable checks passedrun post-CI feedback check

Wait for actionable review bots: sentry, warden, cursor, bugbot, seer, codeql. Do not wait for approval, isDraft, REVIEW_REQUIRED, Codecov, or informational bots.

4. Fix CI Failures

For each failure:

  1. read full log: gh run view <run-id> --log-failed
  2. trace from assertion/exception/lint rule to source
  3. state the cause before editing: "fails because X, affected by Y"
  4. search related call sites/patterns
  5. fix root cause, not symptom
  6. add focused test coverage when needed

5. Verify Locally, Then Commit and Push

Before commit:

  • test fix: rerun specific test
  • lint/type fix: rerun affected checker
  • code fix: rerun covering tests
  • local failure: fix before pushing
git add <files>
git commit -m "fix: <descriptive message>"
git push

6. Monitor CI and Address Feedback

Loop:

  1. run uv run scripts/fetch_pr_checks.py
  2. handle table in step 3
  3. while actionable_pending > 0, run uv run scripts/fetch_pr_feedback.py
  4. fix new high/medium feedback immediately
  5. if changed, verify, commit, push, restart loop
  6. otherwise sleep 30 seconds and repeat
  7. after checks pass, wait 10 seconds, fetch feedback once more
  8. if new high/medium feedback exists, return to step 4

Claude Code optional: run uv run scripts/monitor_pr_checks.py through MonitorTool with persistent: false; set timeout to normal repo CI duration. Restart the monitor after every push.

Exit Conditions

ExitConditions
Successactionable CI passed; post-CI feedback clean; low-priority choice handled
Ask usersame failure after 2 attempts; feedback unclear; infrastructure issue
Stopno PR; branch needs rebase; no checks; draft no-checks; only human gates remain

Fallback

If scripts fail, use gh CLI directly:

  • gh pr view --json number,url,headRefName,isDraft,reviewDecision
  • gh pr checks --json name,state,bucket,description,link
  • gh run view <run-id> --log-failed
  • gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{number}/comments

來自 sentry 的更多技能

generate-frontend-forms
sentry
使用 Sentry 新表單系統建立表單的指南。適用於實作表單、表單欄位、驗證或自動儲存功能時使用。
official
sentry-snapshots-cocoa
sentry
完整的 Sentry Snapshots 設定,適用於 Apple/Cocoa 專案。當被要求「設定 SnapshotPreviews」、「設定 Apple 快照測試」、「上傳 Apple 快照至…」時使用。
official
architecture-review
sentry
員工級別的程式碼庫健康檢查。找出單體模組、靜默失敗、型別安全漏洞、測試覆蓋缺口,以及LLM友善性問題。
official
linear-type-labeler
sentry
根據每個問題的標題與描述內容,從 Sentry 工作區的標籤分類法中分類 Linear 問題,並套用對應的類型標籤。
official
sentry-flutter-sdk
sentry
完整的 Sentry SDK 設定,適用於 Flutter 和 Dart。當被要求「為 Flutter 加入 Sentry」、「安裝 sentry_flutter」、「在 Dart 中設定 Sentry」或設定錯誤…時使用。
official
sentry-svelte-sdk
sentry
完整的 Sentry SDK 設定,適用於 Svelte 和 SvelteKit。當被要求「將 Sentry 加入 Svelte」、「將 Sentry 加入 SvelteKit」、「安裝 @sentry/sveltekit」或進行設定時使用…
official
vercel-react-best-practices
sentry
來自 Vercel Engineering 的 React 與 Next.js 效能優化指南。此技能應在撰寫、審查或重構 React/Next.js… 時使用。
official
sentry-tanstack-start-sdk
sentry
完整的 Sentry SDK 設定,適用於 TanStack Start React。當被要求「將 Sentry 加入 TanStack Start」、「安裝 @sentry/tanstackstart-react」或設定錯誤…時使用。
official