performance-optimization

作者: sanity-io

優化應用程式效能。當存在效能需求、懷疑效能回歸,或核心網頁指標與載入時間…時使用。

npx skills add https://github.com/sanity-io/sanity --skill performance-optimization

Performance Optimization

Overview

Measure before optimizing. Performance work without measurement is guessing — and guessing leads to premature optimization that adds complexity without improving what matters. Profile first, identify the actual bottleneck, fix it, measure again. Optimize only what measurements prove matters.

When to Use

  • Performance requirements exist in the spec (load time budgets, response time SLAs)
  • Users or monitoring report slow behavior
  • Core Web Vitals scores are below thresholds
  • You suspect a change introduced a regression
  • Building features that handle large datasets or high traffic

When NOT to use: Don't optimize before you have evidence of a problem. Premature optimization adds complexity that costs more than the performance it gains.

Core Web Vitals Targets

MetricGoodNeeds ImprovementPoor
LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)≤ 2.5s≤ 4.0s> 4.0s
INP (Interaction to Next Paint)≤ 200ms≤ 500ms> 500ms
CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)≤ 0.1≤ 0.25> 0.25

The Optimization Workflow

1. MEASURE  → Establish baseline with real data
2. IDENTIFY → Find the actual bottleneck (not assumed)
3. FIX      → Address the specific bottleneck
4. VERIFY   → Measure again, confirm improvement
5. GUARD    → Add monitoring or tests to prevent regression

Step 1: Measure

Two complementary approaches — use both:

  • Synthetic (Lighthouse, DevTools Performance tab): Controlled conditions, reproducible. Best for CI regression detection and isolating specific issues.
  • RUM (web-vitals library, CrUX): Real user data in real conditions. Required to validate that a fix actually improved user experience.

Frontend:

# Synthetic: Lighthouse in Chrome DevTools (or CI)
# Chrome DevTools → Performance tab → Record
# Chrome DevTools MCP → Performance trace

# RUM: Web Vitals library in code
import { onLCP, onINP, onCLS } from 'web-vitals';

onLCP(console.log);
onINP(console.log);
onCLS(console.log);

Backend:

# Response time logging
# Application Performance Monitoring (APM)
# Database query logging with timing

# Simple timing
console.time('db-query');
const result = await db.query(...);
console.timeEnd('db-query');

Where to Start Measuring

Use the symptom to decide what to measure first:

What is slow?
├── First page load
│   ├── Large bundle? --> Measure bundle size, check code splitting
│   ├── Slow server response? --> Measure TTFB in DevTools Network waterfall
│   │   ├── DNS long? --> Add dns-prefetch / preconnect for known origins
│   │   ├── TCP/TLS long? --> Enable HTTP/2, check edge deployment, keep-alive
│   │   └── Waiting (server) long? --> Profile backend, check queries and caching
│   └── Render-blocking resources? --> Check network waterfall for CSS/JS blocking
├── Interaction feels sluggish
│   ├── UI freezes on click? --> Profile main thread, look for long tasks (>50ms)
│   ├── Form input lag? --> Check re-renders, controlled component overhead
│   └── Animation jank? --> Check layout thrashing, forced reflows
├── Page after navigation
│   ├── Data loading? --> Measure API response times, check for waterfalls
│   └── Client rendering? --> Profile component render time, check for N+1 fetches
└── Backend / API
    ├── Single endpoint slow? --> Profile database queries, check indexes
    ├── All endpoints slow? --> Check connection pool, memory, CPU
    └── Intermittent slowness? --> Check for lock contention, GC pauses, external deps

Step 2: Identify the Bottleneck

Common bottlenecks by category:

Frontend:

SymptomLikely CauseInvestigation
Slow LCPLarge images, render-blocking resources, slow serverCheck network waterfall, image sizes
High CLSImages without dimensions, late-loading content, font shiftsCheck layout shift attribution
Poor INPHeavy JavaScript on main thread, large DOM updatesCheck long tasks in Performance trace
Slow initial loadLarge bundle, many network requestsCheck bundle size, code splitting

Backend:

SymptomLikely CauseInvestigation
Slow API responsesN+1 queries, missing indexes, unoptimized queriesCheck database query log
Memory growthLeaked references, unbounded caches, large payloadsHeap snapshot analysis
CPU spikesSynchronous heavy computation, regex backtrackingCPU profiling
High latencyMissing caching, redundant computation, network hopsTrace requests through the stack

Step 3: Fix Common Anti-Patterns

N+1 Queries (Backend)

// BAD: N+1 — one query per task for the owner
const tasks = await db.tasks.findMany()
for (const task of tasks) {
  task.owner = await db.users.findUnique({where: {id: task.ownerId}})
}

// GOOD: Single query with join/include
const tasks = await db.tasks.findMany({
  include: {owner: true},
})

Unbounded Data Fetching

// BAD: Fetching all records
const allTasks = await db.tasks.findMany()

// GOOD: Paginated with limits
const tasks = await db.tasks.findMany({
  take: 20,
  skip: (page - 1) * 20,
  orderBy: {createdAt: 'desc'},
})

Missing Image Optimization (Frontend)

<!-- BAD: No dimensions, no format optimization -->
<img src="/hero.jpg" />

<!-- GOOD: Hero / LCP image — art direction + resolution switching, high priority -->
<!--
  Two techniques combined:
  - Art direction (media): different crop/composition per breakpoint
  - Resolution switching (srcset + sizes): right file size per screen density
-->
<picture>
  <!-- Mobile: portrait crop (8:10) -->
  <source
    media="(max-width: 767px)"
    srcset="/hero-mobile-400.avif 400w, /hero-mobile-800.avif 800w"
    sizes="100vw"
    width="800"
    height="1000"
    type="image/avif"
  />
  <source
    media="(max-width: 767px)"
    srcset="/hero-mobile-400.webp 400w, /hero-mobile-800.webp 800w"
    sizes="100vw"
    width="800"
    height="1000"
    type="image/webp"
  />
  <!-- Desktop: landscape crop (2:1) -->
  <source
    srcset="/hero-800.avif 800w, /hero-1200.avif 1200w, /hero-1600.avif 1600w"
    sizes="(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px"
    width="1200"
    height="600"
    type="image/avif"
  />
  <source
    srcset="/hero-800.webp 800w, /hero-1200.webp 1200w, /hero-1600.webp 1600w"
    sizes="(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px"
    width="1200"
    height="600"
    type="image/webp"
  />
  <img
    src="/hero-desktop.jpg"
    width="1200"
    height="600"
    fetchpriority="high"
    alt="Hero image description"
  />
</picture>

<!-- GOOD: Below-the-fold image — lazy loaded + async decoding -->
<img
  src="/content.webp"
  width="800"
  height="400"
  loading="lazy"
  decoding="async"
  alt="Content image description"
/>

Unnecessary Re-renders (React)

// BAD: Creates new object on every render, causing children to re-render
function TaskList() {
  return <TaskFilters options={{sortBy: 'date', order: 'desc'}} />
}

// GOOD: Stable reference
const DEFAULT_OPTIONS = {sortBy: 'date', order: 'desc'} as const
function TaskList() {
  return <TaskFilters options={DEFAULT_OPTIONS} />
}

// Use React.memo for expensive components
const TaskItem = React.memo(function TaskItem({task}: Props) {
  return <div>{/* expensive render */}</div>
})

// Use useMemo for expensive computations
function TaskStats({tasks}: Props) {
  const stats = useMemo(() => calculateStats(tasks), [tasks])
  return (
    <div>
      {stats.completed} / {stats.total}
    </div>
  )
}

Large Bundle Size

// Modern bundlers (Vite, webpack 5+) handle named imports with tree-shaking automatically,
// provided the dependency ships ESM and is marked `sideEffects: false` in package.json.
// Profile before changing import styles — the real gains come from splitting and lazy loading.

// GOOD: Dynamic import for heavy, rarely-used features
const ChartLibrary = lazy(() => import('./ChartLibrary'));

// GOOD: Route-level code splitting wrapped in Suspense
const SettingsPage = lazy(() => import('./pages/Settings'));

function App() {
  return (
    <Suspense fallback={<Spinner />}>
      <SettingsPage />
    </Suspense>
  );
}

Missing Caching (Backend)

// Cache frequently-read, rarely-changed data
const CACHE_TTL = 5 * 60 * 1000 // 5 minutes
let cachedConfig: AppConfig | null = null
let cacheExpiry = 0

async function getAppConfig(): Promise<AppConfig> {
  if (cachedConfig && Date.now() < cacheExpiry) {
    return cachedConfig
  }
  cachedConfig = await db.config.findFirst()
  cacheExpiry = Date.now() + CACHE_TTL
  return cachedConfig
}

// HTTP caching headers for static assets
app.use(
  '/static',
  express.static('public', {
    maxAge: '1y', // Cache for 1 year
    immutable: true, // Never revalidate (use content hashing in filenames)
  }),
)

// Cache-Control for API responses
res.set('Cache-Control', 'public, max-age=300') // 5 minutes

Performance Budget

Set budgets and enforce them:

JavaScript bundle: < 200KB gzipped (initial load)
CSS: < 50KB gzipped
Images: < 200KB per image (above the fold)
Fonts: < 100KB total
API response time: < 200ms (p95)
Time to Interactive: < 3.5s on 4G
Lighthouse Performance score: ≥ 90

Enforce in CI:

# Bundle size check
npx bundlesize --config bundlesize.config.json

# Lighthouse CI
npx lhci autorun

See Also

For detailed performance checklists, optimization commands, and anti-pattern reference, see references/performance-checklist.md.

Common Rationalizations

RationalizationReality
"We'll optimize later"Performance debt compounds. Fix obvious anti-patterns now, defer micro-optimizations.
"It's fast on my machine"Your machine isn't the user's. Profile on representative hardware and networks.
"This optimization is obvious"If you didn't measure, you don't know. Profile first.
"Users won't notice 100ms"Research shows 100ms delays impact conversion rates. Users notice more than you think.
"The framework handles performance"Frameworks prevent some issues but can't fix N+1 queries or oversized bundles.

Red Flags

  • Optimization without profiling data to justify it
  • N+1 query patterns in data fetching
  • List endpoints without pagination
  • Images without dimensions, lazy loading, or responsive sizes
  • Bundle size growing without review
  • No performance monitoring in production
  • React.memo and useMemo everywhere (overusing is as bad as underusing)

Verification

After any performance-related change:

  • Before and after measurements exist (specific numbers)
  • The specific bottleneck is identified and addressed
  • Core Web Vitals are within "Good" thresholds
  • Bundle size hasn't increased significantly
  • No N+1 queries in new data fetching code
  • Performance budget passes in CI (if configured)
  • Existing tests still pass (optimization didn't break behavior)

來自 sanity-io 的更多技能

tdd
sanity-io
以紅-綠-重構循環進行測試驅動開發。當使用者想透過TDD建立功能或修復錯誤、提及「紅-綠-重構」、想要…時使用。
content-experimentation-best-practices
sanity-io
結構化指引,涵蓋設計、執行與分析內容實驗以提升轉換率與參與度。內容包括假設框架、指標選擇、樣本數計算,以及A/B測試與多變量實驗中的統計顯著性檢定。提供關於p值、信賴區間、統計檢定力分析及貝氏方法的詳細資源,用於解讀實驗結果。同時包含CMS整合模式,以便在欄位層級管理變體,並連接外部系統。
content-modeling-best-practices
sanity-io
結構化內容建模指南,涵蓋綱要設計、可重用性與多渠道發布。核心原則包括:將內容視為數據而非頁面、維護單一事實來源、為未來渠道設計,以及優化編輯工作流程。提供關於引用與嵌入物件、關注點分離及內容重用模式的決策框架。包含針對扁平、階層與分面分類法的分類學指引。適用於...
portable-text-conversion
sanity-io
將 HTML 和 Markdown 內容轉換為適用於 Sanity 的可攜式文字區塊。用於從舊版 CMS 遷移內容、將 HTML 或 Markdown 匯入 Sanity 等情境。
portable-text-serialization
sanity-io
將 Portable Text 渲染並序列化為 React、Svelte、Vue、Astro、HTML、Markdown 及純文字。適用於在任何前端實作 Portable Text 渲染時使用…
sanity-best-practices
sanity-io
我們要將提供的英文描述翻譯成繁體中文。注意事項:保留產品名稱、協定名稱、URL、數字和技術術語。不要添加聲明、解釋、Markdown、項目符號、鏈接、標籤、前綴或額外評論。只翻譯<text>內的文字,不要包含名稱除非它在源文本中出現。不要包含標籤如「description」、「server name」或「skill name」。 源文本: "Comprehensive best practices and integration guides for Sanity CMS development across frameworks and topics. Covers 10+ framework integrations including Next.js, Nuxt, Astro, Remix, SvelteKit, and Angular with framework-specific patterns and setup guidance Includes topic guides for schema design, GROQ query optimization, Visual Editing, Portable Text, images, TypeGen, localization, and content migrations Provides quick-reference structure for loading only relevant guides based on task type,..." 注意:Sanity CMS 是產品名稱,保留。Next.js, Nuxt, Astro, Remix, SvelteKit
sanity-migration
sanity-io
規劃、執行並審查從其他內容管理系統及內容平台遷移至 Sanity 的作業。適用於從 AEM、Adobe Experience Manager、Contentful、Strapi、Webflow、WordPress、Payload、Drupal、Markdown/MDX/frontmatter 檔案、WXR/XML 匯出、CMS API、資料庫匯出、靜態 HTML 進行遷移或平台轉換,或設計資料擷取、轉換、Portable Text 轉換、資產遷移、重新導向、驗證及切換流程時使用。
data-analysisdatabasedevelopment
seo-aeo-best-practices
sanity-io
We need to translate the given text from English to Traditional Chinese. The text is about SEO and AEO optimization guidance. We must preserve the name "seo-aeo-best-practices" but it's not in the text, so we don't include it. We translate only the text inside <text>. No extra commentary, no labels. The translation should be accurate and natural in Traditional Chinese. Let's break down the text: "Comprehensive SEO and AEO optimization guidance covering metadata, structured data, EEAT, and AI-readiness. Covers both traditional search engine optimization (SEO) and AI answer engine optimization (AEO) across Google, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and similar platforms Includes technical SEO essentials: metadata, Open Graph tags, sitemaps, robots.txt, hreflang, and international SEO configuration Provides JSON-LD structured data patterns for Article, FAQ, Breadcrumb, and Product schemas" We need to translate each part. Note: "EEAT" is likely a typo for "E-E-A-T" (Experience, Expertise,