codex-bug

作者: openai

診斷 openai/codex 中的 GitHub 錯誤報告。當提供 openai/codex 的 GitHub 問題網址並被要求決定下一步(例如驗證是否與…)時使用。

npx skills add https://github.com/openai/codex --skill codex-bug

Codex Bug

Overview

Diagnose a Codex GitHub bug report and decide the next action: verify against sources, request more info, or explain why it is not a bug.

Workflow

  1. Confirm the input
  • Require a GitHub issue URL that points to github.com/openai/codex/issues/….
  • If the URL is missing or not in the right repo, ask the user for the correct link.
  1. Network access
  • Always access the issue over the network immediately, even if you think access is blocked or unavailable.
  • Prefer the GitHub API over HTML pages because the HTML is noisy:
    • Issue: https://api.github.com/repos/openai/codex/issues/<number>
    • Comments: https://api.github.com/repos/openai/codex/issues/<number>/comments
  • If the environment requires explicit approval, request it on demand via the tool and continue without additional user prompting.
  • Only if the network attempt fails after requesting approval, explain what you can do offline (e.g., draft a response template) and ask how to proceed.
  1. Read the issue
  • Use the GitHub API responses (issue + comments) as the source of truth rather than scraping the HTML issue page.
  • Extract: title, body, repro steps, expected vs actual, environment, logs, and any attachments.
  • Note whether the report already includes logs or session details.
  • If the report includes a thread ID, mention it in the summary and use it to look up the logs and session details if you have access to them.
  1. Summarize the bug before investigating
  • Before inspecting code, docs, or logs in depth, write a short summary of the report in your own words.
  • Include the reported behavior, expected behavior, repro steps, environment, and what evidence is already attached or missing.
  1. Decide the course of action
  • Verify with sources when the report is specific and likely reproducible. Inspect relevant Codex files (or mention the files to inspect if access is unavailable).
  • Request more information when the report is vague, missing repro steps, or lacks logs/environment.
  • Explain not a bug when the report contradicts current behavior or documented constraints (cite the evidence from the issue and any local sources you checked).
  1. Respond
  • Provide a concise report of your findings and next steps.

來自 openai 的更多技能

user-context
openai
載入或管理資料分析插件的持久性來源路由偏好設定、入門邏輯、設定進度以及語義層註冊表。
official
notion-research-documentation
openai
研究Notion內容,並將其整合為結構化的簡報、報告或附有引用的比較分析。透過精準查詢搜尋並擷取Notion頁面,然後按主題組織發現,並附上內文來源引用及參考文獻章節。根據範圍與使用者目標,從四種輸出格式(快速簡報、研究摘要、比較分析、綜合報告)中選擇。使用內建範本建立與更新Notion頁面;直接連結來源,並在新資訊到來時追蹤變更。
official
rcsb-pdb-skill
openai
提交精簡的RCSB PDB請求以獲取核心元數據、Search API查詢及FASTA下載。當用戶需要簡潔的RCSB摘要時使用;保存原始JSON或…
official
pdf
openai
PDF 讀取、建立與驗證,支援視覺化渲染與程式化生成。使用 Poppler(pdftoppm)將 PDF 頁面渲染為 PNG,以便在交付前檢查版面、間距與排版。透過 reportlab 程式化生成 PDF,確保格式可靠;使用 pdfplumber 或 pypdf 提取文字與元資料。執行品質標準:無文字裁切、元素重疊、表格破損或渲染瑕疵;僅使用 ASCII 連字號,引用格式需具可讀性。使用...
official
test-coverage-improver
openai
Improve test coverage in the OpenAI Agents JS monorepo: run `pnpm test:coverage`, inspect coverage artifacts, identify low-coverage files and branches, propose…
official
playwright
openai
終端驅動的瀏覽器自動化,具備元素快照與互動式UI工作流程。透過playwright-cli包裝腳本運作(需npx),支援無頭模式與有頭模式以進行視覺化除錯。核心流程:開啟頁面、擷取快照以取得穩定元素參照、使用參照進行互動、在導航或DOM變更後重新擷取快照。包含表單填寫、點擊、輸入、多分頁管理、螢幕截圖/PDF擷取,以及流程除錯的軌跡記錄。元素參照(例如e3、e15)...
official
ukb-topmed-phewas-skill
openai
接受rsID、GRCh37或GRCh38輸入,解析為所需的GRCh38查詢,以獲取單一變異的簡潔UKB-TOPMed PheWAS摘要。當需要…時使用。
official
code-review-context
openai
模型可見上下文
official