update-screenshots

作者: microsoft

從最新的 CI 執行中下載螢幕截圖基準並提交。當被要求更新、接受或刷新來自 CI 的元件螢幕截圖基準時使用,或…

npx skills add https://github.com/microsoft/vscode --skill update-screenshots

Update Component Screenshots from CI

Screenshot images are not stored in the repository — they live in an external service (hediet-screenshots.azurewebsites.net), keyed by commit SHA. But a subset of fixtures is pinned by hash in test/componentFixtures/blocks-ci-screenshots.md, and that file is committed. When those hashes change, CI fails and you must update the file.

Two different outcomes, only one of which blocks

The Screenshots & Tests job in .github/workflows/component-fixtures.yml produces two independent results:

ResultBlocking?Action
Screenshot diff report (PR comment with before/after images)No — informationalReview the visuals. Nothing to commit.
blocks-ci hash mismatchYes — fails the checkUpdate blocks-ci-screenshots.md and commit.

A fixture opts into the blocking gate with labels: { kind: 'screenshot', blocksCi: true }. Only those fixtures appear in blocks-ci-screenshots.md.

The failure looks like this:

##[error]blocks-ci screenshot hashes do not match committed file. See PR comment or job summary for the updated content.

Step 1: Get the expected hashes from CI

Never regenerate the hashes locally. They are hashes of the rendered PNG bytes, produced on ubuntu-latest. Rendering on macOS or Windows yields different bytes and therefore different hashes, so locally generated values will fail CI. Always copy the values from the CI job.

Three surfaces carry the same content — use whichever is handy:

  • The PR comment titled "blocks-ci screenshots changed" (non-fork PRs only) — contains the full updated file plus a patch.
  • The job summary, which gets the identical body and is the only surface fork PRs receive.
  • The job log, whose final step prints a unified diff:
gh api repos/microsoft/vscode/actions/jobs/<JOB_ID>/logs > "$TMPDIR/ci-job-log.txt"
grep -n '##\[error\]' "$TMPDIR/ci-job-log.txt"

Find the failed job id with:

gh pr checks <PR> --json name,link,bucket --jq '.[] | select(.name == "Screenshots & Tests")'

Step 2: Verify the change is intentional before accepting it

This gate exists to catch unintended layout regressions, so accepting new hashes without looking at the images defeats its purpose. The images are publicly fetchable by hash, so pull both the old (committed) and new (from CI) versions and compare:

curl -sL -o old.png "https://hediet-screenshots.azurewebsites.net/images/<OLD_HASH>"
curl -sL -o new.png "https://hediet-screenshots.azurewebsites.net/images/<NEW_HASH>"

Then view them, and localize the change rather than eyeballing full screenshots — the delta is often only a pixel or two:

python3 -c "
from PIL import Image, ImageChops
a = Image.open('old.png').convert('RGB'); b = Image.open('new.png').convert('RGB')
print('diff bbox:', ImageChops.difference(a, b).getbbox())
"

Confirm the delta matches what the PR intends. If the fixture is unrelated to the change, or the shift is larger than expected, treat it as a regression and fix the code instead of the hashes.

Step 3: Apply and commit

Edit only the changed lines in test/componentFixtures/blocks-ci-screenshots.md, replacing the old hash in the image URL with the new one:

#### editor/inlineChatZoneWidget/InlineChatZoneWidget/Dark
![screenshot](https://hediet-screenshots.azurewebsites.net/images/<NEW_HASH>)

The file is generated by build/lib/screenshotBlocksCi.ts and compared byte-for-byte, so keep the <!-- auto-generated by CI — do not edit manually --> header, the #### <fixtureId> / image-link pairing, the blank line between entries, and the fixtureId sort order intact. Verify your edit is the exact inverse of the diff CI reported:

git diff test/componentFixtures/blocks-ci-screenshots.md

Then commit and push. The check re-runs and should pass; hashes on main become the new baseline after merge.

Investigating further

Raw captured images and the manifest for a run are uploaded as an artifact:

gh run download <RUN_ID> --name screenshots --dir .tmp/screenshots

manifest.json maps each fixtureId to its imageHash and any render errors.

Related failures from the same job

The check also fails if a fixture failed to render (Fail if fixtures had errors) or if the Playwright fixture tests failed. Those are genuine bugs — updating hashes will not help. Look for ::error::<fixtureId>: in the log, and download the playwright-test-results artifact for test failures.

來自 microsoft 的更多技能

oss-growth
microsoft
開源增長駭客角色
agent-framework-azure-ai-py
microsoft
使用Microsoft Agent Framework Python SDK(agent-framework-azure-ai)构建Azure AI Foundry代理。适用于使用AzureAIAgentsProvider创建持久化代理、使用托管工具(代码解释器、文件搜索、网络搜索)、集成MCP服务器、管理对话线程或实现流式响应。涵盖函数工具、结构化输出和多工具代理。
development
airunway-aks-setup
microsoft
在AKS上設定AI Runway——從裸叢集到執行模型。涵蓋叢集驗證、控制器安裝、GPU評估、供應商設定及首次部署。時機:「設定AI Runway」、「上線AKS叢集」、「安裝AI Runway」、「airunway設定」、「部署模型至AKS」、「在AKS上進行GPU推論」、「在AKS上設定KAITO」、「在AKS上執行LLM」、「在AKS上使用vLLM」、「在AKS上設定模型服務」、「AI Runway控制器」。
devops
appinsights-instrumentation
microsoft
使用Azure Application Insights檢測Web應用程式的指南。提供遙測模式、SDK設定與組態參考。適用時機:如何檢測應用程式、App Insights SDK、遙測模式、什麼是App Insights、Application Insights指南、檢測範例、APM最佳實踐。
devops
applicationinsights-web-ts
microsoft
使用Application Insights JavaScript SDK(@microsoft/applicationinsights-web)為瀏覽器/Web應用程式進行檢測。適用於真實使用者監控(RUM)——頁面檢視、點擊、AJAX/fetch依賴、例外、自訂事件,以及與後端OpenTelemetry追蹤關聯的瀏覽器端GenAI代理追蹤。涵蓋SDK載入器指令碼與npm設定、框架擴充(React、React Native、Angular)、點擊分析、遙測初始化器,以及從瀏覽器發出的代理/工具/模型span的OTel GenAI語意慣例。
devops
azure-ai-anomalydetector-java
microsoft
使用適用於 Java 的 Azure AI 異常偵測器 SDK 建置異常偵測應用程式。在實作單變量/多變量異常偵測、時間序列分析或 AI 驅動監控時使用。
development
azure-ai-language-conversations-py
microsoft
使用 azure-ai-language-conversations Python SDK 實作對話語言理解(CLU)。當使用 ConversationAnalysisClient 分析對話意圖與實體、建置 NLP 功能,或將語言理解整合至應用程式時使用。
development
azure-ai-ml-py
microsoft
Azure Machine Learning SDK v2 for Python。用於機器學習工作區、作業、模型、資料集、計算資源與管線。 觸發詞:「azure-ai-ml」、「MLClient」、「workspace」、「model registry」、「training jobs」、「datasets」。
development