triage

作者: mattpocock

透過由分類角色驅動的狀態機來分類問題。當使用者想要建立問題、分類問題、審查傳入的錯誤或功能請求、為AFK代理準備問題,或管理工作流程時使用。

npx skills add https://github.com/mattpocock/skills --skill triage

Triage

Move issues on the project issue tracker through a small state machine of triage roles.

Every comment or issue posted to the issue tracker during triage must start with this disclaimer:

> *This was generated by AI during triage.*

Reference docs

Roles

Two category roles:

  • bug — something is broken
  • enhancement — new feature or improvement

Five state roles:

  • needs-triage — maintainer needs to evaluate
  • needs-info — waiting on reporter for more information
  • ready-for-agent — fully specified, ready for an AFK agent
  • ready-for-human — needs human implementation
  • wontfix — will not be actioned

Every triaged issue should carry exactly one category role and one state role. If state roles conflict, flag it and ask the maintainer before doing anything else.

These are canonical role names — the actual label strings used in the issue tracker may differ. The mapping should have been provided to you - run /setup-matt-pocock-skills if not.

State transitions: an unlabeled issue normally goes to needs-triage first; from there it moves to needs-info, ready-for-agent, ready-for-human, or wontfix. needs-info returns to needs-triage once the reporter replies. The maintainer can override at any time — flag transitions that look unusual and ask before proceeding.

Invocation

The maintainer invokes /triage and describes what they want in natural language. Interpret the request and act. Examples:

  • "Show me anything that needs my attention"
  • "Let's look at #42"
  • "Move #42 to ready-for-agent"
  • "What's ready for agents to pick up?"

Show what needs attention

Query the issue tracker and present three buckets, oldest first:

  1. Unlabeled — never triaged.
  2. needs-triage — evaluation in progress.
  3. needs-info with reporter activity since the last triage notes — needs re-evaluation.

Show counts and a one-line summary per issue. Let the maintainer pick.

Triage a specific issue

  1. Gather context. Read the full issue (body, comments, labels, reporter, dates). Parse any prior triage notes so you don't re-ask resolved questions. Explore the codebase using the project's domain glossary, respecting ADRs in the area. Read .out-of-scope/*.md and surface any prior rejection that resembles this issue.

  2. Recommend. Tell the maintainer your category and state recommendation with reasoning, plus a brief codebase summary relevant to the issue. Wait for direction.

  3. Reproduce (bugs only). Before any grilling, attempt reproduction: read the reporter's steps, trace the relevant code, run tests or commands. Report what happened — successful repro with code path, failed repro, or insufficient detail (a strong needs-info signal). A confirmed repro makes a much stronger agent brief.

  4. Grill (if needed). If the issue needs fleshing out, run a /grill-with-docs session.

  5. Apply the outcome:

    • ready-for-agent — post an agent brief comment (AGENT-BRIEF.md).
    • ready-for-human — same structure as an agent brief, but note why it can't be delegated (judgment calls, external access, design decisions, manual testing).
    • needs-info — post triage notes (template below).
    • wontfix (bug) — polite explanation, then close.
    • wontfix (enhancement) — write to .out-of-scope/, link to it from a comment, then close (OUT-OF-SCOPE.md).
    • needs-triage — apply the role. Optional comment if there's partial progress.

Quick state override

If the maintainer says "move #42 to ready-for-agent", trust them and apply the role directly. Confirm what you're about to do (role changes, comment, close), then act. Skip grilling. If moving to ready-for-agent without a grilling session, ask whether they want to write an agent brief.

Needs-info template

## Triage Notes

**What we've established so far:**

- point 1
- point 2

**What we still need from you (@reporter):**

- question 1
- question 2

Capture everything resolved during grilling under "established so far" so the work isn't lost. Questions must be specific and actionable, not "please provide more info".

Resuming a previous session

If prior triage notes exist on the issue, read them, check whether the reporter has answered any outstanding questions, and present an updated picture before continuing. Don't re-ask resolved questions.

來自 mattpocock 的更多技能

grill-me
mattpocock
持續追問使用者關於某個計畫或設計,直到達成共識,並逐一釐清決策樹的每個分支。適用於使用者想對計畫進行壓力測試、接受設計挑戰,或提到「grill me」時。
researchcommunicationproject-management
grill-with-docs
mattpocock
一場燒烤式討論,挑戰你的計劃與現有領域模型的一致性,精煉術語,並在決策逐漸明朗時即時更新文件(CONTEXT.md、ADRs)。當使用者希望針對專案的語言與已記錄的決策來壓力測試其計劃時使用。
developmentdocumentresearch
improve-codebase-architecture
mattpocock
在程式碼庫中尋找深化機會,依據 CONTEXT.md 中的領域語言與 docs/adr/ 中的決策。適用於使用者想要改善架構、尋找重構機會、整合緊密耦合的模組,或讓程式碼庫更易於測試及便於 AI 導航時使用。
developmentcode-reviewapi
teach
mattpocock
在此工作區內,教導使用者一項新技能或概念。
communicationproductivity
tdd
mattpocock
以紅-綠-重構循環進行測試驅動開發。當使用者想透過TDD建立功能或修復錯誤、提及「紅-綠-重構」、需要整合測試,或要求測試優先開發時使用。
developmenttesting
to-prd
mattpocock
將當前對話內容轉換為PRD,並發佈到專案問題追蹤器中。當使用者希望從當前內容建立PRD時使用。
developmentdocumentproject-management
handoff
mattpocock
將當前對話壓縮成一份交接文件,供其他代理接手處理。
communicationproject-managementdocument
diagnose
mattpocock
針對難以解決的錯誤與效能回歸問題,採用嚴謹的診斷循環流程:重現 → 最小化 → 假設 → 檢測 → 修復 → 回歸測試。當使用者提出「診斷這個」/「除錯這個」、回報錯誤、表示某功能損壞/拋出異常/失敗,或描述效能回歸情況時啟用。
developmenttestingcode-review