eyeball

作者: github

文件分析,附帶內嵌來源截圖。當你要求 Copilot 分析文件時,Eyeball 會生成一份 Word 文檔,其中每個事實陳述都包含一個…

npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill eyeball

Eyeball

Analyze documents with visual proof. When activated, Eyeball produces a Word document on the user's Desktop where every factual assertion includes an inline screenshot from the source material with the cited text highlighted in yellow.

Activation

When the user invokes this skill (e.g., "use eyeball", "run eyeball on this", "eyeball this document"), respond with:

Eyeball is active. I'll analyze the document and produce a Word doc with inline source screenshots so you can verify every claim with your own eyes.

Then follow the workflow below.

Supported Sources

  • Local files: Word documents (.docx, .doc), PDFs (.pdf), RTF files
  • Web URLs: Any publicly accessible web page

Tool Location

The Eyeball Python utility is located at:

<plugin_dir>/skills/eyeball/tools/eyeball.py

To find the actual path, run:

find ~/.copilot/installed-plugins -name "eyeball.py" -path "*/eyeball/*" 2>/dev/null

If not found there, check the project directory or the user's home directory for the eyeball repo.

First-Run Setup

Before first use, check that dependencies are installed:

python3 <path-to>/eyeball.py setup-check

If anything is missing, install the required dependencies:

pip3 install pymupdf pillow python-docx playwright
python3 -m playwright install chromium

On Windows, also install pywin32 for Word automation:

pip install pywin32

Workflow

Follow these steps exactly. The order matters.

Step 1: Read the source text

Before writing any analysis, extract and read the full text of the source document:

python3 <path-to>/eyeball.py extract-text --source "<path-or-url>"

Read the output carefully. Identify actual section numbers, headings, page numbers, and key language.

CRITICAL: Do not skip this step. Do not write analysis based on assumptions about how the document is structured. Read the actual text.

Step 2: Write analysis with exact citations

For each point in your analysis, you must:

  1. Reference the correct section number as it appears in the document (e.g., "Section 9" not "Section 8" because you assumed the numbering).
  2. Reference the correct page number where the section appears in the extracted text.
  3. Select anchors that are verbatim phrases from the source that directly support your claim.

Step 3: Select anchors correctly

This is the most important step. Anchors determine what gets highlighted in the screenshots.

DO:

  • Use verbatim phrases from the source text that directly support your assertion
  • Use multiple anchors to span the full range of text the reader should see
  • Use specific, uncommon phrases that appear only where you intend

DO NOT:

  • Use generic topic labels (e.g., "Confidentiality") that appear throughout the document
  • Use section titles alone when they appear as cross-references elsewhere
  • Use single common words that match in many places

Examples:

WRONG -- uses a generic topic label that matches everywhere:

{"anchors": ["User-Generated Content"], "target_page": 8}

RIGHT -- uses the specific language that supports the claim:

{"anchors": ["retain ownership", "Ownership of Content, Right to Post"], "target_page": 8}

WRONG -- section title appears as a cross-reference on earlier pages:

{"anchors": ["LIMITATION OF LIABILITY"]}

RIGHT -- includes the section number for precision, targets the correct page:

{"anchors": ["12. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY", "INDIRECT", "CONSEQUENTIAL"], "target_page": 13}

Step 4: Build the analysis document

Construct a JSON array of sections and call the build command:

python3 <path-to>/eyeball.py build \
  --source "<path-or-url>" \
  --output ~/Desktop/<title>.docx \
  --title "Analysis Title" \
  --subtitle "Source description" \
  --sections '[
    {
      "heading": "1. Section Title",
      "analysis": "Your analysis text here. Reference Section X on page Y...",
      "anchors": ["verbatim phrase 1", "verbatim phrase 2"],
      "target_page": 5,
      "context_padding": 40
    },
    {
      "heading": "2. Another Section",
      "analysis": "More analysis...",
      "anchors": ["exact quote from source"],
      "target_pages": [10, 11],
      "context_padding": 50
    }
  ]'

Section object fields:

  • heading (required): Section heading in the output document
  • analysis (required): Your analysis text
  • anchors (required): List of verbatim phrases from the source to search for and highlight
  • target_page (optional): Single page number (1-indexed) to search on
  • target_pages (optional): List of page numbers to search across (screenshots stitched vertically)
  • context_padding (optional): Padding in PDF points above/below the anchor region (default: 40). Increase for more context.

Step 5: Deliver the output

Save the output to the user's Desktop. Tell the user the filename and that they can open it to verify each claim against the highlighted source screenshots.

Self-Check Before Delivery

Before saving the final document, mentally verify:

  1. Does each section's analysis text reference the correct section number from the source?
  2. Are the anchors verbatim phrases that appear on the target page?
  3. Does each anchor directly support the claim in the analysis, not just relate to the same topic?
  4. If the screenshot doesn't match the analysis, is the analysis wrong or is the anchor wrong? Fix whichever is incorrect.

Notes

  • The output document includes highlighted screenshots that are dynamically sized. If you provide multiple anchors, the screenshot expands to cover all of them.
  • When a search term is not found, the output document will note this. If this happens, the anchor was likely not verbatim enough. Adjust and rebuild.
  • For web pages, Playwright renders the page to PDF first. The resulting page numbers may differ from what you see in a browser. Use the extracted text output (step 1) to determine correct page numbers.
  • If the user has already provided the source text or you have already read it in the current conversation, you can skip step 1. But always verify section numbers and page references against the actual text before writing analysis.

來自 github 的更多技能

console-rendering
github
在 Go 中使用基於結構體標籤的控制台渲染系統的說明
official
acquire-codebase-knowledge
github
當使用者明確要求對現有程式碼庫進行映射、文件化或入門引導時,使用此技能。觸發詞如「映射此程式碼庫」、「文件化…」等提示。
official
acreadiness-assess
github
Run the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc…
official
acreadiness-generate-instructions
github
透過 AgentRC 指令命令生成量身打造的 AI 代理指令檔案。產生 .github/copilot-instructions.md(預設,建議用於 VS Code 中的 Copilot…
official
acreadiness-policy
github
幫助使用者選取、撰寫或套用 AgentRC 政策。政策可透過停用不相關的檢查、覆寫影響/等級、設定…來自訂整備度評分。
official
add-educational-comments
github
為程式碼檔案添加教育性註解,將其轉化為有效的學習資源。根據三個可設定的知識層級(初學者、中級、進階)調整解釋深度與語氣。若未提供檔案,會自動請求提供,並以編號清單對應以便快速選取。僅透過教育性註解將檔案擴充最多125%(嚴格上限:400行新註解;超過1,000行的檔案上限為300行)。保留檔案編碼、縮排風格、語法正確性及……
official
adobe-illustrator-scripting
github
使用 ExtendScript (JavaScript/JSX) 編寫、除錯及最佳化 Adobe Illustrator 自動化腳本。適用於建立或修改操控…的腳本時。
official
agent-governance
github
宣告式政策、意圖分類與稽核軌跡,用於控制AI代理工具存取與行為。可組合的治理政策定義允許/封鎖的工具、內容過濾器、速率限制與核准要求——以配置而非程式碼形式儲存。語意意圖分類在工具執行前,透過基於模式的訊號偵測危險提示(資料外洩、權限提升、提示注入)。工具層級治理裝飾器在函式層級強制執行政策……
official